Electrocautery vs. Stapler in Comparing Safety for Segmentectomy of Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Application of microwave surgical instrument to lung segmentectomy for small-sized lung cancer

Objectives

For lung segmentectomy of small lung cancers, we used a microwave surgical instrument for lung parenchymal dissection mainly at the pulmonary hilum, which is difficult to handle with surgical staplers. This technique facilitated the insertion of staples.

Methods

In total, 116 patients with cStage 0-1A3 non-small cell lung cancer who underwent lung segmentectomy were included in this study. We compared the perioperative factors of the group in which a microwave surgical instrument was used for dissection procedures, including lung parenchymal dissection at the pulmonary hilum, and peripheral intersegmental dissection was performed with surgical staplers (group M+S: N = 69), with those of the group in which parenchymal dissection was performed mainly with surgical staplers without using the microwave surgical instrument (group S: N = 47).

Results

Although more complex segmentectomies were performed in the M+S group (P = .001), the number of staple cartridges (7 staple cartridges vs 8 staple cartridges, P = .005), the surgical times (179 vs 221 minutes, P < .0001), and the blood loss (5 mL vs 30 mL, P = .012) were significantly lower in the M+S group. The duration of chest tube placement was significantly shorter in the M+S group (P = .019), and postoperative complications of grade 2 or greater were significantly lower in the M+S group (P = .049).

Conclusions

The effective use of the microwave surgical instrument combined with surgical staplers can simplify pulmonary hilar and intersegmental plane dissections not only for simple segmentectomy but also for complex segmentectomy, leading to favorable intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.

The role of new staplers in reducing the incidence of air leak

Surgical staplers play an important role in the contemporary minimally invasive thoracic surgery including resection of lung tissue. However, staple line failure resulting in postoperative air leaks is a common complication after lung surgery, that if persist more than five days are defined as prolonged air leaks (PALs). PALs are associated with increased length of stay, patient morbidity and mortality, and hospital costs. To reduce the incidence of PALs, stapler devices underwent in the last years ongoing development aimed at improving device-to-tissue interaction. This clinical practice review explores the most important aspects of the evolution of surgical staplers, based on the review of the available literature. Modern staple cartridges entail small bumps to engage tissue and minimize tissue movement during compression and firing. Staplers with graduated staple heights are advocated to generate less stress on tissue during compression and clamping, thus affording greater perfusion into the staple line. However, air leaks may occur from an appropriate staple line with complete pleural coverage and perfusion due to enlarged staple canals after lung inflation, particularly in case of emphysema. To buttress staple line, thus prevent air leaks in high-risk patients, several types of tissue coverage (bovine pericardium, polytetrafluoroethylene, knitted calcium alginate, bioabsorbable polyglycolic acid) have been successfully developed in the last years. Finally, the most advanced stapler technology is represented by the new energy powered staplers, able to eliminate the manual firing force, monitor tissue compression during firing, and making automatic adjustments to optimize the staple line.

Division of the intersegmental demarcation using the "modified hand-tearing method" is safe and feasible in thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy

BACKGROUND

The accurate and safe division of the intersegmental demarcation (ISD) is critical and challenging during thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy. Here, we provide an improved technique which emphasizes the application of an electric hook and blunt division of ISD. The technique is termed as the "modified hand-tearing method" (MHT method) with combined application of an electric hook and staplers. The study aimed to review the outcomes of patients who underwent thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy, with or without the MHT method in our institute and assess its feasibility and safety. In addition, we compared the feasibility between video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) using the MHT method.

METHODS

From 2018 July to 2021 June, we retrospectively analyzed 701 patients who underwent segmentectomy. Using propensity score matching, data of two well-matched pairs of 276 cases in the MHT method and non-MHT method groups, and two well-matched pairs of 40 cases in the VATS and RATS subgroups were obtained. The clinical and perioperative characteristics of patients were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Compared with the non-MHT method group, the MHT method group had shorter operation time and shorter postoperative hospital stay. Period of chest tube drainage and postoperative total drainage and postoperative complications had no between-group difference. Compared with VATS, the RATS subgroup had less intraoperative bleeding and shorter postoperative hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

Division of ISD using the MHT method has advantages in precision and ease of operation, so it has the potential to become a feasible and effective method for thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy.