Development and Validation of the Readiness for End-of-Life Conversations (REOLC) Scale

Decisions in end-of-life care: perspectives from family caregivers

BACKGROUND

Making healthcare decisions on behalf of loved ones can be highly stressful for family members to act as surrogate decision makers, especially when decisions are relevant to terminal care.

AIM

To understand the challenges that caregivers face when making decisions for family members at the end of life.

METHODS

A descriptive phenomenological approach using semi-structured interviews with seven family caregivers recruited from two palliative care institutions in Amman.

RESULTS

Family caregivers mentioned several reasons to avoid participating in decisions near their relative's end-of-life, such as holding on to hope that their family member would recover and fearing loss. Others expressed that they felt their relationship to the patient impaired their ability to make reliable judgments and they found it hard to know what the right decisions were. They were worried about being held responsible for the result of decisions and were concerned about felling guilty.

CONCLUSION

To conclude, caregivers do not feel prepared to make decisions about their relative's care and feel that they are too emotional and attached to the patient, or are afraid of the consequences of their decisions.

Changing expectations toward end-of-life communication: An experimental investigation

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effect of a) a brief video intervention and b) end-of-life (EOL) conversations with relatives on EOL communication expectations.

METHODS

272 participants from the general population were randomly assigned to three different video conditions (Intervention group: Persons reporting positive EOL conversation experiences +imagination task, Control group 1: Video unrelated to EOL topics, Control group 2: Persons reporting different attitudes toward EOL conversations +imagination task). Primary outcome was negative expectations. After the videos, participants were invited to have their own conversation with a loved one in the following two months. Data were collected before (pretest) and after watching the videos (posttest) as well as at a two-months follow-up.

RESULTS

Between pre- and posttest, negative expectations decreased significantly more in the IG compared to CG1 (b = 0.15, t = 2.08, p = .020) and CG2 (b = 0.21, t = 2.94, p = .002). Across conditions, participants having had a conversation between posttest and follow-up reported significantly stronger declines of negative expectations (b = 0.35, t = 3.54, p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In the short term, a brief video intervention can change expectations toward EOL communication. EOL conversations with relatives also have the potential to reduce negative expectations.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Based on the findings, larger community-based interventions could be developed in order to increase EOL communication.

Validation of the advance care planning engagement survey in Singapore

BACKGROUND

Singapore has an ageing population. End-of-life care and advance care planning are becoming increasingly important. To assess advance care planning engagement, valid tools are required. The primary objective of the study is to validate the 15-, 9- and 4-item versions of the ACP Engagement Survey in Singapore.

METHODS

10 inpatients in a Singapore community hospital were purposively sampled for a cognitive debriefing interview on the ACP Engagement Survey. We recruited patients 21 years and older, who were able to understand and speak English, without a diagnosis of dementia, and who were not admitted under the palliative care service. Next, 150 inpatients and caregivers were recruited using convenience sampling across 2 Singapore community hospitals to complete the 15-item ACP Engagement Survey. We assessed content validity, internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha, construct validity with hypotheses testing and test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

The ACPES scores were significantly higher for those who reported yes for pre-planning activities such as making a will, making a lasting power of attorney, telling one's doctor about end-of-life care preferences, and telling family or loved ones about end-of-life care preferences. Cronbach's alpha was 0.945 for the 15-item version, 0.915 for the 9-item version, and 0.912 for the 4-item version. Intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.933 for the 15-item version, 0.938 for the 9-item version and 0.865 for the 4-item version.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided good psychometric support for the validity of the 15-item, 9-item and 4-item versions of the ACP Engagement Survey in Singapore.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

SingHealth Centralised Institutional Review Board (CIRB) approved this study (reference 2022/2025).

Factors related to patients' readiness for advance care planning: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Advance care planning can help to align the care provided with the values, goals and preferences of patients at the end of life. Therefore, readiness for advanced care planning is considered a prerequisite and predictor of the patient's willingness to participate in the end of life conversation. The present study was conducted with the aim of investigating the factors affecting patients' readiness for advance care planning (RACP).

