Unveiling the immunosuppressive landscape of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: implications for innovative immunotherapy strategies

Unveiling genetic susceptibility in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and revolutionizing pancreatic cancer diagnosis through imaging

Two landmark studies demonstrate synergistic approaches to gastrointestinal cancer management. Lin et al identified activin A receptor type 1C polymorphisms (rs4556933/rs77886248) as esophageal squamous cell carcinoma risk modifiers in Chinese Han populations through a case-control study (1264 patients/1361 controls), revealing transforming growth factor-beta pathway-mediated susceptibility in older male smokers (P < 0.001). Concurrently, Luo et al established imaging-based differentiation of pancreatic cancer subtypes (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma vs neuroendocrine tumors) via retrospective analysis of 500 cases (area under the curve = 0.89), enabling earlier intervention. These findings underscore the transformative potential of combining genetic risk stratification with advanced imaging to guide precision screening and therapeutic strategies, addressing critical gaps in esophageal and pancreatic cancer outcomes.

Stereotactic Radiotherapy Plus Nivolumab in Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Results from Phase 1/2 Clinical CA209-9KH Trial

INTRODUCTION

The dismal prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) highlights the urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) seem to be ineffective in most PDAC studies. Therefore, we conducted an open-label, multicenter phase 1/2 study (CA209-9KH) to evaluate the safety of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and sequential ICI therapy in PDAC, as well as to validate the efficacy of this regimen as a potential activator of antitumor immunity.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥ 18 years with unresectable non-metastatic PDAC following four FOLFIRINOX induction cycles were included. Treatment comprised SRT (4 × 8 Gy) and sequential nivolumab administration until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoints were safety and toxicity assessment. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), biomarker evaluation, and quality of life (QoL) analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were screened, with 15 enrolled. Eleven (median) nivolumab cycles were administered. SRT demonstrated low and clinically nonsignificant toxicity, whereas nivolumab toxicity aligned with prior safety profiles, without grade 4-5 events observed. Three patients discontinued therapy owing to toxicity. Median PFS and OS were 8.1 and 13.0 months, respectively, with 12-month PFS and OS rates of 0% and 66.7%, respectively, and a 24-month OS rate of 8.9%. Biomarker levels correlated with clinical or radiological disease control. Patient-reported QoL remained acceptable, deteriorating with disease progression.

CONCLUSION

SRT and nivolumab therapy exhibited manageable toxicity profiles consistent with previous findings; however, long-term treatment responses were not achieved with this regimen in locally advanced PDAC. Another strategy to trigger antitumor immunity in PDAC needs to be sought.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT: 2017-003404-52; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04098432.

Immune Marker and C-Reactive Protein Dynamics and Their Prognostic Implications in Modulated Electro-Hyperthermia Treatment in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis

Background: Previous research has suggested that modulated electro-hyperthermia (mEHT) can be used to induce anti-tumor immune effects and to extend patient survival. The use of mEHT in advanced pancreatic cancer is beneficial; however, its immune-mediating effects were never investigated. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted. Leukocyte counts, C-reactive protein (CRP), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and granulocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (GLR) were measured at baseline, midpoint, and after mEHT treatment. Results: A total of 73 mEHT treated pancreatic cancer patients were included. The time elapsed between tumor diagnosis and the first mEHT treatment was 4.40 ± 5.70 months. While no change could be observed between the baseline and the first follow-up visits, the total white blood cell (WBC), neutrophil, and granulocyte count, CRP, NLR, and GLR were significantly higher at the second follow-up compared to both previous visits. Higher levels of the latter parameters following the last mEHT treatment were signaling significantly poor prognostic signs, and so were their longitudinal changes. Conclusions: After the initiation of mEHT, immune markers stabilize with the treatment, but this positive effect is eroded over time by progressive disease. Monitoring the changes in these markers and the occurrence of their increase is a prognostic marker of shorter survival.