Assessment of Financial Toxicity Among Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer in Western China

Financial hardship experience in middle- and older-aged patients with advanced lung cancer

PURPOSE

Advancements in medical treatments have resulted in increased medical costs for cancer patients. More than half of the patients with advanced lung cancer reported unmet financial needs. The purpose of this study is to examine the differences in the prevalence and correlates of financial hardship between middle- and older-aged patients with advanced lung cancer, and its impact on multiple health-related outcomes.

METHODS

This study presents a cross-sectional analysis involving 226 patients with advanced lung cancer, who were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial conducted between 2018 and 2020. Data collection was performed through self-reported questionnaires and electronic medical records. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models were adopted for analysis.

RESULTS

58.0% reported experiencing financial hardships. Middle-aged participants who were single and had a lower education level were more likely to experience financial difficulties. However, males and higher performance status were associated with a lower likelihood of experiencing financial difficulties among older-aged participants. Financial hardship was significantly associated with anxiety (p < 0.001), depression (p < 0.001), sleep disturbances (p < 0.001), quality of life, global health status (p = 0.002), functional scale score (p < 0.001), symptom scale score (p < 0.001), and lung cancer-specific scale score (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

More than half of the patients with advanced lung cancer experienced financial hardships caused by cancer or its treatment, with a higher prevalence reported in middle-aged patients. Different sociodemographic and clinical variables correlated with financial hardship in middle- and older-aged participants, respectively. More attention should be paid to middle-aged patients with advanced lung cancer, particularly during routine assessments.

Financial toxicity and its risk factors among patients with cancer in China: A nationwide multisite study

Objective

We assessed financial toxicity (FT) among Chinese patients with cancer and investigated associated risk factors guided by a multilevel conceptual framework.

Methods

Applying multistage stratified sampling, we selected six tertiary and six secondary hospitals across three economically diverse provinces in China. From February to October 2022, 1208 patients with cancer participated. FT was measured using the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST), with 28 potential risk factors identified at multilevel. Multiple regression analysis was used for risk factor identification.

Results

FT prevalence was 82.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 80.5%, 84.8%), with high FT (COST score ≤ 18.5) observed in 40.9% of participants (95% CI: 38.1%, 43.7%). Significant risk factors included younger age at cancer diagnosis, unmarried status, low annual household income, negative impact of cancer on participants' or family caregiver's work, advanced cancer stage, longer hospital stay for cancer treatment or treatment-related side effects, high perceived stress, poor emotional/informational support, lack of social medical insurance or having urban and rural resident basic medical insurance, lack of commercial medical insurance, tertiary hospital treatment, and inadequate cost discussions with healthcare providers (all P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Cancer-related FT is prevalent in China, contributing to disparities in cancer care access and health-related outcomes. The risk factors associated with cancer-related FT encompasses multilevel, including patient/family, provider/practice, and payer/policy levels. There is an urgent need for collective efforts by patients, healthcare providers, policymakers, and insurers to safeguard the financial security and well-being of individuals affected by cancer, promoting health equities in the realm of cancer care.

Financial Toxicity in Radiation Oncology

Financial toxicity details the financial burden patients face due to a variety of medical costs. Cancer patients, especially those receiving radiation therapy, are at a much higher risk of experiencing economic hardships than healthy people or people with other conditions. There are a variety of risk factors associated with financial toxicity as well as numerous tools to assess the toxicity experienced by patients. In this review article, we present a concise overview of contributors, risk factors, case studies, tools, impacts, and potential interventions of financial toxicity.

Financial toxicity assessment and associated factors analysis of patients with cancer in China

PURPOSE

Cancer-related expenditures present a lasting economic burden on patients and their families and may exert long-term adverse effects on the patients' life and quality of life. In this study, the comprehensive score for financial toxicity (COST) was used to investigate the financial toxicity (FT) levels and related risk factors in Chinese patients with cancer.

METHODS

Quantitative data were collected through a questionnaire covering three aspects: sociodemographic information, economic and behavioral cost-coping strategies, and the COST scale. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with FT.

