The effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors on cardiorespiratory fitness capacity: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of SGLT-2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

To investigate the efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors in patients with heart failure (HF) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

A manual search was conducted in 3 prestigious English databases, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science, for studies published within the last decade, from July 2014 to July 2024. The extracted literature was synthesized to analyze the efficacy outcomes, survival prognostic indicators, and safety profiles of SGLT-2 inhibitors in patients with HF and T2DM. The Cochrane bias risk assessment scale was used as a tool to evaluate the quality of the literature, and Review Manager 5.4 software was used to create the bias risk chart. Data analysis and merging were completed with the help of Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 15.0 statistical software.

RESULTS

Twelve studies encompassing 9509 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The results revealed that compared to the control group, the SGLT-2 inhibitor-treated group demonstrated significantly greater reductions in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index [mean difference (MD) = -7.25, 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] (-9.83, -4.67)], brain natriuretic peptide levels [MD = -36.96, 95% CI (-63.51, -10.41)], and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide [MD = -519.27, 95% CI (-660.77, -377.78)]. Furthermore, the SGLT-2 inhibitor-treated group exhibited significantly higher increases in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores [MD = 3.32, 95% CI (3.30, 3.34)], indicating improved quality of life. Additionally, the incidence of adverse events was significantly lower in the SGLT-2 inhibitor-treated group compared to the control group [OR = 0.78, 95% CI (0.69, 0.88)]. The pooled results of the meta-analysis indicated that SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy reduced the risk of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization by 23%, the risk of cardiovascular death by 19%, and the risk of all-cause mortality by 9%.

CONCLUSION

SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy significantly reduced the risks of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and hospitalization for HF in patients with HF and T2DM. Additionally, SGLT-2 inhibitors significantly improve cardiac function, decrease the incidence of adverse events, and enhance the quality of life in these patients.

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Sodium Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and Cardiorespiratory Fitness Interaction

INTRODUCTION

Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is a stronger predictor of mortality than traditional risk factors and is a neglected vital sign of health. Enhanced fitness is a cornerstone in diabetes management and is most often delivered concurrently with pharmacological agents, which can have an opposing impact, as has been reported with metformin. Considering the rapid evolution of diabetes medications with improved cardiovascular outcomes, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, it is of importance to consider the influence of these vis-a-vis effects on CRF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Combining the words glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors with cardiorespiratory fitness, an online search was done using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Scientific Electronic Library Online, and Cochrane.

RESULTS

There were only a few randomized controlled studies that included CRF, and the results were mostly neutral. A handful of smaller studies detected improved CRF using sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in patients with congestive heart failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Since CRF is a superior prognosticator for cardiovascular outcomes and both medications can cause lean muscle mass loss, the current review highlights the paucity of relevant interactive analysis.

The Effectiveness of Lifestyle Interventions in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To perform a network meta-analysis to determine the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions in exercise tolerance and quality of life (QoL) in people with HFpEF.

METHODS

Ten databases were searched for randomized controlled trials that evaluated a diet and/or exercise intervention in people with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction until May 2022. The co-primary outcomes were peak oxygen uptake (V̇O2peak) and Quality of Life as assessed by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ). We synthesized data using network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 13 trials, including a total of 869 participants, and we incorporated 6 different interventions. Improvements in V̇O2peak compared to controls were seen for all exercise interventions (2.88 [95% CI: 1.36; 4.39] mL/kg/min) for high-intensity interval training (HIIT); 2.37 [95% CI: 1.02; 3.71] mL/kg/min for low-intensity exercise (LIT) combined with a hypocaloric diet; 2.05 [95% CI: 0.81; 3.29] mL/kg/min for moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT); 1.94 [95% CI: 0.59; 3.29] mL/kg/min for LIT; 1.85 [95% CI: 0.27; 3.44] mL/kg/min for MICT combined with resistance training) but not a hypocaloric diet alone (1.26 [95%CI: -0.08; 2.61] mL/kg/min). Only HIIT (-14.45 [95%CI: -24.81; -4.10] points) and LIT (95% CI: -11.05 [-20.55; -1.54] mL/kg/min) significantly improved MLHFQ scores. Network meta-analysis indicated that HIIT was the most effective intervention for improving both V̇O2peak (mean improvement 2.88 [95% CI: 1.36; 4.39] mL/kg/min, follow-up range, 4 weeks-3 years) and QoL (-14.45 [95% CI: -24.81; -4.10] points, follow-up range, 12-26 weeks) compared to usual care.

CONCLUSIONS

This network meta-analysis indicates that HIIT is the most effective lifestyle intervention studied to improve exercise capacity and QoL, with mean improvements exceeding the minimum clinically meaningful thresholds. HIIT is likely to be an underused management strategy in HFpEF, but further studies are needed to confirm long-term improvements in symptoms and clinical outcomes.

Understanding the variation in exercise responses to guide personalized physical activity prescriptions

Understanding the factors that contribute to exercise response variation is the first step in achieving the goal of developing personalized exercise prescriptions. This review discusses the key molecular and other mechanistic factors, both extrinsic and intrinsic, that influence exercise responses and health outcomes. Extrinsic characteristics include the timing and dose of exercise, circadian rhythms, sleep habits, dietary interactions, and medication use, whereas intrinsic factors such as sex, age, hormonal status, race/ethnicity, and genetics are also integral. The molecular transducers of exercise (i.e., genomic/epigenomic, proteomic/post-translational, transcriptomic, metabolic/metabolomic, and lipidomic elements) are considered with respect to variability in physiological and health outcomes. Finally, this review highlights the current challenges that impede our ability to develop effective personalized exercise prescriptions. The Molecular Transducers of Physical Activity Consortium (MoTrPAC) aims to fill significant gaps in the understanding of exercise response variability, yet further investigations are needed to address additional health outcomes across all populations.

Bexagliflozin: First Approval

Bexagliflozin (BRENZAVVY™) is an orally administered potent inhibitor of sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SGLT-2). It is being developed by TheracosBio for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and essential hypertension, and in January 2023 it received its first approval in the USA for use as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycaemic control in adults with T2D. Bexagliflozin is contraindicated in patients receiving dialysis and is not recommended in patients with type 1 diabetes or in those with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of < 30 mL/min/1.73 m². Bexagliflozin is undergoing clinical development for the treatment of essential hypertension in the USA. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of bexagliflozin leading to this first approval for the treatment of T2D.