1
|
Talasaz AH, Sadeghipour P, Ortega-Paz L, Kakavand H, Aghakouchakzadeh M, Beavers C, Fanikos J, Eikelboom JW, Siegal DM, Monreal M, Jimenez D, Vaduganathan M, Castellucci LA, Cuker A, Barnes GD, Connors JM, Secemsky EA, Van Tassell BW, De Caterina R, Kurlander JE, Aminian A, Piazza G, Goldhaber SZ, Moores L, Middeldorp S, Kirtane AJ, Elkind MSV, Angiolillo DJ, Konstantinides S, Lip GYH, Stone GW, Cushman M, Krumholz HM, Mehran R, Bhatt DL, Bikdeli B. Optimizing antithrombotic therapy in patients with coexisting cardiovascular and gastrointestinal disease. Nat Rev Cardiol 2024; 21:574-592. [PMID: 38509244 DOI: 10.1038/s41569-024-01003-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
Balancing the safety and efficacy of antithrombotic agents in patients with gastrointestinal disorders is challenging because of the potential for interference with the absorption of antithrombotic drugs and for an increased risk of bleeding. In this Review, we address considerations for enteral antithrombotic therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease and gastrointestinal comorbidities. For those with gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), we summarize a general scheme for risk stratification and clinical evidence on risk reduction approaches, such as limiting the use of concomitant medications that increase the risk of GIB and the potential utility of gastrointestinal protection strategies (such as proton pump inhibitors or histamine type 2 receptor antagonists). Furthermore, we summarize the best available evidence and potential gaps in our knowledge on tailoring antithrombotic therapy in patients with active or recent GIB and in those at high risk of GIB but without active or recent GIB. Finally, we review the recommendations provided by major medical societies, highlighting the crucial role of teamwork and multidisciplinary discussions to customize the antithrombotic regimen in patients with coexisting cardiovascular and gastrointestinal diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Azita H Talasaz
- Arnold & Marie Schwartz College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Long Island University, New York, NY, USA
- Division of Pharmacy, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irvine Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Outcome Sciences, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Parham Sadeghipour
- Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Luis Ortega-Paz
- Division of Cardiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Hessam Kakavand
- Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Craig Beavers
- University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - John Fanikos
- Department of Pharmacy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - John W Eikelboom
- Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Deborah M Siegal
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Manuel Monreal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitari Germans Trials i Pujol, Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Jimenez
- Respiratory Department, Hospital Ramón y Cajal and Medicine Department, Universidad de Alcalá (IRYCIS), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias, ISCIII, Madrid, Spain
| | - Muthiah Vaduganathan
- Cardiovascular Medicine Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lana A Castellucci
- Department of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute at the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Adam Cuker
- Department of Medicine and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Geoffrey D Barnes
- Frankel Cardiovascular Center, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jean M Connors
- Hematology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eric A Secemsky
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Penn Cardiovascular Outcomes, Quality, & Evaluative Research Center, Cardiovascular Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Benjamin W Van Tassell
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Outcome Sciences, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Raffaele De Caterina
- Cardiology Division, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
- Fondazione Villa Serena per la Ricerca, Città Sant'Angelo, Pescara, Italy
| | - Jacob E Kurlander
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- VA Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ali Aminian
- Bariatric and Metabolic Institute, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Gregory Piazza
- Cardiovascular Medicine Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Thrombosis Research Group, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Samuel Z Goldhaber
- Cardiovascular Medicine Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Thrombosis Research Group, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lisa Moores
- F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Saskia Middeldorp
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences (RIHS), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Ajay J Kirtane
- Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA
- Division of Cardiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mitchell S V Elkind
- Department of Neurology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dominick J Angiolillo
- Division of Cardiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Stavros Konstantinides
- Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Johannes Gutenberg, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Gregory Y H Lip
- Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science at University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
- Danish Center for Health Services Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Gregg W Stone
- Mount Sinai Heart, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mary Cushman
- University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Harlan M Krumholz
- Yale New Haven Hospital/Yale Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Roxana Mehran
- Mount Sinai Heart, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Deepak L Bhatt
- Mount Sinai Heart, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Behnood Bikdeli
- Cardiovascular Medicine Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- VA Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- Yale New Haven Hospital/Yale Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, New Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dunbar KB. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Ann Intern Med 2024; 177:ITC113-ITC128. [PMID: 39133924 DOI: 10.7326/aitc202408200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a condition that occurs when reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus causes symptoms and/or complications. The prevalence of GERD in Western societies has been estimated at 30%, making it one of the most commonly encountered disorders in primary care. The spectrum of GERD includes typical symptoms of esophageal reflux (heartburn and/or regurgitation); esophageal injury (erosive esophagitis; stricture; Barrett esophagus; and, rarely, adenocarcinoma); and extraesophageal symptoms, such as hoarseness and chronic cough. Proper diagnosis and treatment of GERD includes symptom control, exclusion of other disorders, avoiding overuse of medications and invasive testing, and minimizing complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerry B Dunbar
