Comparison of perioperative outcomes in frail patients following multilevel lumbar fusion surgery with and without the implementation of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol

Assessing combined effects of risk analysis index-revised (RAI-rev), malnutrition, and anemia on morbidity and mortality after spine surgery for metastatic spinal tumors

PURPOSE

This study evaluates the combined effects of frailty, anemia, and malnutrition on outcomes in spinal metastases patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the 2011-2022 NSQIP database. Adult patients undergoing spinal surgery for spinal metastases were identified using CPT and ICD codes and stratified based on Risk Analysis Index-revised (RAI-rev) frailty status; frail patients were subdivided based on anemia and malnutrition status. Our primary outcomes were extended hospital length of stay (LOS), 30-day adverse events (AEs), non-routine discharge (NRD), and 30-day mortality. For each outcome, we fitted four nested multivariable logistic regression models (RAI-rev + anemia + malnutrition, RAI-rev + anemia, RAI-rev + malnutrition, and RAI-rev alone) and compared the incremental discrimination of each model using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

1530 patients were stratified accordingly: 355 Frail Alone, 540 Frail + Anemic, 85 Frail + Malnourished, 407 Frail + Anemic + Malnourished, and 143 Not Frail. RAI-rev and malnourishment were risk factors for extended LOS ((RAI-rev: aOR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08; malnourishment: aOR 1.98, 95% CI 1.44-2.73)) and mortality (RAI-rev: aOR: 1.07, 95% CI 1.03-1.11; malnourishment: aOR: 2.37, 95% CI 1.50-3.75). RAI-rev (aOR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.03) and anemia (aOR 2.06, 95% CI 1.50-2.84) independently predicted AEs and malnourishment predicted NRD (aOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.15-2.13). On ROC analysis, RAI-rev + anemic + malnourished superiorly predicted extended LOS (p = 0.021), AEs (p = 0.035), and mortality (p = 0.023) compared to RAI-rev. RAI-rev + malnourished outperformed RAI-rev in predicting extended LOS (p = 0.035) and mortality (p = 0.020). RAI-rev + anemic outperformed RAI-rev in predicting AEs (p = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that RAI-rev-defined frailty combined with anemia and malnutrition is a superior predictor of outcomes in spinal metastases patients.

Application of an enhanced recovery after surgery care protocol in patients undergoing lumbar interbody fusion surgery: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been widely used in several surgical fields. This meta-analysis compared the clinical outcomes of the ERAS protocol and standard care (SC) in patients who underwent lumbar interbody fusion surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were systematically searched to identify studies reporting the effects of the ERAS protocol on clinical outcomes in patients who underwent lumbar interbody fusion surgery.

RESULTS

Overall, 15 studies involving 17 865 patients were included in the final analysis. With the ERAS protocol, the length of hospitalization (SMD: - 0.47, 95% CI - 0.56 to -0.38), postoperative complications (OR = 0.62; 95% CI 0.50 to 0.77), operation time (SMD = - 0.26; 95% CI - 0.44 to -0.09), postoperative pain (SMD = - 0.35; 95% CI - 0.64 to -0.07) and duration of ambulation (SMD = - 0.80; 95% CI - 1.02 to - 0.58) were significantly reduced. The rates of readmission (OR = 0.63; 95% CI 0.38 to 1.04), estimated blood loss (SMD = - 0.31; 95% CI - 0.69 to 0.06) and hospitalization costs (SMD: - 0.56, 95% CI - 1.27 to 0.14) did not significantly differ between the ERAS and SC groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The present meta-analysis indicated that the ERAS protocol could be safely and feasibly implemented in the perioperative management of patients receiving lumbar interbody fusion surgery. The protocol significantly reduced the length of hospitalization, incidence of postoperative complications, operation time, duration of 1st ambulation and duration of postoperative pain. However, no differences were observed in estimated blood loss, readmission rates or hospitalization costs.

Enhanced recovery pathway in adult patients with spinal deformity undergoing open thoracolumbar surgery

PURPOSE

The poor prognosis of adult patients with spinal deformity following long-segment spinal fusion surgery remains a major concern. Our study aims to investigate the impact of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol on the prognosis of adult patients with spinal deformity.

METHODS

This study focused on a retrospective review of a database of previous adult spinal deformity. Adult patients with spinal deformity who underwent long-segment fusion surgery from July 2016 to July 2022 were evaluated, from July 2016 to July 2019 for the pre-ERAS patient group and from July 2019 to July 2022 for the ERAS group. Demographic data, radiological sagittal parameters, and intraoperative data were collected from all patients. The length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and 90-day readmission rates were compared between the two groups. Additionally, multivariate regression models were used to analyze the predictors of postoperative length of stay, postoperative complications, and 90-day readmission rates.

