Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for children and adolescents with first-episode and drug-naïve major depressive disorder: A systematic review

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation frequency effects on suicidal ideation in adolescents with major depressive disorder

Previous research has explored Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) interventions for suicidal thoughts and behaviors. However, the optimal dose parameters for TMS interventions targeting suicidal ideation in adolescents remain unknown. This exploratory study examined the impact of 1 Hz and 10 Hz TMS treatment on suicidal ideation in adolescents with major depressive disorder. Participants (N = 41) aged 12-18 years were randomized to TMS treatments with 1 Hz or 10 Hz frequency over 6 weeks and included in the exploratory analyses. The change in the intensity of suicidal ideation throughout treatment was estimated with ordinal logistic regression models with and without adjustments for the change in depressive symptom severity. The predicted odds of intensity of suicidal ideation significantly decreased over six-weeks of acute TMS treatment for both the 10 Hz TMS group (OR = 0.754, 95 % CI = 0.634 to 0.897, p = 0.0015) and the 1 Hz TMS group (OR = 0.780, 95 % CI = 0.668 to 0.909, p = 0.0016). However, after adjustment for the change in depression severity as a time-varying covariate in the ordinal logistic regression model, the magnitude of the decrease (or predicted odds) in intensity of suicidal ideation was attenuated and rendered non-significant for both the 10 Hz and 1 Hz TMS groups. TMS treatment suicidal ideation outcomes were not significantly different between the 10 Hz and 1 Hz TMS groups. Low-frequency TMS may be as effective as high-frequency TMS in treating suicidal ideation in adolescents with depression. Notably, 1 Hz TMS may have a favorable tolerability and safety profile for adolescents.

Effectiveness of rTMS compared to SSRI as early treatment of depression - study protocol of a randomized controlled trial (Early-TMS)

Psychotherapy and antidepressant medication are considered first-line treatment options for major depressive disorder (MDD). However, a high proportion of patients do not respond to initial treatment, underlining the need for alternative treatment methods. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been established in the treatment of MDD, but the available evidence is limited to forms of MDD with varying degrees of treatment resistance. Randomized-controlled trials (RCT) investigating first-line treatment with rTMS in comparison with first-line antidepressant medication are warranted to further position rTMS within current treatment algorithms for MDD. In this two-stage, therapy response-adapted, randomized multi-center phase 2 rater blinded trial, 106 medication-naïve patients suffering from MDD will be enrolled. In Stage I, participants receive one of the two treatment options for four weeks: either daily bilateral theta burst stimulation (TBS), a patterned and time-saving form of rTMS, or antidepressant medication with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI). The allocation to Stage II occurs therapy response-adapted. Therefore, patients either receive maintenance treatment or will be switched to the respective other treatment arm. Primary outcome is the comparison between the two study arms with regard to therapy response measured by the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) after 4 weeks at the end of Stage I. The aim of the study is to provide reliable first evidence and effect size measures of rTMS as first-line treatment compared to SSRI treatment. Positive results will help to implement rTMS in early stages of MDD. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06545474, August 15, 2024.

Safety of noninvasive brain stimulation in children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is a promising method for altering cortical excitability with clinical implications. It has been increasingly used in children, especially in neurodevelopmental disorders. Yet, its safety and applications in the developing brain require further investigation. This review aims to provide an overview of the safety of commonly used NIBS techniques in children, including transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Safety data for other NIBS methods is not reported in this review.

RECENT FINDINGS

In line with studies from the last decade, findings in the last 2 years (2022-2023) support the safety of NIBS in children and adolescents within the currently applied protocols. Both tES and TMS are well tolerated, if safety rules, including exclusion criteria, are applied.

SUMMARY

We briefly discussed developmental aspects of stimulation parameters that need to be considered in the developing brain and provided an up-to-date overview of tES/TMS applications in children and adolescents. Overall, the safety profile of tES/TMS in children is good. For both the tES and TMS applications, epilepsy and active seizure disorder should be exclusion criteria to prevent potential seizures. Using child-sized earplugs is required for TMS applications. We lack large randomized double-blind trialsand longitudinal studies to establish the safety of NIBS in children.

VIDEO ABSTRACT

http://links.lww.com/YCO/A78 .

