1
|
Nakanishi M, Martins Pereira S, Van den Block L, Parker D, Harrison-Dening K, Di Giulio P, In der Schmitten J, Larkin PJ, Mimica N, Sudore RL, Holmerová I, Korfage IJ, van der Steen JT. Future policy and research for advance care planning in dementia: consensus recommendations from an international Delphi panel of the European Association for Palliative Care. Lancet Healthy Longev 2024; 5:e370-e378. [PMID: 38608695 DOI: 10.1016/s2666-7568(24)00043-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Advance care planning (ACP) is increasingly recognised in the global agenda for dementia care. The European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) Taskforce on ACP in Dementia aimed to provide recommendations for policy initiatives and future research. We conducted a four-round Delphi study with a 33-country panel of 107 experts between September, 2021, and June, 2022, that was approved by the EAPC Board. Consensus was achieved on 11 recommendations concerning the regulation of advance directives, equity of access, and dementia-inclusive approaches and conversations to express patients' values. Identified research gaps included the need for an evidence-based dementia-specific practice model that optimises engagement and communication with people with fluctuating and impaired capacity and their families to support decision making, while also empowering people to adjust their decisions if their goals or preferences change over time. Policy gaps included insufficient health services frameworks for dementia-inclusive practice. The results highlight the need for more evidence and policy development that support inclusive ACP practice models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miharu Nakanishi
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Department of Psychiatric Nursing, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai-shi, Japan; Mental Health Promotion Unit, Research Center for Social Science and Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Sandra Martins Pereira
- CEGE: Research Center in Management and Economics - Ethics and Sustainability Research Area, Católica Porto Business School, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal
| | - Lieve Van den Block
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel-UGent End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Deborah Parker
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Karen Harrison-Dening
- Department of Research and Publications, Dementia UK, London, UK; Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK
| | - Paola Di Giulio
- Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Jürgen In der Schmitten
- Institute of General Practice/Family Practice, Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Philip J Larkin
- Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; Palliative and Supportive Care Service, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ninoslav Mimica
- School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; Department for Biological Psychiatry and Psychogeriatrics, University Psychiatric Hospital Vrapče, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Rebecca L Sudore
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Iva Holmerová
- Centre of Expertise in Longevity and Long-Term Care, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ida J Korfage
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jenny T van der Steen
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Radboudumc Alzheimer Center and Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Cicely Saunders Institute, Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mertens V, Cottignie C, van de Wiel M, Vandewoude M, Perkisas S, Roelant E, Moorkens G, Hans G. Comprehensive geriatric assessment as an essential tool to register or update DNR codes in a tertiary care hospital. Eur Geriatr Med 2024; 15:295-303. [PMID: 38277096 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-023-00925-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the prevalence of Do not Resuscitate (DNR) code registration in patients with a geriatric profile admitted to Antwerp University Hospital, a tertiary care hospital in Flanders, Belgium, and the impact of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) on DNR code registration. PATIENTS AND METHODS Retrospective analysis of a population of 543 geriatric patients (mean age 82.4 ± 5.19 years, 46.4% males) admitted to Antwerp University Hospital from 2018 to 2020 who underwent a CGA during admission. An association between DNR code registration status before and at hospital admission and age, gender, ethnicity, type of residence, clinical frailty score (CFS), cognitive and oncological status, hospital ward and stay on intensive care was studied. Admissions before and during the first wave of the pandemic were compared. RESULTS At the time of hospital admission, a DNR code had been registered for 66.3% (360/543) of patients. Patients with a DNR code at hospital admission were older (82.7 ± 5.5 vs. 81.7 ± 4.6 years, p = 0.031), more frail (CFS 5.11 ± 1.63 vs. 4.70 ± 1.61, p = 0.006) and less likely to be admitted to intensive care. During the hospital stay, the proportion of patients with a DNR code increased to 77% before and to 85.3% after CGA (p < 0.0001). Patients were consulted about and agreed with the registered DNR code in 55.8% and 52.1% of cases, respectively. The proportion of patients with DNR codes at the time of admission or registered after CGA did not differ significantly before and after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION After CGA, a significant increase in DNR registration was observed in hospitalized patients with a geriatric profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veerle Mertens
- Department of Geriatrics, Antwerp University Hospital, Drie Eikenstraat 655, 2650, Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium.