- VA North Texas Healthcare System and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Teperikidis E, Boulmpou A, Potoupni V, Kundu S, Singh B, Papadopoulos C. Does the long-term administration of proton pump inhibitors increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes? A ChatGPT powered umbrella review. Acta Cardiol 2023; 78:980-988. [PMID: 37431972 DOI: 10.1080/00015385.2023.2231299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly prescribed for the treatment of acid-related disorders. In the context of coronary artery disease (CAD), PPIs are commonly prescribed along with antiplatelet medications. In fact, the potential interaction between these two classes of medications has been subject to much debate. This review aimed to summarise the findings from systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the casual relationship between PPI use (alone) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Furthermore, the recent release of ChatGPT has provided reviewers with a powerful natural language processing tool. We therefore aimed to assess the utility of ChatGPT in the systematic review process. METHODS A comprehensive search of PubMed was conducted to identify relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses published up to March 2023. Two independent reviewers assessed the eligibility of the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the methodological quality using AMSTAR 2.0. The population of interest was adults that received the medications of interest (PPIs) for a minimum of three months, regardless of indication. Control groups were defined as placebo or active comparators. The outcomes of interest were described under the general term MACE, which include cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal stroke. There were no restrictions with regards to time, but we only included reports in English. A different group of independent reviewers simultaneously ran the same process using ChatGPT. The results were then compared with the human generated results. RESULTS Seven systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included, involving a total of 46 randomised controlled trials and 33 observational studies. The studies examined the association between PPI use and MACE, including stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality. The results of the individual studies were conflicting, with some showing a positive association between PPI use and MACE, some showing no association, and others showing mixed results. However, the majority of the studies that included observational data reported a positive association between PPI use and MACE. Sensitivity analyses conducted in some studies did not significantly alter the primary results, suggesting that the findings were robust. Furthermore, ChatGPT was successfully prompted to execute most tasks involved in this review. We therefore present text that was generated by ChatGPT, including the abstract, introduction, results, and discussion sections. CONCLUSION The findings of this umbrella review suggest that a causal relationship between PPI use and an increased risk of MACE cannot be ruled out. Further research is needed to better understand this relationship, particularly the underlying mechanisms and potential confounding factors. Healthcare professionals should consider the long-term use of PPIs and carefully weigh the risks and benefits for each patient. Finally, ChatGPT was successfully prompted to execute most of the tasks involved in this review. We therefore feel that this tool will be of great assistance in the field of evidence synthesis in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleftherios Teperikidis
- Third Department of Cardiology, Ippokratio General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessa-loniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
- Clinical Research Unit, Special Unit for Biomedical Research and Education (SUBRE), School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Aristi Boulmpou
- Third Department of Cardiology, Ippokratio General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessa-loniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Victoria Potoupni
- Third Department of Cardiology, Ippokratio General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessa-loniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Satyabrata Kundu
- Department of Pharmacology, ISF College of Pharmacy, Moga, India
| | - Balpreet Singh
- Department of Biochemistry, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India
| | - Christodoulos Papadopoulos
- Third Department of Cardiology, Ippokratio General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessa-loniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abukhalil AD, Al Sheikh T, Muallem S, Al-Shami N, Naseef HA. Prevalence and Safety of Prescribing PPIs with Clopidogrel in Palestine. Patient Prefer Adherence 2023; 17:749-759. [PMID: 36970301 PMCID: PMC10038207 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s404139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly prescribed medications that are thought to increase the risk of cardiovascular events because they reduce the effectiveness of clopidogrel via shared hepatic pathways. OBJECTIVE This study examined the prevalence of concomitant prescribing of clopidogrel/PPI among patients diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome and the adverse cardiovascular event associated with this interaction. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted by retrieving patient data from the Nat Health Insurance claims processor database in Palestine. Adults diagnosed with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) from 2019 through 2021 who were prescribed clopidogrel or clopidogrel in combination with a PPI were included in the study. Endpoints were adverse cardiac events, including readmission for revascularization during the first year of treatment. RESULTS The study included 443 patients; the prevalence of prescribing concomitant clopidogrel with a PPI was 74.7%, whereas 49.2% were prescribed interacting PPI (omeprazole, esomeprazole, and lansoprazole). 59 (13.3%) of participants experienced a cardiovascular event within 1 year of starting therapy, including 27 (12.4%) patients who had a cardiovascular event while taking an interacting PPI. No significant association was found between PPI administration and increased CV event risk in patients receiving concomitant clopidogrel and PPIs therapy (p = 0.579). CONCLUSION In this study, we observed a high prevalence of prescribing a PPI in combination with clopidogrel, regardless of the FDA recommendations. No significant increase in cardiovascular events was observed in patients receiving concomitant clopidogrel and PPI therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdallah Damin Abukhalil
- Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Nursing and Health Professions, Birzeit University, Birzeit, West Bank, Palestine
- Correspondence: Abdallah Damin Abukhalil; Ni’meh Al-Shami, Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Nursing and Health Professions, Birzeit University, Birzeit, West Bank, Palestine, Tel/Fax +970-2-2982017, Email ;
| | - Tala Al Sheikh
- Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Nursing and Health Professions, Birzeit University, Birzeit, West Bank, Palestine
| | - Sandra Muallem
- Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Nursing and Health Professions, Birzeit University, Birzeit, West Bank, Palestine
| | - Ni’meh Al-Shami
- Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Nursing and Health Professions, Birzeit University, Birzeit, West Bank, Palestine
| | - Hani A Naseef
- Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Nursing and Health Professions, Birzeit University, Birzeit, West Bank, Palestine
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kim Y, Seo SI, Lee KJ, Kim J, Yoo JJ, Seo WW, Shin WG. Risks of long-term use of proton pump inhibitor on ischemic vascular events: A distributed network analysis of 5 real-world observational Korean databases using a common data model. Int J Stroke 2022; 18:590-598. [PMID: 36190338 DOI: 10.1177/17474930221133219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are frequently prescribed drugs. However, it has been suggested that they are associated with an increased risk of ischemic vascular events (IVE) including stroke, although the data are inconsistent. AIMS We investigated the association between PPIs use and IVE in five observational Korean databases using a common data model (CDM). METHODS This study included patient-based retrospective, observational cohort data of subjects aged over 18 years between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2020, from five medical centers as part of the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) CDM. Subjects who were included in both cohorts or had a previous history of ischemic stroke were excluded. After propensity matching, 8007 propensity-matched pairs between the PPIs and H2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) users were included in this study. RESULTS In the 1:1 propensity score matching with 8007 in each group, long-term PPIs use (⩾365 days) was not associated with ischemic stroke (odds ratio (OR) = 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-1.56; I2 = 57%), ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (OR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.71-1.48; I2 = 53%), and net adverse clinical events (OR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.83-1.40; I2 = 47%) compared with H2RAs users. CONCLUSIONS Our analysis in a large dataset found no evidence that long-term use of PPIs was associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yerim Kim
- Department of Neurology, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung In Seo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung Joo Lee
- University Industry Foundation, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Jinseob Kim
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Jin Yoo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Won-Woo Seo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Woon Geon Shin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ma Y, Li S, Yang H, Zhang Y, Li H, Zhou L, Lin J, Chen Y, Hou Y, Zhang X, Liu T, Zhou X, Wang Y. Acid suppressants use and risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in middle-aged and older adults. Atherosclerosis 2022; 358:47-54. [PMID: 36113328 DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2022.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Concerns regarding adverse events associated with the use of acid suppressants have increased. However, the impact of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) on the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains unknown. This study aimed to estimate the risk of ASCVD in association with the use of PPIs and H2RAs. METHODS This prospective cohort study included participants without cardiovascular diseases or anti-hypertensive treatment at baseline (2006-2010) in the UK Biobank. The outcomes were ASCVD and each subtype (coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, peripheral artery disease, and ischemic stroke). The association was estimated by Cox proportional-hazards models. RESULTS Among 316,730 individuals (aged 50-88 years), during a median of 12.5 years of follow-up, we documented 13,503 (4.3%) incident ASCVD. Regular PPIs use was associated with a higher risk of ASCVD (HR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.09-1.23) and every subtype of ASCVD. Among each type of PPIs, omeprazole (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.11-1.28), lansoprazole (HR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.02-1.22), and pantoprazole (HR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.00-1.97) were associated with a higher risk of ASCVD. Stratification analysis showed that PPIs use was associated with a higher risk of ASCVD among individuals without indications of medications for PPIs. In addition, use of H2RAs was not related to the risk of ASCVD (HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.85-1.11). CONCLUSIONS PPIs were associated with increased risk of ASCVD, particularly amongst participants without indications for medication. Our findings are of important practical significance and suggest that clinicians should be cautious in prophylactic use of PPIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Ma
- School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Shu Li
- School of Management, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
| | - Hongxi Yang
- Department of Bioinformatics, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Yuan Zhang
- School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Huiping Li
- School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China; Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Lihui Zhou
- School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Jing Lin
- School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Yanchun Chen
- School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Yabing Hou
