Long-term sleep apnea CPAP via tracheostomy in children with tracheomalacia: 20-year experience

Weaning strategies for children on home invasive mechanical ventilation

Children who require home mechanical ventilation (HMV) with an artificial airway or invasive mechanical ventilation (HMV) have a possibility of successful weaning due to the potential of compensatory lung growth. Internationally accepted guidelines on how to wean from HMV in children is not available, we summarize the weaning strategies from the literature reviews combined with our 27-year experience in the Pediatric Home Respiratory Care program at the tertiary care center in Thailand. The readiness to wean is considered in patients with hemodynamic stability, having effective cough measured by maximal inspiratory pressure, requiring a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) < 40%, positive end expiratory pressure <5 cmH2O, and acceptable arterial blood gases. The strategies of weaning is start weaning during the daytime while the child is awake and close monitoring is feasible. Disconnect time is gradually increased through naps and sleeping hours. Weaning from the conventional mechanical ventilator to Bilevel PAP or CPAP are optional. Factors affected the successful weaning are mainly the underlying diseases, complications, growth and development, caregivers, and resources. Weaning should be stopped during acute illness or increased work of breathing. The readiness for decannulation could be determined by using the speaking devices, tracheostomy capping, and measurement of end-expiratory pressure. Polysomnography and airway evaluation by bronchoscopy are recommended before decannulation. Weaning when the child is ready is crucial because living with HMV can be challenging and stressful. Failure to remove a tracheostomy when indicated can result in delayed speech, social problems as well as risk for infection.

Home ventilation in low resource settings: Learning to do more, with less

Long-term ventilation (LTV) in children at home, especially invasive ventilation, is not widely available nor practised in low-resource settings (LRS). Barriers to providing LTV include underdeveloped pediatric critical care services, limited expertise in pediatric LTV, limited capacity to screen for sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) and high cost of LTV equipment and consumables. Additional challenges encountered in LRS may be unreliable electricity supply and difficult socioeconomic conditions. Where LTV at home has been successfully implemented, caregivers and families in LRS must often take full responsibility for their child's care as professional home-based nursing care is scarce. Selecting suitable children and families to offer LTV in LRS may therefore face difficult ethical decisions when families are disempowered or incapable of providing 24-h care at home. Early caregiver participation and hands-on training in tracheostomy care and LTV equipment is key to success, irrespective of the caregiver's level of education. The use of overnight oximetry, mobile phone technology, spirometry, and clinical evaluation are simple tools that can aid recognition and monitoring of children needing LTV. As children survive longer supported by LTV, engaging with adult services at an early stage is important to ensure suitable pathways for transition to adult care are in place. Building capacity and expertise in pediatric LTV in LRS requires targeted training of health professionals in related disciplines and advocacy to policymakers and funders that LTV in appropriately selected circumstances is worthwhile, life-changing, and cost-saving.