Magnetic Seizure Therapy Compared to Electroconvulsive Therapy for Schizophrenia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

An Update on the Use of Neuromodulation Strategies in the Treatment of Schizophrenia

The field of neuromodulation has evolved tremendously and now includes a vast array of interventions utilizing different technologies that span electrical, magnetic, and ultrasound forms of stimulation. The evolution of interventions holds the promise of fewer adverse effects and a noninvasive approach, increasing the scale at which these interventions may be offered in hospital and community settings. While the majority of neuromodulation studies have focused on patients with mood disorders, predominantly depression, there is an unmet need for patients with schizophrenia, who are in dire need of novel therapeutic options. Advances in neuroimaging and approaches for examining individual variability and transdiagnostic symptoms may lead to more effective neuromodulation treatments in this patient population. This overview explores the modern landscape of invasive and noninvasive neuromodulation treatments for patients with schizophrenia. It begins with approaches that involve diffuse stimulation of the cortex and subcortex and then reviews more focal stimulation approaches at the cortical and subcortical levels. The authors also reflect on the relationship between our understanding of the neurobiology of schizophrenia and neuromodulation interventions.

Does Electroencephalography Seizure Duration Account for an Adequate Treatment of Magnetic Seizure Therapy for Schizophrenia?

OBJECTIVES

A seizure lasting >15 s has been considered to indicate treatment for magnetic seizure therapy (MST), a modification of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), without much validation. This study aimed to investigate whether this seizure duration was suitable for the treatment of schizophrenia.

METHODS

Altogether, 34 and 33 in-patients with schizophrenia received 10 sessions of MST and ECT, respectively. Clinical symptoms were assessed using the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale at baseline and at the 4-week follow-up. Electroencephalogram (EEG) was monitored during each MST or ECT treatment using bifrontal electrodes.

RESULTS

The proportion of participants who achieved the 15-second threshold was only 28.6% in the MST group, with a significant difference between responders and nonresponders. For patients receiving MST, the average EEG seizure duration correlated with the percentage of Positive and Negative Symptom Scale reduction ( t(32) = 2.51, P = 0.017, uncorrected; t(32) = 2.00, P = 0.055, corrected with clinical characteristics). The average EEG seizure duration predicted the clinical response at a trend level ( Z = 1.76, P = 0.078) with an optimal cutoff of 11.3 seconds. All patients in the ECT group achieved the 15-second threshold. However, their average EEG seizure duration was uncorrelated with clinical improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

The duration of EEG seizures may be associated with the antipsychotic effects of MST. This association may have been influenced by various clinical and technical factors. More research is needed to define the specific criteria for adequate MST in schizophrenia in order to achieve personalized dosing.

Efficacy of Magnetic Seizure Therapy in Patients with Schizophrenia and Combined fMRI-EEG to Explore the Regulatory Mechanisms of Brain Networks

Background

Magnetic Seizure Therapy (MST) is an emerging psychiatric physical therapy in recent years, and the MST technique induces seizures by stimulating the local cortex. Numerous studies have shown that compared to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), magnetic shock therapy (MST) has relatively little effect on cognitive function, and thus has certain advantages in clinical application. However, as far as magnetic shock therapy itself is concerned, there are few studies specifically focusing on its efficacy in depth, and the mechanism of MST in treating schizophrenia is still unclear.

Methods

This study centered on the key question of "the efficacy of magnetic stunning therapy for patients with schizophrenia and the combined fMRI-EEG to explore the regulatory mechanisms of brain networks". The study protocol describes our interventional clinical trial aimed at developing magnetic convulsive therapy as an effective and safe treatment for SCZ. The study population consisted of SCZ patients and healthy controls (Hc). Clinical symptoms, cognitive function, EEG and fMRI data were collected from the patient group at baseline, post-treatment and follow-up phases. We systematically assessed the clinical features and cognitive functions of the patients, combined with EEG and fMRI indexes to explore the brain network connectivity abnormalities in SCZ patients, and jointly explored the neuroimaging mechanisms in SCZ patients.