METHODS

This systematic review was searched in 4 databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of science, ProQuest using relevant keywords. No time limit was considered. The quality of the articles was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute tool for qualitative studies and the Appraisal Tool for cross-sectional Studies. The data was analyzed based on the directed content analysis approach guided by the theory of planned behavior (TPB).

RESULTS

3227 primary article titles were identified. After removing duplicates, screening and final selection, 22 relevant articles remained for analysis. Factors affecting RACP were extracted based on the TPB. Attitude factors include "ACP training", "perceived experiences of health status", "Socio-demographic factors", and "psycho-spiritual readiness". Subjective norms include "social support and family participation" and "accessibility to health services". The perceived behavioral control includes "dialogue about ACP", "readiness actions", and "determining a proxy decision maker."

CONCLUSION

In this study, according to the theory of planning behavior, various factors have an effect on the RACP. Therefore, according to the collaborative and multifactorial nature of the factors affecting preparation for ACP, it is suggested that different effective dimensions should be considered according to the specific conditions of each patient and the stage of the disease. Therefore, health service providers should first measure the level of readiness of patients and families, and by understanding the factors affecting their readiness, they should conduct training or dialogue in the field of ACP.

Expectations in the Communication About Death and Dying: Development and Initial Validation of the End-of-Life Conversations - Expectations Scale

End-of-life (EOL) conversations with relatives or significant others are often avoided. One reason can be negative expectations regarding these conversations. The present study was conducted to develop and initially validate the End-of-Life Conversations - Expectations Scale (EOLC-E). An exploratory factor analysis (N = 307) resulted in a 20-item version with three distinct dimensions: expected own emotional burden (α = .92), expected other person's emotional burden (α = .94) and communication self-efficacy (α = .89). The EOLC-E total score correlated significantly with communication apprehension about death (r = .62), fear of death (r = .58), death avoidance (r = .52) as well as readiness for end-of-life conversations (r = -.38) and occurrence of previous conversations (r = -.29). Results suggest that the EOLC-E is a reliable and valid instrument to assess death and dying communication expectations. This measure has utility in communication research focusing on optimizing expectations and increasing EOL communication.

The trajectory of prognostic cognition in patients with advanced cancer: is the traditional advance care planning approach desirable for patients?

Most patients with advanced cancer initially express a desire to be informed of their prognosis, and prognostic discussions between patients and their oncologists can trigger the subsequent trajectory of prognostic cognitions. On the continuum of prognostic cognition, including inaccurate/accurate prognostic awareness (awareness of incurability of cancer, terminal nature of illness or life expectancy) and prognostic acceptance (accepting one's prognosis), patients' perceptions of being informed of their prognosis by oncologists and patients' coping strategy for serious medical conditions regulate prognostic cognitions. However, nearly half of the patients with advanced cancer have poor prognostic awareness, and few patients achieve prognostic acceptance. These phenomena partly act as barriers to participation in advance care planning. When oncologists engage in advance care planning conversations, they must assess the patient's prognostic cognition and readiness for advance care planning. Considering the inaccurate prognostic awareness in a non-negligible proportion of patients and that astatic patients' preferences for future treatment and care are influenced by prognostic cognition, more research on decision-making support processes for high-quality and goal-concordant end-of-life care is needed along with research of advance care planning. In addition to making decisions regarding future medical treatment and care, oncologists must engage in continuous and dynamic goal-of-care conversations with empathic communication skills and compassion from diagnosis to end-of-life care.

Questionnaires About the End of Life for Cancer Patients - Is the Response Burden Acceptable?

CONTEXT

Research about the end of life with the help of patient-reported outcomes in vulnerable populations such as cancer patients is needed but is potentially burdensome and can therefore raise concerns.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the response burden due to questionnaires about the end of life in cancer patients and to explore associations with individual variables.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional design response burden was assessed using a six-item instrument after completion of a survey that concerned the end of life. Associations with age, gender, type of care (curative/palliative), years since diagnosis, distress, depression, anxiety, death anxiety, readiness for end-of-life conversations, and readiness for advance care planning were explored via correlational analyses and multiple regressions. Burden due to the topic of end-of-life and completing questionnaires in general was compared.