- School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Xinyu Zhang
- School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Tong Liu
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Xin Zhou
- Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Yaogang Wang
- School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China; School of Integrative Medicine, Public Health Science and Engineering College, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ben Ghezala I, Luu M, Bardou M. An update on drug-drug interactions associated with proton pump inhibitors. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2022; 18:337-346. [PMID: 35787720 DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2022.2098107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) block the gastric H/K-ATPase, therefore inhibiting acid gastric secretion, leading to an increased pH (>4). They account for an extremely high number of prescriptions worldwide. Numerous drug-drug interactions have been described with PPIs, but all the described interactions do not have clinical significance. AREAS COVERED This review will discuss the latest updates on drug-drug interactions with PPIs, focusing on the last ten-year publications in the following areas: anti-infective agents, anticancer drugs, antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants, and antidiabetics. EXPERT OPINION Although pharmacokinetic interactions of PPIs have been described with many drugs, their clinical relevance remains controversial. However, given the extremely high number of people being treated with PPIs, clinicians should remain vigilant for interactions that may be clinically significant and require dose adjustment or therapeutic monitoring. Interestingly, not all PPIs have the same pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile, with some having a strong potential to inhibit CYP2C19, such as omeprazole, esomeprazole and lansoprazole, while others, pantoprazole, rabeprazole and dexlansoprazole, are weak CYP2C19 inhibitors. These may be preferred depending on co-prescribed treatments.In addition, new formulations have been developed to prevent some of the gastric pH-dependent drug interactions and should be evaluated in further large-scale prospective comparative studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inès Ben Ghezala
- INSERM, CIC1432, Plurithematic Unit, 21079 Dijon, France.,Centre d'Investigations Cliniques, Dijon Bourgogne University Hospital, 21079 Dijon, France.,Ophthalmology Department, Dijon Bourgogne University Hospital, 21079 Dijon, France
| | - Maxime Luu
- INSERM, CIC1432, Plurithematic Unit, 21079 Dijon, France.,Centre d'Investigations Cliniques, Dijon Bourgogne University Hospital, 21079 Dijon, France
| | - Marc Bardou
- INSERM, CIC1432, Plurithematic Unit, 21079 Dijon, France.,Centre d'Investigations Cliniques, Dijon Bourgogne University Hospital, 21079 Dijon, France.,Gastroenterology Department, Dijon Bourgogne University Hospital, 21079 Dijon, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Factors Associated with Platelet Activation-Recent Pharmaceutical Approaches. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23063301. [PMID: 35328719 PMCID: PMC8955963 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23063301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Platelets are at the forefront of human health and disease following the advances in their research presented in past decades. Platelet activation, their most crucial function, although beneficial in the case of vascular injury, may represent the initial step for thrombotic complications characterizing various pathologic states, primarily atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. In this review, we initially summarize the structural and functional characteristics of platelets. Next, we focus on the process of platelet activation and its associated factors, indicating the potential molecular mechanisms involving inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and miRs. Finally, an overview of the available antiplatelet agents is being portrayed, together with agents possessing off-set platelet-inhibitory actions, while an extensive presentation of drugs under investigation is being given.
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhai Y, Ye X, Hu F, Xu J, Guo X, Lin Z, Zhou X, Guo Z, Cao Y, He J. Updated Insights on Cardiac and Vascular Risks of Proton Pump Inhibitors: A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Study. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:767987. [PMID: 35282344 PMCID: PMC8913586 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.767987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the most widely prescribed medications in clinical practice. However, there are also concerns about the potential risks of long-term PPI use. The present study aimed to examine the safety of PPIs and summarize their potential cardiac and vascular risks in a real-world setting. Methods This pharmacovigilance study extracted records between January 2015 and December 2019 from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. The association of seven PPI medications with cardiac and vascular events (CVEs) were evaluated. Two established pharmacovigilance methods, reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information components (IC) based statistical shrinkage, were used to measure disproportionality. Results In total 62,140 CVE records associated with PPI use were investigated. Women showed a higher proportion (54.37%) of PPI-associated CVEs. The median time from PPI initiation to CVE onset was 97 [interquartile range (IQR): 8–491] days, with the shortest median time of 42 days (IQR: 2–277 days) for esomeprazole, and the longest time of 389 days (IQR: 0–525 days) for dexlansoprazole. Although PPIs were not associated with elevated CVE risks compared those of the whole database (IC025/ROR025 = −0.39/0.74), various signals emerged. Despite some similarities exist between the PPIs, their cardiac and vascular safety profiles varied significantly. Pantoprazole showed the broadest spectrum of signals, from thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (IC025/ROR025 = 0.01/1.08) to renal haemangioma (IC025/ROR025 = 3.14/9.58). Esomeprazole showed the second-broadest spectrum of toxicities, ranging from duodenal ulcer hemorrhage (IC025/ROR025 = 0.07/1.28) to hypertensive nephropathy (IC025/ROR025 = 4.09/18.72). Vascular signals were more dominant than cardiac signals, suggesting that vascular function was more heavily affected. Hypertensive nephropathy, renal haemangioma, renal artery stenosis, and renal infarct had strong signals across most PPI regimens and merited further attention. Conclusions PPIs may inflict various CVEs, particularly those involving the vascular system, on the users. Given the wide range of onset times and different toxicity profiles for various PPI medications, they should be prescribed with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yinghong Zhai
