Effect of multidisciplinary team care on patient survival in chronic hepatitis B or C hepatocellular carcinoma

Effects of multidisciplinary teamwork in non-hospital settings on healthcare and patients with chronic conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is evidence that multidisciplinary teams can improve health outcomes for patients with chronic conditions, enhance the quality and coordination of care, and promote teamwork among staff in hospital settings. However, their effectiveness in non-hospital settings remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effects of multidisciplinary teams on patients with chronic conditions, health professionals, and healthcare in non-hospital settings.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, EconLit, OpenGrey, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and WanFang for randomised controlled trials published before March 2025. Narrative syntheses were used to synthesise the characteristics of multidisciplinary teams, interventions, and effects. Data were statistically pooled using both random-effects and fixed-effects meta-analyses to synthesize the outcomes. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using Cochrane's risk of bias tool.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine studies were analyzed, with a total of 8186 participants. Nurses, general practitioners, and specialists were the most common members of the multidisciplinary teams. Staffing models, shared care and role expansion or task shifting are the most common multidisciplinary teamwork interventions. Narrative syntheses revealed improvements in self-management, self-efficiency, satisfaction, health behaviours, and knowledge. A meta-analysis found a significant reduction in hospitalisation days for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (MD=-0.66, 95% CI -1.05 to -0.26, I2 = 0%) and significant improvement in quality of life for patients with chronic heart failure (MD=-4.63, 95% CI: -8.67 to -0.60, I2 = 0%). There is no consistent evidence of other indicators of this effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Multidisciplinary teamwork can improve patient-reported outcomes for patients with chronic conditions in non-hospital settings, but the effects on clinical outcomes, health utilisation, and costs are not evident.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO on January 21, 2019, with the registration number CRD42019121109.

Experiences of women of childbearing age with diabetes skin pruritus: An interpretative phenomenological analysis

AIM

This study aims to explore the experiences and feelings of women of childbearing age with diabetes skin pruritus after being diagnosed.

METHODS

Using the Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis method, semi-structured interviews were conducted with women of childbearing age who suffer from diabetes skin pruritus, followed by data analysis.

RESULTS

Three superordinate themes and eight subthemes were identified, including psychological distress (self-identity, lack of understanding from others, emotional damage and self-disgust), physical impairment (loss of bodily control, treatment challenges, impact on female sexual characteristics), and coping post-trauma (social withdrawal, active coping).

CONCLUSION

The physical and mental health of women of childbearing age with diabetes skin pruritus has been severely compromised, particularly their sense of self-worth as women of childbearing age. Despite this, they demonstrate a solid willingness to seek treatment. Therefore, it is recommended to strengthen research in this field, improve health education, establish online support platforms for sharing experiences, and enhance government oversight of social security measures. These initiatives will promote active treatment and recovery among patients, ultimately improving their quality of life.

Multidisciplinary approach for hepatocellular carcinoma patients: current evidence and future perspectives

Management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is challenging due to the complex relationship between underlying liver disease, tumor burden, and liver function. HCC is also notorious for its high recurrence rate even after curative treatment for early-stage tumor. Liver transplantation can substantially alter patient prognosis, but donor availability varies by each patient which further complicates treatment decision. Recent advancements in HCC treatments have introduced numerous potentially efficacious treatment modalities. However, high level evidence comparing the risks and benefits of these options is limited. In this complex situation, multidisciplinary approach or multidisciplinary team care has been suggested as a valuable strategy to help cope with escalating complexity in HCC management. Multidisciplinary approach involves collaboration among medical and health care professionals from various academic disciplines to provide comprehensive care. Although evidence suggests that multidisciplinary care can enhance outcomes of HCC patients, robust data from randomized controlled trials are currently lacking. Moreover, the implementation of a multidisciplinary approach necessitates increased medical resources compared to conventional cancer care. This review summarizes the current evidence on the role of multidisciplinary approach in HCC management and explores potential future directions.