Preferences for HIV prevention strategies among newly arrived Asian-born men who have sex with men living in Australia: A discrete choice experiment

Changes in HIV post-exposure prophylaxis prescriptions before and after the introduction of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis at a sexual health clinic in Melbourne, Australia, 2011-2021

OBJECTIVE

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) became available in Victoria, Australia, in 2016. We examined non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis (nPEP) usage among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (MSM) before and after PrEP became available.

METHODS

We included MSM attending Melbourne Sexual Health Centre for nPEP between 2011 and 2021. We analysed three periods: the 'pre-PrEP' (01 Jan 2011 to 25 Jul 2016), 'PrEP before COVID-19' (26 Jul 2016 to 31 Dec 2019), and 'PrEP during COVID-19' (01 Jan 2020 to 31 Dec 2021).

RESULTS

There were 222,978 consultations for MSM; 8292 (3.7%) were nPEP consultations. The proportion of nPEP consultations increased from 3.3% (3093/94263) in the pre-PrEP period to 4.3% (3843/89251) in the PrEP before COVID-19 period then dropped to 3.4% (1356/39464) during the COVID-19 period. Compared to Australian-born MSM, MSM born in Central/South America (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.75; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27-2.40) had the highest odds of accessing nPEP, followed by Asian-born MSM (aOR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.27-1.71) after adjusting for PrEP availability and COVID-19. Those newly arrived in Australia in ≤4 years had higher odds (aOR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.05-1.22) of accessing nPEP than those living in Australia for >4 years.

CONCLUSION

nPEP prescriptions declined with PrEP availability. Newly arrived overseas-born MSM who are unlikely to have access to subsidised PrEP have a higher demand of nPEP.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH

Increasing PrEP education and ensuring equal access is vital in the drive to reduce new HIV diagnoses.

Sexual health challenges in migrant, immigrant, and displaced populations 2022-2023

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews recently published research on sexual health challenges and HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among migrant, immigrant and displaced people (MIDP) worldwide. We aimed to identify current evidence gaps regarding HIV/STI epidemiology, sexual health needs and interventions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Incidence and prevalence of HIV, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus and syphilis were higher among MIDP compared to host populations. However, research studies are limited in geographical distribution and few routine surveillance data are collected. Barriers to sexual health services use and participation in preventive interventions include low HIV/STI symptom knowledge and risk awareness, and intersectional experiences of stigma/discrimination. Better targeted promotion messages are needed to increase utilization of preventive sexual health interventions.

SUMMARY

Access to, and use of, sexual health services and interventions are evident needs among MIDP. These needs are intertwined with social determinants of health, including cultural/language barriers and stigma. Effective interventions require involvement of multiple stakeholder groups, encouraging engagement and providing social protection. Promising directions for interventions and further research include developing sexual health supportive environments through peer-strategies and provider training in trauma-informed care.

Assessing HIV risk and the social and behavioural characteristics of gay and bisexual men who have recently migrated to Australia: an analysis of national, behavioural surveillance data 2019-2021

INTRODUCTION

Overseas-born gay and bisexual men (GBM) are overrepresented in HIV diagnoses in Australia. We assessed social and sexual behaviours, and the use of HIV prevention and testing, by region of birth and length of residence in Australia. We sought to identify similarities and differences between recently arrived and non-recently arrived GBM from non-English-speaking countries to improve targeting and engagement with HIV testing and prevention.

METHODS

Data were collected in national repeated, behavioural surveillance surveys conducted across Australia during 2019-2021. Logistic regression was used to identify factors that differentiated between recently arrived (<2 years) and non-recently arrived (≥2 years in Australia) GBM from non-English-speaking countries.

RESULTS

Among 24,707 participants in 2019-21, 2811 (11.4%) were from high-income English-speaking countries, 714 (2.9%) were recently arrived overseas-born GBM and 3833 (15.5%) were non-recently arrived migrants. Recently arrived GBM were most likely to be born in Asia (36.1%) and Europe (21.1%). Compared with non-recently arrived GBM, recently arrived GBM from non-English-speaking countries were younger (aOR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.94-0.96, p<0.001), more likely to be students (aOR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.11-1.85, p = 0.005), less likely to be in full-time employment (aOR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.46-0.69, p <0.001), more likely to report consistent condom use (aOR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.01-1.66, p = 0.039), but had lower awareness (aOR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.48-0.80, p<0.001) and use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) (22.8%, vs. 32.3%, χ2 (1, 4185) = 23.78, p<0.001), and similar levels of casual sex with a risk of HIV acquisition or transmission (aOR = 1.29, 95% CI = 0.98-1.69, p = 0.066). Recently arrived GBM reported similar levels of lifetime HIV testing (aOR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.54-1.74, p = 0.915) and recent HIV testing (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.86-1.22, p = 0.779), but were much less likely to have tested at general practitioners (aOR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.41-0.68, p<0.001) and more likely to report testing at hospitals (aOR = 3.35, 95% CI = 2.53-4.43, p<0.001), at home (aOR = 2.85, 95% CI = 1.63-4.99, p<0.001), or community-based services (aOR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.01-1.84, p = 0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

Recently arrived GBM from non-English-speaking countries reported similar levels of risk of HIV acquisition to longer-term residents in Australia, but lower levels of PrEP awareness and use, and more reliance on HIV testing services which are free or low cost. It is necessary to enhance access to HIV testing and prevention among recently arrived GBM in Australia.