- School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Health Statistics, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaofei Ye
- Department of Health Statistics, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Fangyuan Hu
- Department of Health Statistics, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Medical Service, Naval Hospital of Eastern Theater, Zhoushan, China
| | - Jinfang Xu
- Department of Health Statistics, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaojing Guo
- Department of Health Statistics, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhen Lin
- Department of Health Statistics, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiang Zhou
- School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Health Statistics, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhijian Guo
- Department of Health Statistics, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yang Cao
- Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Jia He
- School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Health Statistics, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Jia He
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Veettil SK, Sadoyu S, Bald EM, Chandran VP, Khuu SAT, Pitak P, Lee YY, Nair AB, Antony PT, Ford AC, Chaiyakunapruk N. Association of proton-pump inhibitor use with adverse health outcomes: A systematic umbrella review of meta-analyses of cohort studies and randomised controlled trials. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2022; 88:1551-1566. [PMID: 34622475 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS The aim was to perform an umbrella review to summarise the existing evidence on proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) use and adverse outcomes and to grade the certainty of evidence. METHODS Electronic databases were searched up to July 2021 for meta-analyses of cohort studies and/or randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Summary effect sizes from a random-effects model, between-study heterogeneity, 95% prediction interval, small-study effect, excess significance and credibility ceilings were devised to classify the credibility of evidence from meta-analyses of cohort studies, whereas the GRADE approach was used for meta-analyses of RCTs. RESULTS In meta-analyses of cohort studies, 52 of the 91 examined associations were statistically significant (P ≤ .05). Convincing evidence emerged from main analysis for the association between PPI use and risk of all-site fracture and chronic kidney disease in the elderly population. However, none of these associations remained supported by convincing evidence after sensitivity analyses. The use of PPI is also associated with an increased risk of mortality due to COVID-19 infection and other related adverse outcomes, but the quality of evidence was weak. In meta-analyses of RCTs, 38 of the 63 examined associations were statistically significant. However, no associations were supported by high or moderate-quality evidence. CONCLUSION This study's findings imply that most putative adverse outcomes associated with PPI use may not be supported by high-quality evidence and are likely to have been affected by underlying confounding factors. Future research is needed to confirm the causal association between PPI use and risk of fracture and chronic kidney disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sajesh K Veettil
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Saranrat Sadoyu
- Department of Pharmacy, Pakchongnana Hospital, Pakchong, Thailand
| | - Elizabeth M Bald
- College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Viji P Chandran
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | | | | | - Yeong Yeh Lee
- School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Malaysia
- GI Function and Motility Unit, Hospital USM, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Malaysia
| | - Athira Balakrishnan Nair
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Paul T Antony
- Department of Rheumatology, Amala Institute of Medical Sciences, Kerala, India
| | - Alexander C Ford
- Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
ACG Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2022; 117:27-56. [PMID: 34807007 PMCID: PMC8754510 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 308] [Impact Index Per Article: 154.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) continues to be among the most common diseases seen by gastroenterologists, surgeons, and primary care physicians. Our understanding of the varied presentations of GERD, enhancements in diagnostic testing, and approach to patient management have evolved. During this time, scrutiny of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has increased considerably. Although PPIs remain the medical treatment of choice for GERD, multiple publications have raised questions about adverse events, raising doubts about the safety of long-term use and increasing concern about overprescribing of PPIs. New data regarding the potential for surgical and endoscopic interventions have emerged. In this new document, we provide updated, evidence-based recommendations and practical guidance for the evaluation and management of GERD, including pharmacologic, lifestyle, surgical, and endoscopic management. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system was used to evaluate the evidence and the strength of recommendations. Key concepts and suggestions that as of this writing do not have sufficient evidence to grade are also provided.
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) continues to be among the most common diseases seen by gastroenterologists, surgeons, and primary care physicians. Our understanding of the varied presentations of GERD, enhancements in diagnostic testing, and approach to patient management have evolved. During this time, scrutiny of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has increased considerably. Although PPIs remain the medical treatment of choice for GERD, multiple publications have raised questions about adverse events, raising doubts about the safety of long-term use and increasing concern about overprescribing of PPIs. New data regarding the potential for surgical and endoscopic interventions have emerged. In this new document, we provide updated, evidence-based recommendations and practical guidance for the evaluation and management of GERD, including pharmacologic, lifestyle, surgical, and endoscopic management. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system was used to evaluate the evidence and the strength of recommendations. Key concepts and suggestions that as of this writing do not have sufficient evidence to grade are also provided.