Conclusion

Positive results from this trial may have a direct and significant impact on patients with SCZ. Once the MST demonstrates significant antipsychotic efficacy with high perceived safety, it will have significant implications for clinical practice. Brain network abnormality may be one of the core pathological mechanisms of SCZ. Therefore, by combining neurophysiological imaging techniques to scientifically verify the abnormality of SCZ brain network, the elucidation of this issue can help to further reveal the pathological mechanism of SCZ and provide a scientific basis for the effective and precise treatment of the disease.

Trial Registration

ChiCTR2000038361 Registered on September 21, 2020.

Magnetic Seizure Therapy in Refractory Psychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: La thérapie par convulsions magnétiques pour la prise en charge des troubles psychiatriques réfractaires : revue systématique et méta-analyse

ObjectiveTo qualitatively and quantitatively synthesize the literature on the efficacy and safety of magnetic seizure therapy (MST) in psychiatric disorders.MethodsA literature search was conducted of the OVID Medline, OVID EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science and Cochrane databases from inception to 14 January 2024, using subject headings and key words for "magnetic seizure therapy." Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), post-hoc analyses of RCTs, open-label trials, or case series investigating MST in adults with a verified psychiatric diagnosis and reporting on two possible primary outcomes (1) psychiatric symptom reduction (as measured by validated rating scale) or (2) neurocognitive outcomes (as measured by standardized testing), were included. Abstracts, individual case reports, reviews and editorials were excluded. Extracted data included: (1) basic study details; (2) study design; (3) sample size; (4) baseline demographics; (5) outcome data (including secondary outcomes of suicidal ideation and adverse events); and (6) stimulation parameters. Cochrane's risk of bias tool was applied. A quantitative analysis was conducted for the depression studies, using Hedge's g effect sizes.ResultsA total of 24 studies (n = 377) were eligible for inclusion. Seventeen studies in depression (including three RCTs), four studies in schizophrenia (including one RCT), one study in bipolar disorder, one study in obsessive-compulsive disorder and one study in borderline personality disorder were summarized. We found no significant difference in depressive symptom reduction between MST and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in randomized, controlled trials (g = 0.207 towards ECT, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.132 to 0.545, P = 0.232). We found a significant reduction in depressive symptoms overall with MST in the pooled RCT and open-label analysis (g = 1.749, CI 1.219 to 2.279, P < 0.005). It is suggested that MST has modest cognitive side effects.ConclusionsLarge-scale RCTs are necessary to confirm early signals of MST as an effective intervention in psychiatric disorders with a cognitive profile that is potentially more favourable than ECT.

Magnetic Seizure Therapy vs Modified Electroconvulsive Therapy in Patients With Bipolar Mania: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Bipolar mania is a common disabling illness. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for patients with severe mania, though it is limited by the risk of cognitive adverse effects. Magnetic seizure therapy (MST) as an alternative treatment to ECT for bipolar mania has not yet been reported.

Objective

To compare the effectiveness and cognitive adverse effects of MST and ECT in bipolar mania.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This randomized clinical trial was conducted at the Shanghai Mental Health Center from July 1, 2017, through April 26, 2021. Forty-eight patients with bipolar mania were recruited and randomly allocated to receive MST or ECT. The data analysis was performed from June 5, 2021, through August 30, 2023.

Interventions

Patients completed 2 or 3 sessions of MST or ECT per week for a total of 8 to 10 sessions. The MST was delivered at 100% device output with a frequency of 75 Hz over the vertex.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcomes were reduction of total Young Manic Rating Scale (YMRS) score and response rate (more than 50% reduction of the total YMRS score compared with baseline). An intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and repeated-measures analyses of variance were conducted for the primary outcomes.

Results

Twenty patients in the ECT group (mean [SD] age, 31.6 [8.6] years; 12 male [60.0%]) and 22 patients in the MST group (mean [SD] age, 34.8 [9.8] years; 15 male [68.2%]) were included in the ITT analysis. The response rates were 95.0% (95% CI, 85.4%-100%) in the ECT group and 86.4% (95% CI, 72.1%-100%) in the MST group. The YMRS reduction rate (z = -0.82; 95% CI, -0.05 to 0.10; P = .41) and response rate (χ2 = 0.18; 95% CI, -0.13 to 0.31; P = .67) were not significantly different between the groups. The time-by-group interaction was significant for the language domain (F1,24 = 7.17; P = .01), which was well preserved in patients receiving MST but worsened in patients receiving ECT. No serious adverse effects were reported in either group.