RESULTS

A total of 269 cancer patients (mean age 61.4 (SD =12.3); 59.5% male; 58.4% in palliative care) completed the survey in a German hospital. The majority did not report response burden; 29.7% reported at least some burden due to study participation. The multiple regression (F [10,26] = 9.97, p < 0.001) indicated that stable predictors of response burden were higher death anxiety (ß = 0.4), lower readiness to talk about one's end of life (ß = -0.34) and higher age (ß = 0.23). No additional subjective burden due to the topic of end-of-life was reported.

CONCLUSION

The reported response burden seems acceptable since it was generally low. However, a subgroup did report some burden. Minimising burden and enhancing participants' benefits without compromising the research quality should further influence study designs in this field.

Death Preparedness: Development and Initial Validation of the Advance Planning Preparedness Scale

Delayed advance planning and costs of life sustaining treatments at end of life significantly contribute to the economic burden of healthcare. Clinician barriers include perceptions of inappropriate timing, lack of skills in end-of-life communication and viewing readiness as a behavior rather than a death attitude. This study developed and validated a measurement of psychological preparedness for advance directive completion. Confirmatory factor analysis (N = 543) of a 35 item pool (Cronbach α = .96) supported five sub-scales; psychological comfort (α = .87), desire to know (α = .88), thinking (α = .84), willingness (α = .82) and existential reflection (α = .79) with a possible common factor (α = .84). Results suggested significant predictors of completing directives in 30 days included discussion (OR .08, p < .001), preparedness (OR 4.08, p = .03) and uncertainty (OR 4.37, p = .02). APP = 35 is a reliable and valid measure with utility to assess readiness for completion of EOL documents.

Applying the community readiness model to identify and address inequity in end-of-life care in South Asian communities

BACKGROUND

Individuals from minoritised ethnic backgrounds are less likely than individuals from the dominant ethnic group to access palliative care services and to have documented Advance Care Plans. They are more likely to be admitted to hospital in the last months of life.

AIM

To use the Community Readiness Model to identify the barriers that influence how South Asian communities access and use two new palliative care services.

DESIGN

The Community Readiness Model is a validated tool that measures the readiness of a community. Key stakeholders were asked to: (i) complete a questionnaire to assess South Asian communities' readiness to engage in advance care planning and, (ii) attend a focus group to explore their views on the communities' understandings of palliative and end-of-life care.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

Ten key stakeholders who held a variety of occupations within palliative and end-of-life care services were recruited from the community.

FINDINGS

The South Asian communities were found to be at the 'pre-planning' stage of readiness, despite initiatives to improve awareness. The readiness of the health system was found to be limited, with a narrow medical focus during advance care planning, poor integration of voluntary and community services and limited understanding of what people consider a 'good' death.

CONCLUSIONS

The Community Readiness Model allowed insight into the South Asian communities' awareness of and readiness (to use) palliative care services. Using the Community Readiness Model before service implementation allowed steps to be taken to avoid widening inequities in access and use of new services.

Validation of the Readiness for End-of-Life Conversations (REOLC) scale in a German hospital setting

Objective

For every health behavior, readiness to engage is a necessary and crucial foundation for following conversations, interventions or behavior changes. The present study aims to support a one-factor structure for the Readiness for End-of-Life Conversations (REOLC) scale (Berlin et al., 2021) in a population of cancer patients (N = 295).

Methods

For validation purposes, data of patients participating in a screening development study at a university clinic was used. Model adequacy was analyzed with structural equation modelling and controlled for with goodness of fit indices: χ²-test, SRMR, rRMSEA. Discriminant and convergent validity were assessed with correlations of REOLC and psychological or health behavior measures.

Results

Factor structure was supported with good fit indices, discriminant validity and convergent validity. Readiness correlated significantly with age and reported death anxiety.

Conclusion

The REOLC scale is a reliable instrument to assess cancer patients' readiness for end-of-life conversations. Future studies may further address moderating and mediating effects of socio-demographic, medical and psychological factors.

Innovation

The assessment of readiness may further indicate anxiety levels of cancer patients and enables practitioners to provide interventions accordingly. However, in a clinical setting and especially for patients with a palliative prognosis, end-of-life care conversations may need to be introduced early.