1
|
Koo H, Smith TB, Callaghan JT, Osei W, Bray SM, Tillman EM, Tran MT, Fausel CA, Schneider BP, Shugg T, Skaar TC. Return of Clinically Actionable Pharmacogenetic Results From Molecular Tumor Board DNA Sequencing Data: Workflow and Estimated Costs. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2025; 117:1017-1020. [PMID: 39789831 PMCID: PMC11924161 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.3545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2024] [Accepted: 12/15/2024] [Indexed: 01/12/2025]
Abstract
Pharmacogenetic testing can prevent severe toxicities from several oncology drug therapies; it also has the potential to improve the outcomes from supportive care drugs. Paired tumor and germline sequencing is increasingly common in oncology practice; these include sequencing of pharmacogenes, but the germline pharmacogenetic variants are rarely included in the clinical reports, despite many being clinically actionable. We established an informatics workflow to evaluate the clinical sequencing results for pharmacogenetic variants. We used the Aldy computational tool, which we have previously shown to determine the variant alleles in 14 pharmacogenes in clinical sequencing data with >99% accuracy, to identify pharmacogenetic variants in the clinical whole exome sequencing from our molecular tumor board. Patients with genetic variants that are clinically actionable for their individual therapy programs, including both treatment and supportive care, are referred to a clinical pharmacogenetics testing laboratory for confirmation. Through an evaluation of our weekly informatics workflow, we determined it took approximately 3.25 hours to complete the analysis of the sequencing data from approximately 20 patients. Using a United States pharmacist's median salary, we estimated the incremental added cost of the process to be only ~$15 per patient. This adds only a minor increase to the patient's cost of testing and has the potential to improve the safety and efficacy of their treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyunwoo Koo
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of MedicineIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
- Department of Pharmacy PracticePurdue University College of PharmacyWest LafayetteIndianaUSA
| | - Tayler B. Smith
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of MedicineIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
- Department of Medical and Molecular GeneticsIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| | - John T. Callaghan
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of MedicineIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
- Department of Pharmacology and ToxicologyIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| | - Wilberforce Osei
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of MedicineIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
- Department of Pharmacy PracticePurdue University College of PharmacyWest LafayetteIndianaUSA
| | | | - Emma M. Tillman
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of MedicineIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| | - Mya T. Tran
- Indiana University HealthIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| | | | - Bryan P. Schneider
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of MedicineIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| | - Tyler Shugg
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of MedicineIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| | - Todd C. Skaar
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of MedicineIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
- Department of Medical and Molecular GeneticsIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
- Department of Pharmacology and ToxicologyIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mosch R, van der Lee M, Guchelaar HJ, Swen JJ. Pharmacogenetic Panel Testing: A Review of Current Practice and Potential for Clinical Implementation. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2025; 65:91-109. [PMID: 39348848 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-061724-080935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/02/2024]
Abstract
Pharmacogenetics (PGx) aims to optimize drug treatment outcomes by using a patient's genetic profile for individualized drug and dose selection. Currently, reactive and pretherapeutic single-gene PGx tests are increasingly applied in clinical practice in several countries and institutions. With over 95% of the population carrying at least one actionable PGx variant, and with drugs impacted by these genetic variants being in common use, pretherapeutic or preemptive PGx panel testing appears to be an attractive option for better-informed drug prescribing. Here, we discuss the current state of PGx panel testing and explore the potential for clinical implementation. We conclude that available evidence supports the implementation of pretherapeutic PGx panel testing for drugs covered in the PGx guidelines, yet identification of specific patient populations that benefit most and cost-effectiveness data are necessary to support large-scale implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Mosch
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands;
| | - M van der Lee
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands;