Collapse
|
13
|
Guo H, Ye Z, Huang R. Clinical Outcomes of Concomitant Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:694698. [PMID: 34408652 PMCID: PMC8366318 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.694698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The safety and efficacy associated with the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) by patients with coronary artery disease receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) remain unclear. Methods: The evaluated outcomes included combined major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality, and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. A random effects meta-analysis, stratified by study design, was performed and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Results: In total, 6 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (6930 patients) and 16 observational studies (183,546 patients) were included. Analysis of RCTs showed that there were no significant differences in the incidences of MACEs (risk ratio [RR] = 0.89 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.75-1.05]), MI (RR = 0.93 [95% CI = 0.76-1.15]), and all-cause mortality (RR = 0.79 [95% CI = 0.50-1.23]) in the PPI groups vs. the non-PPI groups. Pooled data from observational studies revealed an inconsistent association between the use of each PPI subtype and the increased risks of MACEs during clopidogrel treatment. There was no increased risk of MACEs or all-cause mortality associated with the use of PPIs (as a class) and other P2Y12 inhibitors. Both the RCTs and observational studies revealed that the use of PPIs significantly reduced the risks of GI bleeding. Conclusion: The use of PPIs was associated with a reduced risk of GI bleeding in patients treated with DAPT after percutaneous coronary intervention or acute coronary syndrome. There was no clear evidence of an association between the use of PPIs and adverse cardiovascular events. Clinical Trial Registration: identifier [CRD42020190315].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Rongchong Huang
- Cardiac Center/Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Maret-Ouda J, Santoni G, Xie S, Rosengren A, Lagergren J. Proton Pump Inhibitor and Clopidogrel Use After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Risk of Major Cardiovascular Events. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2021; 36:1121-1128. [PMID: 34241731 DOI: 10.1007/s10557-021-07219-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Due to shared hepatic metabolism, concomitant medication with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and clopidogrel might reduce the effectiveness of clopidogrel in the prevention of cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to examine the risk of major cardiovascular events after PCI comparing patients who used clopidogrel together with PPI with those who used clopidogrel alone. METHODS This Swedish nationwide cohort study included patients who received clopidogrel after primary PCI in 2005-2019. Patients were followed for up to 12 months after PCI. Data were retrieved from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Registry, Patient Registry, Cancer Registry, and Cause of Death Registry. Multivariable Cox regression provided hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for cardiovascular events comparing PPI users (exposed) with non-users of PPI (non-exposed). The HRs were adjusted for sex, age, comorbidity, calendar period, obesity, diabetes, anti-diabetic medication, tobacco-related diseases, hypertension, and congestive heart failure. RESULTS The cohort included 99,836 patients who received clopidogrel after primary PCI. Among these, 35,772 (35.8%) received concomitant PPI. Compared to non-users, PPI users had increased adjusted HRs of all study outcomes, i.e., the main outcome myocardial infarction (HR = 1.23, 95% CI 1.15-1.32) and the secondary outcomes coronary heart disease (HR = 1.28, 95% CI 1.24-1.33), stroke (HR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.05-1.40), and death due to coronary heart disease (HR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.37-1.69). The results were similar in analyses including both primary and secondary PCIs. CONCLUSIONS In patients who receive clopidogrel after PCI, concomitant use of PPI seems to increase the risk of major cardiovascular events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Maret-Ouda
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Retzius Street 13a, 4th Floor, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden. .,Centre for Clinical Research Sörmland, Uppsala University, Eskilstuna, Sweden.
| | - Giola Santoni
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Retzius Street 13a, 4th Floor, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Shaohua Xie
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Retzius Street 13a, 4th Floor, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Annika Rosengren
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jesper Lagergren
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Retzius Street 13a, 4th Floor, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden.,School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Catapano JS, Srinivasan VM, Wakim AA, Lundberg JN, Rutledge C, Cole TS, Baranoski JF, Fredrickson VL, Rahmani R, Albuquerque FC, Ducruet AF. Omeprazole-clopidogrel interaction and neurovascular complications after flow-diverter device placement. J Neurointerv Surg 2021; 14:380-383. [PMID: 34083398 DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Omeprazole is a common proton pump inhibitor that interferes with the hepatic activation of clopidogrel and potentially reduces its platelet-inhibitory effect. Omeprazole has been shown to increase P2Y12 levels and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients treated with drug-eluting stents. However, omeprazole use among patients treated with flow-diverting stents for intracranial aneurysms has not been evaluated. METHODS All patients with placement of a flow-diverting device for treatment of an intracranial aneurysm at a tertiary institution from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2018, were retrospectively analyzed. Inclusion criteria included documented clopidogrel administration, available P2Y12 levels, and thorough documentation of administration of other medications, including omeprazole. RESULTS A total of 138 patients met the inclusion criteria. Sixteen patients (12%) were receiving omeprazole and clopidogrel at treatment. P2Y12 reactivity was significantly greater in the omeprazole cohort (mean P2Y12 level, 250 P2Y12 reaction units (PRU)) than in the control cohort (mean P2Y12 level, 112PRU) (P<0.001). Furthermore, a greater proportion of patients had a P2Y12 level >180 PRU in the omeprazole cohort (14 of 16 [88%] vs 24 of 122 [20%]; P<0.001; OR [95% CI], 29 [6-134]). CONCLUSION Omeprazole was associated with a significant increase in the mean P2Y12 reactivity level among patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with flow-diverting devices who received clopidogrel. However, receipt of omeprazole was not associated with an increased risk of ischemic events or stent stenosis. For neuroendovascular patients who are treated with a flow diverter while receiving clopidogrel, alternative gastrointestinal medication regimens should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua S Catapano
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Visish M Srinivasan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Andre A Wakim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Jaclyn N Lundberg
- Department of General Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix Health Sciences Campus, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Caleb Rutledge
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Tyler S Cole
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Jacob F Baranoski
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Vance L Fredrickson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Redi Rahmani
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Felipe C Albuquerque
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Andrew F Ducruet
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Trials of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Lack Strategies to Ensure Appropriate Gastroprotection. Am J Gastroenterol 2021; 116:821-824. [PMID: 33982954 PMCID: PMC8119932 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gastrointestinal bleeding is a morbid complication of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). We evaluated the extent to which contemporary trials of DAPT included steps to ensure appropriate use of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) gastroprotection and reported rates of PPI use. METHODS A methodological review of randomized trials comparing varying durations of DAPT after percutaneous coronary intervention. RESULTS Among 21 trials, none incorporated protocol procedures or guidance for prescribing PPIs. Five reported rates of PPI use (range 25.6-69.1%). DISCUSSION PPI gastroprotection is overlooked in major trials of DAPT. Appropriate use of PPI gastroprotection represents an important opportunity to improve patient safety.
