Stress Experience of COVID-19 Patients as Reported by Psychological Supporters in South Korea: A Qualitative Study

Comparative analysis of mental health impairment among COVID-19 confirmed cases across the pandemic period in South Korea

OBJECTIVES

South Korea operates a complete enumeration surveillance of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Online mental health survey links were distributed to all COVID-19 confirmed patients within three days of confirmation of infection. This study evaluates the trend of depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, post-traumatic stress symptoms, somatic symptoms, and suicidal ideation of COVID-19 confirmed cases across the pandemic from January 2020 to July 2022.

METHODS

A total of 99,055 responses were analyzed. Validated questionnaires were used to assess depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety symptoms (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), post-traumatic stress symptoms (Primary Care Post Traumatic Stress Disorder screen), somatic symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-15), and suicidal ideation (P4 suicidality screener). Log-binomial regression was used to estimate prevalence ratio across 11 quarters (Q) of the year (2020Q1 to 2022Q3). Stratified analysis was conducted by sex to compare risk between males and females when adjusted prevalence was high.

RESULTS

Compared to 2022Q1 (January-March), all symptoms had their highest prevalence ratio during 2020Q1 to 2020Q3 (January-September). The difference in adjusted symptom prevalence between males and females was nonsignificant during high-risk periods.

CONCLUSIONS

Adverse mental health symptoms were most prevalent during the early pandemic, with a nonsignificant difference in prevalence observed between males and females. Greater attention should be given to individuals who experienced COVID-19 infection during the early stages of the pandemic.

Patient Engagement With and Perceptions of the COVIDA Project, a Volunteer-Led Telemonitoring and Teleorientation Service for COVID-19 Community Management: Mixed Methods Study

BACKGROUND

During the pandemic in Peru, the COVIDA (Collaboration Network of Volunteer Brigade Members for the Investigation, Detection, and Primary Management of Community Cases Affected by COVID-19) project proposed an innovative way to provide telemonitoring and teleorientation to COVID-19 patients, led by health care student volunteers. However, it has not been described how this interaction is perceived from the patient's perspective and which factors increase their engagement with this service.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to describe the perceptions of patients about COVIDA and identify factors associated with their engagement with this service.

METHODS

A mixed methods study was conducted to evaluate perceptions of patients that participated in the COVIDA project. This telehealth intervention organized by the National University of San Marcos was implemented in Peru from August to December 2020. The service involved daily phone calls by volunteer students to monitor registered COVID-19 patients until the completion of the 14th day of the illness or if a warning sign was identified. The volunteers also provided teleorientation to address the patients' needs and concerns. Quantitative analysis was performed to describe the characteristics of the patients and to assess the factors related to their engagement with the service, which was defined by the percentage of participants who completed the follow-up according to their individual schedule. Qualitative analysis through semistructured interviews evaluated the patients' perceptions of the service regarding the aspects of communication, interaction, and technology.

RESULTS

Of the 770 patients enrolled in COVIDA, 422 (55.7%) were female; the median age was 39 (IQR 28-52) years. During the monitoring, 380 patients (49.4%) developed symptoms, and 471 (61.2%) showed warning signs of COVID-19. The overall median for engagement was 93% (IQR 35.7%-100%). Among those patients who did not develop warning signs, engagement was associated with the presence of symptoms (OR 3.04, 95% CI 2.22-4.17), a positive COVID-19 test at the start of follow-up (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.48-2.61), and the presence of comorbidities (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.29-2.59). Patients reported that the volunteers provided clear and valuable information and emotional support. Communication via phone calls took place smoothly and without interruptions.

CONCLUSIONS

COVIDA represents a well-accepted and well-perceived alternative model for student volunteers to provide telemonitoring, teleorientation, and emotional support to patients with COVID-19 in the context of overwhelmed demand for health care services. The deployment of this kind of intervention should be prioritized among patients with symptoms and comorbidities, as they show more engagement with these services.

COVID-19 and New-Onset Psychosis: A Comprehensive Review

Psychosis is a multifactorial condition that typically involves delusions, hallucinations, and disorganized thought, speech or behavior. The observation of an association between infectious epidemics and acute psychosis dates back to the last century. Recently, concerns have been expressed regarding COVID-19 and the risk for the development of new-onset psychosis. This article reviewed the current evidence of a possible link between SARS-CoV-2 and risk of psychosis as an acute or post-infectious manifestation of COVID-19. We here discuss potential neurobiological and environmental factors as well as a number of challenges in ascribing a causal pathogenic relationship between SARS-CoV-2 infection and new-onset psychosis.

Differences in the Course of Depression and Anxiety after COVID-19 Infection between Recovered Patients with and without a Psychiatric History: A Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to examine the course of depression and anxiety in COVID-19 survivors with a psychiatric history compared with those without a psychiatric history.

METHODS

A web-based cross-sectional survey for COVID-19 survivors was conducted from July to September 2021. A total of 6016 COVID-19 survivors, the accuracy of whose responses was determined to be assured, were included in analyses. Exposures included psychiatric history and time since COVID-19 infection, and the main outcomes and measures included severity of depression and anxiety, as assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), respectively.

RESULTS

Mean severity of PHQ-9 and GAD-7 were significantly higher in participants with a psychiatric history than in those without a psychiatric history. Two-way analysis of covariance for PHQ-9 showed a significant main effect of the presence of psychiatric history and a significant interaction effect of psychiatric history × time since infection. Two-way analysis of covariance for the GAD-7 score revealed a significant main effect of the presence of psychiatric history and time since COVID-19 infection and the interaction effect of these factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The course of depression and anxiety was more severe in COVID-19 survivors with a psychiatric history than in those without a psychiatric history.