| | - H J Guchelaar
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands;
| | - J J Swen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhou Q, Ghezelji M, Hari A, Ford MKB, Holley C, Sahinalp SC, Numanagić I. Geny: a genotyping tool for allelic decomposition of killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor genes. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1494995. [PMID: 39763645 PMCID: PMC11701374 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1494995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2024] [Accepted: 11/29/2024] [Indexed: 01/15/2025] Open
Abstract
Introduction Accurate genotyping of Killer cell Immunoglobulin-like Receptor (KIR) genes plays a pivotal role in enhancing our understanding of innate immune responses, disease correlations, and the advancement of personalized medicine. However, due to the high variability of the KIR region and high level of sequence similarity among different KIR genes, the generic genotyping workflows are unable to accurately infer copy numbers and complete genotypes of individual KIR genes from next-generation sequencing data. Thus, specialized genotyping tools are needed to genotype this complex region. Methods Here, we introduce Geny, a new computational tool for precise genotyping of KIR genes. Geny utilizes available KIR allele databases and proposes a novel combination of expectation-maximization filtering schemes and integer linear programming-based combinatorial optimization models to resolve ambiguous reads, provide accurate copy number estimation, and estimate the correct allele of each copy of genes within the KIR region. Results & Discussion We evaluated Geny on a large set of simulated short-read datasets covering the known validated KIR region assemblies and a set of Illumina short-read samples sequenced from 40 validated samples from the Human Pangenome Reference Consortium collection and showed that it outperforms the existing state-of-the-art KIR genotyping tools in terms of accuracy, precision, and recall. We envision Geny becoming a valuable resource for understanding immune system response and consequently advancing the field of patient-centric medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qinghui Zhou
- Department of Computer Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Mazyar Ghezelji
- Department of Computer Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Ananth Hari
- Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States
- National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | | | - Connor Holley
- Department of Computer Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | | | - Ibrahim Numanagić
- Department of Computer Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Steuerwald NM, Morris S, Nguyen DG, Patel JN. Understanding the Biology and Testing Techniques for Pharmacogenomics in Oncology: A Practical Guide for the Clinician. JCO Oncol Pract 2024; 20:1441-1451. [PMID: 39531848 DOI: 10.1200/op.24.00191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Revised: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing is a growing area of personalized medicine with demonstrated clinical utility in improving patient outcomes in oncology. PGx testing of pharmacogenes affecting drug pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and response can help inform drug selection and dosing of several anticancer therapies and supportive care medications. Several PGx testing techniques exist including polymerase chain reaction (PCR), MassARRAY, microarray, and sequencing. This review article provides a clinician-friendly guide of these techniques. Understanding the advantages, limitations, ideal use, and potential clinical applications of each platform can help clinicians choose the appropriate PGx testing platform for specific use cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nury M Steuerwald
- Molecular Biology and Genomics Core Laboratory, Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC
- Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Sarah Morris
- Department of Cancer Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC
| | - D Grace Nguyen
- Department of Cancer Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC
| | - Jai N Patel
- Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC
- Department of Cancer Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shugg T, Tillman EM, Breman AM, Hodge JC, McDonald CA, Ly RC, Rowe EJ, Osei W, Smith TB, Schwartz PH, Callaghan JT, Pratt VM, Lynch S, Eadon MT, Skaar TC. Development of a Multifaceted Program for Pharmacogenetics Adoption at an Academic Medical Center: Practical Considerations and Lessons Learned. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2024; 116:914-931. [PMID: 39169556 PMCID: PMC11452286 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.3402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2024] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/23/2024]
Abstract
