Advances in efficacy prediction and monitoring of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy strategies for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Current evidence among special populations and future perspectives

About one third of patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) presents at diagnosis with localized or locally advanced disease amenable to curative surgical resection. Surgical operability refers to stage I to IIIA and selected stage IIIB NSCLC. One of the main challenges in the management of early-stage resectable NSCLC is the optimization of available therapeutic strategies to prevent local and distant disease relapse, thus improving survival outcomes. There is evidence supporting the clinical use of both adjuvant and neoadjuvant immunotherapy-based strategies for resected/resectable, stage IB-IIIA NSCLC. Available data from randomized phase III trials have led to the incorporation of several immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) into the international guidelines for early-stage NSCLC. Preclinical rationale of targeting specific subsets of T-cells by acting early on immune checkpoint receptors (e.g., PD-(L)1 and CTLA-4) is strong. Recent evidence is in favor of the neoadjuvant approach alone or as a part of perioperative strategy, demonstrating survival benefit. Combining neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy before surgery results in both pathologic complete response (pCR) and major pathologic response (MPR) improvement, and survival outcomes, with no major safety issues. In this review, we summarize the rationale behind neoadjuvant/perioperative immunotherapy strategies and, due to the clinical relevance of immunotherapy in resectable NSCLC, we provide current evidence of this cutting-edge approach among special populations including older adults, women, and oncogene addicted NSCLC. To conclude, we present future perspectives in the use of immunotherapy for operable NSCLC with a special focus on novel investigational combinations underway.

Blood biomarkers to predict the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients

Background

Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy has increased the number of patients with advanced lung cancer eligible for surgery. However, only a small number of such patients respond to this approach. Intensive research is being conducted to identify biomarkers to predict the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy. Among these, blood predictive biomarkers are particularly promising, and have the advantages of being both non-invasive and cost effective. This study aims to evaluate the predictive value of blood biomarkers in determining the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), addressing a critical need for more personalized treatment strategies in clinical practice.

Methods

We retrospectively collected the data of 199 NSCLC patients who received neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2023, at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital. We then analyzed the performance of blood biomarkers in predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy.

Results

The patients in the major pathological response (MPR) group had significantly higher pre-treatment squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA) levels, and a significantly lower post-treatment platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) than those in the non-MPR group. For patients with higher pre-treatment SCCA levels, the 1- and 2-year event-free survival (EFS) rates were 97.87% [95% confidence interval (CI): 94.99-100.00%] and 93.21% (95% CI: 84.32-100.00%), respectively. In those with lower pre-treatment SCCA levels, the 1- and 2-year EFS rates were 91.39% (95% CI: 84.93-98.35%) and 82.24% (95% CI: 72.42-93.39%), respectively. The survival analysis showed that higher pre-treatment SCCA levels were correlated with improved EFS (P=0.02) in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy. Conversely, for patients undergoing surgery alone, high pre-treatment SCCA levels were correlated with a poorer prognosis [disease-free survival (DFS), P=0.001]. These findings confirm the value of SCCA levels in predicting which patients will have a more favorable response to neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy. In patients receiving neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy, a high post-treatment PLR indicated a poorer prognosis (P=0.02). The Cox regression analysis indicated that the pre-treatment SCCA level (P=0.04) and post-treatment PLR (P=0.04) were independent predictive factors of EFS.

Conclusions

In patients receiving neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy, high pre-treatment SCCA levels and low post-treatment PLRs were significantly associated with better efficacy and survival. Thus, these biomarkers could be used to guide the choice of treatment modalities.