Conclusions and Relevance

These findings suggest that MST is associated with a high response rate and fewer cognitive impairments in bipolar mania and that it might be an alternative therapy for the treatment of bipolar mania.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03160664.

Pre-clinical indications of brain stimulation treatments for non-affective psychiatric disorders, a status update

Over the past two decades noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques have emerged as powerful therapeutic options for a range of psychiatric and neurological disorders. NIBS are hypothesized to rebalance pathological brain networks thus reducing symptoms and improving functioning. This development has been fueled by controlled studies with increasing size and rigor aiming to characterize how treatments induce clinically effective change. Clinical trials of NIBS for specific indications have resulted in federal approval for unipolar depression, bipolar depression, smoking cessation, and obsessive-compulsive disorder in the United States, and several other indications worldwide. As a rapidly emerging field, there are numerous pre-clinical indications currently in development using a variety of electrical and magnetic, non-convulsive, and convulsive approaches. This review discusses the state-of-the-science surrounding promising avenues of NIBS currently in pre-approval stages for non-affective psychiatric disorders. We consider emerging therapies for psychosis, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and borderline personality disorder, utilizing transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and magnetic seizure therapy (MST), with an additional brief section for early-stage techniques including transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation (tFUS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). As revealed in this review, there is considerable promise across all four psychiatric indications with different NIBS approaches. Positive findings are notable for the treatment of psychosis using tDCS, MST, and rTMS. While rTMS is already FDA approved for the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder, methodologies such as tDCS also demonstrate potential in this condition. Emerging techniques show promise for treating non-affective disorders likely leading to future regulatory approvals.

Magnetic seizure therapy for people with schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Schizophrenia is one of the most common and disabling mental disorders. About 20% of people with schizophrenia do not respond to antipsychotics, which are the mainstay of the treatment for schizophrenia today, and need to seek other treatment options. Magnetic seizure therapy (MST) is one of the novel non-invasive brain stimulation techniques that are being investigated in recent years.  OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of MST for people with schizophrenia.

SEARCH METHODS

On 6 March 2022, we searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials which is based on CENTRAL, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.Gov, Embase, ISRCTN, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, and WHO ICTRP.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MST alone or plus standard care with ECT or any other interventions for people with schizophrenia.  DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We performed reference screening, study selection, data extraction and risk of bias and quality assessment in duplicate. We calculated the risk ratios (RRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for binary outcomes and the mean difference (MD) and their 95% CIs for continuous outcomes. We used the original risk of bias tool for risk of bias assessment and created a Summary of findings table using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included one four-week study with 79 adults in acute schizophrenia, comparing MST plus standard care to ECT plus standard care in this review. We rated the overall risk of bias as high due to high risk of bias in the domains of selective reporting and other biases (early termination and baseline imbalance) and unclear risk of bias in the domain of blinding of participants and personnel. We found that MST and ECT may not differ in improving the global state (n = 79, risk ratio (RR) 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73 to 1.70), overall (n = 79, mean difference (MD) -0.20, 95% CI -8.08 to 7.68), the positive symptoms (n = 79, MD 1.40, 95% CI -1.97 to 4.77) and the negative symptoms (n = 79, MD -1.00, 95% CI -3.85 to 1.85) in people with schizophrenia.  We found  that MST compared to ECT may cause less delayed memory deficit and less cognitive deterioration (n = 79, number of people with a delayed memory deficit, RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.96; n = 79, mean change in global cognitive function, MD 5.80, 95% CI 0.80 to 10.80), but also may improve more cognitive function (n = 47, number of people with any cognitive improvement, RR 3.30, 95% CI 1.29 to 8.47).  We found that there may be no difference between the two groups in terms of leaving the study early due to any reason (n = 79, RR 2.51, 95% CI 0.73 to 8.59), due to adverse effects (n = 79, RR 3.35, 95% CI 0.39 to 28.64) or due to inefficacy (n = 79, RR 2.52, 95% CI 0.11 to 60.10).  Since all findings were based on one study with high risk of bias and the confidence in the evidence was very low, we were not sure these comparable or favourable effects of MST over ECT were its true effects.  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Due to the paucity of data, we cannot draw any conclusion on the efficacy and tolerability of MST for people with schizophrenia. Well-designed RCTs are warranted to answer the question.

