Benefits and Harms of Low-Dose Rivaroxaban in Asian Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Real-World Studies

Effectiveness and Safety of Early Versus Routine Switching from Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin to Maintenance Therapy of Rivaroxaban for Acute Iliofemoral Vein Thrombosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The anticoagulation strategy of switching to rivaroxaban after 1 week of initial low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) therapy is recommended by a guideline for the treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT). However, the initial rivaroxaban dose in the switching strategy, as well as the effectiveness and safety of the early switching (less than 1 week) to rivaroxaban, remain inadequately substantiated. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of early switching from LMWH to maintenance therapy of rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily) for acute iliofemoral DVT.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from patients with acute iliofemoral DVT who received initial LMWH anticoagulation followed by rivaroxaban maintenance therapy. The clinical outcomes were compared between early (LMWH course ≤7 days) and routine (LMWH course >7 days) switching strategies within 3 months of initiating anticoagulation.

RESULTS

217 patients were included, 59 (27.2%) receiving early switching and 158 (72.8%) receiving routine switching. Compared with routine switching, patients with early switching had a significantly shorter hospital stay (7 days vs. 14 days, P < 0.001). The length of hospital stay was significantly positively correlated with the duration of LMWH (r = 0.762, P < 0.001). The incidences of recurrent venous thromboembolism (5.1% vs. 2.5%, P = 0.606), major bleeding (0% vs. 1.9%, P = 0.564), clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (1.7% vs. 2.5%, P = 1.000) and all-cause mortality (6.8% vs. 2.5%, P = 0.283) were not statistically different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct early switching from LMWH to maintenance therapy of rivaroxaban is effective and safe for acute iliofemoral DVT.

Low-dose Rivaroxaban: is it a safe alternative in Chinese older patients?

PURPOSE

10 mg rivaroxaban is widely used in the Chinese mainland. This study aims to explore the association between 10 mg once daily rivaroxaban and all-cause mortality in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).

METHODS

This observational study enrolled 1131 NVAF patients at the cardiovascular department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University. One-year outcomes included all-cause mortality and bleeding were recorded. Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier analysis were utilized in the study.

RESULTS

In total, 1131 patients (402 no anticoagulants, and 729 rivaroxaban) were included. Cox proportional hazard analysis demonstrated that low-dose rivaroxaban (10 mg, HR: 0.14, 95% CI:(0.07-0.28), P<0.001; 15 mg, HR: 0.20, 95% CI:(0.09-0.43), P<0.001; 20 mg, HR: 0.22, 95% CI:(0.05-0.96), P = 0.044) exhibited lower mortality risk compared to untreated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

10 mg once daily rivaroxaban may provide survival benefits for elderly patients with NVAF.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Dose Optimization Based on Renal Function of Rivaroxaban in Thai Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

Low-dose rivaroxaban has been used in Asian patients with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) eligible for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there are few pharmacokinetic (PK) data in Thai patients to support precise dosing. This study aimed to develop a population PK model and determine the optimal rivaroxaban doses in Thai patients. A total of 240 Anti-Xa levels of rivaroxaban from 60 Thai patients were analyzed. A population PK model was established using the nonlinear mixed-effect modeling approach. Monte Carlo simulations were used to predict drug exposures at a steady state for various dosages. Proportions of patients having rivaroxaban exposure within typical exposure ranges were determined. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption best described the data. Creatinine clearance (CrCl) and body weight significantly affected CL/F and V/F, respectively. Regardless of body weight, a higher proportion of patients with CrCl < 50 mL/min receiving the 10-mg once-daily dose had rivaroxaban exposures within the typical exposure ranges. In contrast, a higher proportion of patients with CrCl ≥ 50 mL/min receiving the 15-mg once-daily dose had rivaroxaban exposures within the typical exposure ranges. The study’s findings suggested that low-dose rivaroxaban would be better suited for Thai patients and suggested adjusting the medication’s dose in accordance with renal function.

