Efficacy of Conversion Surgery Following Apatinib Plus Paclitaxel/S1 for Advanced Gastric Cancer With Unresectable Factors: A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Phase II Trial

Transarterial Infusion Chemotherapy and Embolization for Patients With Unresectable Advanced Cancer of Stomach or Gastroesophageal Junction: A Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

The feasibility of transarterial infusion chemotherapy and embolization (TAICE) in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer remains unclear. This study explored the value of TAICE in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic cancer of stomach or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ).

METHODS

Patients with unresectable gastric cancer who received TAICE for tumor hemorrhage cessation were enrolled in this retrospective study. TAICE was performed using the Seldinger method. The tumor feeding artery was selected for infusion chemotherapy and then was embolized by microspheres or gelatin sponge. Patients involved in this study received one to four cycles TAICE with one to three drugs in the regimen. The possibility of surgery was evaluated after TAICE. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), R0 resection rate, pathological complete remission (pCR) rate, major pathological remission (MPR) rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety were analyzed.

RESULTS

Between January 2015 and December 2020, a total of 27 patients received a median of 2 (range, 1-4) cycles of TAICE. ORR and DCR were 33.3% and 74.0%, respectively. Eighteen patients received surgery, and 15 of them underwent gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection, with an R0 resection rate of 83.3% (15/18). Four (26.7%, 4/15) patients achieved MPR, but none achieved pCR. The median PFS was 19.8 months (95%CI, 12.1-40.0), and the median OS was 36.1 months (95%CI, 21.0-not reached). Patients with gastrectomy had significantly longer PFS (40.0 vs. 9.5 months, p < 0.0001) and OS (not reached vs. 16.6 months, p < 0.0001) than those without gastrectomy. All the TAICE-related adverse events were manageable, with the most common being fatigue (100%), nausea (63.0%), and vomiting (55.6%). No severe surgical complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

TAICE was well-tolerated and could be a potential therapy to provide opportunity of surgery for patients with unresectable advanced gastric or GEJ cancer.

Apatinib combined with SOX regimen for conversion therapy in advanced gastric cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Recently, many studies have shown that the progress of conversion therapy can provide surgical opportunities for patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC) and bring survival benefits. However, the results of the current study show that the regimen used in conversion therapy is still controversial. Apatinib, as the standard third-line treatment for GC, has an inconclusive status in conversion therapy.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed GC patients admitted to Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital from June 2016 to November 2019. All patients were pathologically diagnosed, had unresectable factors, and received SOX regimen with or without apatinib as conversion therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients were enrolled in the study. Altogether 33 patients (66%) received conversion surgery and 17 patients (34%) received conversion therapy without surgery. The median progression-free survival (PFS) between surgery group and non-surgery group were 21.0 versus 4.0 months (p < 0.0001), and the median overall survival (OS) were 29.0 versus 14.0 months (p < 0.0001). In conversion surgery group, 16 patients (16/33) were treated with SOX plus apatinib, and the R0 resection rate was 81.3%; 17 patients (17/33) were treated with SOX regimen along, and the R0 resection rate was 41.2% (p = 0.032). The PFS in the SOX combined with apatinib group was significantly longer than that of SOX group (25.5 versus 16 months, p = 0.045), and the median OS were 34.0 versus 23.0 months (p = 0.048). The addition of apatinib did not increase the incidence of serious adverse reactions throughout the preoperative therapy period.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with advanced inoperable gastric cancer could benefit probably from conversion chemotherapy and subsequence conversion surgery. Apatinib-targeted therapy combined with SOX chemotherapy may be a safe and feasible option for conversion therapy.

Efficacy of intra-arterial chemotherapy with sequential anti-PD-1 antibody in unresectable gastric cancer: A retrospective real-world study

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of unresectable gastric cancer is poor, while the efficacy of anti-PD antibodies has not been evaluated.

METHODS

Patients with unresectable gastric cancer who received intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) with sequential anti-PD-1 antibody as induction therapy in Jinling Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome is R0 resection rate. The secondary outcomes include safety, conversion surgery rate, overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) after postoperative IAC and anti-PD-1 treatments. Meanwhile, Tumor immunity in the microenvironment (TIME) before and after IAC was comprehensively dissected with multiplex immunofluorescence in order to detect possible mechanisms favoring anti-PD-1 treatment response.

RESULTS

Between May 2019 and October 2020, 36 patients received at least one cycle of IAC with sequential anti-PD-1 antibody in our institution. The objective response was achieved in 28 patients (77.8%). Thirty patients (83.3%) successfully underwent conversion surgery, among which R0 resection was managed in 25/30 patients, and 23.3% (7/30) was assessed as pathological complete remission. During the median follow-up period of 19.7 months, patients who underwent R0 resection displayed superior OS (HR 0.14 [95% CI 0.04-0.50], P < 0.0001) and PFS (HR 0.11 [0.03-0.44], P < 0.0001) than those who did not. Grade 3 adverse events (AEs) were only encountered in 19.4% patients, no grade 4 AEs observed. In TIME analysis, the number of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) (P = 0.004) were greatly induced by IAC, as well as CD8+ T cells (P = 0.011) and PD-1+ cells (P = 0.025). Meanwhile, Tumor associated macrophages shifted towards anti-tumor M1-like subtypes, with CD68+CD163+ M2-like subpopulation significantly decreased (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative IAC with sequential anti-PD-1 antibody exhibited promising clinical benefit for unresectable gastric cancer with remarkable conversion rate and R0 resection rate, and also prolonged survival as postoperative regimen. TIME transformation induced by ICA might mediate the additive effect with the immune checkpoint inhibitor.

Neoadjuvant therapy with immune checkpoint blockade, antiangiogenesis, and chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer

Despite neoadjuvant/conversion chemotherapy, the prognosis of cT4a/bN+ gastric cancer is poor. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and antiangiogenic agents have shown activity in late-stage gastric cancer, but their efficacy in the neoadjuvant/conversion setting is unclear. In this single-armed, phase II, exploratory trial (NCT03878472), we evaluate the efficacy of a combination of ICI (camrelizumab), antiangiogenesis (apatinib), and chemotherapy (S-1 ± oxaliplatin) for neoadjuvant/conversion treatment of cT4a/bN+ gastric cancer. The primary endpoints are pathological responses and their potential biomarkers. Secondary endpoints include safety, objective response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Complete and major pathological response rates are 15.8% and 26.3%. Pathological responses correlate significantly with microsatellite instability status, PD-L1 expression, and tumor mutational burden. In addition, multi-omics examination reveals several putative biomarkers for pathological responses, including RREB1 and SSPO mutation, immune-related signatures, and a peripheral T cell expansion score. Multi-omics also demonstrates dynamic changes in dominant tumor subclones, immune microenvironments, and T cell receptor repertoires during neoadjuvant immunotherapy. The toxicity and post-surgery complications are limited. These data support further validation of ICI- and antiangiogenesis-based neoadjuvant/conversion therapy in large randomized trials and provide candidate biomarkers.

Low-dose apatinib combined with camrelizumab and the SOX regimen in the neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (SPACE-neo): a protocol for an open-label, single-arm, clinical trial

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX regimen) has shown promising results in pathological response rate and survival rate in patients with locally advanced resectable gastric cancer (LAGC). We previously carried out the SPACE study to assess efficacy and safety of low-dose apatinib combined with camrelizumab and the SOX regimen as a first-line treatment of advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (AGC/GEJC). The preliminary results demonstrated a high objective response rate. However, the SPACE study was conducted in patients with AGC, but the efficacy of LAGC patients is not yet known. The SPACE-neo study is designed to investigate whether this combination could improve outcomes in patients with locally advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer (LAGC/GEJC) as neoadjuvant therapy.

Methods

SPACE-neo is a prospective, open-label, single-arm study conducted in China at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Jiangsu Province Hospital). Thirty-two patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative or HER2-unknown LAGC/GEJC confirmed by histopathology or cytology will be recruited. Included patients shall be clinically staged as M0 and either T3 to T4 or N+ assessed by ultrasound endoscopy and thoracoabdominal-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. The patients will receive three cycles of this combined regimen as a neoadjuvant treatment. Each patient will receive screening visits within 2 weeks before the first cycle and planned visits before every cycle of treatment. Key monitoring data include imaging data, pathological findings, and adverse events associated with neoadjuvant and surgical treatment. The primary endpoints are major pathological response (MPR) and safety. MPR is the proportion of patients whose residual tumor cells make up less than 10% of the primary tumor from among the total cohort. Clopper-Pearson method will be used to estimate the 95% confidence interval of MPR and safety data will be reported as descriptive statistical analysis.

Discussion

The SPACE-neo trial aims to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of this regimen in the neoadjuvant treatment of LAGC/GEJC. It is hoped that the study can achieve a higher pathological response rate and longer survival rate.

Trial Registration

ChiCTR.gov.cn: ChiCTR2100049305.

Advances in Treatment Models of Advanced Gastric Cancer

The prognosis of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is extremely poor, and the therapeutic effect of traditional palliative chemotherapy is far from satisfactory. To overcome this bottleneck, palliative surgery resection, perioperative chemotherapy combined with surgical resection, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC), radiation therapy, molecular-targeted therapy have been explored in AGC. Although considerable progress has been achieved, there is still no overwhelming therapeutic method. Due to the high heterogeneity of AGC, it is particularly vital to reshaped the paradigm of gastric cancer therapy according to the characteristics of clinical classifications and molecular subtypes.

Effect of different doses of apatinib mesylate combined with chemotherapy on advanced oral cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the therapeutic effect and safety of different doses of apatinib mesylate combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced oral cancer.

METHODS

Totally 100 patients with advanced oral cancer admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to July 2020 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into a control group (500 mg apatinib mesylate combined with chemotherapy) and an experimental group (250 mg apatinib mesylate combined with chemotherapy). The two groups were compared in terms of the incidence of adverse reactions, treatment effective rate, disease control rate, objective response rate, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score (quality of life), score of the mental status scale in non-psychiatric settings (MSSNS), survival rates and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) after treatment. In addition, logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors for KPS<85 after oral cancer treatment.

RESULTS

The treatment effective rate, disease control rate, objective response rate, KPS score (quality of life), survival rates in the experimental group were all significantly improved compared to those in the control group (all P<0.05), and the incidence of adverse reactions, MSSNS score, and the levels of VEGF and VEGFR-2 after treatment in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group (all P<0.05). Furthermore, a history of smoking, a history of drinking, a tooth brushing index <3, the frequency of teeth cleansing ≤1 time per year, a history of oral diseases >3 times, and poor nutritional status were independent risk factors for KPS<85 after oral cancer treatment.

CONCLUSION

Apatinib mesylate (250 mg) combined with chemotherapy can reach optimal efficacy with highest safety but least adverse effects for patients with advanced oral cancer.