The experiences of autistic doctors: a cross-sectional study

Barriers to healthcare and a 'triple empathy problem' may lead to adverse outcomes for autistic adults: A qualitative study

LAY ABSTRACT

Autistic people live with more mental and physical health conditions and, on average, die younger than non-autistic people. Despite widespread commitments to tackling these issues, autistic people still report various barriers to accessing healthcare. This article aims to explore the area in depth, from the perspective of autistic people. This research benefits from being led by autistic people, for autistic people - all of the researchers are autistic, and most of us are also medical doctors. Data, in the form of written comments and stories, were collected as part of a large survey. Here, we explored these for common themes and possible deeper meaning within the experiences. People who took part reported a variety of barriers. Here, our article gives voice to their stories, in their own words. Themes included: early barriers; communication mismatch; doubt - in oneself and from doctors; helplessness and fear; and healthcare avoidance and adverse health outcomes. Our findings allowed us to create a model that aimed to understand and explain the reported barriers in the context of the previously known consequences. We also built on wider autism theories to explain our findings in more depth.

The experiences of medical students with ADHD: A phenomenological study

Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity 'Disorder' (ADHD) is a form of neurodivergence, characterised by lifelong differences in attention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity. University students with ADHD underachieve academically and tend to have lower levels of self-esteem. Medical schools have an obligation to minimise barriers for students with ADHD. Understanding the experiences of medical students with ADHD is vital to promote inclusive approaches. Our exploratory research question was: "What are the experiences of medical students with ADHD?" This was an interpretive phenomenological study. Loosely structured interviews were conducted with participants (medical students with ADHD) over Zoom. Subsequent transcripts were analysed using interpretive phenomenological analysis. Six people participated. Our analysis identified the following themes: Identity and diagnosis; ADHD profile; system issues; conflict, competition and compensation; improving the experience. Participants reported experiences of bullying and isolation at medical school, perpetrated by doctors and peers, as well as feelings of alienation when unable to conform on placement and in exams. From this, participants adopted survival strategies, such as masking, to avoid being ostracised. All recognised their ADHD status when their mental health deteriorated during their medical studies. Of those who disclosed their diagnosis, none were offered personalised support. Participants feared disclosure, largely due to weaponised professionalism and the effects of toxic competitiveness in medicine. They yearned for a sense of belonging. Participants reported strengths associated with ADHD such as empathy and working well under pressure, which are highly desirable aptitudes for doctors. This study has highlighted areas where medical schools can be instrumental in cultivating an environment where medical students with ADHD can thrive, not just survive. This may take the form of peer support groups, alongside reasonable adjustments throughout medical school-particularly for Objective Structured Clinical Examinations, for example. Enabling these students to thrive may help to prevent early burnout and subsequent attrition from medicine.