Effectiveness of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients: Real-world data of a retrospective, dual-center study

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for laryngeal preservation in locally advanced hypopharyngeal cancer

OBJECTIVES

To retrospectively investigate the pathological response rate, laryngeal preservation surgery (LPS) rate and progression free survival (PFS) of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced hypopharyngeal cancer (LAHPC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, LAHPC patients, who were first diagnosed and underwent surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University between January 2021 and January 2024, preoperatively administered PD-1 inhibitor and TP induction regimen (albumin-bound paclitaxel 260 mg/m2 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2). The primary endpoint was major pathological response (MPR), with ORR rate, LPS rate and PFS as the secondary endpoints. Then, the correlation between MPR and overall response rate (ORR) was further validated.

RESULTS

A total of 46 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria, with the median follow-up period of 10.5 months. After neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, the ORR was observed to be 71.9 %, and the LPS rate reached 80.4 % (76.5 % in stage IV patients). The pathological response indicated a favorable response, with the MPR ratio at 52.2 % and pathological complete response (pCR) ratio at 32.6 %. The imaging score highly correlated with pathological response (Kappa = 0.058, P<0.001), while the MPR and ORR shared a strong positive linear relationship (r = 0.753, P<0.001). The 1-year and 2-year PFS rates were 97.1 % and 93.8 % for all patients, with stage IV patients having a 1-year PFS of 92.2 %. Patients who achieved MPR demonstrated a significant prognostic advantage (P=0.008), with no recurrence instances or mortality reported. Grade 3 adverse events were observed in 8.7 % of the cohort. The most common Grade 1-2 adverse events were alopecia, reactive telangiosis and loss of appetite, and no delayed surgery occurred.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant therapy of PD-1 inhibitor combined with TP effectively improved the MPR and LPS rates of LAHPC patients, especially in those at clinical stage IV.

Prognosis prediction using significant pathological response following neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable non-small-cell lung tumors: a meta-analysis

Background

A meta-analysis study was done to figure out how to predict the prognosis of people with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had a significant pathological response following neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Methods

Up until August 2024, a comprehensive literature study was completed, and 2,386 connected studies were revised. The 35 selected studies included 3,118 resectable non-small-cell lung tumor participants at the beginning of the study. Using dichotomous techniques and a fixed or random model, the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the prediction using significant pathological response following neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable NSCLC.

Results

Individuals with resectable NSCLC had significantly higher major pathological response when comparing neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR, 5.07; 95% CI, 4.09-6.27, p < 0.001), objective response rate to non-objective response rate (OR, 7.02; 95% CI, 4.28-11.50, p < 0.001), and programmed death-ligand 1 ≥1% to programmed death-ligand ≤1% (OR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.44-4.30, p = 0.001). However, no significant difference was found in major pathological response between stage III and stage I-II (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.88-2.33, p = 0.15), and squamous cell cancer and non-squamous cell cancer (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.95-1.92, p = 0.09) in individuals with resectable NSCLCs.

Conclusion

Individuals with resectable NSCLCs had significantly higher major pathological response when comparing neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, objective response rate to non-objective response rate, and programmed death-ligand 1≥1% to programmed death-ligand 1 ≤1%, however, no significant difference was found between stage III and stage I-II, and squamous cell cancer and non-squamous cell cancer. To validate this discovery, more research is required since most of the selected studies had a low sample size, and caution must be implemented when interacting with its values.

Perioperative immune checkpoint blockades improve prognosis of resectable non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Immune checkpoint blockades (ICB) have been proven to improve prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer in the neoadjuvant setting, while whether its perioperative use could bring extra benefit remained unidentified. We aimed to demonstrate the prognostic benefit of perioperative ICB over preoperative-only use and investigate who could benefit from this 'sandwich ICB therapy'.

METHODS

Patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery from 2018 to 2022 were retrospectively reviewed, and were divided into 4 groups based on the perioperative regimens: pre-ICB + post-computed tomography (CT), pre-ICB-only, pre-CT + post-ICB and pre-CT-only. Treatment-related adverse events, surgical outcomes, therapeutic response, recurrence-free survival and overall survival were compared.

RESULTS

Of 214 enrolled patients with preoperative therapy, 108 underwent immunochemotherapy and 106 underwent platinum-based chemotherapy. Compared with preoperative chemotherapy, preoperative immunochemotherapy was demonstrated with significantly higher major pathologic response (57/108 vs 12/106) and pathologic complete response (35/108 vs 4/106) rates with comparable adverse events. Regarding survival, perioperative ICB significantly improved the recurrence-free survival [versus pre-CT-only hazard ratio (HR) 0.15; 95% CI 0.09-0.27; versus pre-ICB-only HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.15-0.88] and overall survival (versus pre-CT-only HR 0.24; 95% CI 0.08-0.68). In patients without major pathologic response, perioperative ICB was observed to decrease the risk of recurrence (HR 0.31; 95% CI 0.11-0.83) compared with preoperative ICB, and was an independent prognostic factor (P < 0.05) for recurrence-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative ICB showed promising efficacy in improving pathological response and survival outcomes of resectable non-small cell lung cancer. For patients without major pathologic response after resection followed by preoperative ICB, sequential ICB treatment could be considered.