Efficacy and safety of non-invasive brain stimulation in combination with antidepressants in adolescents with depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is beneficial to adult patients with depression, but its safety and efficacy in combination with antidepressants in children and adolescents with depression are not clear. We conducted a preliminary meta-analysis to objectively evaluate its clinical effect and provide information for future research and clinical practice.

Methods

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science were searched systematically to find clinical trials published in English before April 11, 2023. Stata software was used for meta-analysis, and random or fixed effect models were used to combine effect sizes.

Results

Nine studies were eligible and included (n = 393). No articles about children were included in the analysis. The results showed that the remission rate was 40% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 13% to 71%). The scores of Children's Depression Rating Scale (CRDS) and Hamilton's depression scale (HAMD) significantly decreased compared to baseline value (MD = -27.04, 95% CI: -30.95, -23.12 and MD = -12.78, 95% CI: -19.55 to -6.01). In addition, the incidence of all adverse events was 13% (95% CI: 5%, 23%), and all were minor pain-related events.

Conclusion

The combination of NIBS and antidepressants has been shown to notably alleviate depressive symptoms in adolescents, offering a considerable level of safety. This therapeutic synergy is particularly effective in patients with major depressive disorder, where repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation augmented with antidepressants can enhance the amelioration of depressive symptoms.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023442215, PROSPERO CRD42023442215.

Adjunctive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for adolescents with first-episode major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was conducted to explore the therapeutic effects, tolerability and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as an adjunct treatment in adolescents with first-episode major depressive disorder (FE-MDD).

METHODS

RCTs examining the efficacy, tolerability and safety of adjunctive rTMS for adolescents with FE-MDD were included. Data were extracted by three independent authors and synthesized using RevMan 5.3 software with a random effects model.

RESULTS

A total of six RCTs involving 562 adolescents with FE-MDD were included. Adjunctive rTMS was superior in improving depressive symptoms over the control group [standardized mean difference (SMD) = -1.50, 95% confidence interval (CI): -2.16, -0.84; I2 = 89%, p < 0.00001] in adolescents with FE-MDD. A sensitivity analysis and two subgroup analyses also confirmed the significant findings. Adolescents with FE-MDD treated with rTMS had significantly greater response [risk ratio (RR) = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.76; I2 = 56%, p = 0.03] and remission (RR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.77; I2 = 0%, p = 0.03) over the control group. All-cause discontinuations were similar between the two groups (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.32, 1.93; I2 = 0%, p = 0.60). No significant differences were found regarding adverse events, including headache, loss of appetite, dizziness and nausea (p = 0.14-0.82). Four out of six RCTs (66.7%), showed that adjunctive rTMS was more efficacious over the control group in improving neurocognitive function (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Adjunctive rTMS appears to be a beneficial strategy in improving depressive symptoms and neurocognitive function in adolescents with FE-MDD. Higher quality RCTs with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are warranted in the future.

A Systematic Review of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation for Neurocognitive Dysfunction in Older Adults with Schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

Neurocognitive dysfunction is thought to be one of the core clinical features of schizophrenia, and older adults with schizophrenia exhibited greater overall cognitive deficits than younger adults. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the neurocognitive effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) as an adjunctive treatment for older adults suffering from schizophrenia.

METHODS

Randomized double-blinded controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the neurocognitive effects of adjunctive active iTBS versus sham iTBS in older adults with schizophrenia were systematically identified by independent investigators searching Chinese and English databases.

RESULTS

Two double-blinded RCTs (n = 132) compared the neurocognitive effects of adjunctive active iTBS (n = 66) versus sham iTBS (n = 66) in patients that fulfilled the inclusion criteria of this systematic review and were analyzed. One RCT found significant superiority of active iTBS over sham iTBS in improving neurocognitive performance in older adults with schizophrenia. In the other RCT, the findings on the neurocognitive effects of iTBS as measured by three different measurement tools were inconsistent. The dropout rate was reported in the two RCTs, ranging from 3.8% (3/80) to 7.7% (4/52).

CONCLUSION

There is preliminary evidence that adjunctive iTBS may have some beneficial effects in the treatment of neurocognitive function in older patients with schizophrenia. Future RCTs with larger sample sizes focusing on the neurocognitive effects of adjunctive iTBS in older adults with schizophrenia are warranted to verify these findings.