Safety Profile of Ibrutinib: An Analysis of the WHO Pharmacovigilance Database

Cardiovascular events of Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors: A real-world study based on the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database

AIMS

Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKIs), including first-generation ibrutinib, second-generation acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib, may be involved in the mechanisms of action related to adverse events (AEs) of the cardiovascular system. We aimed to characterize the cardiovascular AEs of BTKIs reported in the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System, and to compare the cardiovascular risks of BTKIs.

METHODS

Across all indications of three FDA-approved BTKIs, primary suspect drugs were extracted over two periods: from January 2013 to December 2022 (after the approval of the first BTKI), and from January 2020 to December 2022 (all three BTKIs on the market). Disproportionality was measured by reporting odds ratios (RORs) and information components. Additional analyses were performed without incorporating patients with underlying cardiovascular disease (CVD).

RESULTS

A total of 10 353 cases included the uses of ibrutinib, acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib. Ibrutinib was significantly associated with 47 cardiovascular AEs. Acalabrutinib was associated with new signals, including cardiac failure (ROR = 1.82 [1.13-2.93]), pulmonary oedema (ROR = 2.15 [1.19-3.88]), ventricular extrasystoles (ROR = 5.18 [2.15-12.44]), heart rate irregular (ROR = 3.05 [1.53-6.11]), angina pectoris (ROR = 3.18 [1.71-5.91]) and cardiotoxicity (ROR = 25.22 [17.14-37.10]). In addition, cardiovascular events had an earlier onset in acalabrutinib users. Zanubrutinib was only associated with atrial fibrillation. Acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib had lower ROR values than ibrutinib. The AE signals were generally consistent between the population receiving and not receiving CVD medications.

CONCLUSIONS

Potential cardiovascular risks identified in this study were not clearly noted on the label of marketed acalabrutinib. Caution should be paid to the cardiovascular risks of BTKIs having been or being developed.

CDK4/6 inhibitors: basics, pros, and major cons in breast cancer treatment with specific regard to cardiotoxicity - a narrative review

Breast cancer is characterized by the uncontrolled proliferation of breast cells, with a high incidence reported in 2020 to have affected over 2 million women. In recent years, the conventional methods of treating breast cancer have involved radiotherapy and chemotherapy. However, the emergence of CDK4/6 inhibitors has shown potential as a promising cancer therapy. Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) inhibitors are a class of molecules that impede the formation of an active kinase complex, thereby hindering its activity and consequently halting the progression of the cell cycle. It was discovered that they have a significant impact on impeding the progression of the cancer. This is evident with the Food and Drug Administration's approval of drugs such as palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer in combination with specific endocrine therapies. In spite of enormous success in breast cancer treatment, certain obstacles have emerged, such as therapy resistance, side effects, and most of all, cardiotoxicity. Some of these drawbacks have been successfully overcome by dosage reduction, different combinations of the drugs, and the assessment of each patient's condition and suitability prior to treatment. Yet other drawbacks still require tenacious research, especially certain cases of cardiotoxicities. This article delves into the biological mechanisms of CDK4/6 in the cell cycle and cancer, as well as the clinical advantages and most common adverse events (AEs) associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors. The primary objective of this review is to provide a comprehensive analysis of cardiotoxic AEs and elucidate the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for the cardiotoxicity of CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Which is the top player for the cardiovascular safety? ibrutinib vs. obinutuzumab in CLL

Introduction: Ibrutinib, a Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, is authorized for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). This study aims to explore the cardiac safety profile of ibrutinib in comparison with obinutuzumab. Methods: A retrospective pharmacovigilance study was conducted on data retrieved from the European pharmacovigilance database (Eudravigilance) from 1 January 2014 to 30 September 2022. To compare the reporting frequency of cardiovascular events among ibrutinib, obinutuzumab, and the combination of both. Results: A total of 2 291 CV cases were retrieved, of which 1965 were related to ibrutinib, 312 to obinutuzumab, and 14 to the combination. Most cases referred to patients aged ≥65 years (N = 1,454; 63.47%) and male (N = 1,497; 65.34%). Most cases were serious (N = 2,131; 93.02%). The most reported events were: atrial fibrillation (N = 913; 31.31%) and haemorrhage (N = 201; 6.89%). A higher reporting frequency of CV events was found when ibrutinib was compared to obinutuzumab (ROR, 3.22; 95% CI, 2.89-3.60) or combination (ROR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.11-2.83). A lower reporting was observed when obinutuzumab was compared to combination (ROR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.34-0.88). Discussion: A higher reporting frequency of CV events in patients exposed to ibrutinib in comparison with obinutuzumab was found. Further studies are needed to better explore the safety of ibrutinib.

Pharmacovigilance analysis of cardiac risks associated with Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKIs) can be associated with several cardiac risks.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The study was conducted based on records from a large spontaneous reporting database, the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System, for cardiac events reported for several BTKI agents. Reporting odds ratio and information components based on statistical shrinkage transformation were utilized to measure disproportionality.

RESULTS

The final number of records for BTKI-related cardiac events was 10 320. Death or life-threatening events occurred in 17.63% of all associated cardiac records. Significant reporting was captured between BTKI (total/specific) and cardiac events, with the strongest association for ibrutinib. A total of 47 positive signals were evacuated for ibrutinib, with atrial fibrillation being the most commonly reported one. Concomitantly, cardiac failure, congestive, cardiac disorder, arrhythmia, pericardial effusion, and atrial flutter were also noticed for relatively stronger signal and disproportionality. Atrial fibrillation was over-reported in the three groups (ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, and zanubrutinib), and acalabrutinib had statistically significant lower reporting compared with ibrutinib.

CONCLUSIONS

Receiving ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, or zanubrutinib might increase the chance of cardiac complications, with ibrutinib posing the highest risk. The type of cardiotoxicity involved in ibrutinib was highly variable.

Cardiotoxicity Induced by Protein Kinase Inhibitors in Patients with Cancer

Kinase inhibitors (KIs) represent a growing class of drugs directed at various protein kinases and used in the treatment of both solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. It is a heterogeneous group of compounds that are widely applied not only in different types of tumors but also in tumors that are positive for a specific predictive factor. This review summarizes common cardiotoxic effects of KIs, including hypertension, arrhythmias with bradycardia and QTc prolongation, and cardiomyopathy that can lead to heart failure, as well as less common effects such as fluid retention, ischemic heart disease, and elevated risk of thromboembolic events. The guidelines for cardiac monitoring and management of the most common cardiotoxic effects of protein KIs are discussed. Potential signaling pathways affected by KIs and likely contributing to cardiac damage are also described. Finally, the need for further research into the molecular mechanisms underlying the cardiovascular toxicity of these drugs is indicated.