Collapse
|
17
|
Brown JP, Tazare JR, Williamson E, Mansfield KE, Evans SJ, Tomlinson LA, Bhaskaran K, Smeeth L, Wing K, Douglas IJ. Proton pump inhibitors and risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality: A cohort study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2021; 87:3150-3161. [PMID: 33393677 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Revised: 12/05/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To investigate the association between proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and both all-cause and cause-specific mortality. METHODS We conducted a cohort study using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD database. We compared 733 885 new users of PPIs to 124 410 new users of H2 receptor antagonists (H2Ras). In a secondary analysis we compared 689 602 PPI new users to 1 361 245 nonusers of acid suppression therapy matched on age, sex and calendar year. Hazard ratios for all-cause and cause-specific mortality were estimated using propensity score (PS) weighted Cox models. RESULTS PPI prescription was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality, with hazard ratios decreasing considerably by increasing adjustment (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.62-1.69; PS-weighted HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.33-1.44; high-dimensional PS-weighted HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.26-1.37). Short-term associations were observed with mortality from causes where a causal short-term association is unexpected (eg, lung cancer mortality: PS-weighted HR at 6 months 1.77, 95% CI 1.39-2.25). Adjusted hazard ratios were substantially higher when compared to nonusers (PS-weighted HR all-cause mortality 1.96, 95% CI 1.94-1.99) rather than H2RA users. CONCLUSIONS PPI prescription was strongly associated with all-cause and cause-specific mortality. However, the change in hazard ratios (a) by increasing adjustment and (b) between comparator groups indicates that residual confounding is likely to explain the association between poor health outcomes and PPI use, and fully accounting for this using observational data may not be possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy P Brown
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - John R Tazare
- Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Elizabeth Williamson
- Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Kathryn E Mansfield
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Stephen J Evans
- Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Laurie A Tomlinson
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Krishnan Bhaskaran
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Liam Smeeth
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Kevin Wing
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Ian J Douglas
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dharmarajan TS. The Use and Misuse of Proton Pump Inhibitors: An Opportunity for Deprescribing. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2020; 22:15-22. [PMID: 33321078 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.09.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Revised: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are proven medications of choice for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), acid-related disorders, erosive esophagitis, Barrett esophagus, prevention of gastrointestinal bleeding while on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, eosinophilic esophagitis, peptic ulcer disease, stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients, and other indications. Best practice guidelines from several sources on the appropriate indications and duration of PPI therapy have been summarized for easy assimilation. Individualized decision with regard to PPI use is illustrated by case vignettes; best approaches are provided. The significant increase in use of PPIs for ill-defined indications over the years, associated adverse outcomes with long-term use, and consequent increase in health care costs have drawn much attention. Adverse outcomes due to PPI therapy may be categorized as unrelated or related to gastric acid inhibition. Examples of outcomes unrelated to acid inhibition include allergic reactions, acute interstitial nephritis, chronic kidney disease, poor cardiovascular outcomes, dementia, and drug interactions; consequences of acid inhibition include gastrointestinal infections, pneumonia, nutrient deficiencies, fractures, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Provider awareness regarding best practice guidelines on PPI use and imparting pertinent education to patients may be the rational approach to safe and effective PPI therapy. In individuals in whom the drug is not indicated, efforts at deprescribing the PPI may be attempted following discussion with the patient. Approaches include stopping the drug, reducing the dose or using "on-demand" therapy after completing the course of treatment for the specific indication. Barriers to successful deprescribing exist. Follow-up is recommended for recurrence of manifestations; in the event of recurrence, the PPI may need to be re-instituted. PPIs are valuable, irreplaceable drugs in the prevention and treatment of certain disorders for specific durations of time. Evidence nevertheless suggests that excessive and inappropriately prolonged use of PPIs is associated with a broad range of adverse effects. Education of provider and patient, stewardship, and motivation are key to appropriate use of PPIs for the right indications. Key implications for practice are offered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thiruvinvamalai S Dharmarajan
- Department of Medicine, Geriatric Medicine, Geriatric Medicine Fellowship Program, Montefiore Medical Center, Wakefield Campus, Bronx, NY, USA; Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Dhar A, Maw F, Dallal HJ, Attwood S. Side effects of drug treatments for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: current controversies. Frontline Gastroenterol 2020; 13:45-49. [PMID: 34966532 PMCID: PMC8666855 DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2019-101386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2020] [Revised: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The two main drugs used in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease are proton pump inhibitors and histamine-2 receptor antagonists and both these agents have been implicated in a number of adverse effects, leading to considerable controversies related to their long-term use. This paper is aimed at a critical review of the published literature and the clinical significance of these reported side effects, most of which are associations rather than causal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anjan Dhar
