Common Bias and Challenges in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Research: How to Tackle Them

Stroke Rehabilitation: Synopsis of the 2024 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and U.S. Department of Defense Clinical Practice Guidelines

DESCRIPTION

In July 2024, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) released a joint update of their 2019 clinical practice guideline (CPG) for the management of stroke rehabilitation. This synopsis is a condensed version of the 2024 CPG, highlighting the key aspects of the guideline development process and describing the major recommendations.

METHODS

The VA/DOD Evidence-Based Practice Work Group convened a joint VA/DOD guideline development work group (WG) that included clinical stakeholders and conformed to the Institute of Medicine's tenets for trustworthy CPGs. The guideline WG conducted a patient focus group, developed key questions, and systematically searched and evaluated the literature (English-language publications from 1 July 2018 to 2 May 2023). The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system was used to evaluate the evidence. The WG developed 47 recommendations along with algorithms for stroke rehabilitation in the inpatient and outpatient settings. Stakeholders outside the WG reviewed the CPG before approval by the VA/DOD Evidence-Based Practice Work Group.

RECOMMENDATIONS

This synopsis summarizes where evidence is strongest to support guidelines in crucial areas relevant to primary care physicians: transition to community (case management, psychosocial or behavioral interventions); motor therapy (task-specific practice, mirror therapy, rhythmic auditory stimulation, electrical stimulation, botulinum toxin for spasticity); dysphagia, aphasia, and cognition (chin tuck against resistance, respiratory muscle strength training); and mental health (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use, psychotherapy, mindfulness-based therapies for treatment but not prevention of depression).

The influence of intervention fidelity on treatment effect estimates in clinical trials of complex interventions: a metaepidemiological study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) provide the most reliable estimates of treatment effectiveness for therapeutic interventions. However, flaws in their design and conduct may bias treatment effect estimates, leading to overestimation or underestimation of the true intervention effect. This is especially relevant for complex interventions, such as those in rehabilitation, which are multifaceted and tailored for individual patients or providers, leading to variations in delivery and treatment effects. To assess whether poor intervention fidelity, the faithfulness of the intervention delivered in an RCT to what was intended in the trial protocol, influences (biases) estimates of treatment effects derived from meta-analysis of rehabilitation RCTs.

METHODS

In this metaepidemiological study of 19 meta-analyses and 204 RCTs published between 2010 and 2020, we evaluated the difference in intervention effects between RCTs in which intervention fidelity was monitored and those in which it was absent. We also conducted random-effects metaregression to measure associations between intervention fidelity, risk of bias, study sample size, and treatment effect estimates.

RESULTS

There was a linear relationship between fidelity and treatment effect sizes across RCTs, even after adjusting for risk of bias and study sample size. Higher degrees of fidelity were associated with smaller but more precise treatment effect estimates (d = -0.23 95% CI: -0.38, -0.74). Lower or absent fidelity was associated with larger, less precise estimates. Adjusting for fidelity reduced pooled treatment effect estimates in 4 meta-analyses from moderate to small or from small to no negligible or no effect, highlighting how poor fidelity can bias meta-analyses' results.

CONCLUSION

Poor or absent intervention fidelity in RCTs may lead to overestimation of observed treatment effects, skewing the conclusions from individuals studies and systematic reviews with meta-analyses when pooled. Caution is needed when interpreting the results of complex intervention RCTs when fidelity is not monitored or is monitored but not reported.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Patients, the public, and health-care providers rely on clinical trials for information about how effective treatments are when making decisions about health care. However, the way that clinical trials are conducted may alter the evidence that clinical trials provide about how effective interventions truly are. In this study, we investigated whether how closely health-care providers monitor how they deliver rehabilitation treatments to patients in clinical studies, and how closely those treatments match the treatment that the researchers had planned, influences the results of those studies. We found that when researchers or health-care providers don't closely monitor how they deliver treatments during a study, those studies may provide exaggerated estimates of the effectiveness of the treatments studies. This is important, because it may mean that some health-care providers and patients may opt for treatments that are less effective than they appeared in clinical studies, or may overlook treatments that are more effective than they appeared in other studies.

Factors Influencing the Attrition Rate of a 10-Week Multimodal Rehabilitation Program in Patients After Lung Transplant: A Neural Network Analysis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Despite the effectiveness of exercise and nutritional interventions to improve aerobic capacity and quality of life in lung transplant (LT) recipients, their compliance is low. Strategies to reduce the high attrition rate (participants lost over time) is a major challenge. Artificial neural networks (ANN) may assist in the early identification of patients with high risk of attrition. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of ANNs to identify prognostic factors for high attrition rate of a 10-week rehabilitation program after a LT.

METHODS

This prospective observational study included first-time LT recipients over 18 years of age. The main outcome for each patient was the attrition rate, which was estimated by the amount of missing data accumulated during the study. Clinical variables including malnutrition, sarcopenia, and their individual components were assessed at baseline. An ANN and regression analysis were used to identify the factors determining a high attrition rate.

RESULTS

Of the 41 participants, 17 (41.4%) had a high rate of attrition in the rehabilitation program. Only 23 baseline variables had no missing data and were included in the analysis, from which a low age-dependent body mass index (BMI) was the most important conditioning factor for a high attrition rate (p = 7.08 × 10-5), followed by end-stage respiratory disease requiring PT (p = 0.000111), low health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) (p = 0.0009078), and low handgrip strength (p = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of high attrition rate in LT recipients is high. The profile of patients with a high probability of attrition includes those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, low BMI and handgrip strength, and reduced HRQoL.