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Timeliness of Clinical Care Pathway for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in Austria: The PRATER Retrospective Study

This was a retrospective study of the profile and initial treatments of adults diagnosed with early-stage (ES) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) during January 2018-December 2021 at 16 leading hospital institutions in Austria, excluding patients enrolled in clinical trials. In total, 319 patients were enrolled at a planned ~1:1:1 ratio across StI:II:III. Most tested biomarkers were programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1; 58% expressing), Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS; 22% positive), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR; 18% positive). Of 115/98/106 StI/II/III patients, 82%/85%/36% underwent surgery, followed by systemic therapy in 9%/45%/47% of those [mostly chemotherapy (ChT)]. Unresected treated StIII patients received ChT + radiotherapy [43%; followed by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in 39% of those], ICI ± ChT (35%), and ChT-alone/radiotherapy-alone (22%). Treatment was initiated a median (interquartile range) of 24 (7-39) days after histological confirmation, and 55 (38-81) days after first medical visit. Based on exploratory analyses of all patients newly diagnosed with any stage NSCLC during 2018-2021 at 14 of the sites (N = 7846), 22%/10%/25%/43% had StI/II/III/IV. The total number was not significantly different between pre-COVID-19 (2018-2019) and study-specific COVID-19 (2020-2021) periods, while StI proportion increased (21% vs. 23%; p = 0.012). Small differences were noted in treatments. In conclusion, treatments were aligned with guideline recommendations at a time which preceded the era of ICIs and targeted therapies in the (neo)adjuvant setting.

Easily applicable predictive score for MPR based on parameters before neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in operable NSCLC: a single-center, ambispective, observational study

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NACI) is promising for resectable nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but predictive biomarkers are still lacking. The authors aimed to develop a model based on pretreatment parameters to predict major pathological response (MPR) for such an approach.

METHODS

The authors enrolled operable NSCLC treated with NACI between March 2020 and May 2023 and then collected baseline clinical-pathology data and routine laboratory examinations before treatment. The efficacy and safety data of this cohort was reported and variables were screened by Logistic and Lasso regression and nomogram was developed. In addition, receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis were used to assess its power. Finally, internal cross-validation and external validation was performed to assess the power of the model.

RESULTS

In total, 206 eligible patients were recruited in this study and 53.4% (110/206) patients achieved MPR. Using multivariate analysis, the predictive model was constructed by seven variables, prothrombin time (PT), neutrophil percentage (NEUT%), large platelet ratio (P-LCR), eosinophil percentage (EOS%), smoking, pathological type, and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression finally. The model had good discrimination, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.775, 0.746, and 0.835 for all datasets, cross-validation, and external validation, respectively. The calibration curves showed good consistency, and decision curve analysis indicated its potential value in clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

This real world study revealed favorable efficacy in operable NSCLC treated with NACI. The proposed model based on multiple clinically accessible parameters could effectively predict MPR probability and could be a powerful tool in personalized medication.

Front-line chemoimmunotherapy for treating epithelial ovarian cancer: Part II promising results of phase 2 study of paclitaxel-carboplatin-oregovomab regimen

In the Part I, we have discussed the background of CA125 and the development of anti-CA125 monoclonal antibody (MAb) to highlight the potential role of CA125 and anti-CA125 MAb in the management of women with advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Glycosylation change either by N-link or by O-link of CA125 is supposed to play a role in the modification of immunity. Anti-CA125 MAb, which can be classified as OC 125-like Abs, M11-like Abs, and OV197-like Abs, is often used for diagnosing, screening, monitoring and detecting the mesothelin-related diseases of the abdominal cavity, particular for those women with EOC. Additionally, anti-CA125 MAb also plays a therapeutic role, named as OvaRex MAb-B43.13 (oregovomab), which has also been extensively reviewed in the Part I review article. The main mechanisms include (a) forming CA125 immune complexes to activate the antigen-presenting cells; (b) triggering induction of CA125-specific immune responses, including anti-CA125 Abs against various epitopes and CA125-specific B and T cell responses; and (c) triggering CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses specific for B43.13 to produce specific and non-specific immune response. With success in vitro, in vivo and in primitive studies, phase II study was conducted to test the effectiveness of chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) for the management of EOC patients. In the 97 EOC patients after optimal debulking surgery (residual tumor <1 cm or no gross residual tumor), patients treated with CIT had a dramatical and statistically significant improvement of both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to those treated with chemotherapy alone with a median PFS of 41.8 months versus 12.2 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.46, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.28-0.7) and OS not yet been reached (NE) versus 42.3 months (HR 0.35, 95 % CI 0.16-0.74), respectively. The current review as Part II will explore the possibility of using CIT as front-line therapy in the management of advanced-stage EOC patients after maximal cytoreductive surgery based on the evidence by many phase 2 studies.