Do GnRH Agonists Really Increase Body Weight Gain? Evaluation of a Multicentric Portuguese Cohort of Patients With Central Precocious Puberty

The Effect of GnRH Analogs on Body Mass Index in Girls with Central Precocious Puberty: A Single-Center Retrospective Study with a Literature Review

Background/Objectives: Central precocious puberty (CPP) is defined by the premature onset of secondary sexual characteristics prior to the age of 8 and 9 years in girls and boys, respectively. The administration of GnRH analogs (GnRH-a) has become a cornerstone in the management of CPP, but effects on metabolic processes, particularly body mass index (BMI), remain a subject of ongoing investigation. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between GnRH-a treatment and BMI changes in a cohort of Italian children with CPP. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 34 girls with idiopathic CPP, all treated with GnRH-a. Anthropometric parameters including BMI were collected at three time points: baseline, one year after treatment, and one year after treatment cessation. A comprehensive review of the medical literature concerning GnRH-a and BMI was performed. Results: Statistical analysis using the Wilcoxon and McNemar tests revealed a significant increase in BMI-for-age z-scores after one year of GnRH-a, with a slight increase also observed one year post-treatment of CPP. These findings suggest that GnRH-a treatment contributes to an increase in BMI, particularly in CPP children with a normal weight at baseline, although the overall impact on the progression of obesity remains minimal. A review of the existing literature supports the notion that changes in BMI during GnRH-a treatment are influenced by various factors, including baseline BMI, gender, and metabolic processes. Conclusions: Despite our findings suggesting the potential impact of GnRH-a on BMI, further longitudinal studies are necessary to fully understand the long-term metabolic consequences of GnRH-a therapy in children with CPP.

Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcomes of Males with Central Precocious Puberty

Central precocious puberty (CPP) among males is less frequent than among females but more likely to have an underlying pathologic cause. Diagnosis of CPP is often straightforward among males because increased testicular volume, the first sign of puberty, can be verified although careful central nervous system (CNS) assessment is generally necessary. Treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) is indicated, given in conjunction with any therapy needed for CNS lesions. Monitoring of treatment usually can consist of evaluating growth and physical puberty and with testosterone levels as the only lab data. Short-term and long-term outcome data indicate efficacy and safety, although data are limited. Such data need to be reported.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs treatment in girls with central precocious puberty and early fast puberty

BACKGROUND

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog (GnRHa) is the standard treatment for children with central precocious puberty (CPP). We assessed efficacy and safety of GnRHa treatment in girls with CPP and early fast puberty (EFP).

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included anthropometric, clinical and laboratory data retrieved from medical files of girls with CPP or EFP, treated with GnRHa and followed at a tertiary endocrine clinic during 2007-2021.

RESULTS

For both CPP (n = 144) and EFP (n = 231) groups, mean height-SDS at GnRHa initiation and termination and at the last follow-up visit was greater than mid-parental height-SDS (P < 0.001). Only among girls with EFP, mean BMI-SDS was higher at treatment termination than initiation (P = 0.025). Median ages at menarche of the CPP and EFP groups were 11.8 and 12.0 years. Menstrual irregularities were reported in 20.3% of girls with CPP and in 18.7% of those with EFP. Adverse effects to treatment were reported in 3.5% and 3.9% of girls with CPP and EFP, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large cohort, GnRHa treatment in girls with EFP was effective without significant adverse effects as in those with CPP. A randomized controlled trial is required to examine the psychological impact of GnRHa treatment of variant early puberty.

IMPACT STATEMENT

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog (GnRHa) is the standard treatment for central precocious puberty (CPP). We assessed efficacy and safety of GnRHa treatment in girls with early fast puberty (EFP), characterized by pubertal signs between ages 8-9 years with fast pubertal signs advancement and accelerated growth and bone maturation and in girls with CPP. We found in this large cohort that GnRHa treatment in girls with EFP was effective and safe as in those with CPP. A prospective randomized controlled trial is required to examine the psychological impact of GnRHa treatment of variant early puberty.

[Beyond NICE: Updated Systematic Review on the Current Evidence of Using Puberty Blocking Pharmacological Agents and Cross-Sex-Hormones in Minors with Gender Dysphoria]

Beyond NICE: Updated Systematic Review on the Current Evidence of Using Puberty Blocking Pharmacological Agents and Cross-Sex-Hormones in Minors with Gender Dysphoria Abstract: Objective: The suppression of physiological puberty using puberty-blocking pharmacological agents (PB) and prescribing cross-sex hormones (CSH) to minors with gender dysphoria (GD) is a current matter of discussion, and in some cases, PB and CSH are used in clinical practice for this particular population. Two systematic reviews (one on PB, one on CSH treatment) by the British National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) from 2020 indicated no clear clinical benefit of such treatments regarding critical outcome variables. In particular, these two systematic NICE reviews on the use of PB and CSH in minors with GD detected no clear improvements of GD symptoms. Moreover, the overall scientific quality of the available evidence, as discussed within the above-mentioned two NICE reviews, was classified as "very low certainty" regarding modified GRADE criteria. Method: The present systematic review presents an updated literature search on this particular topic (use of PB and CSH in minors with GD) following NICE principles and PICO criteria for all relevant new original research studies published since the release of the two above-mentioned NICE reviews (updated literature search period was July 2020-August 2023). Results: The newly conducted literature search revealed no newly published original studies targeting NICE-defined critical and important outcomes and the related use of PB in minors with GD following PICO criteria. For CSH treatment, we found two new studies that met PICO criteria, but these particular two studies had low participant numbers, yielded no significant additional clear evidence for specific and clearly beneficial effects of CSH in minors with GD, and could be classified as "low certainty" tfollowing modified GRADE criteria. Conclusions: The currently available studies on the use of PB and CSH in minors with GD have significant conceptual and methodological flaws. The available evidence on the use of PB and CSH in minors with GD is very limited and based on only a few studies with small numbers, and these studies have problematic methodology and quality. There also is a lack of adequate and meaningful long-term studies. Current evidence doesn't suggest that GD symptoms and mental health significantly improve when PB or CSH are used in minors with GD. Psychotherapeutic interventions to address and reduce the experienced burden can become relevant in children and adolescents with GD. If the decision to use PB and/or CSH is made on an individual case-by-case basis and after a complete and thorough mental health assessment, potential treatment of possibly co-occurring mental health problems as well as after a thoroughly conducted and carefully executed individual risk-benefit evaluation, doing so as part of clinical studies or research projects, as currently done in England, can be of value in terms of generation of new research data. The electronic supplement (ESM) 1 is an adapted and abreviated English version of this work.

