Mental health problems among healthcare professionals following the workplace violence issue-mediating effect of risk perception

Burnout syndrome and psychological workplace violence among Peruvian physicians: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Physicians face increased emotional weariness as a result of the inherent stress and responsibility of their roles. In addition, they are vulnerable to abuse, coercion, and aggressiveness in their workplace settings. The link between burnout syndrome and psychological workplace violence (WPV) is complex and must be viewed as bidirectional. We assessed the association between the levels of burnout and psychological WPV among their colleagues among Peruvian physicians.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study that surveyed licensed Peruvian physicians actively practicing clinical medicine from April to December 2023. A non-probability convenience sampling via hospital interviews and diffusion through online platforms was carried out. The SPV-Health scale, validated for the Peruvian context, assessed psychological violence, while the MBI-HSS evaluated burnout dimensions. Descriptive statistics and Poisson regression models, adjusting for covariates, were employed for analysis.

RESULTS

We included 384 medical doctors; most participants worked in urban areas, with nearly half being specialists or subspecialists, predominantly in medicine services. Physicians experiencing burnout were 4.04 times more likely to encounter psychological violence compared to those without burnout (95% CI: 2.45-6.57), even after adjusting for age, sex, medical positions and years of medical practice (PR: 3.93; 95% CI: 2.35-6.57). Among the risk factors for psychological violence, being a resident practitioner was the only significant one (PR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.18-2.73).

CONCLUSION

Our study underscores a significant association between Burnout Syndrome among Peruvian doctors and their experience of psychological WPV from colleagues. Tailored interventions addressing these challenges are imperative, with organizational strategies offering potential while interventions for WPV require further investigation.

Workplace violence experiences of intensive care unit healthcare providers: a qualitative systematic review and meta--synthesis

OBJECTIVE

Workplace violence (WPV) in intensive care units (ICUs) is a prevalent issue that affects staff well-being and patient care. Although individual studies have explored various facets of WPV, there is a need for a comprehensive synthesis to provide a cohesive understanding of the phenomenon and inform effective interventions. This study aimed to understand its impact on the mental health and work status of ICU staff, identify the coping strategies used by ICU staff to manage WPV and explore the support required by healthcare professionals when facing WPV.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Medline, PsycINFO, and Web of Science from the date of inception until June 5, 2024. Only qualitative studies or the qualitative part of mixed methods studies were included in the analysis, with no restrictions on the type of ICU or type or source of violence. This study assessed the risk of bias in the included studies and synthesized the results according to the guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute (2024).

RESULTS

Six studies were included. These studies, which were published between 2018 and 2023, were conducted in four countries and involved 91 participants. Six analytical themes and 17 subthemes emerged from the qualitative data. The themes were as follows: Prevalence of ICUs Violence, ICU healthcare perceptions of WPV, The Ripple Effect of WPV in ICU, Practical Strategies for ICU Staff Dealing with WPV, What they need when facing WPV, and Reasons for Not Reporting WPV.

CONCLUSIONS

The synthesized findings highlight the pervasive nature of WPV in ICUs and its profound impact on staff members. This review underscores the need for systematic interventions, including comprehensive training, accessible psychological support, and robust reporting mechanisms, to mitigate the effects of WPV.

OTHER

This study was funded by the Wu Jieping Medical Foundation(320.6750.18526),China. The review protocol was prospectively registered in the Prospective Register of PROSPERO (CRD42024559076).

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The research findings can provide important evidence for hospital managers and policymakers, helping them develop more effective workplace management policies to enhance the safety and well-being of ICU staff.

Risk factors and consequences of mental health problems in nurses: A scoping review of cohort studies

Mental health problems in nurses are prevalent and impairing. To date, no literature has comprehensively synthesised cohort evidence on mental health among nurses. This scoping review aimed to synthesise the existing literature on the risk factors and consequences of mental health problems in nurses. A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Epistemonikos database, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO from inception to March 2023. We identified 171 cohort studies from 16 countries, mostly (95.3%) from high-income economies. This review indicated that nurses worldwide encountered significant mental health challenges, including depression, cognitive impairment, anxiety, trauma/post-traumatic stress disorder, burnout, sleep disorder, and other negative mental health problems. These problems were closely related to various modifiable risk factors such as nurses' behaviours and lifestyles, social support, workplace bullying and violence, shift work, job demands, and job resources. Moreover, nurses' mental health problems have negative effects on their physical health, behaviour and lifestyle, occupation and organisation, and intrapersonal factors. These findings provided an enhanced understanding of mental health complexities among nurses, and shed light on policy enactment to alleviate the negative impact of mental health problems on nurses. Addressing mental health among nurses should be a top priority.

How Do Disaster Relief Nurses in Japan Perceive and Respond to Risks? A Cross-Sectional Study

This study assessed the risk perceptions among disaster relief nurses (DRNs) in Japan by focusing on 15 risk factors associated with frequent natural disasters and the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We conducted a cross-sectional study that targeted DRNs across six prefectures in Japan and explored nurses' perceptions of risks including radiation exposure, volcanic eruptions, and mass infections. The findings indicated a heightened perception of radiation and nuclear-related risks. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, DRNs perceived "mass infection" as a significant risk. An age-based analysis revealed that younger nurses had more dread about "mass infection" and had heightened uncertainty about the "X-ray test" compared with their older peers. Understanding DRNs' risk perceptions is crucial for effective disaster response preparedness and training. The study highlights the need to address these perceptions to ensure that DRNs are well prepared and supported in their roles. This study was not pre-registered on a publicly accessible registry.