1
|
Grange R, Rousset P, Williet N, Guesnon M, Milot L, Passot G, Phelip JM, Le Roy B, Glehen O, Kepenekian V. Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Combined Liver Resection, Cytoreductive Surgery, and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC): Predictive Factors for Early Recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:2378-2390. [PMID: 38170409 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14840-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Selection of colorectal cancer patients with concomitant peritoneal (PM) and liver metastases (LM) for radical treatment with cytoreductive surgery (CRS), including liver resection and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), needs improvement. This retrospective, monocentric study was designed to evaluate the predictive factors for early recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) in such patients treated in a referral center. METHODS Consecutive colorectal cancer patients with concomitant LM and PM treated with curative intent with perioperative systemic chemotherapy, simultaneous complete CRS, liver resection, and HIPEC in 2011-2022 were included. Clinical, radiological (before and after preoperative chemotherapy), surgical, and pathological data were investigated, along with long-term oncologic outcomes. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictive factors associated with early recurrence (diagnosed <6 months after surgery), DFS, and OS. RESULTS Of more than 61 patients included, 31 (47.1%) had pT4 and 27 (40.9%) had pN2 primary tumors. Before preoperative chemotherapy, the median number of LM was 2 (1-4). The median surgical PCI (peritoneal carcinomatosis index) was 3 (5-8.5). The median DFS and OS were 8.15 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.5-10.1) and 34.1 months (95% CI 28.1-53.5), respectively. In multivariate analysis, pT4 (odds ratio [OR] = 4.14 [1.2-16.78], p = 0.032]) and pN2 (OR = 3.7 [1.08-13.86], p = 0.042) status were independently associated with an early recurrence, whereas retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio [HR] = 39 [8.67-175.44], p < 0.001) was independently associated with poor OS. CONCLUSIONS In colorectal cancer patients with concomitant PM and LM, an advanced primary tumor (pT4 and/or pN2) was associated with a higher risk of early recurrence following a radical multimodal treatment, whereas RLN metastases was strongly detrimental for OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rémi Grange
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Pascal Rousset
- Department of Radiology, CHU Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, CICLY EMR 3738, Lyon 1 University, Pierre Bénite, France
| | - Nicolas Williet
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Mathias Guesnon
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre, Bénite, France
- CICLY, EMR 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
| | - Laurent Milot
- Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Guillaume Passot
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre, Bénite, France
- CICLY, EMR 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
| | - Jean-Marc Phelip
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Bertrand Le Roy
- Department of Digestive and Oncologic Surgery, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre, Bénite, France
- CICLY, EMR 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
| | - Vahan Kepenekian
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre, Bénite, France.
- CICLY, EMR 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stage IV Colorectal Cancer Management and Treatment. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12052072. [PMID: 36902858 PMCID: PMC10004676 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12052072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Up to 50% of patients with CRC develop metastatic CRC (mCRC). Surgical and systemic therapy advances can now offer significant survival advantages. Understanding the evolving treatment options is essential for decreasing mCRC mortality. We aim to summarize current evidence and guidelines regarding the management of mCRC to provide utility when making a treatment plan for the heterogenous spectrum of mCRC. (2) Methods: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed and current guidelines written by major cancer and surgical societies were reviewed. The references of the included studies were screened to identify additional studies that were incorporated as appropriate. (3) Results: The standard of care for mCRC primarily consists of surgical resection and systemic therapy. Complete resection of liver, lung, and peritoneal metastases is associated with better disease control and survival. Systemic therapy now includes chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy options that can be tailored by molecular profiling. Differences between colon and rectal metastasis management exist between major guidelines. (4) Conclusions: With the advances in surgical and systemic therapy, as well as a better understanding of tumor biology and the importance of molecular profiling, more patients can anticipate prolonged survival. We provide a summary of available evidence for the management of mCRC, highlighting the similarities and presenting the difference in available literature. Ultimately, a multidisciplinary evaluation of patients with mCRC is crucial to selecting the appropriate pathway.
Collapse
|
3
|
Therapeutic Strategies and Oncological Outcome of Peritoneal Metastases from Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:2928-2941. [PMID: 36975437 PMCID: PMC10047709 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30030224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The peritoneum is an unusual site of metastases from lung cancer, and optimal management at the moment remains unclear and mostly based on palliative strategies. Therefore, the aim of the study was to investigate demographic characteristics, management and overall survival of patients with peritoneal metastases from lung cancer (PCLC). A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and pooled analysis was performed searching all English studies published until December 2022. PROSPERO, CRD42022349362. Inclusion criteria were original articles including patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from lung cancer, specifying at least one outcome of interest. Exclusion criteria were being unable to retrieve patient data from articles, and the same patient series included in different studies. Among 1746 studies imported for screening, twenty-one were included (2783 patients). Mean overall survival was between 0.5 and 5 months after peritoneal carcinomatosis diagnosis and 9 and 21 months from lung cancer diagnosis. In total, 27% of patients underwent first-line or palliative chemotherapy and 7% of them surgery. Management differs significantly among published studies. The literature on PCLC is scarce. Its incidence is low but appears to be substantially rising and is likely to be an underestimation. Prognosis is very poor and therapeutic strategies have been limited and used in a minority of patients. Subcategories of PCLC patients may have an improved prognosis and may benefit from an aggressive oncological approach, including cytoreductive surgery. Further investigation would be needed in this regard.
Collapse
|