Efficacy and Safety Considerations With Dose-Reduced Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Review

Importance

Dose-reduced regimens of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be used for 2 main purposes: dose-adjusted treatment intended as full-intensity anticoagulation (eg, for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation [AF] in patients requiring dose reduction) or low-intensity treatment (eg, extended-duration treatment of venous thromboembolism [VTE]). We reviewed randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to understand the scenarios in which dose-adjusted or low-intensity DOACs were tested and reviewed the labeled indications by regulatory authorities, using data from large registries to assess whether the use of dose-reduced DOACs in routine practice aligned with the findings of RCTs.

Observations

Among 4191 screened publications, 35 RCTs that used dose-adjusted DOACs were identified for dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban. Of these 35 RCTs, 29 were related to stroke prevention in AF. Efficacy and safety results for dose-adjusted DOACs in large RCTs of AF were similar to those found for full-dose DOACs. To our knowledge, dabigatran, apixaban, and rivaroxaban have not been studied as dose-adjusted therapy for acute VTE treatment. Low-intensity DOACs were identified in 37 RCTs. Low-intensity DOACs may be used for extended-duration treatment of VTE (apixaban and rivaroxaban), primary prevention in orthopedic surgeries (dabigatran, apixaban, and rivaroxaban), primary prevention in ambulatory high-risk cancer patients (apixaban and rivaroxaban) or (postdischarge) high-risk medical patients (rivaroxaban), in stable atherosclerotic vascular disease, or after a recent revascularization for peripheral artery disease in conjunction with aspirin (rivaroxaban). Minor variations exist between regulatory authorities in different regions regarding criteria for dose adjustment of DOACs. Data from large registries indicated that dose-reduced DOACs were used occasionally with doses or for clinical scenarios different from those studied in RCTs or recommended by regulatory authorities.

Conclusions and Relevance

Dose adjustment and low-intensity treatment are 2 different forms of dose-reduced DOACs. Dose adjustment is mostly relevant for AF and should be done based on the approved criteria. Dose adjustment of DOACs should not be used for acute VTE treatment in most cases. In contrast, low-intensity DOACs may be used for primary or secondary VTE prevention for studied and approved indications. Attention should be given to routine practice patterns to align the daily clinical practice with existing evidence of safety and efficacy.

Current Therapeutic Approach to Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Congenital Hemophilia

Cardiovascular disease in hemophiliacs has an increasing prevalence due to the aging of this population. Hemophiliacs are perceived as having a high bleeding risk due to the coagulation factor VIII/IX deficiency, but it is currently acknowledged that they also have an important ischemic risk. The treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) is particularly challenging since it usually requires anticoagulant treatment. The CHA2DS2-VASc score is used to estimate the risk of stroke and peripheral embolism, and along with the severity of hemophilia, guide the therapeutic strategy. Our work provides the most complete, structured, and updated analysis of the current therapeutic approach of AF in hemophiliacs, emphasizing that there is a growing interest in therapeutic strategies that allow for short-term anticoagulant therapy. Catheter ablation and left atrial appendage occlusion have proven to be efficient and safe procedures in hemophiliacs, if appropriate replacement therapy can be provided.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Rivaroxaban in Chinese Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Rivaroxaban is a novel oral anticoagulant widely used for thromboprophylaxis in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The present study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model for rivaroxaban in Chinese patients with NVAF.

METHODS

We performed a prospective multicenter study. The plasma concentration of rivaroxaban was directly detected by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) and indirectly by rivaroxaban-calibrated chromogenic anti-Xa assay (STA^®). Gene polymorphisms were detected by MassARRAY single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping technology. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was used to develop the PPK model for rivaroxaban in patients with NVAF, and we simulated the steady-state rivaroxaban exposures under different dosing strategies in different covariate levels.

