Bile Microbiota in Liver Transplantation: Proof of Concept Using Gene Amplification in a Heterogeneous Clinical Scenario

Microbial profile in bile from pancreatic and extra-pancreatic biliary tract cancer

BACKGROUND

Dysbiotic biliary bacterial profile is reported in cancer patients and is associated with survival and comorbidities, raising the question of its effect on the influence of anticancer drugs and, recently, the suggestion of perichemotherapy antibiotics in pancreatic cancer patients colonized by the Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we investigated the microbial communities that colonize tumours and which bacteria could aid in diagnosing pancreatic and biliary cancer and managing bile-colonized patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study on positive bile cultures of 145 Italian patients who underwent cholangiopancreatography with PC and EPC cancer hospitalized from January 2006 to December 2020 in a QA-certified academic surgical unit were investigated for aerobic/facultative-anaerobic bacteria and fungal organisms.

RESULTS

We found that among Gram-negative bacteria, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas spp were the most frequent in the EPC group, while Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp, and Pseudomonas spp were the most frequent in the PC group. Enterococcus spp was the most frequent Gram-positive bacteria in both groups. Comparing the EPC and PC, we found a significant presence of patients with greater age in the PC compared to the EPC group. Regarding Candida spp, we found no significant but greater rate in the PC group compared to the EPC group (11.7% vs 1.96%). We found that Alcaligenes faecalis was the most frequent bacteria in EPC than the PC group, among Gram-negative bacterial species.

CONCLUSIONS

Age differences in gut microbiota composition may affect biliary habitats in our cancer population, especially in patients with pancreatic cancer. Alcaligenes faecalis isolated in the culture of bile samples could represent potential microbial markers for a restricted follow-up to early diagnosis of extra-pancreatic cancer. Finally, the prevalence of Candida spp in pancreatic cancer seems to trigger new aspects about debate about the role of fungal microbiota into their relationship with pancreatic cancer.

The Role of Microbiota in Liver Transplantation and Liver Transplantation-Related Biliary Complications

Liver transplantation as a treatment option for end-stage liver diseases is associated with a relevant risk for complications. On the one hand, immunological factors and associated chronic graft rejection are major causes of morbidity and carry an increased risk of mortality due to liver graft failure. On the other hand, infectious complications have a major impact on patient outcomes. In addition, abdominal or pulmonary infections, and biliary complications, including cholangitis, are common complications in patients after liver transplantation and can also be associated with a risk for mortality. Thereby, these patients already suffer from gut dysbiosis at the time of liver transplantation due to their severe underlying disease, causing end-stage liver failure. Despite an impaired gut-liver axis, repeated antibiotic therapies can cause major changes in the gut microbiome. Due to repeated biliary interventions, the biliary tract is often colonized by several bacteria with a high risk for multi-drug resistant germs causing local and systemic infections before and after liver transplantation. Growing evidence about the role of gut microbiota in the perioperative course and their impact on patient outcomes in liver transplantation is available. However, data about biliary microbiota and their impact on infectious and biliary complications are still sparse. In this comprehensive review, we compile the current evidence for the role of microbiome research in liver transplantation with a focus on biliary complications and infections due to multi-drug resistant germs.

The microbiota and the gut-liver axis in primary sclerosing cholangitis

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) offers unique opportunities to explore the gut-liver axis owing to the close association between liver disease and colonic inflammation. It is well established that the gut microbiota in people with PSC differs from that of healthy individuals, but details of the microbial factors that demarcate PSC from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) without PSC are poorly understood. In this Review, we aim to provide an overview of the latest literature on the gut microbiome in PSC and PSC with IBD, critically examining hypotheses on how microorganisms could contribute to the pathogenesis of PSC. A particular emphasis will be put on pathogenic features of the gut microbiota that might explain the occurrence of bile duct inflammation and liver disease in the context of IBD, and we postulate the potential existence of a specific yet unknown factor related to the gut-liver axis as causative in PSC. Available data are scrutinized in the perspective of therapeutic approaches related to the gut-liver axis.

ABO-Incompatible Liver Transplantation under the Desensitization Protocol with Rituximab: Effect on Biliary Microbiota and Metabolites

Background: ABO-incompatible liver transplantation (ABOi LT) under the desensitization protocol with rituximab had excellent survival outcomes comparable to those of ABO-compatible liver transplantation (ABOc LT). In this work, we explored the effect of ABOi LT on recipients from the perspective of biliary microbiota and metabonomics. Methods: Liver transplant (LT) recipients treated at our center were enrolled in the study. In total, 6 ABOi LT recipients and 12 ABOc LT recipients were enrolled, and we collected their bile five times (during LT and at 2 days, 1 week, 2 weeks and 1 month after LT). The collected samples were used for 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry analysis. Results: We obtained 90 bile samples. Whether in group ABOi LT or ABOc LT, the most common phyla in all of the samples were Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria. The most common genera were Lactobacillus, Weissella, Klebsiella, Pantoea and Lactococcus. There was no significant difference in the diversity between the two groups at 1 week, 2 weeks and 1 month after LT. However, the biggest disparities between the ABOi LT recipients and ABOc LT recipients were observed 2 days after LT, including increased biodiversity with a higher ACE, Chao1, OBS and Shannon index (p < 0.05), and more Staphylococcus in ABOi LT and binary−Jaccard dissimilarity, which indicated varying β-diversity (p = 0.046). These differences were not observed at 1 week, 2 weeks and 1 month after LT. The principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) revealed that the composition of the bile microbiota did not change significantly within 1 month after LT by longitudinal comparison. In an analysis of the bile components, the metabolites were not significantly different every time. However, four enrichment KEGG pathways were observed among the groups. Conclusion: These findings suggest that ABOi LT under the desensitization protocol with rituximab did not significantly affect the biliary microbiota and metabolites of recipients.

Bile duct anastomosis does not promote bacterial contamination of autologous blood salvaged during living donor liver transplantation

Bile duct surgeries are conventionally considered to promote bacterial contamination of the surgical field. However, liver transplantation recipients' bile produced by the newly implanted liver graft from healthy living donors may be sterile. We tested bacterial contamination of autologous blood salvaged before and after bile duct anastomosis (BDA) during living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). In 29 patients undergoing LDLT, bacterial culture was performed for four blood samples and one bile sample: two from autologous blood salvaged before BDA (one was nonleukoreduced and another was leukoreduced), two from autologous blood salvaged after BDA (one was nonleukoreduced and another was leukoreduced), and one from bile produced in the newly implanted liver graft. The primary outcome was bacterial contamination. The risk of bacterial contamination was not significantly different between nonleukoreduced autologous blood salvaged before BDA and nonleukoreduced autologous blood salvaged after BDA (44.8% and 31.0%; odds ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.03-1.86; p = 0.228). No bacteria were found after leukoreduction in all 58 autologous blood samples. All bile samples were negative for bacteria. None of the 29 patients, including 13 patients who received salvaged autologous blood positive for bacteria, developed postoperative bacteremia. We found that bile from the newly implanted liver graft is sterile in LDLT and BDA does not increase the risk of bacterial contamination of salvaged blood, supporting the use of blood salvage during LDLT even after BDA. Leukoreduction converted all autologous blood samples positive for bacteria to negative. The clinical benefit of leukoreduction for salvaged autologous blood on post-LDLT bacteremia needs further research.