- Gastroenterology, County Durham & Darlington NHS Foundation Trust, Darlington, UK
| | - Frances Maw
- Pharmacy, County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust, Darlington, Darlington, UK
| | - Helen Jane Dallal
- Gastroenterology, County Durham & Darlington NHS Foundation Trust, Darlington, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Koyyada A. Long-term use of proton pump inhibitors as a risk factor for various adverse manifestations. Therapie 2020; 76:13-21. [PMID: 32718584 DOI: 10.1016/j.therap.2020.06.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Revised: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The long-term use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can lead to increased gastric pH, hypochlorhydria and in some cases to achlorhydria when compared to other acid-suppressing agents like histamine-2 (H2) receptor blockers and antacids. These consequences by the use of long-term PPIs may lead to significant vitamin (B12 and C) and mineral (iron, calcium and magnesium) deficiencies which needs gastric acid for their absorption and bioavailability. Long-term use of PPIs by the pregnant patients may impose a potential risk of congenital malformations. Various studies have recommended the life style modifications and antacid use as first choice among pregnant womens by preserving PPIs (omeprazole as a safe choice of PPI) for severe conditions of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The long-term acid suppression by PPIs can also lead to enteric, respiratory and urinary tract infections. The hypochlorhydria by chronic PPIs use may induce hypergastrinemia, which ultimately mediates the gastric polyps, gastric carcinoids and gastric cancer. The concomitant use of PPIs with antiplatelet drugs like clopidogrel can impose the patients to major adverse cardiac events. This review has enlisted the comprehensive information regarding the adverse effects induced by long-term use of PPIs and their possible relations. Considerable studies like case-control, randomized trials, cohort studies and meta-analysis were reported in supporting these adverse effects. The clinicians and patients should be cautious about these effects so that they can avoid the serious outcomes. PPIs should be avoided for long-term use mainly in older adults unless there is a proper indication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arun Koyyada
- GITAM Institute of Pharmacy, GITAM University, Rushikonda, Visakhapatnam, 530045 Andhra Pradesh, India.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Proton pump inhibitors and risk of liver cancer and mortality in patients with chronic liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2020; 76:851-866. [PMID: 32172363 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-020-02854-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Epidemiological studies investigating the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) on the risk of liver cancer and/or mortality among persons with chronic liver disease (CLD) have reported conflicting results. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the impact of PPI use on liver cancer and/or death among patients with CLD. METHODS The core databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library were searched through January 2020. We included studies, evaluating the association between PPIs and liver cancer or mortality among patients with CLD including randomized controlled, nonrandomized controlled, and observational studies. We used inverse-variance random-effects models to estimate the pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for liver cancer or mortality. RESULTS Eleven studies including 173,894 patients were selected. In three studies, individuals with CLD who used PPIs had a 67% greater risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared to nonusers (RR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.12-2.50; I2 = 92%). Combining data from the eight studies relating PPI to overall mortality, we observed a 57% increased risk of mortality in PPI users with CLD compared to CLD nonusers (RR: 1.57; 95% CI, 1.24-1.99; I2 = 69%). CONCLUSION PPI use was associated with an increased risk of HCC and mortality in patients with CLD suggesting that PPI prescriptions in patients with CLD should be considered carefully.
Collapse
|
22
|
Manolis AA, Manolis TA, Melita H, Katsiki N, Manolis AS. Proton pump inhibitors and cardiovascular adverse effects: Real or surreal worries? Eur J Intern Med 2020; 72:15-26. [PMID: 31796246 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2019.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2019] [Revised: 11/21/2019] [Accepted: 11/24/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the most widely prescribed agents, either for treatment or prophylaxis of gastrointestinal (GI) disease, that are often administered for prolonged or chronic use. Patients with cardiovascular (CV) disease frequently receive PPIs for prophylaxis against GI bleeding due to common use of antithrombotic drugs. Over the last several years there is a growing number of reports associating chronic PPI use with a variety of serious CV and non-CV adverse effects. In this context, PPI use has been independently associated with an increased risk of CV morbidity (myocardial infarction, stroke, other CV events) and mortality. However, the critique remains that these data do not largely derive from randomized controlled trials. On the other hand, in certain conditions, the benefits of PPIs may outweigh the risks of adverse CV effects. As the indications for prolonged, particularly lifelong, prophylactic use of PPIs are not compelling and in the light of evidence of serious CV and other adverse effects, clinicians have to reconsider such long-term use of these drugs. Importantly, histamine 2 blockers have not been found to be associated with increased CV risk and thus may be an alternative therapeutic option in certain patients. These issues are amply discussed together with the potential mechanisms of these pleiotropic and off-target effects of PPIs, which are also depicted in an illustrative schema; data are also presented on differential effects of specific agents involved, alternative modes of therapy available, and relevant current guidelines on this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Niki Katsiki
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Diabetes Center, Medical School, AHEPA University Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Antonis S Manolis
- Third and First Department of Cardiology, Athens University School of Medicine, Ippokrateio Hospital, Vas. Sofias 114, Athens 115 27, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|