Deictic Navigation Network: Linguistic Viewpoint Disturbances in Schizophrenia

Speaking of yourself: A meta-analysis of 80 years of research on pronoun use in schizophrenia

People with schizophrenia experience significant language disturbances that profoundly affect their everyday social interactions. Given its relevance to the referential function of language, aberrations in pronoun use are of particular interest in the study of schizophrenia. This systematic review and meta-analysis, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, examines the frequency of pronoun use in schizophrenia. PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science were searched up to May 1, 2024. All studies analyzing pronoun frequency in various spoken language contexts in schizophrenia were included. Bias was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A Bayesian meta-analysis with model averaging estimated effect sizes and moderating factors. 13 studies with n = 917 unique participants and 13 case-control contrasts were included. 37.9 % of patient samples were women, with a weighted mean (SD) age of 34.45 (9.72) years. 53.85 % of the studies were in languages other than English. We report a medium-sized effect for first-person pronoun impairment in schizophrenia (model-averaged d = 0.89, 95 % CrI (0.44, 1.33)). There was significant heterogeneity moderated by age. Evidence for publication bias was weak, with a strong support for first-person pronoun impairment after accounting for bias and heterogeneity. There was a small reduction of inter-individual variability in first-person pronoun use in patients compared to healthy controls (lnCVR = -0.12, 95 % CrI [-0.35, -0.13]). While all pronoun use was also high in patients, this was not robust due to heterogeneity and publication bias. Individuals with schizophrenia excessively use first-person pronouns. This may be a marker of a disturbed sense of self in this illness.

Inferring Depression and Its Semantic Underpinnings from Simple Lexical Choices

Spatial demonstratives are highly frequent linguistic universals, with at least two contrastive expressions (proximal ("this") vs. distal ("that")) indicating physical, social, or functional proximity of the speaker to the referent object. Recent evidence based on the Demonstrative Choice Task (DCT), in which participants couple words with a spatial demonstrative with no context provided, suggests that demonstrative use is also indicative of experienced or emotional proximity to the self in an imagined mental space. As depression is characterized by increased and maladaptive focus on the self, the DCT may be a simple and reliable way to elicit behaviors that enable inference on the presence of severe depressive states and allow descriptions of the semantic characteristics of individual differences in such states. In two independent cross-sectional studies, including 775 and 879 participants, respectively, we showed that DCT-based classification models reliably capture semantic characteristics of experiential states that are predictive of self-reported depression symptom severity, as measured by PHQ-9. In both samples, DCT classifiers outperformed baseline models and replicated semantic patterns of negative affect previously observed to be associated with depression. This indicates that the paradigm captures semantic characteristics of the experiential states underlying depression symptoms and may be used to map individuals along a broad semantic space, potentially providing novel insights into individual differences in depressive states.

A data-driven linguistic characterization of hallucinated voices in clinical and non-clinical voice-hearers

BACKGROUND

Auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs) are heterogeneous regarding phenomenology and etiology. This has led to the proposal of AVHs subtypes. Distinguishing AVHs subtypes can inform AVHs neurocognitive models and also have implications for clinical practice. A scarcely studied source of heterogeneity relates to the AVHs linguistic characteristics. Therefore, in this study we investigate whether linguistic features distinguish AVHs subtypes, and whether linguistic AVH-subtypes are associated with phenomenology and voice-hearers' clinical status.

METHODS

Twenty-one clinical and nineteen non-clinical voice-hearers participated in this study. Participants were instructed to repeat verbatim their AVHs just after experiencing them. AVH-repetitions were audio-recorded and transcribed. AVHs phenomenology was assessed using the Auditory Hallucinations Rating Scale of the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales. Hierarchical clustering analyses without a priori group dichotomization were performed using quantitative measures of sixteen linguistic features to distinguish sets of AVHs.

RESULTS

A two-AVHs-cluster solution best partitioned the data. AVHs-clusters significantly differed in linguistic features (p < .001); AVHs phenomenology (p < .001); and distribution of clinical voice-hearers (p < .001). The "expanded-AVHs" cluster was characterized by more determiners, more prepositions, longer utterances (all p < .01), and mainly contained non-clinical voice-hearers. The "compact-AVHs" cluster had fewer determiners and prepositions, shorter utterances (all p < .01), more negative content, higher degree of negativity (both p < .05), and predominantly came from clinical voice-hearers.

DISCUSSION

Two voice-speech clusters were recognized, differing in syntactic-grammatical complexity and negative phenomenology. Our results suggest clinical voice-hearers often hear negative, "compact-voices", understandable under Broca's right hemisphere homologue and memory-based mechanisms. Conversely, non-clinical voice-hearers experience "expanded-voices", better accounted by inner speech AVHs models.

Anomalies in language as a biomarker for schizophrenia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

After more than a century of neuroscience research, reproducible, clinically relevant biomarkers for schizophrenia have not yet been established. This article reviews current advances in evaluating the use of language as a diagnostic or prognostic tool in schizophrenia.

RECENT FINDINGS

The development of computational linguistic tools to quantify language disturbances is rapidly gaining ground in the field of schizophrenia research. Current applications are the use of semantic space models and acoustic analyses focused on phonetic markers. These features are used in machine learning models to distinguish patients with schizophrenia from healthy controls or to predict conversion to psychosis in high-risk groups, reaching accuracy scores (generally ranging from 80 to 90%) that exceed clinical raters. Other potential applications for a language biomarker in schizophrenia are monitoring of side effects, differential diagnostics and relapse prevention.

SUMMARY

Language disturbances are a key feature of schizophrenia. Although in its early stages, the emerging field of research focused on computational linguistics suggests an important role for language analyses in the diagnosis and prognosis of schizophrenia. Spoken language as a biomarker for schizophrenia has important advantages because it can be objectively and reproducibly quantified. Furthermore, language analyses are low-cost, time efficient and noninvasive in nature.