| | - Charlotte Cottignie
- Department of Geriatrics, Antwerp University Hospital, Drie Eikenstraat 655, 2650, Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Mick van de Wiel
- Department of Geriatrics, Antwerp University Hospital, Drie Eikenstraat 655, 2650, Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Maurits Vandewoude
- Department of Geriatrics, Antwerp University Hospital, Drie Eikenstraat 655, 2650, Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | - Ella Roelant
- Clinical Trial Center (CTC), CRC Antwerp, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Greta Moorkens
- Department of Internal Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Guy Hans
- Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bonares M, Fisher S, Quinn K, Wentlandt K, Tanuseputro P. Study protocol for the development and validation of a clinical prediction tool to estimate the risk of 1-year mortality among hospitalized patients with dementia. Diagn Progn Res 2024; 8:5. [PMID: 38500236 PMCID: PMC10949607 DOI: 10.1186/s41512-024-00168-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with dementia and their caregivers could benefit from advance care planning though may not be having these discussions in a timely manner or at all. A prognostic tool could serve as a prompt to healthcare providers to initiate advance care planning among patients and their caregivers, which could increase the receipt of care that is concordant with their goals. Existing prognostic tools have limitations. We seek to develop and validate a clinical prediction tool to estimate the risk of 1-year mortality among hospitalized patients with dementia. METHODS The derivation cohort will include approximately 235,000 patients with dementia, who were admitted to hospital in Ontario from April 1st, 2009, to December 31st, 2017. Predictor variables will be fully prespecified based on a literature review of etiological studies and existing prognostic tools, and on subject-matter expertise; they will be categorized as follows: sociodemographic factors, comorbidities, previous interventions, functional status, nutritional status, admission information, previous health care utilization. Data-driven selection of predictors will be avoided. Continuous predictors will be modelled as restricted cubic splines. The outcome variable will be mortality within 1 year of admission, which will be modelled as a binary variable, such that a logistic regression model will be estimated. Predictor and outcome variables will be derived from linked population-level healthcare administrative databases. The validation cohort will comprise about 63,000 dementia patients, who were admitted to hospital in Ontario from January 1st, 2018, to March 31st, 2019. Model performance, measured by predictive accuracy, discrimination, and calibration, will be assessed using internal (temporal) validation. Calibration will be evaluated in the total validation cohort and in subgroups of importance to clinicians and policymakers. The final model will be based on the full cohort. DISCUSSION We seek to develop and validate a clinical prediction tool to estimate the risk of 1-year mortality among hospitalized patients with dementia. The model would be integrated into the electronic medical records of hospitals to automatically output 1-year mortality risk upon hospitalization. The tool could serve as a trigger for advance care planning and inform access to specialist palliative care services with prognosis-based eligibility criteria. Before implementation, the tool will require external validation and study of its potential impact on clinical decision-making and patient outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT05371782.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Bonares
- Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Stacey Fisher
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- ICES Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Kieran Quinn
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
- ICES Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kirsten Wentlandt
- Department of Supportive Care, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Tanuseputro
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- ICES Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Maters J, van der Steen JT, de Vugt ME, Bakker C, Koopmans RT. Palliative Care in Nursing Home Residents with Young-Onset Dementia: Professional and Family Caregiver Perspectives. J Alzheimers Dis 2024; 97:573-586. [PMID: 38217594 PMCID: PMC10836558 DOI: 10.3233/jad-230486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The evidence underpinning palliative care in dementia is mostly based on research in older populations. Little is known about the palliative care needs of people with young-onset dementia (YOD). OBJECTIVE To describe palliative care practices including advance care planning (ACP) in people with YOD residing in Dutch nursing homes. METHODS The study presents baseline questionnaire data from an observational cohort study. Physicians, family caregivers, and nursing staff completed questionnaires about 185 residents with YOD. The questionnaires included items on sociodemographics, quality of life measured with the quality of life in late-stage dementia (QUALID) scale, dementia-related somatic health problems, symptoms, pain medication, psychotropic drugs, and ACP. RESULTS The mean age was 63.9 (SD 5.8) years. Half (50.3%) of them were female. Alzheimer's disease dementia (42.2%) was the most prevalent subtype. The mean QUALID score was 24.0 (SD 7.9) as assessed by family caregivers, and 25.3 (SD 8.6) as assessed by the nursing staff. Swallowing problems were the most prevalent dementia-related health problem (11.4%). Agitation was often reported by physicians (42.0%) and nursing staff (40.5%). Psychotropics were prescribed frequently (72.3%). A minority had written advance directives (5.4%) or documentation on treatment preferences by the former general practitioner (27.2%). Global care goals most often focused on comfort (73.9%). Proportions of do-not-treat orders were higher than do-treat orders for all interventions except for hospitalization and antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS ACP must be initiated earlier, before nursing home admission. A palliative approach seems appropriate even though residents are relatively young and experience few dementia-related health problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasper Maters
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Radboudumc Alzheimer Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jenny T. van der Steen
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Radboudumc Alzheimer Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolein E. de Vugt
- School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Christian Bakker
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Radboudumc Alzheimer Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Groenhuysen, Center for Geriatric Care, Roosendaal, the Netherlands
| | - Raymond T.C.M. Koopmans
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Radboudumc Alzheimer Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Joachim en Anna, Center for Specialized Geriatric Care, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van der Steen JT, Engels Y, Touwen DP, Kars MC, Reyners AKL, van der Linden YM, Korfage IJ. Advance Care Planning in the Netherlands. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2023; 180:133-138. [PMID: 37482528 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2023.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
The Dutch health care system fosters a strong public health sector offering accessible generalist care including generalist palliative care. General practitioners are well positioned to conduct ACP, for example, to continue or initiate conversations after hospitalization. However, research shows that ACP conversations are often ad hoc and in frail patients, ACP is often only initiated when admitted to a nursing home by elderly care physicians who are on the staff. Tools that raise awareness of triggers to initiate ACP, screening tools, information brochures, checklists and training have been developed and implemented with funding by national programs which currently focus on implementation projects rather than or in addition to, research. The programs commonly require educational deliverables, patient and public involvement and addressing diversity in patient groups. A major challenge is how to implement ACP systematically and continuously across sectors and disciplines in a way that supports a proactive yet person-centered approach rather than an approach with an exclusive focus on medical procedures. Digital solutions can support continuity of care and communication about care plans. Solutions should fit a culture that prefers trust-based, informal deliberative approaches. This may be supported by involving disciplines other than medicine, such as nursing and spiritual caregiving, and public health approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny T van der Steen
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Primary and Community Care and Radboudumc Alzheimer center, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Yvonne Engels
- Department of anesthesiology, pain and palliative medicine, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Dorothea P Touwen
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Law, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marijke C Kars
- Center of Expertise of Palliative Care, Julius Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Anna K L Reyners
- Center of Expertise of Palliative Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Yvette M van der Linden
- Center of Expertise of Palliative Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands/Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ida J Korfage
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bryant J, Mansfield E, Cameron E, Sanson-Fisher R. Experiences and preferences for advance care planning following a diagnosis of dementia: Findings from a cross-sectional survey of carers. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0286261. [PMID: 37307258 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Future medical and financial planning is important for persons with dementia given the impact of the disease on capacity for decision making. AIMS To explore from the perspective of carers of persons with dementia: (1) Participation in future medical and financial planning by the person they care for, including when planning was undertaken and the characteristics associated with having an advance care directive completed; (2) The type of healthcare providers who discussed advance care planning following diagnosis; and (3) Preferences for timing of discussions about advance care planning following diagnosis. METHODS Recruitment and data collection took place between July 2018 and June 2020. Carers of persons with dementia aged 18 years and older were mailed a survey. Participants completed questions regarding completion of various future planning documents by the person they support, including time of completion and who discussed advance care planning following diagnosis. Participants were presented with information about the benefits and consequences of early and late discussions of advance care planning and asked when discussions about advance care planning were best initiated. RESULTS 198 carers participated. Most participants were female (74%) and had been a carer for more than 2 years (82%). Most participants reported that the person with dementia they support had made a Will (97%) and appointed an Enduring Guardian (93%) and Enduring Power of Attorney (89%). Only 47% had completed an advance care directive. No significant associations were found between characteristics of persons with dementia and completion of an advance care directive. Geriatricians (53%) and GPs (51%) most often discussed advance care planning following diagnosis. Most carers thought that discussions about advance care planning should occur in the first few weeks or months following diagnosis (32%), at the healthcare provider's discretion (31%), or at the time of diagnosis (25%). CONCLUSIONS More than half of persons with dementia do not have an advance care directive. There is variability in preferences for timing of discussions following dementia diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie Bryant
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
- Equity in Health and Wellbeing Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia
| | - Elise Mansfield
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
- Equity in Health and Wellbeing Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia
| | - Emilie Cameron
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
- Equity in Health and Wellbeing Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia
| | - Rob Sanson-Fisher
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
- Equity in Health and Wellbeing Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tros W, van der Steen JT, Liefers J, Akkermans R, Schers H, Numans ME, van Peet PG, Groenewoud AS. Actual timing versus GPs' perceptions of optimal timing of advance care planning: a mixed-methods health record-based study. BMC Prim Care 2022; 23:321. [PMID: 36514002 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-022-01940-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Timely initiation of advance care planning (ACP) in general practice is challenging, especially in patients with non-malignant conditions. Our aim was to investigate how perceived optimal timing of ACP initiation and its triggers relate to recorded actual timing in patients with cancer, organ failure, or multimorbidity. METHODS In this mixed-methods study in the Netherlands, we analysed health records selected from a database with primary care routine data and with a recorded ACP conversation in the last two years before death of patients who died with cancer, organ failure, or multimorbidity. We compared actual timing of ACP initiation as recorded in health records of 51 patients with the perceived optimal timing as determined by 83 independent GPs who studied these records. Further, to identify and compare triggers for GPs to initiate ACP, we analysed the health record documentation around the moments of the recorded actual timing of ACP initiation and the perceived optimal timing of ACP initiation. We combined quantitative descriptive statistics with qualitative content analysis. RESULTS The recorded actual timing of ACP initiation was significantly closer to death than the perceived optimal timing in patients with cancer (median 88 vs. 111 days before death (p = 0.049)), organ failure (227 vs. 306 days before death (p = 0.02)) and multimorbidity (113 vs. 338 days before death (p = 0.006)). Triggers for recorded actual versus perceived optimal timing were similar across the three groups, the most frequent being 'expressions of patients' reflections or wishes' (14% and 14% respectively) and 'appropriate setting' (10% and 13% respectively). CONCLUSION ACP in general practice was initiated and recorded later in the illness trajectory than considered optimal, especially in patients with organ failure or multimorbidity. As triggers were similar for recorded actual and perceived optimal timing, we recommend that GPs initiate ACP shortly after a trigger is noticed the first time, rather than wait for additional or more evident triggers when the illness is in an advanced stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willemijn Tros
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Jenny T van der Steen
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Janine Liefers
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Reinier Akkermans
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Henk Schers
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Mattijs E Numans
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Petra G van Peet
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - A Stef Groenewoud
