Intra-fraction motion of pelvic oligometastases and feasibility of PTV margin reduction using MRI guided adaptive radiotherapy

Investigation of intrafractional spinal cord and spinal canal movement during stereotactic MR-guided online adaptive radiotherapy for kidney cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the intrafractional movement of the spinal cord and spinal canal during MR-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART) for kidney cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients who received stereotactic MRgART for kidney cancer between February 2022 and February 2024 were included in this study. Patients received 30-42 Gy in 3-fraction MRgART for kidney cancer using the Elekta Unity, which is equipped with a linear accelerator and a 1.5 Tesla MRI. MRI scans were performed at three points during each fraction: for online planning, position verification, and posttreatment assessment. The spinal cord was contoured from the upper edge of Th12 to the medullary cone, and the spinal canal was contoured from Th12 to L3, using the first MRI. These contours were adjusted to the second and third MR images via deformable image registration, and movements were measured. Margins were determined via the formula "1.3×Σ+0.5×σ" and 95% prediction intervals.

RESULTS

A total of 22 patients (66 fractions) were analyzed. The median interval between the first and third MRI scans were 38 minutes. The mean ± standard deviation of the spinal cord movements after this interval were -0.01 ± 0.06 for the x-axis (right-left), 0.01 ± 0.14 for the y-axis (caudal-cranial), 0.07 ± 0.05 for the z-axis (posterior-anterior), and 0.15 ± 0.08 for the 3D distance, respectively. The correlation coefficients of the 3D distance between the spinal cord and the spinal canal was high (0.92). The calculated planning organ at risk volume margin for all directions was 0.11 cm for spinal cord. The 95% prediction intervals for the x-axis, y-axis, and z-axis were -0.11-0.09 cm, -0.23-0.25 cm and -0.14-0.03 cm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Margins are necessary in MRgART to compensate for intrafractional movement and ensure safe treatment delivery.

Enhancing Delivery Efficiency on the Magnetic Resonance-Linac: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Using Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy

PURPOSE

Long treatment sessions are a limitation within magnetic resonance imaging guided adaptive radiation therapy (MRIgART). This work aims for significantly enhancing the delivery efficiency on the magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MR-linac) by introducing dedicated optimization and delivery techniques for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). VMAT plan and delivery quality during MRIgART is compared with step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ten patients with prostate cancer previously treated on a 1.5T MR-linac were retrospectively replanned to 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions using step-and-shoot IMRT and the clinical Hyperion optimizer within Monaco (Hyp-IMRT), the same optimizer with a VMAT technique (Hyp-VMAT), and a research-based optimizer called optimal fluence levels and pseudo gradient descent with VMAT (OFL+PGD-VMAT). The plans were then adapted onto each daily magnetic resonance imaging data set using 2 different optimization strategies to evaluate the adapt-to-position workflow: "optimize weights" (IMRT-Weights and VMAT-Weights) and "optimize shapes" (IMRT-Shapes and VMAT-Shapes). Treatment efficiency was evaluated by measuring optimization time, delivery time, and total time (optimization+delivery). Plan quality was assessed by evaluating organ at risk sparing. Ten patient plans were measured using a modified linac control system to assess delivery accuracy via a gamma analysis (2%/2 mm). Delivery efficiency was calculated as average dose rate divided by maximum dose rate.

RESULTS

For Hyp-VMAT and OFL+PGD-VMAT, the total time was reduced by 124 ± 140 seconds (P = .020) and 459 ± 110 seconds (P < .001), respectively, as compared with the clinical Hyp-IMRT group. Speed enhancements were also measured for adapt-to-position with reductions in total time of 404 ± 55 (P < .001) for VMAT-Weights as compared with the clinical IMRT-Shapes group. Bladder and rectum dosimetric volume histogram (DVH) points were within 1.3% or 0.8 cc for each group. All VMAT plans had gamma passing rates greater than 96%. The delivery efficiency of VMAT plans was 89.7 ± 2.7 % compared with 50.0 ± 2.2 % for clinical IMRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating VMAT into MRIgART will significantly reduce treatment session times while maintaining equivalent plan quality.

Pelvic lymph node motion during cone-beam computed tomography guided stereotactic radiotherapy

Background and purpose

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly applied for pelvic lymph node recurrence. Thus far, knowledge on pelvic lymph node motion during CBCT-guided SBRT is lacking and the applied margins vary between institutions. This study evaluated pelvic lymph node motion during CBCT-guided SBRT and assessed the currently applied PTV margins of 3 and 5 mm.

Material and methods

In total, 45 pelvic lymph node metastases were included. One observer delineated 45 GTVs on planning CT, 224 GTVs on pre-fraction and 216 on post-fraction CBCT. The GTV centroid coordinates were derived from all images for inter- and intrafraction motion analysis. Additionally, we assessed the influence of treatment time and lesion location on lesion motion. The expected coverage of a 3-mm and 5-mm PTV margin was assessed using the inclusiveness index for GTVs on pre- and post-fraction CBCT.

Results

Lymph node interfraction motion was limited to 5 mm in 96-97 % of fractions for all translational directions and intrafraction lesion motion was limited to 3 mm in 97-100 % of fractions. Para-rectal lesions (11 %) were associated with significantly larger inter- and intrafraction motion compared to other pelvic locations and treatment duration showed no correlation with lesion motion. The mean (sd) lesion inclusiveness index was 99 % (5 %) for the 5-mm PTV margin and 96 % (9 %) for the 3-mm margin.

Conclusion

Pelvic lymph node motion during CBCT-guided stereotactic radiotherapy was within the widely applied PTV margin of 5 mm, providing an opportunity to reduce this margin for pelvic lymph node SBRT.

Simulating an intra-fraction adaptive workflow to enable PTV margin reduction in MRIgART volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate SBRT

Purpose

This study simulates a novel prostate SBRT intra-fraction re-optimization workflow in MRIgART to account for prostate intra-fraction motion and evaluates the dosimetric benefit of reducing PTV margins.

Materials and methods

VMAT prostate SBRT treatment plans were created for 10 patients using two different PTV margins, one with a 5 mm margin except 3 mm posteriorly (standard) and another using uniform 2 mm margins (reduced). All plans were prescribed to 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions and adapted onto each daily MRI dataset. An intra-fraction adaptive workflow was simulated for the reduced margin group by synchronizing the radiation delivery with target position from cine MRI imaging. Intra-fraction delivered dose was reconstructed and prostate DVH metrics were evaluated under three conditions for the reduced margin plans: Without motion compensation (no-adapt), with a single adapt prior to treatment (ATP), and lastly for intra-fraction re-optimization during delivery (intra). Bladder and rectum DVH metrics were compared between the standard and reduced margin plans.

Results

As expected, rectum V18 Gy was reduced by 4.4 ± 3.9%, D1cc was reduced by 12.2 ± 6.8% (3.4 ± 2.3 Gy), while bladder reductions were 7.8 ± 5.6% for V18 Gy, and 9.6 ± 7.3% (3.4 ± 2.5 Gy) for D1cc for the reduced margin reference plans compared to the standard PTV margin. For the intrafraction replanning approach, average intra-fraction optimization times were 40.0 ± 2.9 seconds, less than the time to deliver one of the four VMAT arcs (104.4 ± 9.3 seconds) used for treatment delivery. When accounting for intra-fraction motion, prostate V36.25 Gy was on average 96.5 ± 4.0%, 99.1 ± 1.3%, and 99.6 ± 0.4 for the non-adapt, ATP, and intra-adapt groups, respectively. The minimum dose received by the prostate was less than 95% of the prescription dose in 84%, 36%, and 10% of fractions, for the non-adapt, ATP, and intra-adapt groups, respectively.

Conclusions

Intra-fraction re-optimization improves prostate coverage, specifically the minimum dose to the prostate, and enables PTV margin reduction and subsequent OAR sparing. Fast re-optimizations enable uninterrupted treatment delivery.