RESULTS

A total of 215 patients were included in this study, 102 patients in the pre-ERAS group and 113 patients in the ERAS group. Postoperative outcomes in the ERAS group included significantly lower postoperative length of stay (LOS) (13.09 ± 4.57 vs. 11.13 ± 4.16, P = 0.001); significantly lower rate of postoperative complications (52.0% vs. 29.2%, P < 0.001) and significantly lower 90-day readmission rates (14.7% vs. 6.19%, P = 0.040). Multivariate linear regression showed that fewer ERAS (P = 0.022), later drain placement (P = 0.027), and more complications (P = 0.002) were significantly associated with longer postoperative LOS. Multivariate logistic regression showed that fewer ERAS (P = 0.015) and later drain removal (P = 0.041) were significantly associated with more complications, and more ERAS (P = 0.009), earlier postoperative LOS (P = 0.020), and earlier urinary catheter removal (P = 0.034) were significantly associated with the 90-day readmission rates.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the results of our study, it is necessary to implement an ERAS protocol for adult patients with spinal deformity undergoing long-segment fusion surgery. The ERAS protocol is effective in reducing postoperative hospital length of stay, incidence of surgical complications, and 90-day readmission rates.

Effectiveness, usability, and patient satisfaction of an mHealth application with an integrated ePRO system following lumbar degenerative spinal surgery: A quasi-experimental study

Introduction

There is a lack of comprehensive clinical research to assess potential benefits of mHealth solutions in post discharge follow-up care after spinal surgery.

Purpose

This quasi-experimental study evaluated the effectiveness, usability, and patient satisfaction of an mHealth pathway with an electronic Patient-Reported Outcome (ePRO)-based post-discharge nurse-led intervention for patients undergoing surgery for lumbar spine degenerative disorders, compared to standard care.

Methods

Conducted at a Danish tertiary spine center, this study represents the final stage of a three-phase participatory design. The primary outcome was patient quality of recovery, measured by the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included patient-perceived usability, assessed with the Danish System Usability Scale (SUS). To capture additional patient insights, an open-ended feedback question was included at the end of the survey.

Results

Data from 150 patients (77 women and 73 men) were analyzed, with 104 in the intervention group and 46 in the comparison group. Both groups showed significant improvement over time, but no significant difference between groups. Of 154 potential SUS respondents, 110 participated. Analysis revealed 48 statements, categorized into five themes: (1) Usability and functionality of the mHealth solution, (2) Feedback on the QoR-15 questionnaire, (3) Safety and support, (4) Missing functions and suggestions for improvements, and (5) Patient satisfaction.

Conclusion

No significant differences in effectiveness between the mHealth pathway and standard care were found for post-surgery recovery in lumbar spine patients. Usability and patient satisfaction were generally high, though suggestions for improvements were noted. The study highlighted the importance of post-discharge support, suggesting that the intervention provided crucial security and support, potentially demonstrating compassion through nurse-led care.

The Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Spine Surgery in High and Low/Middle-income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

In this review article, we explore the implementation and outcomes of enhanced recovery after spine surgery (spine ERAS) across different World Bank country-income levels. A systematic literature search was conducted through PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL databases for articles on the implementation of spine ERAS in both adult and pediatric populations. Study characteristics, ERAS elements, and outcomes were analyzed and meta-analyses were performed for length of stay (LOS) and cost outcomes. The number of spine ERAS studies from low-middle-income countries (LMICs) increased since 2017, when the first spine ERAS implementation study was published. LMICs were more likely than high-income countries (HICs) to conduct studies on patients aged ≥18 years (odds ratio [OR], 6.00; 95% CI, 1.58-42.80), with sample sizes 51 to 100 (OR, 4.50; 95% CI, 1.21-22.90), and randomized controlled trials (OR, 7.25; 95% CI, 1.77-53.50). Preoperative optimization was more frequently implemented in LMICs than in HICs (OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.06-4.41), and operation time was more often studied in LMICs (OR 3.78; 95% CI, 1.77-8.35). Implementation of spine ERAS resulted in reductions in LOS in both LMIC (-2.06; 95% CI, -2.47 to -1.64 d) and HIC (-0.99; 95% CI, -1.28 to -0.70 d) hospitals. However, spine ERAS implementation did result in a significant reduction in costs. This review highlights the global landscape of ERAS implementation in spine surgery, demonstrating its effectiveness in reducing LOS across diverse settings. Further research with standardized reporting of ERAS elements and outcomes is warranted to explore the impact of spine ERAS on cost-effectiveness and other patient-centered outcomes.