In 2019, Indiana University launched the Precision Health Initiative to enhance the institutional adoption of precision medicine, including pharmacogenetics (PGx) implementation, at university-affiliated practice sites across Indiana. The overarching goal of this PGx implementation program was to facilitate the sustainable adoption of genotype-guided prescribing into routine clinical care. To accomplish this goal, we pursued the following specific objectives: (i) to integrate PGx testing into existing healthcare system processes; (ii) to implement drug-gene pairs with high-level evidence and educate providers and pharmacists on established clinical management recommendations; (iii) to engage key stakeholders, including patients to optimize the return of results for PGx testing; (iv) to reduce health disparities through the targeted inclusion of underrepresented populations; (v) and to track third-party reimbursement. This tutorial details our multifaceted PGx implementation program, including descriptions of our interventions, the critical challenges faced, and the major program successes. By describing our experience, we aim to assist other clinical teams in achieving sustainable PGx implementation in their health systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler Shugg
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Emma M. Tillman
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Amy M. Breman
- Division of Diagnostic Genomics, Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Jennelle C. Hodge
- Division of Diagnostic Genomics, Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Christine A. McDonald
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Reynold C. Ly
- Division of Diagnostic Genomics, Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Elizabeth J. Rowe
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Wilberforce Osei
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Tayler B. Smith
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Peter H. Schwartz
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - John T. Callaghan
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Victoria M. Pratt
- Division of Diagnostic Genomics, Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Sheryl Lynch
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Michael T. Eadon
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Todd C. Skaar
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
John S, Klumsathian S, Own‐eium P, Eu‐ahsunthornwattana J, Sura T, Dejsuphong D, Sritara P, Vathesatogkit P, Thongchompoo N, Thabthimthong W, Teerakulkittipong N, Chantratita W, Sukasem C. A comprehensive Thai pharmacogenomics database (TPGxD-1): Phenotype prediction and variants identification in 942 whole-genome sequencing data. Clin Transl Sci 2024; 17:e13830. [PMID: 38853370 PMCID: PMC11163017 DOI: 10.1111/cts.13830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Revised: 04/21/2024] [Accepted: 04/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Computational methods analyze genomic data to identify genetic variants linked to drug responses, thereby guiding personalized medicine. This study analyzed 942 whole-genome sequences from the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT) cohort to establish a population-specific pharmacogenomic database (TPGxD-1) in the Thai population. Sentieon (version 201808.08) implemented the GATK best workflow practice for variant calling. We then annotated variant call format (VCF) files using Golden Helix VarSeq 2.5.0 and employed Stargazer v2.0.2 for star allele analysis. The analysis of 63 very important pharmacogenes (VIPGx) reveals 85,566 variants, including 13,532 novel discoveries. Notably, we identified 464 known PGx variants and 275 clinically relevant novel variants. The phenotypic prediction of 15 VIPGx demonstrated a varied metabolic profile for the Thai population. Genes like CYP2C9 (9%), CYP3A5 (45.2%), CYP2B6 (9.4%), NUDT15 (15%), CYP2D6 (47%) and CYP2C19 (43%) showed a high number of intermediate metabolizers; CYP3A5 (41%), and CYP2C19 (9.9%) showed more poor metabolizers. CYP1A2 (52.7%) and CYP2B6 (7.6%) were found to have a higher number of ultra-metabolizers. The functional prediction of the remaining 10 VIPGx genes reveals a high frequency of decreased functional alleles in SULT1A1 (12%), NAT2 (84%), and G6PD (12%). SLCO1B1 reports 20% poor functional alleles, while PTGIS (42%), SLCO1B1 (4%), and TPMT (5.96%) showed increased functional alleles. This study discovered new variants and alleles in the 63 VIPGx genes among the Thai population, offering insights into advancing clinical pharmacogenomics (PGx). However, further validation is needed using other computational and genotyping methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shobana John
- Division of Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi HospitalMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand
- Laboratory for Pharmacogenomics, Somdech Phra Debaratana Medical Center (SDMC)Ramathibodi HospitalBangkokThailand
| | - Sommon Klumsathian
- Center for Medical Genomics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi HospitalMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand
| | - Paravee Own‐eium
- Center for Medical Genomics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi HospitalMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand
| | | | - Thanyachai Sura
- Division of Medical Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi HospitalMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand
| | - Donniphat Dejsuphong
- Program in Translational Medicine, Chakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute, Faculty of Medicine Ramathobodi HospitalMahidol UniversityBang PhliSamutprakarnThailand
