Dermal open flow microperfusion for PK-based clinical bioequivalence studies of topical drug products

Enhancing Transcutaneous Drug Delivery: Advanced Perspectives on Skin Models

Skin acts as a dynamic interface with the environment. Pathological alterations in the skin barrier are associated with skin diseases. These conditions are characterized by specific impairments in epidermal barrier functions. Despite its protective nature, the skin can be a relevant route of drug administration, both for topical and transdermal therapy, allowing for improved drug delivery and reducing the incidence of adverse reactions. This manuscript reviews transcutaneous drug delivery as a strategy for treating localized and systemic conditions, highlighting the importance of skin models in the evaluation of drug efficacy and barrier function. It explores advances in in vitro, ex vivo, in vivo, and in silico models for studying cellular uptake, wound healing, oxidative stress, anti-inflammatory, and immune modulation activities. Disease-specific skin models are also discussed.

Opportunities of topical drug products in a changing dermatological landscape

Despite the prevalence and the impact on quality of life of dermatological indications, drug products to treat such conditions have rarely been blockbusters. The prevailing perception of a limited commercial potential of dermatological drug products has restricted innovation and encouraged a more conservative development approach. For example, the focus was on repurposing/reformulation of existing active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) specifically for the topical delivery route. However, the situation is quite different today catalyzed in part by the blockbuster success of Dupixent (dupilumab), the first monoclonal antibody treatment for atopic dermatitis which has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) in 2017. Dupixent's success not only encouraged the development of other biologics but also inspired the (re-)development of new dermal drug products that can reap the many benefits of topical administration. We have also witnessed a shift toward outsourcing development efforts (and associated risks) towards small- to mid-size pharmaceutical companies which often require support of contract research and development/manufacturing organizations (CRO and CDMO). Such trends also emphasize the need of greater expertise in topical formulation design, as well as associated commercial and regulatory considerations. Today, we believe that topical drug products remain not only an essential but also commercially viable class of dermatological therapeutics. In this opinion article, we will address the challenges as well as opportunities of coherent development strategies in the current market environment, formulation innovations of topical drug products and technological advances to facilitate rational topical drug formulation development.

Equivalence assessment of creams with quali-quantitative differences in light of the EMA and FDA regulatory framework

EMA and FDA are upgrading guidelines on assessing the quality and the equivalence of topically applied drug products for developing copies of originator products and supporting post-marketing variations. For topical products having remarkably similar composition, both EMA and FDA accept the equivalence on the bases of the comparison of rheological properties and in vitro drug release constant (k) and skin permeation flux (J) values, instead of clinical studies. This work aims to evaluate the feasibility to expand this approach to variations of the composition of complex semi-solid preparations. Ibuprofen (IB) creams at two different strengths (i.e., 1 % and 10 %) were used as a model formulation. Two formulative changes were performed: (a) the addition of the humectant to simulate a minor post-marketing variation; (b) the substitution of the emulsifying system to simulate a major one. These variations impacted only in 1 % IB formulations where both the equivalences of rheological data and J-values failed. At the highest concentration, the presence of IB crystals broke down the differences in rheological patterns and lead the IB thermodynamic activity at the maximum figuring out an overlapping of the J-values. Such data suggest the combination of these studies, which are thought mainly for the development of copies, could be also applied to the management of post-marketing variations that involve product composition.

Update on the advances and challenges in bioequivalence testing methods for complex topical generic products

Most of the government regulatory agencies, including the United States Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicine Agency, demand that the generic complex topical products prove pharmaceutical and bioequivalence. The evaluation of bioequivalence for complex topical dermatological formulations is a challenging task that requires careful consideration of several factors. Although comparative clinical studies are still considered the gold standard approach for establishing bioequivalence in most formulations, these studies can be costly and insensitive to detect formulation differences. Therefore, significant efforts have been made to develop and validate alternative approaches that demonstrate bioequivalence and expedite the availability of high-quality generic topical dermatological products. This article reviews the current methods for determining the bioequivalence of topical formulations in humans, with particular emphasis on recent advances in these methodologies. Most of the alternative methods are sensitive and reproducible, with the capability to ease the financial burden of comparative clinical studies within a short delivery time. The limitations associated with each technique are reviewed in detail.