Three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction in video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy (DRIVATS): A prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial

Three-dimensional reconstruction computed tomography in thoracoscopic segmentectomy: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

Thoracoscopic segmentectomy is the recommended treatment option for small peripheral pulmonary nodules. To assess the ability of preoperative three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction computed tomography (CT) to shorten the operative time and improve perioperative outcomes in thoracoscopic segmentectomy compared with standard chest CT, we conducted this randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

The DRIVATS study was a multicentre, randomized controlled trial conducted in 3 hospitals between July 2019 and November 2023. Patients with small peripheral pulmonary nodules not reaching segment borders were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 3D reconstruction CT or standard chest CT before thoracoscopic segmentectomy. The primary end-point was operative time. The secondary end-points included incidence of postoperative complications, intraoperative blood loss and operative accident event.

RESULTS

A total of 191 patients were enrolled in this study: 95 in the 3D reconstruction CT group and 96 in the standard chest CT group. All patients underwent thoracoscopic segmentectomy except for 1 patient in the standard chest CT group who received a wedge resection. There is no significant difference in operative time between the 3D reconstruction CT group (median, 100 min [interquartile range (IQR), 85-120]) and the standard chest CT group (median, 100 min [IQR, 81-140]) (P = 0.82). Only 1 intraoperative complication occurred in the standard chest CT group. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of postoperative complications between the 2 groups (P = 0.52). Other perioperative outcomes were also similar.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with small peripheral pulmonary nodules not reaching segment borders, the use of 3D reconstruction CT in thoracoscopic segmentectomy was feasible, but it did not result in significant differences in operative time or perioperative outcomes compared to standard chest CT.

Resectability versus Operability in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With increased detection of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) owing to screening, determining optimal management increasingly hinges on assessing resectability and operability. Resectability refers to the feasibility of achieving microscopically negative margins based on tumour size, location and degree of local invasion and achieving an anatomical lobar resection. Operability reflects the patient's tolerance for resection based on comorbidities, cardiopulmonary reserve and frailty. Standardized criteria help guide these assessments, but application variability contributes to practice inconsistencies. This review synthesizes a strategic approach to evaluating resectability and operability in contemporary practice. Standardization promises reduced care variability and optimized patient selection to maximize curative outcomes in this new era of early detection.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent pivotal trials demonstrate equivalency of sublobar resection to lobectomy for small, peripheral, node-negative NSCLC, expanding options for parenchymal preservation in borderline surgical candidates. Furthermore, recent phase 3 trials have highlighted the benefit of chemoimmunotherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment with an excellent pathological response and a down staging of the tumour, improving the resectability of the early-stage NSCLC. A good assessment of the operability and resectability is paramount in order to offer the best course of treatment for our patients. European and American societies have issued recommendations to help clinicians assess the cardiopulmonary function and predict the extension of pulmonary resection that could afford the patient. This operability assessment is closely linked with the evaluated tumour resectability which will determine the extension of pulmonary resection that is needed for the patient in order to achieve a good oncological outcome. Some major progresses have been done recently to improve the operability and resectability of patients. For instance, prehabilitation program allows better postoperative morbidity. Some studies have shown a potential good oncological outcome with sublobar resection expending access to surgery for patient with reduced lung function. Some others have identified the neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy as a potential solution for downstaging tumours. Work-up of early-stage NSCLC is a key moment and has to be done thoroughly and in full knowledge of the recent findings in order to propose the most appropriate treatment for the patient.

Three-Dimensional Imaging-Guided Lung Anatomic Segmentectomy: A Single-Center Preliminary Experiment

Background and objectives: VATS segmentectomy has been proven to be effective in the treatment of stage I NSCLC, but its technical complexity remains one of the most challenging aspects for thoracic surgeons. Furthermore, 3D-CT reconstruction images can help in planning and performing surgical procedures. In this paper, we present our personal experience of 11 VATS anatomical resections performed after accurate pre-operative planning with 3D reconstructions. Materials and methods: A 3D virtual model of the lungs, airways, and vasculature was obtained, starting from a 1.25 mm 3-phase contrast CT scan, and the original images were used for the semi-automatic segmentation of the lung parenchyma, airways, and tumor. Results: Six males and five females were included in this study. The median diameter of the pulmonary lesion at the pre-operative chest CT scan was 20 mm. The surgical indication was confirmed in seven patients: in three cases, a lobectomy, instead of a segmentectomy, was needed due to intraoperative findings of nodal metastasis. Meanwhile, only in one case, we performed a lobectomy because of inadequate surgical resection margins. Skin-to-skin operative average time was 142 (IQR 1-3 105-182.5) min. The median post-operative stay was 6 (IQR 1-3 3.5-7) days. The mean value of the closest surgical margin was 13.7 mm. Conclusion: Image-guided reconstructions are a useful tool for surgeons to perform complex resections in order to spare healthy parenchyma and to ensure disease-free margins. Nevertheless, human skill and surgeon experience still remain fundamental for the final decisions regarding the proper resection to perform.

Harnessing 3D-CT Simulation and Planning for Enhanced Precision Surgery: A Review of Applications and Advancements in Lung Cancer Treatment

The clinical application of three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) technology has rapidly expanded in the last decade and has been applied to lung cancer surgery. Two consecutive reports of large-scale prospective clinical trials from Japan and the United States have brought a paradigm shift in lung cancer surgery and may have led to a rapid increase in sublobar lung resections. Sublobar resection, especially segmentectomy, requires a more precise understanding of the anatomy than lobectomy, and preoperative 3D simulation and intraoperative navigation support it. The latest 3D simulation software packages are user-friendly. Therefore, in this narrative review, we focus on recent attempts to apply 3D imaging technologies, particularly in the sublobar resection of the lung, and review respective research and outcomes. Improvements in CT accuracy and the use of 3D technology have advanced lung segmental anatomy. Clinical applications have enabled the safe execution of complex sublobar resection through a minimally invasive approach, such as video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and robotic surgery. However, currently, many facilities still render 3D images on two-dimensional monitors for usage. In the future, it will be challenging to further spread and advance intraoperative navigation through the application of 3D output technologies such as extended reality.

Anatomy of the lung revisited by 3D-CT imaging

The anatomy of the lung was originally described based on data acquired from cadaveric studies and surgical findings. Over time, computed tomography (CT) and three-dimensional (3D) imaging techniques have been developed, allowing for reconstruction and understanding of lung anatomy in a more intuitive way. The wide adoption of 3D-CT imaging technology has led to a variety of anatomical studies performed not only by anatomists but also by surgeons and radiologists. Such studies have led to new or modified classification systems, shed light on lung anatomy from a useful surgical viewpoint, and enabled us to analyze lung anatomy with a focus on particular anatomical features. 3D images also allow for enhanced pre- and intra-operative simulation, improved surgical safety, enhanced educational utility, and the capacity to perform large-scale anatomical studies in shorter time frames. We will review here the key features of 3D-CT imaging of the lung, along with representative anatomical studies regarding (I) general lung anatomy, (II) anatomy of the right and left lobes, and (III) features of interlobar vessels. The current surge of 3D imaging analysis shows that the field is growing, with the technology continuing to improve. Future studies using these new and innovative methodologies will continue to refine our understanding of lung anatomy while enhancing our ability to perform safe and effective surgical resections.