| | - Piyamitr Sritara
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi HospitalMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand
| | - Prin Vathesatogkit
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi HospitalMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand
| | - Nartthawee Thongchompoo
- Center for Medical Genomics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi HospitalMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand
| | - Wiphaporn Thabthimthong
- Center for Medical Genomics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi HospitalMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand
| | - Nuttinee Teerakulkittipong
- Department of Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical SciencesBurapha UniversityChonburiThailand
| | - Wasun Chantratita
- Center for Medical Genomics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi HospitalMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand
| | - Chonlaphat Sukasem
- Division of Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi HospitalMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand
- Laboratory for Pharmacogenomics, Somdech Phra Debaratana Medical Center (SDMC)Ramathibodi HospitalBangkokThailand
- Department of Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical SciencesBurapha UniversityChonburiThailand
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative BiologyUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
- Pharmacogenomics and Precision MedicineThe Preventive Genomics & Family Check‐up Services Center, Bumrungrad International HospitalBangkokThailand
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhou Q, Ghezelji M, Hari A, Ford MKB, Holley C, Mirabello L, Chanock S, Sahinalp SC, Numanagić I. Geny: A Genotyping Tool for Allelic Decomposition of Killer Cell Immunoglobulin-Like Receptor Genes. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.02.27.582413. [PMID: 38529502 PMCID: PMC10962708 DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.27.582413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
Accurate genotyping of Killer cell Immunoglobulin-like Receptor (KIR) genes plays a pivotal role in enhancing our understanding of innate immune responses, disease correlations, and the advancement of personalized medicine. However, due to the high variability of the KIR region and high level of sequence similarity among different KIR genes, the currently available genotyping methods are unable to accurately infer copy numbers, genotypes and haplotypes of individual KIR genes from next-generation sequencing data. Here we introduce Geny, a new computational tool for precise genotyping of KIR genes. Geny utilizes available KIR haplotype databases and proposes a novel combination of expectation-maximization filtering schemes and integer linear programming-based combinatorial optimization models to resolve ambiguous reads, provide accurate copy number estimation and estimate the haplotype of each copy for the genes within the KIR region. We evaluated Geny on a large set of simulated short-read datasets covering the known validated KIR region assemblies and a set of Illumina short-read samples sequenced from 25 validated samples from the Human Pangenome Reference Consortium collection and showed that it outperforms the existing genotyping tools in terms of accuracy, precision and recall. We envision Geny becoming a valuable resource for understanding immune system response and consequently advancing the field of patient-centric medicine.
Collapse
|
8
|
Deserranno K, Tilleman L, Rubben K, Deforce D, Van Nieuwerburgh F. Targeted haplotyping in pharmacogenomics using Oxford Nanopore Technologies' adaptive sampling. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1286764. [PMID: 38026945 PMCID: PMC10679755 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1286764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Pharmacogenomics (PGx) studies the impact of interindividual genomic variation on drug response, allowing the opportunity to tailor the dosing regimen for each patient. Current targeted PGx testing platforms are mainly based on microarray, polymerase chain reaction, or short-read sequencing. Despite demonstrating great value for the identification of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and insertion/deletions (INDELs), these assays do not permit identification of large structural variants, nor do they allow unambiguous haplotype phasing for star-allele assignment. Here, we used Oxford Nanopore Technologies' adaptive sampling to enrich a panel of 1,036 genes with well-documented PGx relevance extracted from the Pharmacogenomics Knowledge Base (PharmGKB). By evaluating concordance with existing truth sets, we demonstrate accurate variant and star-allele calling for five Genome in a Bottle reference samples. We show that up to three samples can be multiplexed on one PromethION flow cell without a significant drop in variant calling performance, resulting in 99.35% and 99.84% recall and precision for the targeted variants, respectively. This work advances the use of nanopore sequencing in clinical PGx settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Filip Van Nieuwerburgh
- Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|