Heterogeneous treatment effects of Cerebrolysin as an early add-on to reperfusion therapy: post hoc analysis of the CEREHETIS trial

Cerebrolysin as an adjuvant therapy after mechanical thrombectomy in large vessel occlusion cardioembolic stroke: a propensity score matching analysis

Introduction

Endovascular recanalization therapy has demonstrated considerable efficacy in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, not all patients appear to benefit on the long term from this therapy. No studies have assessed the role of Cerebrolysin following mechanical thrombectomy (MT). The present study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Cerebrolysin as add-on treatment to MT in patients with cardioembolic AIS.

Methods

This study evaluated 150 patients admitted to the stroke unit. Data were prospectively collected from 75 patients with cardioembolic AIS and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥10, who underwent successful MT ± recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA). Patients fulfilling inclusion criteria were consecutively enrolled and treated with Cerebrolysin at a daily dose of 30 ml for 14 days, with treatment initiated within 8 h following MT. Patients were compared with a historical control group of 75 well-matched patients who underwent MT ± rt-PA but did not receive Cerebrolysin. The primary outcome measure was a favorable modified Rankin Scale (mRS = 0-2) at day 90. Secondary parameters included the NIHSS, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the rate of hemorrhagic transformation, mortality, and adverse events. Propensity score matching was performed to match the variables between the compared groups.

Results and discussion

The overall results demonstrated that patients treated with Cerebrolysin exhibited a significantly higher proportion of mRS scores of 0-2 at day 90 (64% vs. 34.7%) in comparison to the control group. This finding was consistent with lower NIHSS and mRS scores at all study visits, and a lower any hemorrhagic transformation rate (20% vs. 57.3%). Furthermore, the logistic regression analysis revealed that patients with favorable mRS scores were less likely to undergo hemorrhagic transformation (odds ratio = 2.75, 95% confidence interval = 1.17, 6.45; p = 0.002). The administration of Cerebrolysin as an add-on treatment resulted in a significant benefit for AIS patients following MT, characterized by an improvement in mRS and NIHSS scores, along with a reduced rate of hemorrhagic transformation. The administration of Cerebrolysin was safe and well tolerated. Further studies are required to confirm these results.

[Cerebrolysin and the optimal timing of anticoagulation resumption in stroke: combined post hoc survival analysis of the CEREHETIS trial]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of Cerebrolysin on hazard dynamics of hemorrhagic transformation (HT) and identify optimal anticoagulation therapy (AT) resumption timing in stroke patients, stratified by the Hemorrhagic Transformation Index (HTI).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A post hoc survival analysis of the CEREHETIS trial (ISRCTN87656744) included patients with middle cerebral artery infarctions. The intervention group (IG, n=91) received Cerebrolysin with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and standard care, while the control group (CG, n=147) received IVT and standard care alone. Additionally, a validation cohort (VC, n=248) from an observational study was analyzed. Patients were stratified into low-risk (HT=0), high-risk (HTI=1-4), and very-high-risk (HTI=5-8, VC only) groups. Symptomatic HT and any HT within 14 days post-stroke were defined as failure events. Hazard dynamics were modeled using a Gompertz parametric survival approach, with a hazard threshold (0.6% per day) estimating safe AT resumption timing.

RESULTS

Cerebrolysin significantly reduced risk of symptomatic HT (HR 0.245; 95% CI 0.072-0.837; p=0.02) and any HT (HR 0.543; 95% CI 0.297-0.991; p=0.032). The compounding effect peaked on day 1 and persisted through days 7-10 in very-high-risk patients (HTI=5-8). In high-risk patients (HTI=1-4), Cerebrolysin mitigated the compounding effect and reduced hazard levels to the threshold by day 2, compared to days 3-5 in the CG and VC. The hazardous period extended to day 10 in HTI=5-8. In low-risk patients (HTI=0), hazard levels remained below the threshold from day 1, with no measurable impact of Cerebrolysin on HT.

CONCLUSION

AT may be safely resumed within 48 h in low-risk patients (HTI=0), on days 3-5 in high-risk patients (HTI=1-4), and on day 10 in very-high-risk patients (HTI=5-8) without symptomatic HT. Cerebrolysin mitigates the compounding effect, reduces HT risk, and facilitates earlier, safer AT resumption in high-risk patients (HTI=1-4) by day 2 post-stroke, supporting its role in personalized stroke management.

[Cerebrolysin as an early add-on to reperfusion therapy: heterogeneous treatment effect analysis in ischemic stroke patients with varying risk of hemorrhagic transformation]

OBJECTIVE

The study goal was the assessment of heterogeneous treatment effects of Cerebrolysin as an early add-on to reperfusion therapy in stroke patients with varying risk of hemorrhagic transformation (HT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

It was post hoc analysis of the CEREHETIS trial (ISRCTN87656744). Patients with middle cerebral artery infarction (n=238) were stratified by HT risk with the HTI score. The study outcomes were symptomatic and any HT, and functional outcome measured with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) on day 90. Favorable outcome was defined as an mRS score of ≤2. Heterogeneous treatment effect analysis was performed using techniques of meta-analysis and the matching-smoothing method.

RESULTS

Heterogeneity of Cerebrolysin treatment effects was moderate (I2=36.98-69.3%, H2=1.59-3.26) and mild (I2=18.33-32.39%, H2=1.22-1.48) for symptomatic and any HT, respectively. A positive impact of the Cerebrolysin treatment on HT and functional outcome was observed in patients with moderate (HTI=1) and high (HTI≥2) HT risk. However, the effect was neutral in those with low risk (HTI=0). In high HT risk patients, there was a steady decline in the rate of symptomatic (HTI=0 vs. HTI≥2: by 3.8%, p=0.120 vs. 14.3%, p<0.001) and any HT (HTI=0 vs. HTI≥2: by 0.6%, p=0.864 vs. 19.5%, p<0.001). Likewise, Cerebrolysin treatment resulted in an overall decrease in the mRS scores (HTI=0 vs. HTI≥2: by 2.1%, p=0.893 vs. 63%, p<0.001) with a reciprocal increase of the fraction with favorable outcome (HTI=0 vs. HTI≥2: by 2% p=0.634 vs. 19.2%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Clinically meaningful heterogeneity of Cerebrolysin treatment effects on HT and functional outcome was established in stroke patients. The Cerebrolysin positive impact was significant in those whose estimated on-admission HT risk was either moderate or high.