Non-Intubated Thoracic Surgery: Standpoints and Perspectives

Perioperative Outcomes of Non-Intubated Versus Intubated Anesthesia in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Background: Previous studies have shown that ventilation strategies used in general anesthesia influence perioperative outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). This study investigated the perioperative effects of non-intubated anesthesia (NIA) versus intubated anesthesia (IA) in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing VATS. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed patients who underwent elective VATS for early-stage NSCLC between January 2015 and December 2022. Patients were categorized into the NIA and IA groups based on the ventilation strategies during general anesthesia. Comprehensive outcome data, including intraoperative and postoperative variables, were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess the odds ratios for conversion from NIA to IA. Results: A total of 372 patients who received NIA and 1560 who received IA for VATS were eligible for analysis. After propensity score matching, 336 patients were included in each group. In the matched analysis, patients who received NIA demonstrated favorable perioperative outcomes, including reduced opioid consumption, lower postoperative complication rates, and shorter hospital stays, compared to those who received IA. Additionally, patients with a lower baseline oxygen saturation and those who experienced intraoperative pulmonary and cardiovascular adverse events had a higher risk of conversion from NIA to IA. Conclusions: NIA during VATS in patients with early-stage NSCLC was associated with superior perioperative outcomes. Prospective studies are warranted to further evaluate the impact of NIA on perioperative outcomes in this patient population.

Prospective in-depth analysis of anaesthetic management of spontaneous ventilation VATS for lung cancer resection: a matched pairs comparison to intubated VATS

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous ventilation video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (SV-VATS) has been propagated for nearly two decades without a prospective in-depth analysis of anaesthetic management and anaesthetic processing times. This would be important as anaesthetic management of SV-VATS imposes fundamental changes to standards in thoracic anaesthesia and may increase anaesthetic risks. Therefore, this study aimed to provide such in-depth analysis and compare the results to data from matched intubated VATS (I-VATS) patients. 3D-reconstruction of bronchial airways helped to estimate the risk reduction by avoiding double-lumen tube (DLT) intubation according to common selection methods in SV-VATS patients.

METHODS

SV-VATS patients receiving anatomical (N = 22) and non-anatomical (N = 16) lung cancer resections were prospectively enrolled. A retrospective I-VATS control cohort (N = 76) allowed for a 2:1 propensity score matching. DLT sizes necessary for SV-VATS patients according to common selection methods were evaluated by 3D-reconstruction of the left main bronchus and the ≥ 1 mm criterion.

RESULTS

SV-VATS patients required substantially less propofol dosage (P < 0.001) with an increase in variability of drug dosing (P < 0.001) and higher BIS values (P < 0.001) as compared to I-VATS patients. SV-VATS lead to higher variability in respiratory parameters (P < 0.001) with less driving pressure (P < 0.001) and similar mean tidal volumes, oxygenation, and hemodynamic parameters compared to I-VATS. Spontaneous ventilation was achieved by allowing for permissive hypercapnia and respiratory acidosis. Anaesthetic processing time was reduced by 7 min (P < 0.001). 5-10% of female and 5% of male patients would have received a DLT larger than their bronchial airway.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides the first prospective quantitative in-depth analysis of a standardised anaesthetic management regime for SV-VATS, including anaesthetic processing times. Respiratory parameters during SV-VATS are compatible with reduced mechanical power as compared to patients undergoing I-VATS. The anaesthetic management regime reduced the risk of airway damage imposed by choosing too-large DLTs in up to 10% of patients without compromising oxygenation and hemodynamic stability. Changes in anaesthetic processing time by 7 min would not allow for a higher caseload of SV-VATS for lung cancer surgery.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

Current New Approach in Thoracoscopic Surgery: Non-Intubated Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (NI-UniVATS)

Background and Objectives: Non-intubated uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (NI-UniVATS) is a minimally invasive technique performed using a single port, allowing the entire surgical procedure to be completed with spontaneous breathing without the need for general anesthesia. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 51 patients who underwent NI-UniVATS between 2020 and 2023. The intraoperative and postoperative data of patients who underwent NI-UniVATS were evaluated. Results: Among the cases, 37 (72.5%) were male, and 14 (46.6%) were female, with a mean age of 47.73 ± 20.43 years (range: 18-78 years). The mean operative time was 25.92 ± 7.31 min. No perioperative complications were observed in any patient. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 4.17 ± 1.76 days (range: 2-9 days). A right hemithoracic approach was performed in 28 patients (54.9%), whereas a left hemithoracic approach was used in 23 patients (45.1%). The procedures performed included wedge resection in 27 patients (52.9%), biopsy in 22 patients (43.1%), pericardial window creation in one patient (2%), and intrathoracic foreign body removal in one patient (2%). Conclusions: NI-UniVATS allows for safer surgery by preventing the adverse effects and complications associated with general anesthesia. NI-UniVATS can be recommended as a safe and feasible approach for both minor and major thoracic procedures.

Nonintubated video-assisted thoracic surgery: myth or reality?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review discusses nonintubated video-assisted thoracic surgery (NIVATS) by presenting its physiological, technical aspects and recent clinical data from the literature.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the last two decades, NIVATS has gained traction as an alternative to traditional intubated thoracic surgery, offering potential benefits in terms of reduced complications, faster recovery times, and improved patient satisfaction. Several approaches to this technique have been described in the literature, mainly divided into the awake patient technique (awake-NIVATS) and the asleep patient technique (asleep-NIVATS). The availability of various sedatives, numerous devices to ensure good oxygenation, and the countless loco-regional techniques available today for pain control in the thoracic region offer the possibility to develop many anesthesia protocols in this context. Numerous studies have already shown that NIVATS is feasible and safe with proper patient selection and adequate collaboration of the surgical team. Some studies have also shown that NIVATS may improve patient outcomes, but the evidence is still limited.

SUMMARY

Literature has demonstrated the feasibility of NIVATS and suggest that it can improve patient outcomes. High-quality international randomized multicenter studies comparing NIVATS and intubated video-assisted thoracic surgery are necessary for a strong comprehension to clarify whether it can be a technique that can guarantee safety and improve the perioperative course of patients.

Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Lung Cancer: Physiological Principles and Clinical Utilization in Surgical and Non-surgical Settings

Non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) has emerged as a pivotal intervention for the care of individuals with lung cancer. NIMV offers substantial advantages in enhancing oxygenation, optimizing respiratory function, elevating pulmonary capacities, and facilitating patient comfort. NIMV's utility extends to enhancing clinical conditions that range from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and emphysematous lung ailments to aiding patients with lung cancer facing acute respiratory failure. Furthermore, NIVM includes perioperative pulmonary rehabilitation. This approach is particularly relevant for individuals with limited lung capacity. Since both non-invasive positive pressure ventilation modes, including BiLevel positive airway pressure and continuous positive airway pressure, address the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms that contribute to postoperative respiratory failure, the proactive and early integration of NIMV has the potential to significantly enhance gas exchange and overall respiratory performance in meticulously chosen patients within the perioperative phase. Although non-intubated video-assisted thoracic surgery represents an interesting field of application for NIMV strategies, further studies are needed to optimize operative modalities. Lastly, NIMV has a pivotal role in the settings of intensive care and palliative care units, thereby cementing its versatile utility across various medical contexts.

Minimally invasive lung surgery with an intraoperative completely or partially tubeless protocol: randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Thoracic surgery is an invasive procedure and there has been a move towards minimally invasive approaches. This includes video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery without endotracheal intubation has been developed with a view to avoiding complications associated with intubation including tracheal injury, vocal cord injury and lung impairment due to mechanical ventilation. This study aims to compare outcomes from non-intubated 'completely tubeless' versus intubated 'partially tubeless' minimally invasive thoracic surgery.

METHODS

A single-institution, prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted comparing patients who underwent minimally invasive lung completely tubeless versus partially tubeless surgery, both with enhanced recovery. The primary outcome was the short-term postoperative complication rate. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the significant predictors of severe mediastinal shift and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve plots were drawn.

RESULTS

Among the 348 patients, 174 patients were assigned to the completely tubeless group and 174 patients were assigned to the partially tubeless group. There was no difference in postoperative complications including pulmonary complications, supraventricular arrhythmia, acute myocardial infarction, acute cerebral stroke, venous thromboembolism and urinary retention. The completely tubeless protocol was associated with a higher proportion of early mobilization (66.7% versus 55.7%, P = 0.047), a shorter median duration of drainage (1.0 versus 2.0 days, P = 0.002), and a shorter median duration of postoperative hospital stay (2.0 versus 3.0 days, P = 0.001). The completely tubeless group had less of a difference in white blood cell count before and after the operation (P = 0.042). Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that weight was a significant predictor of mediastinal shift in the completely tubeless group.

CONCLUSION

Under enhanced recovery after surgery protocols, there is no difference in postoperative complications in patients undergoing completely or partially tubeless surgery. However, patients having completely tubeless surgery have shorter durations of postoperative drainage, shorter durations of hospital stay, milder systemic inflammatory reactions, and better immune protection than patients who undergo lung resection with a partially tubeless protocol. The severity of mediastinal shift may be mainly related to body-weight.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05269784 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Comparison of postoperative pulmonary complications and intraoperative safety in thoracoscopic surgery under non-intubated versus intubated anesthesia: a randomized, controlled, double-blind non-inferiority trial

PURPOSE

Traditional anesthesia for video-assisted thoracoscopy (VATS) such as double-lumen tracheal intubation (DLT) and one-lung ventilation (OLV), may lead to post-operative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Non-intubation VATS (NIVATS) is an anesthetic technique that avoided DLT and OLV, maybe avoiding the PPCs. So we hypothesized that NIVATS would non-inferiority to intubation VATS (IVATS) in the risk of developing PPCs and some safety indicators.