The Impact of Improved Compliance With Enhanced Recovery After Surgery on Frail Patients Undergoing Multi-Level Posterior Lumbar Fusion Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Diseases

Background

Patients with frailty are more prone to have perioperative adverse events, and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been widely adopted to improve perioperative outcomes. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of improved compliance with ERAS on perioperative outcomes in frail patients.

Methods

Geriatric patients (over 65 years) who underwent multi-level lumbar fusion surgery between June 2017 and June 2022 were included. The patients were divided into two groups according to their degree of compliance with the ERAS. Stepwise nearest-neighbor propensity score matching 1:1 cohorts for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classfication and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was performed between groups, namely frail-compliant (FC), frail-noncompliant (FN). Further length of stay (LOS), complications and clinical efficacy were compared between groups.

Results

There were 83 pairs of well-balanced patients with comparable clinical baseline data. It was worth noting that patients in FC group has significant lower overall complications (20.5% in the FC group vs 39.8% in the FN group, P = 0.007), major complications (7.2% in the FC group vs 19.3% in the FN group, P = 0.022) and shorter LOS (11.18 ± 5.32 in the FC group vs 14.45 ± 4.68 in the FN group, P < 0.001) than patients in FN group. In addition, the initial occurrence of ambulation (2.14 ± 1.21 in FC group vs 3.18 ± 1.73 in FN group, P = 0.012) and bowel movement (3.68 ± 1.24 in FC group vs 4.17 ± 1.32 in FN group, P = 0.031) were earlier for patients in FC group than patients in FN group. With regard to clinical efficacy, there were no significant difference between FC and FN group in terms of patients who meet minimal clinical important difference (MCID) for Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at postoperative day (POD) 30, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back at POD 30-90 and VAS for legs at POD 30, 90, and 180 follow-up intervals. However, there were significant more patients meeting MCID for ODI at POD 90 and180, and VAS for back at POD 180 between FC and FN group.

Conclusions

In this retrospective cohort study, we found that frail patients with higher ERAS adherence group had a lower incidence of overall complication, mjor complications, and a shorter LOS than their lower ERAS adherence counterparts. In addition, frail patients with higher ERAS adherence had earlier ambulatioin and bowel movement. More importantly, we found there were significant more patients meeting MCID for ODI at POD 90 and180, and VAS for back at POD 180 in higher ERAS adherence than their lower counterparts.

Transforming Outcomes of Spine Surgery-Exploring the Power of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of 15 198 Patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols aim to optimize patient outcomes by reducing the surgical stress response, expediting recovery, and reducing care costs. We aimed to evaluate the impact of implementing ERAS protocols on the perioperative surgical outcomes and financial implications associated with spine surgeries.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of peer-reviewed studies directly comparing outcome differences between spine surgeries performed with and without utilization of ERAS pathways was conducted along Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

RESULTS

Of 676 unique articles identified, 59 with 15 198 aggregate patients (7748 ERAS; 7450 non-ERAS) were included. ERAS-treated patients had shorter operative times (mean difference [MD]: 10.2 mins; P < .01), shorter hospitalizations (MD: 1.41 days, P < .01), fewer perioperative complications (relative risk [RR] = 0.64, P < .01), lower postoperative opioid use (MD of morphine equivalent dose: 164.36 mg; P < .01), and more rapid mobilization/time to first out-of-bed ambulation (MD: 0.92 days; P < .01). Spine surgeries employing ERAS were also associated with lower total costs (MD: $1140.26/patient; P < .01), especially in the United States (MD: $2869.11/patient, P < .01) and lower postoperative visual analog pain scores (MD = 0.56, P < .01), without any change in odds of 30-day readmission (RR: 0.80, P = .13) or reoperation (RR: 0.88, P = .60). Subanalyses based on the region of spine showed significantly lower length of stay in both cervical and lumbar surgeries implementing ERAS. Type of procedure showed a significantly lesser time-to-initiate mobilization in fusion surgeries using ERAS protocols compared with decompression.

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analysis indicates that current literature supports ERAS implementation as a means of reducing care costs and safely accelerating hospital discharge for patients undergoing spine surgery.