RESULTS

According to 594 completed questionnaires, the COST score ranged 0-41, with a median of 18 (mean±SD, 17.98±7.978). Over 80% of patients with cancer reported at least moderate FT (COST score <26). A multivariate model showed that urban residents, coverage by other health insurance policies, and higher household income and consumption expenditures were significantly associated with higher COST scores, indicative of lower FT. The middle-aged (45-59 years old), higher out-of-pocket (OOP) medication expenditures and hospitalizations, borrowed money, and forgone treatment were all significantly associated with lower COST scores, indicating higher FT.

CONCLUSION

Severe FT was associated with sociodemographic factors among Chinese patients with cancer, family financial factors, and economic and behavioral cost-coping strategies. Government should identify and manage the patients with high-risk characteristics of FT and work out better health policies for them.

Financial toxicity of patients with lung cancer in China: Results from a National Survey Study

OBJECTIVE

To develop a comprehensive understanding of financial toxicity (FT) among patients with lung cancer in China and the major factors affecting FT.

METHODS

Drawing from a national cross-sectional survey, which used the validated comprehensive score for financial toxicity (COST) questionnaire, we estimated the prevalence and degree of FT. Patient coping actions were investigated. Pearson's chi tests and multinomial logistic regression were used to evaluate the predictors of FT in patients with lung cancer.

RESULTS

The median score of FT was 20 (scored on a range of 0-44, with lower scores indicating more severe toxicity). Altogether, 77% of the sample patients had FT (COST <26), 54.5% had mild FT (COST 14-25), and 22.5% had moderate and severe FT (COST 0-13). Living in the less-developed western region of China, being male, having a lower educational level, lower annual family income, and advanced stage or worse self-reported health status were significantly related to higher FT than their counterparts (p < 0.05). Patients with higher FT tended to have a lower level of medical compliance, a higher risk of incurring debts, and reduced living expenditures relative to those with lower FT.

CONCLUSION

Despite China's remarkable progress in the past two decades with regard to Universal Healthcare Coverage, FT still presents a serious challenge for patients with lung cancer. Keen attention must be paid to reducing the disproportionate high financial risks of patients with low socioeconomic status.

Assessment of self-reported financial toxicity among patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma undergoing radiotherapy: A cross-sectional study in western China

OBJECTIVE 

Using the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) tool to measure financial toxicity (FT) among nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patients in western China and investigate the association between FT and psychological distress.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study of survivors with NPC in a tertiary oncology hospital in China. FT was assessed using the COST (Chinese version), a validated instrument widely used both at home and abroad. The NCCN Distress Thermometer (DT) was used to measure psychological distress. A multivariate logistic regression model was built to determine factors associated with FT, and the Pearson correlation was used to assess the correlation between COST and DT scores.

RESULTS

Of 210 patients included in this study, the mean FT score was 16.3 (median: 22.5, SD: 9.7), and the prevalence of FT was 66.2% (mild FT: 37.1%, moderate FT: 50.5%, severe FT: 2.4%). Suggested by the logistic regression model, 5 variables were associated with increased FT: unemployed, no commercial insurance, receiving lower annual income, advanced cancer, and receiving targeted therapy. The Pearson correlation showed a significantly moderate correlation between financial toxicity and psychological distress (r= -0.587, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in western China demonstrated higher self-reported financial toxicity (FT) associated with factors including unemployed, no commercial insurance, receiving lower annual income, advanced cancer, and receiving targeted therapy. These predictors will help clinicians identify potential patients with FT in advance and conduct effective psychological interventions.

Financial toxicity in lung cancer

In the United States, lung cancer is the third most common cancer and the overall leading cause of cancer death. Due to advances in immunotherapy and targeted therapy, 5-year survival is increasing. The growing population of patients with lung cancer and cancer survivors highlights the importance of comprehensive cancer care, including recognizing and addressing financial toxicity. Financial toxicity is a term used to contextualize the negative effects of the costs of cancer treatment in terms of patient quality of life. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Value Framework places emphasis on high-value care as it evaluates cancer treatments "based on clinical benefit, side effects, and improvements in patient symptoms or quality of life in the context of cost". Prior studies have shown that risk factors for financial toxicity in patients with lung cancer include lower household income or savings, inability to afford basic necessities, higher than anticipated out of pocket expenses, and taking sick leave. Among lung cancer survivors, patients experience increased unemployment and lower wages compared to the general population underscoring the lasting effects of financial toxicity. Financial toxicity is associated with increased psychosocial distress and decreased quality of life, and bankruptcy is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with cancer. Despite the negative implications of financial toxicity on patients, standardized screening practices and evidence-based interventions are lacking. The "COmphrensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST)" tool has been validated for assessing financial toxicity with correlation with health-related quality of life. Further research is needed to understand the utility of incorporating routine screening for financial toxicity into clinical practice and the efficacy of interventions. Understanding the relationship between financial toxicity and quality of life and survival is critical to providing high-value cancer care and survivorship care.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of tislelizumab, nivolumab and docetaxel as second- and third-line for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in China