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bavelaar L, Visser M, Schlicksupp P, Tilburgs B, van der Maaden T, Achterberg WP, van der Steen JT. Change in Advance Care Plans of Nursing Home Residents With Dementia and Pneumonia: Secondary Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial Data. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2022; 23:1741.e19-1741.e26. [PMID: 35932798 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.06.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore changes in advance care plans of nursing home residents with dementia following pneumonia, and factors associated with changes. Second, to explore factors associated with the person perceived by older adult care physicians as most influential in advance treatment decision making. DESIGN Secondary analysis of physician-reported PneuMonitor trial data. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS The PneuMonitor trial took place between January 2012 and May 2015 in 32 nursing homes across the Netherlands; it involved 429 residents with dementia who developed pneumonia. METHODS We compared advance care plans before and after the first pneumonia episode. Generalized logistic linear mixed models were used to explore associations of advance care plan changes with the person most influential in decision making, with demographics and indicators of disease progression. Exploratory analyses assessed associations with the person most influential in decision making. RESULTS For >90% of the residents, advance care plans had been established before the pneumonia. After pneumonia, treatment goals were revised in 15.9% of residents; 72% of all changes entailed refinements of goals. Significant associations with treatment goal changes were not found. Treatment plans changed in 20.0% of residents. Changes in treatment decisions were more likely for residents who were more severely ill (odds ratio 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.9) and those estimated to live <3 months (odds ratio 3.3, 95% CI 1.9-5.8). Physicians reported that a family member was often (47.4%) most influential in decision making. Who is most influential was associated with the resident's dementia severity. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS Overall, changes in advance care plans after pneumonia diagnosis were small, suggesting stability of most preferences or limited dynamics in the advance care planning process. Advance care planning involving family is common for nursing home residents with dementia, but advance care planning with persons with dementia themselves is rare and requires more attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Bavelaar
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Mandy Visser
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Philine Schlicksupp
- Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Bram Tilburgs
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Tessa van der Maaden
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Wilco P Achterberg
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jenny T van der Steen
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Visser M, Smaling HJA, Parker D, van der Steen JT. How Do We Talk With People Living With Dementia About Future Care: A Scoping Review. Front Psychol 2022; 13:849100. [PMID: 35496203 PMCID: PMC9039178 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.849100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
A diagnosis of dementia often comes with difficulties in understanding a conversational context and expressing how one feels. So far, research on how to facilitate advance care planning (ACP) for people with dementia focused on defining relevant themes and topics for conversations, or on how to formalize decisions made by surrogate decision makers, e.g., family members. The aim of this review is to provide a better scope of the existing research on practical communication aspects related to dementia in ACP conversations. In November 2020, seven databases were searched to select papers for inclusion (Proquest, Medline, Embase, Scopus, Psycinfo, Amed, and Cinahl). This search was updated in December 2021. The search strategy consisted of three tiers (related terms to "dementia," "communication" and "ACP"), intersected by using the Boolean term "AND," and resulted in 787 studies. Two researchers followed explicit criteria for two sequential levels of screening, based on titles and abstracts and full papers. A total of 22 studies were included for data analysis. Seven topics (i.e., importance of having ACP conversations, knowledge gap, inclusion of people with dementia in ACP conversations, policy vs. practice, adapting to cognitive changes, adapting to psychosocial changes, and adapting to emotional changes) emerged clustered around two themes (i.e., communicating with people with dementia in ACP, and changes in communication due to dementia). This scoping review provides practical suggestions for healthcare professionals to improve ACP communication and uncovered gaps in research on communication aspects related to dementia in ACP conversations, such as non-verbal behavior, timing and implementation, and personal preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mandy Visser
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Hanneke J A Smaling
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.,University Network for the Care Sector Zuid-Holland, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Deborah Parker
- Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care Through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| | - Jenny T van der Steen
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.,Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|