A Systematic Review of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation for Neurocognitive Dysfunction in Older Adults with Schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

Neurocognitive dysfunction is thought to be one of the core clinical features of schizophrenia, and older adults with schizophrenia exhibited greater overall cognitive deficits than younger adults. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the neurocognitive effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) as an adjunctive treatment for older adults suffering from schizophrenia.

METHODS

Randomized double-blinded controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the neurocognitive effects of adjunctive active iTBS versus sham iTBS in older adults with schizophrenia were systematically identified by independent investigators searching Chinese and English databases.

RESULTS

Two double-blinded RCTs (n = 132) compared the neurocognitive effects of adjunctive active iTBS (n = 66) versus sham iTBS (n = 66) in patients that fulfilled the inclusion criteria of this systematic review and were analyzed. One RCT found significant superiority of active iTBS over sham iTBS in improving neurocognitive performance in older adults with schizophrenia. In the other RCT, the findings on the neurocognitive effects of iTBS as measured by three different measurement tools were inconsistent. The dropout rate was reported in the two RCTs, ranging from 3.8% (3/80) to 7.7% (4/52).

CONCLUSION

There is preliminary evidence that adjunctive iTBS may have some beneficial effects in the treatment of neurocognitive function in older patients with schizophrenia. Future RCTs with larger sample sizes focusing on the neurocognitive effects of adjunctive iTBS in older adults with schizophrenia are warranted to verify these findings.

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Magnetic Seizure Therapy and Electroconvulsive Therapy for Depression: A Systematic Review

Objectives: As a new physical therapeutic technique, magnetic seizure therapy (MST) has established efficacy in the treatment of depression with few cognitive side effects, and thus appears to be a potential alternative to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). The findings of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy and safety of MST versus ECT for depression are inconsistent. This systematic review of RCTs was designed with the aim of assessing the safety and efficacy of MST versus ECT for patients with depression. Methods: The WanFang, Chinese Journal Net (CNKI), EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO databases were systematically searched by three independent investigators, from their inceptions to July 24, 2021. Results: In total, four RCTs (n = 86) were included and analyzed. Meta-analyses of study-defined response (risk ratio (RR) = 1.36; 95% CI = 0.78 to 2.36; p = 0.28; I2 = 0%), study-defined remission (RR = 1.17; 95% CI = 0.61 to 2.23; p = 0.64; I2 = 0%), and the improvement in depressive symptoms (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.21; 95% CI = −0.29 to 0.71; p = 0.42; I2 = 0%) did not present significant differences between MST and ECT. Three RCTs evaluated the cognitive effects of MST compared with ECT using different cognitive measuring tools, but with mixed findings. Only two RCTs reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs), but these lacked specific data. Only one RCT reported discontinuation due to any reason. Conclusions: This preliminary study suggests that MST appears to have a similar antidepressant effect as ECT for depression, but mixed findings on adverse cognitive effects were reported.

Comparison of electroconvulsive therapy and magnetic seizure therapy in schizophrenia: Structural changes/neuroplasticity

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) can effectively reduce the symptoms of schizophrenia, but may also impair cognitive function. A potential alternative is magnetic seizure therapy (MST), which has shown comparable efficacy with less severe cognitive disruption. This study compared ECT to MST for clinical efficacy and cognitive side effects. In addition, we examined the possible contributions of hippocampal volume changes and enhanced brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) signaling to the therapeutic responses. Thirty-four confirmed schizophrenia patients were allocated to receive ECT (n = 16) or MST (n = 18) over a 4-week period. Schizophrenia symptoms were measured by PANSS, cognition by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), and serum BDNF and its precursor proBDNF by ELISA at baseline and following ECT or MST. Both treatments reduced PANSS scores with comparable efficacy, while MST was superior for preservation of RBANS language score. ECT significantly increased the volumes of the bilateral hippocampus and multiple subfields, while MST had no effect on hippocampal volume. The change in right hippocampal volume was correlated with proBDNF change among ECT and MST non-responders (< 25% decrease in PANSS score). MST reduced schizophrenia symptoms as effectively as ECT with slightly better preservation of cognitive function.