Objective: Domestic PD-1inhibitor tislelizumab has emerged as a promising treatment for Chinese patients with driver-negative advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of our study to evaluate whether tislelizumab is cost-effective as a second- or third-line treatment for this population compared with docetaxel (conventional chemotherapy) and nivolumab (imported PD-1inhibitor), from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.

Material and Methods: A Markov model with a 3-week Markov cycle and a 30-year time horizon was built to compare the cost-effectiveness of second- or third-line tislelizumab versus docetaxel and nivolumab. Transition probabilities, including disease progression, survival, and adverse events (AEs)-related treatment discontinuation event, were estimated from the clinical trials. Costs and health utilities were collected from local hospitals, public database and published literature.

Results: Compared with docetaxel, tislelizumab provided an additional 0.33 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) (1.37 vs. 1.04 QALYs) at an incremental cost of $9,286 ($23,646 vs. $14,360) for Chinese patients with driver-negative advanced or metastatic NSCLC, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $27,959/QALY under the WTP threshold of $35,663/QALY used in the model. Compared with nivolumab, tislelizumab was associated with a lower cost ($23,646 vs. $59,447) and higher QALYs (1.37 vs. 1.20 QALYs), resulting in its dominance of nivolumab.

Conclusion: From the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, domestic PD-1inhibitor tislelizumab immunotherapy represents a cost-effective treatment strategy compared with conventional docetaxel chemotherapy and imported PD-1inhibitor nivolumab immunotherapy in the treatment of driver-negative advanced or metastatic NSCLC beyond the first-line setting. In the era of “Universal Medical Insurance System”, the rational use of domestic anticancer drugs guided by cost-benefit evidence would be an effective means to balance the limited expenditure of medical insurance fund and the growing demand for cancer treatments.

Financial Toxicity and psychological distress in Adults with Cancer: A Treatment-based Analysis

Objective

To evaluate disparities in financial toxicity and psychological distress in patients with cancer as a function of treatment and reveal the relationship between financial toxicity and psychological distress.

Methods

This was a multicenter cross-sectional study. Patients were recruited from March 2017 to October 2018, and questionnaires were completed regarding their demographics, financial toxicity, and psychological distress. A multiple linear regression model was used to examine factors associated with financial and psychological distress.

Results

Significant financial toxicity and psychological distress occurred in 47.9% and 56.5% of patients, respectively. Financial toxicity (P ​= ​0.032) and psychological distress (P ​< ​0.001) were statistically different among the single chemotherapy, adjuvant therapy, and surgery groups. Multivariable analysis revealed that patients aged 50–59 years (P ​= ​0.035), 60–69 years (P ​= ​0.007), and 70 years or older (P ​= ​0.002) had higher the Comprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) scores compared with patients less than 50 years old. Patients with personal annual income > 40,000 CNY reported higher COST scores than those who had < 20,000 CNY (P ​< ​0.001). Patients who had Urban Resident Basic Medical Insurance (URBMI) (P ​= ​0.030) or New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme (NRCMS) (P ​= ​0.006) compared with Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance (UEBMI) presented lower COST scores than patients with UEBMI. The multiple analysis model of psychological distress showed that an age of more than 70 years (P ​= ​0.010) was significantly associated with low the Distress Thermometer (DT) scores, and patients with colorectal cancer (P ​= ​0.009), the surgery group (P ​< ​0.001) and adjuvant therapy group (P ​< ​0.001) were significantly associated with high DT scores. The correlations between financial toxicity and psychological distress were mild but statistically significant in the chemotherapy-related treatment groups.

Conclusions

The research highlights the high rates of financial and psychological distress in adult patients. Multidimensional distress screening and psychosocial interventions should be provided for patients with cancer according to related factors.