Focal Versus Combined Focal Plus Radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy: A Retrospective Study

Background: Lateral epicondylitis of the elbow, commonly known as tennis elbow, is a musculoskeletal disorder characterized by pain and degeneration of the common extensor tendon. Despite various treatments, optimal management remains debated. Objective: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of focal extracorporeal shockwave therapy (F-ESWT) alone versus a combination of focal and radial pressure waves (F-ESWT+R-PW) in treating chronic lateral epicondylitis. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 45 patients diagnosed with chronic lateral epicondylitis divided into two groups based on the treatment received: group A (F-ESWT, n = 23) and group B (F-ESWT+R-PW, n = 22). Both groups underwent three weekly sessions of their respective treatments. Patients were also given a home exercise protocol. Primary outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) for pain and functional impairment at baseline (T0), 4 weeks (T1), 12 weeks (T2), and 24 weeks (T3) post-treatment. Secondary outcomes included grip strength and ultrasonographic measurements of common extensor tendon (CET) thickness and vascularization. Results: Significant improvements in VAS and PRTEE scores were observed in both groups at all follow-up points. Group B showed greater pain reduction at T1 (VAS: 3.0 ± 1.6 vs. 4.43 ± 1.47; p < 0.005) and T2 (VAS: p < 0.030) compared to group A. Functional outcomes (PRTEE) also favored group B at T1 (p < 0.030) and in the pain section at T2 (p < 0.020). Grip strength improved similarly in both groups. CET thickness showed no significant differences at T3. Vascularization decreased significantly in both groups, with a non-significant trend favoring group B. Conclusions: The combined F-ESWT+R-PW therapy proved more effective than F-ESWT alone in the short- to mid-term management of chronic lateral epicondylitis, significantly enhancing pain reduction and functional outcomes. The combination of focal and radial pressure waves offers a superior therapeutic approach, leveraging the distinct mechanisms of each modality for better clinical results. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and establish long-term efficacy.

Best Practice Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Post-Stroke Spasticity: A Modified Scoping Review

This article aims to provide a concise overview of the best available evidence for managing post-stroke spasticity. A modified scoping review, conducted following the PRISMA guidelines and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), involved an intensive search on Medline and PubMed from 1 January 2000 to 31 August 2023. The focus was placed on high-quality (GRADE A) medical, rehabilitation, and surgical interventions. In total, 32 treatments for post-stroke spasticity were identified. Two independent reviewers rigorously assessed studies, extracting data, and evaluating bias using GRADE criteria. Only interventions with GRADE A evidence were considered. The data included the study type, number of trials, participant characteristics, interventions, parameters, controls, outcomes, and limitations. The results revealed eleven treatments supported by GRADE A evidence, comprising 14 studies. Thirteen were systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and one was randomized control trial. The GRADE A treatments included stretching exercises, static stretching with positional orthosis, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, extracorporeal shock wave therapy, peripheral magnetic stimulation, non-invasive brain stimulation, botulinum toxin A injection, dry needling, intrathecal baclofen, whole body vibration, and localized muscle vibration. In conclusion, this modified scoping review highlights the multimodal treatments supported by GRADE A evidence as being effective for improving functional recovery and quality of life in post-stroke spasticity. Further research and exploration of new therapeutic options are encouraged.

Evidence-based rehabilitation medicine: definition, foundation, practice and development

To determine the definition, foundation, practice, and development of evidence-based rehabilitation medicine (EBRM) and point out the development direction for EBRM. Retrieve the database of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China national knowledge infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and China science and technology journal database (CSTJ). The search was conducted from the establishment of the database to June 2023. The key words are "rehabilitation medicine and evidence based" in Chinese and English. After reading the abstract or full text of the literature, a summary analysis is conducted to determine the definition, foundation, practice, and development of EBRM. A total of 127 articles were included. The development of 14 sub majors in EBRM are not balanced, evidence-based musculoskeletal rehabilitation medicine (EBMRM) (31 articles, mainly focuses on osteoarthritis, osteoporosis and musculoskeletal pain), evidence-based neurorehabilitation medicine (EBNM) (34 articles, mainly concentrated in stroke, traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury) and evidence-based education rehabilitation medicine (EBEDRM) (17 articles, mainly focuses on educational methodology), evidence-based nursing rehabilitation medicine (EBNRM) (2 articles), evidence-based engineering rehabilitation medicine (EBENRM) (7 articles), evidence-based traditional Chinese rehabilitation medicine (EBTCRM) (3 articles), evidence-based internal rehabilitation medicine (EBIRM) (11 articles), evidence-based intensive care rehabilitation medicine (EBICRM) (4 articles), evidence-based oncology rehabilitation medicine (EBORM) (6 articles), evidence-based physical therapy medicine (EBPTM) (3 articles), evidence-based cardiopulmonary rehabilitation medicine (EBCRM) (6 articles), evidence-based speech therapy medicine (EBSTM)/evidence-based occupation therapy medicine (EBOTM)/evidence-based geriatric rehabilitation medicine (EBGRM) (1 article). The EBMRM, EBNM and EBEDRM are relatively well developed. The development of EBNRM, EBENRM, EBTCRM, EBIRM, EBICRM, EBGRM, EBORM, EBCRM, EBPTM, EBSTM and EBOTM is relatively slow, indicating these eleven fields should be pay more attention in future.