Contemporary Strategies in the Management of Civilian Neck Zone II Vascular Trauma

Endovascular Treatment of Vascular Injuries in the Craniocervical Region With a Graft Stent: A Single-Center Experience

AIM

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of graft stent implantation in the endovascular treatment of vascular injuries in the craniocervical area.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was carried out through the retrospective screening of eight (two females and six males) patients' records. Patients who used graft stents as an endovascular method were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 43.6 years (with a range of 15-69 years). Due to different mechanisms, the patients had vascular injuries in the craniocervical region, and graft stent implantation was performed between 2010 and 2022. We evaluated patient demographics, admission symptoms, trauma mechanisms, angiographic findings, treatment modalities and materials, patient outcomes, and follow-up periods.

RESULTS

Due to iatrogenesis for four patients, penetrating trauma for three patients, and blunt trauma for one patient, injuries were present in the right internal carotid artery {ICA} (n=1), left ICA (n=1), left common carotid artery {CCA} (n=3), right CCA (n=1), right vertebral artery (n=1), and left vertebral artery (n=1). Angiographically, pseudoaneurysm was detected in seven patients, and vascular rupture was detected in one patient using contrast agent extravasation. All patients who underwent the endovascular method had technical success. Since bleeding from the external carotid artery branches was seen in two patients, these branches were embolized with coils. No radiologically or neurologically pathological findings were recorded during the follow-up period (with a range of one week to 12 years).

CONCLUSION

Graft stent use in the endovascular treatment of craniocervical vascular injuries is an operable, safe, and promising option, especially in patients with pseudoaneurysms and active bleeding.

A Prospective Study of Management of Neck Trauma and its Complications : An Institutional Approach

Background: Assessment and immediate surgical management of laryngotracheal injuries is essential to minimize the risk of perioperative and long term complications [1]. The present study was conducted at tertiary care centre to assess the proportions of complications following neck injuries. Methodology: The study was conducted as a prospective study on 19 patients presenting with laryngotracheal injuries at Emergency department in NSCB Medical College, Jabalpur, India during the study period of 2 years. History was obtained in detail and depending upon the extent and nature of injury, patients were managed. Patients were followed up till discharge for assessment of any postoperative complications. Results: A total of 19 cases with neck trauma were enrolled during our study period with mean age of 27.37±8.88 years. Tracheal breach was noted in 78.9% cases. The most common site of airway injury was tracheal wall (47.3%), followed by Laryngeal trauma with unilateral or bilateral thyroid cartilage (15.8%). Major vessels injury was noted in 26.3% cases and injury to minor blood vessels was observed in 68.4% cases. Wound exploration followed by wound repair was done in 36.8% of the cases whereas emergency tracheostomy along with wound repair was done in 31.6% of the cases. During surgery, brachial plexus injury and surgical site infection were the surgical complications in 1 case each. However, anemia psychiatric tendency and symptoms due to alcohol withdrawal were the complications in 1 case each. Among postoperative complications, persistence of psychiatric symptoms, recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, withdrawal symptoms, and complications due to brachial plexus injury persisted. Conclusion: Neck injuries and laryngotracheal injuries are rare but life threatening injuries, timely management of which is essentially important to avoid the occurrence of complications. Management often requires multidisciplinary approach due to associated complications. The complications may be immediate or remote which can be prevented if patients are managed timely.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-023-03533-7.

Role of imaging in penetrating vascular injuries of the craniocervical region

Penetrating vascular injury has become the topic of interest with increased gun violence in the United States. The radiologist plays a crucial role in establishing and systemizing the signs of vascular injury such as intimal flap, dissection, pseudoaneurysm, rupture, and arteriovenous fistula. Various imaging techniques such as ultrasound Doppler, computed tomographic angiography (CTA), magnetic resonance angiography, and conventional angiography are being employed based on clinical recommendations. Of all the techniques, CTA has been shown to embrace a promising role in identifying vascular injuries with superior sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. An acquaintance of the imaging features has been shown to improve the approach to trauma patients in clinical settings. This article details the imaging modalities and the features of the head-and-neck penetrating vascular injury.

[Update on neck trauma]

BACKGROUND

Important organs and structures are located in the cervical region. In case of blunt and penetrating trauma, emergency situations may arise.

OBJECTIVE

Emergency management as well as diagnostic and therapeutic steps pertaining to neck injuries are presented.

CONCLUSION

Shock therapy and airway management are essential, fast management of neck injuries highly relevant.

Endovascular Therapy of Vascular Trauma—Current Options and Review of the Literature

Objective:

To review the current use of endovascular techniques in trauma.

Summary Background Data:

Multiple studies have demonstrated that, despite current guidelines, endovascular therapies are used in instances of arterial trauma.

Methods:

The existing literature concerning arterial trauma was reviewed. Studies reviewed included case reports, single-center case series, large database studies, official industry publications and instructions for use, and society guidelines.

Results:

Endovascular therapies are used in arterial trauma in all systems. The use of thoracic endografts in blunt thoracic aortic trauma is accepted and endorsed by society guidelines. The use of endovascular therapies in other anatomic locations is largely limited to single-center studies. Advantages potentially include less morbidity due to smaller incisions as well as shorter operating room times. Many report using endovascular therapies even with hard signs of injury. Long-term results are limited by a lack of long-term follow-up but, in general, suggest that these techniques produce acceptable outcomes. The adoption of these techniques may be limited by resource and surgeon availability.

Conclusions:

The use of endovascular therapies in trauma has gained acceptance despite not yet having a place in official guidelines.