Augmented reality hologram combined with pre-bent distractor enhanced the accuracy of distraction vector transfer in maxillary distraction osteogenesis, a study based on 3D printed phantoms

Artificial Intelligence Applications in Pediatric Craniofacial Surgery

Artificial intelligence is rapidly transforming pediatric craniofacial surgery by enhancing diagnostic accuracy, improving surgical precision, and optimizing postoperative care. Machine learning and deep learning models are increasingly used to analyze complex craniofacial imaging, enabling early detection of congenital anomalies such as craniosynostosis, and cleft lip and palate. AI-driven algorithms assist in preoperative planning by identifying anatomical abnormalities, predicting surgical outcomes, and guiding personalized treatment strategies. In cleft lip and palate care, AI enhances prenatal detection, severity classification, and the design of custom therapeutic devices, while also refining speech evaluation. For craniosynostosis, AI supports automated morphology classification, severity scoring, and the assessment of surgical indications, thereby promoting diagnostic consistency and predictive outcome modeling. In orthognathic surgery, AI-driven analyses, including skeletal maturity evaluation and cephalometric assessment, inform optimal timing and diagnosis. Furthermore, in cases of craniofacial microsomia and microtia, AI improves phenotypic classification and surgical planning through precise intraoperative navigation. These advancements underscore AI's transformative role in diagnostic accuracy, and clinical decision-making, highlighting its potential to significantly enhance evidence-based pediatric craniofacial care.

Feasibility of augmented reality using dental arch-based registration applied to navigation in mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a phantom experiment

OBJECTIVE

Distraction osteogenesis is a primary treatment for severe mandibular hypoplasia. Achieving the ideal mandible movement direction through precise distraction vector control is still a challenge in this surgery. Therefore, the aim of this study was to apply Optical See-Through (OST) Augmented Reality (AR) technology for intraoperative navigation during mandibular distractor installation and analyze the feasibility to evaluate the effectiveness of AR in a phantom experiment.

METHODS

Phantom was made of 3D-printed mandibular models based on preoperative CT scans and dental arch scans of real patients. Ten sets of 3D-printed mandible models were included in this study, with each set consisting of two identical mandible models assigned to the AR group and free-hand group. 10 sets of mandibular distraction osteogenesis surgical plans were designed using software, and the same set of plans was shared between the AR and free-hand groups. Surgeons performed bilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis tasks under the guidance of AR navigation, or the reference of the preoperative surgical plan displayed on the computer screen. The differences in angular errors of distraction vectors and the distance errors of distractor positions under the guidance of the two methods were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

40 distractors were implanted in both groups, with 20 cases in each. In intra-group comparisons between the left and right sides, the AR group exhibited a three-dimensional spatial angle error of 1.88 (0.59, 2.48) on the left and 2.71 (1.33, 3.55) on the right, with P = 0.085, indicating no significant bias in guiding surgery on both sides of the mandible. In comparisons between the AR group and the traditional free-hand (FH) group, the average angle error was 1.94 (1.30, 2.93) in the AR group and 5.06 (3.61, 9.22) in the free-hand group, with P < 0.0001, resulting in a 61.6% improvement in accuracy. The average displacement error was 1.53 ± 0.54 mm in the AR group and 3.56 ± 1.89 mm in the free-hand group, with P < 0.0001, indicating a 57% improvement in accuracy.

CONCLUSION

Augmented Reality technology for intraoperative navigation in mandibular distraction osteogenesis is accurate and feasible. A large randomized controlled trial with long-term follow-up is needed to confirm these findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The project has been registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, with registration number ChiCTR2300068417. Date of Registration: 17 February 2023.

Taxonomic discordance of immersive realities in dentistry: A systematic scoping review

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to map taxonomy frameworks, descriptions, and applications of immersive technologies in the dental literature.

DATA

The Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines was followed, and the protocol was registered at open science framework platform (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/H6N8M).

SOURCES

Systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases, and complemented by manual search.

STUDY SELECTION

A total of 84 articles were included, with 81 % between 2019 and 2023. Most studies were experimental (62 %), including education (25 %), protocol feasibility (20 %), in vitro (11 %), and cadaver (6 %). Other study types included clinical report/technique article (24 %), clinical study (9 %), technical note/tip to reader (4 %), and randomized controlled trial (1 %). Three-quarters of the included studies were published in oral and maxillofacial surgery (38 %), dental education (26 %), and implant (12 %) disciplines. Methods of display included head mounted display device (HMD) (55 %), see through screen (32 %), 2D screen display (11 %), and projector display (2 %). Descriptions of immersive realities were fragmented and inconsistent with lack of clear taxonomy framework for the umbrella and the subset terms including virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), mixed reality (MR), augmented virtuality (AV), extended reality, and X reality.

CONCLUSIONS

Immersive reality applications in dentistry are gaining popularity with a notable surge in the number of publications in the last 5 years. Ambiguities are apparent in the descriptions of immersive realities. A taxonomy framework based on method of display (full or partial) and reality class (VR, AR, or MR) is proposed.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Understanding different reality classes can be perplexing due to their blurred boundaries and conceptual overlapping. Immersive technologies offer novel educational and clinical applications. This domain is fast developing. With the current fragmented and inconsistent terminologies, a comprehensive taxonomy framework is necessary.

Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis

Distraction osteogenesis (DO) of the craniofacial skeleton has become an effective technique for the treatment of both nonsyndromic and syndromic conditions. The advent of craniofacial DO has allowed for earlier intervention in pediatric patients with less complication risk and morbidity compared to traditional techniques. In this review, we will discuss current application and technique for craniofacial DO by anatomical region and explore future applications in craniofacial surgery.