RESULTS

A total of 150 patients from five centers were recruited, including 263 plasma concentrations detected by HPLC-MS/MS, 2626 gene polymorphisms, and 131 plasma concentrations detected by anti-Xa assay. In our study, an oral one-compartment model was used to describe the pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban in patients with NVAF. In the final model, the estimated apparent clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (V/F) were 5.79 L/h (relative standard error [RSE] 4.4%) and 51.5 L (RSE 5.0%), respectively. Covariates in the final model included creatinine clearance, total bilirubin, rs4728709, and body weight. The simulation results showed that in the 15 mg once-daily dosing regimen, in most instances the maximum plasma concentration at steady state (C_max,ss) and trough plasma concentration at steady state (C_min,ss) were in the target range for different covariate levels. When patients were administered rivaroxaban 15 or 20 mg once daily, the C_max,ss and C_min,ss in the different bodyweight levels were also in the target range. For patients with the ABCB1 rs4728709 mutation, the C_min,ss in the 10, 15, and 20 mg once-daily dosing regimens were lower than the target range. The anti-Xa assay was highly linearly correlated with the HPLC-MS/MS method [y = 1.014x - 2.4648 (R² = 0.97)].

CONCLUSIONS

Our study was the first multicenter PPK model for rivaroxaban in Chinese patients with NVAF (Alfalfa-RIVAAF-PPK). The study found that 15 mg once daily may be suitable as the principal rivaroxaban dose for Chinese patients with NVAF. For patients with the rs4728709 mutation, it may be necessary to examine insufficient anticoagulation. We found that the rivaroxaban-calibrated chromogenic anti-Xa assay and HPLC-MS/MS method were highly linearly correlated. Prospective studies with larger sample sizes and real-world studies are needed for further verification.

A Network Comparison on Safety Profiling of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Lung Cancer

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become one of the standard treatment options for advanced lung cancer. However, adverse events (AEs), particularly immune–related AEs (irAEs), caused by these drugs have aroused public attention. The current network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to compare the risk of AEs across different ICI–based regimens in patients with advanced lung cancer.

Methods

We systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases (from inception to 19 April 2021) for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared two or more treatments, with at least one ICI administered to patients with advanced lung cancer. The primary outcomes were treatment–related AEs and irAEs, including grade 1–5 and grade 3–5. The secondary outcomes were grade 1–5 and grade 3–5 irAEs in specific organs. Both pairwise and network meta-analyses were conducted for chemotherapy, ICI monotherapy, ICI monotherapy + chemotherapy, dual ICIs therapy, and dual ICIs + chemotherapy for all safety outcomes. Node–splitting analyses were performed to test inconsistencies in network. Sensitivity analyses were adopted by restricting phase III RCTs and studies that enrolled patients with non–small cell lung cancer.

Results

Overall, 38 RCTs involving 22,178 patients with advanced lung cancer were enrolled. Both pooled incidence and NMA indicated that treatments containing chemotherapy increased the risk of treatment–related AEs when compared with ICI-based regimens without chemotherapy. As for grade 1–5 irAEs, dual ICIs + chemotherapy was associated with the highest risk of irAEs (probability in ranking first: 50.5%), followed by dual-ICI therapy (probability in ranking second: 47.2%), ICI monotherapy (probability in ranking third: 80.0%), ICI monotherapy + chemotherapy (probability in ranking fourth: 98.0%), and finally chemotherapy (probability in ranking fifth: 100.0%). In grade 3–5 irAEs, subtle differences were observed; when ranked from least safe to safest, the trend was dual ICIs therapy (60.4%), dual ICIs + chemotherapy (42.5%), ICI monotherapy (76.3%), ICI monotherapy + chemotherapy (95.0%), and chemotherapy (100.0%). Furthermore, detailed comparisons between ICI–based options provided irAE profiles based on specific organ/system and severity.

Conclusions

In consideration of overall immune–related safety profiles, ICI monotherapy + chemotherapy might be a better choice among ICI–based treatments for advanced lung cancer. The safety profiles of ICI–based treatments are various by specific irAEs and their severity.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42021268650