Efficacy and mechanism of nourishing yin and purging fire therapy for central precocious puberty based on meta-analysis and network pharmacology

BACKGROUND

Central precocious puberty (CPP) is due to the early activation of the hypothalamus-pituitary-gonadal axis, and its incidence is on the rise. A number of studies have shown that nourishing yin and purging fire (NYPF) therapy can be beneficial for CPP. Therefore, we conducted this review to investigate the efficacy, safety, and mechanism of NYPF therapy for CPP.

METHODS

Electronic databases including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Wan-fang Database, and China Scientific Technical Journals Database and 2 platforms including Clinical Trials and Chinese Clinical Trial Registry were searched for randomized controlled trials of NYPF therapy for CPP. A meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 17.0 software. The core herb pair of NYPF was identified by data mining using IBM SPSS Modeler 18.0 software. The active ingredients and targets of the core herb pair were obtained through the TCMSP database. The main targets of CPP were acquired form the GeneCards, Disgenet and TTD databases. A protein-protein interaction network was carried out to select the core genes by using STRING platform and Cytoscape 3.7.2 software. Metascape platform was used to conduct gene ontology (GO) and KEGG enrichment analysis. The results were verified utilizing molecular docking.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies were included. Meta-analysis shows the NYPF therapy could significantly improve the clinical efficacy rate and secondary sexual indicators (uterine volume, ovarian volume, breast nucleus diameter, follicular diameter), reduce TCM syndrome scores and serum sex hormone (FSH, LH, E2), and slow down bone age maturation compared to GnRHa therapy group. In addition, NYPF therapy was safe and has no obvious adverse events. Data mining revealed that the core herb pair of NYPF was "Anemarrhenae Rhizoma (Zhimu) - Phellodendri Chinensis Cortex (Huangbai)." Network pharmacology predicted that quercetin, kaempferol, beta-sitosterol, etc were the key components of Zhimu-Huangbai for treating CPP. The core targets were TP53, JUN, AKT1, ESR1, TNF, IL6, CCND1, MAPK1, BCL2, EGFR, IL1B, and PTGS2. They played a pivotal role in modulating multiple signaling pathways, such as Endocrine resistance, MAPK signaling pathway, and PI3K-Akt signaling pathway.

CONCLUSION

This article revealed that NYPF therapy is effective and safe against CPP. The mechanism of the core herb pair of NYPF therapy for CPP through muti-components, muti-targets and muti-pathways.

Central precocious puberty: a review of diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes

Central precocious puberty (CPP) refers to early activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis and is manifested by breast development in girls or testicular enlargement in boys before the normal physiological age ranges. CPP can be precipitated by intracranial pathology, exposure to high levels of sex steroids, or environmental risk factors, but most cases are idiopathic. Monogenic causes have also been identified. In this Review, we summarise pathophysiology, risk factors, diagnosis, and management of CPP. Concern for CPP should prompt referral to paediatric endocrinology where diagnosis is confirmed by clinical, biochemical, radiological, and genetic testing. CPP is treated with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue, the primary aims of which are to increase adult height and postpone development of secondary sexual characteristics to an age that is more commensurate with peers. Although long-term outcomes of treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues are reassuring, additional research on the psychological effect of CPP is needed.

Height benefit of GnRH agonists after age 8 in a Portuguese cohort of central precocious puberty

OBJECTIVE

Idiopathic central precocious puberty (iCPP) is common in paediatric endocrinology. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) are safe, but the effect on final height and the ideal timing for treatment remains controversial. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of GnRHa on growth outcomes in girls with iCPP treated before and after the age of 8 years old.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

This retrospective longitudinal study evaluated data from Portuguese girls with iCPP who completed treatment between 2010 and 2021.

MEASUREMENTS

Auxological and clinical characteristics were compared according to age at treatment onset.

RESULTS

A cohort of 134 girls with iCPP, was divided into early treatment (ET) (<8 years, n = 48) and later treatment (LT) groups (≥8 years, n = 86). In both groups, most children presented with Tanner II and III. Tanner IV was more frequent in LT group (p = .003). At the end of treatment, predicted adult height increased in both groups (ET p = .032; LT p = .04) and bone age significantly slowed down in all participants (p = .008, p = .034). The height gain was greater in the ET group, but without significant differences (p = .065).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with GnRHa improved final height in all girls with iCPP, even when initiated after 8 years. To achieve better outcomes, treatment should be provided promptly after diagnosis.