METHODS

This study is a randomised, controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority trial, 120 patients were randomly assigned to the NIVATS group and IVATS group according to 1:1. The primary outcome was the incidence of PPCs with a pre-defined non-inferiority margin of 10%. The second outcome was the safety indicators, including the incidence of cough/body movement, hypoxemia, malignant arrhythmia, regurgitation and aspiration, and transferring to endobronchial intubation intraoperatively (The malignant arrhythmia was defined as an arrhythmia that caused hemodynamic disturbances in a short period of time, resulting in persistent hypotension or even cardiac arrest in the patient).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in demographic indicators such as gender and age between the two groups. The incidence of PPCs in the NIVATS group was non-inferior to that in the IVATS group (1.67% vs. 3.33%, absolute difference: - 1.67%; 95%CI - 7.25 to 3.91). In additionan, no significant differences were found between the two groups for the incidence of cough/body movement (10.00% vs. 11.67%, p = 0.77), the incidence of hypoxemia (25% vs. 18.33%, p = 0.38), the incidence of malignant arrhythmia (1.67% vs. 6.67%, p = 0.36), the incidence of regurgitation and aspiration (0% vs. 0%, p > 0.999) and the incidence of transferring to endobronchial intubation intraoperatively (0% vs. 0%, p > 0.999).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that when using the non-intubation anesthesia for VATS, the incidence of PPCs was not inferior to intubation anesthesia. Furthermore, NIVATS had little effect on perioperative safety.

Airway management for a patient with tracheobronchomegaly undergoing lobectomy: a case report

BACKGROUND

Tracheobronchomegaly (TBM) is a rare disorder mainly characterized by dilatation and malacia of the trachea and major bronchi with diverticularization. This will be a great challenge for airway management, especially in thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation. Using a laryngeal mask airway and a modified double-lumen Foley catheter (DFC) as a "blocker" may achieve one-lung ventilation. This is the first report introducing this method in a patient with TBM.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a 64-year-old man with TBM receiving left lower lobectomy. Preoperative chest computed tomography demonstrated a prominent tracheobronchial dilation and deformation with multiple diverticularization. The most commonly used double-lumen tube or bronchial blocker could not match the distorted airways. After general anesthesia induction, a 4# laryngeal mask was inserted, through which the modified DFC was positioned in the left main bronchus with the guidance of a fiberoptic bronchoscope. The DFC balloon was inflated with 10 ml air and lung isolation was achieved without any significant air leak during one-lung or two-lung ventilation. However, the collapse of the non-dependent lung was delayed and finally achieved by low-pressure artificial pneumothorax. The surgery was successful and the patient was extubated soon after the surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a laryngeal mask airway with a modified double-lumen Foley catheter acted as a bronchial blocker could be an alternative method to achieve lung isolation.

Outcomes of Non-intubated Versus Intubated Thoracoscopic Surgery for Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of non-intubated video-assisted thoracic surgery (N-VATS) and intubated video-assisted thoracic surgery (I-VATS) for primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 120 consecutive patients who underwent VATS for PSP. The patients were divided into N-VATS and I-VATS groups. Demographics, clinical characteristics, postoperative results, pain scores, follow-up results, and management were evaluated and compared between the groups. Local anesthesia and deep sedation (ketamine 2 mg/kg IV and propofol 2 mg/kg IV slow infusion) were administered under spontaneous ventilation in the N-VATS group.

RESULTS

The groups did not differ significantly in terms of age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiology score, pneumothorax side, or smoking history ( P >0.05). The mean operation time, anesthesia time, oral intake opening time, and mobilization time were significantly shorter in the N-VATS group (26.04±4.61 vs. 48.26±7.82 min, 42.14±6.40 vs. 98.16±12.4 min, 2.1±0.4 vs. 8.4±1.2 h, and 4.2±0.9 vs. 2.6±1.4 between N-VATS and I-VATS, respectively; P <0.05). The surgical outcomes did not differ in terms of minor complications (12%-13%) and recurrence rates (5.1%-6.4%) during a mean follow-up period of 88.4±10.2 mo. No cases of conversion to open surgery or mortality were observed. General anesthesia and intubation were not required for any patient in the N-VATS group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results revealed no differences in minor complications or recurrence rates between groups. However, the N-VATS group had significantly shorter operation, anesthesia, oral intake opening, and mobilization times. The most important advantage of N-VATS for PSP is its fast recovery while avoiding the risks of general anesthesia and intubation. Further prospective studies with larger sample sizes are warranted.

Current overview of awake, non-intubated, video-assisted thoracic surgery

Awake video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (A-VATS) enables the surgeon to penetrate the tissue via a small incision and with less contact between the lung and atmospheric pressure; postoperative respiratory functions are also less affected than in open surgery. A-VATS is a safer technique than traditional VATS and non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (NI-VATS) because it does not require muscle relaxants and sedoanalgesics. In particular, diagnostic VATS for pleural effusions can be easily performed over a single port using only local anaesthetic. Anaesthesia-related risks increase even more for elderly patients and those with severe comorbidities. Although there are long and risky operations in thoracic surgery, general anaesthesia is not required for some thoracic surgery procedures. However, A-VATS is limited to minor procedures. Due to regional anaesthesia and sedation, NI-VATS is a safe and effective method for many indications. The results show that this method can be applied with low mortality and morbidity.