Intraoperative and postoperative short-term outcomes of intracorporeal anastomosis versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy

Short-term outcomes for intracorporeal vs. extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colonic cancer-a prospective cohort study (ICEA-study)

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to compare short-term outcomes and 1-year incisional hernia rates between intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) and extracorporeal anastomosis (EA) in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for management of right-sided colonic cancer. The primary outcome was the complication rate assessed by the comprehensive complication index (CCI). Secondary outcomes included time to bowel movement, length of hospital stay, 30-day readmission rate, early warning scores, and 1-year incisional hernia rate.

METHOD

This was a single-center, prospective cohort study. Patients with right-sided colonic cancer eligible for laparoscopic surgery with primary anastomosis were consecutively included. Patients included in the first period underwent EA, while those in the second underwent IA. Clinical data were collected during the hospital admission up to 30 days postoperatively. Complications were evaluated by the CCI. A routine 1-year CT-scan was used to assess hernias.

RESULTS

One hundred three patients (51 in the EA and 52 in the IA groups) were included. Demographics were similar between the two groups. No significant difference in the CCI-score was found (EA: 17.9 (23.9) vs. IA: 15.0 (17.4), p = 0.85). The mean length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the IA group (EA 6.6 days, IA 3.9 days, p = 0.02). The groups had no significant differences regarding other outcomes, including hernia rates (p = 0.12).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with IA significantly reduced the length of hospital stay without increasing complication rates compared to EA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05039762).

Short-term outcomes of extracorporeal versus intracorporeal side-to-side anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: an affiliated study of a multicenter snapshot study

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (RHC) is the primary surgical approach for right-sided colon cancer. Different ileo-colonic anastomosis techniques may lead to varied postoperative outcomes. This study aims to compare intracorporeal versus extracorporeal side-to-side anastomosis post laparoscopic RHC for short-term outcomes in right-sided colon cancer patients.

METHODS

This prospective, multicenter, cohort study utilized 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse propensity of treatment weighting (IPTW) to address baseline imbalances. The primary endpoint was the incidence of anastomotic leakage (AL) within 30 days postoperatively, with its definition, diagnosis, and grading criteria standardized according to a published study.

RESULTS

A total of 1028 eligible patients were analyzed, with 316 in the intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) group and 712 in the extracorporeal anastomosis (EA) group. After both PSM and IPTW, all 17 covariates were balanced between groups. No statistically significant difference in AL incidence was found between the two groups (before matching, 1.8% in EA and 1.6% in IA, P = 0.78; PSM, 1.3% in EA and 1.6% in IA, P = 0.74; IPTW, 1.9% in EA and 1.6% in IA, P = 0.76). However, peak C-reactive protein levels within 3 days postoperatively were higher in the EA group (before matching, P < 0.001; PSM, P < 0.001; IPTW, P = 0.003). Patients in the IA group had earlier postoperative defecation (before matching, P = 0.01; PSM, P < 0.001) and a shorter total hospital stay (before matching, P = 0.01; IPTW, P = 0.046). Post-PSM analysis showed earlier flatus in the IA group (P = 0.03), while post-IPTW analysis indicated later postoperative eating resumption in the IA group (P = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

Intracorporeal anastomosis during laparoscopic RHC for right-sided colon cancer does not increase the incidence of AL or other short-term complications. Furthermore, it facilitates postoperative bowel function recovery.

Effectiveness and safety of self-pulling and latter transection reconstruction in totally laparoscopic right hemicolectomy

Background

Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy is a standard treatment modality for right colon cancer. However, performing intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) for totally laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (TLRH) remains a challenge for some surgeons. To simplify IA in TLRH we used self-pulling and latter transection (SPLT) reconstruction in TLRH, and compared this procedure with overlap IA and laparoscopy-assisted right hemicolectomy (LARH) in order to evaluate its safety and effectiveness.

Methods

Patients with right colon cancer who underwent SPLT-TLRH, TLRH with overlap IA or LARH between July 2019 and June 2023 were evaluated retrospectively. Basic information, oncological features, perioperative outcomes, and postoperative complications were compared between groups.

Results

In total, 188 patients with right colon cancer that underwent SPLT-TLRH (n = 60), TLRH(n=21) or LARH (n = 107) were included in the study. No patient required conversion to open surgery. The operation time in SPLT-TLRH group was significantly shorter than that in TLRH group (P<0.05). Compared with LARH group, SPLT-TLRH group had significantly longer distal margins, shorter skin incisions (P < 0.001), time to first flatus, time to first defecation, and postoperative hospital stays (P<0.05).

Conclusion

We introduced SPLT to TLRH. The SPLT-TLRH group demonstrated better short-term outcomes. Therefore, we believe that SPLT reconstruction is effective and safe in TLRH for right colon cancer, and can simplify reconstruction.