Efficacy and Safety of Stem Cell Therapy in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cell therapy in acute on chronic liver failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Acute-on-chronic liver failure has become a serious global health burden, which is characterized by an acute deterioration of liver function, rapidly evolving organ failure, and high short-term mortality in patients with chronic liver disease. The pathogenesis includes extensive hepatic necrosis, which is related to intense systemic inflammation and subsequently causes the inflammatory cytokine storm, resulting in portal hypertension, organ dysfunction, and organ failure. Mesenchymal stem cells can function as seed cells to remodel and repair damaged liver tissues, thus showing potential therapeutic alternatives for patients with chronic liver disease. However, standard treatment protocols for mesenchymal stem cells in acute-on-chronic liver failure patients have not been established.

METHODS

We conducted a detailed search from PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library to find randomized controlled trials published before October 23, 2021. We formulated criteria for the literature screening according to the PICOS principle (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Study design). Subsequently, the bias risk assessment tool was used to assess the quality of all enrolled studies. Finally, outcome measurements including the model of end-stage liver disease score, albumin, total bilirubin, coagulation function, and aminotransferase were extracted for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 7 clinical trials were included. The results of enrolled studies indicated that patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure who received mesenchymal stem cells inoculation showed a decreased MELD score in 4 weeks and 24 weeks, compared with counterparts who received conventional treatment. Reciprocally, mesenchymal stem cells inoculation improved the ALB levels in 4 weeks and 24 weeks. For secondary indicators, mesenchymal stem cells treatment significantly reduced INR levels and ALT levels, compared with the control group. Our results showed no significant differences in the incidence of adverse reactions or serious adverse events monitored in patients after mesenchymal stem cells inoculation.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis indicated that mesenchymal stem cell infusion is effective and safe in the treatment of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure. Without increasing the incidence of adverse events or serious adverse events, MSC treatment improved liver function including a decrease in MELD score and an increase in ALB levels in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure. However, large-cohort randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up periods are required to further confirm our conclusions.

Autologous cord blood vs individualized supplements in autistic spectrum disorder: CORDUS study results

BACKGROUND

Cellular therapies have started an important new therapeutic direction in autistic spectrum disorder (ASD), and the ample diversity of ASD pathophysiology and the different types of cell therapies prompt an equally ample effort to employ clinical studies for studying the ASD causes and cell therapies. Stem cells have yielded so far mixed results in clinical trials, and at patient level the results varied from impressive to no improvement. In this context we have administered autologous cord blood (ACB) and a non-placebo, material intervention represented by an individualized combination of supplements (ICS) to ASD children.

AIM

To compare the efficacy of ACB vs ICS and find markers correlated with the child's progress in order to better predict ACB efficacy.

METHODS

CORDUS clinical study is a crossover study in which both oral ICS and intravenous ACB were sequentially administered to 56 children; ACB was infused as an inpatient procedure. Treatment efficacy was evaluated pre-treatment and post-treatment at 6 months by an independent psychotherapist with Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist, Quantitative Checklist for Autism in Toddlers and a 16-item comparative table score, after interviewing the children’s parents and therapists. Before and after each intervention participants had a set of blood tests including inflammatory, metabolic and oxidative markers, and the neuronal specific enolase.

RESULTS

No serious adverse reactions were noted during and after cord blood or supplement administration. ACB improved evaluation scores in 78% of children with age 3–7-years (n = 28), but was much less effective in kids older than 8 years or with body weight of more than 35 kg (n = 28; only 11% of children improved scores). ICS yielded better results than ACB in 5 cases out of 28, while in 23 kids ACB brought more improvement than ICS (P < 0.05); high initial levels of inflammation and ferritin were associated with no improvement. Ample individual differences were noted in children's progress, and statistically significant improvements were seen after ACB on areas such as verbalization and social interaction, but not on irritability or aggressive behavior.

CONCLUSION

ACB has superior efficacy to ICS in ASD; high inflammation, ferritin, age and body weight predict less improvement; more clinical studies are needed for studying ACB efficacy in ASD.

Efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cells therapy in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a serious public health issue. In COVID-19 patients, the elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines lead to the manifestation of COVID-19 symptoms, such as lung tissue edema, lung diffusion dysfunction, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), secondary infection, and ultimately mortality. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) exhibit anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties, thus providing a potential treatment option for COVID-19. The number of clinical trials of MSCs for COVID-19 has been rising. However, the treatment protocols and therapeutic effects of MSCs for COVID-19 patients are inconsistent. This meta-analysis was performed to systematically determine the safety and efficacy of MSC infusion in COVID-19 patients.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature search from PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library up to 22 November 2023 to screen for eligible randomized controlled trials. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for searched literature were formulated according to the PICOS principle, followed by the use of literature quality assessment tools to assess the risk of bias. Finally, outcome measurements including therapeutic efficacy, clinical symptoms, and adverse events of each study were extracted for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 14 randomized controlled trials were collected. The results of enrolled studies demonstrated that patients with COVID-19 pneumonia who received MSC inoculation showed a decreased mortality compared with counterparts who received conventional treatment (RR: 0.76; 95% CI [0.60, 0.96]; p = 0.02). Reciprocally, MSC inoculation improved the clinical symptoms in patients (RR: 1.28; 95% CI [1.06, 1.55]; p = 0.009). In terms of immune biomarkers, MSC treatment inhibited inflammation responses in COVID-19 patients, as was indicated by the decreased levels of CRP and IL-6. Importantly, our results showed that no significant differences in the incidence of adverse reactions or serious adverse events were monitored in patients after MSC inoculation.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrated that MSC inoculation is effective and safe in the treatment of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Without increasing the incidence of adverse events or serious adverse events, MSC treatment decreased patient mortality and inflammatory levels and improved the clinical symptoms in COVID-19 patients. However, large-cohort randomized controlled trials with expanded numbers of patients are required to further confirm our results.

Anethole via increase in the gene expression of PI3K/AKT/mTOR mitigates the autistic-like behaviors induced by maternal separation stress in mice

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodegenerative disease with increasing incidence in the world. The maternal separation (MS) stress at early life with its own neuroendocrine and neurostructural changes can provide the basis for development of ASD. Previously it has been reported neuroprotective characteristics for anethole. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway has pivotal role in the function of central nervous system (CNS). This study aimed to evaluate the possible effects of anethole on the autistic-like behaviors in the maternally separated (MS) mice focusing on the potential role of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. Forty male Naval Medical Research Institute (NMRI) mice were assigned to five groups (n = 8) comprising a control group (treated with normal saline) and four groups subjected to MS and treated with normal saline and or anethole at doses of 31.25, 62.5 and 125 mg/kg, respectively. All gents were administrated via intraperitoneal (i.p.) route for 14 constant days. Behavioral tests were conducted, including the three-chamber test, shuttle box and resident-intruder test. The gene expression of the PI3K, AKT and mTOR assessed in the hippocampus by qRT-PCR. Findings indicated that MS is associated with autistic-like behaviors. Anethole increased the sociability and social preference indexes in the three-chamber test, increased duration of secondary latency in the shuttle box test and decreased aggressive behaviors in the resident-intruder test. Also, anethole increased the gene expression of PI3K, AKT and mTOR in the hippocampus of MS mice. We concluded that anethole through increase in the gene expression of PI3K/ AKT/mTOR mitigated autistic-like behaviors induced by MS in mice.

Advances in the Treatment of Autism Spectrum Disorder: Current and Promising Strategies

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is an umbrella term for developmental disorders characterized by social and communication impairments, language difficulties, restricted interests, and repetitive behaviors. Current management approaches for ASD aim to resolve its clinical manifestations based on the type and severity of the disability. Although some medications like risperidone show potential in regulating ASD-associated symptoms, a comprehensive treatment strategy for ASD is yet to be discovered. To date, identifying appropriate therapeutic targets and treatment strategies remains challenging due to the complex pathogenesis associated with ASD. Therefore, a comprehensive approach must be tailored to target the numerous pathogenetic pathways of ASD. From currently viable and basic treatment strategies, this review explores the entire field of advancements in ASD management up to cutting-edge modern scientific research. A novel systematic and personalized treatment approach is suggested, combining the available medications and targeting each symptom accordingly. Herein, summarize and categorize the most appropriate ways of modern ASD management into three distinct categories: current, promising, and prospective strategies.

Implication of Hippocampal Neurogenesis in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Implications

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a cluster of heterogeneous neurodevelopmental conditions with atypical social communication and repetitive sensory-motor behaviors. The formation of new neurons from neural precursors in the hippocampus has been unequivocally demonstrated in the dentate gyrus of rodents and non-human primates. Accumulating evidence sheds light on how the deficits in the hippocampal neurogenesis may underlie some of the abnormal behavioral phenotypes in ASD. In this review, we describe the current evidence concerning pre-clinical and clinical studies supporting the significant role of hippocampal neurogenesis in ASD pathogenesis, discuss the possibility of improving hippocampal neurogenesis as a new strategy for treating ASD, and highlight the prospect of emerging pro-neurogenic therapies for ASD.

Haste Makes Waste: There Is No Solid Evidence to Translate the Use of Stem Cells into Clinical Practice for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Increasingly, private clinics around the world offer stem cell therapy as a therapeutic approach for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) [...].