Toxicological Assessment of Flavor Ingredients in E-Vapor Products

A contextualised e-cigarette testing strategy shows flavourings do not impact lung toxicity in vitro

Vaping has the potential to reduce the individual health risks associated with smoking and e-cigarette flavours have been reported to help smokers' transition from cigarettes. In this manuscript, we provide evidence to support the reduced risk potential of e-cigarette aerosols and flavours by assessing commercially available e-liquids (Vuse ePod - Manufactured by British American Tobacco) in a 2D in vitro screening approach. We also analysed selected flavours using a more physiologically relevant 3D (MucilAir) whole aerosol exposure model, measuring toxicity and functional endpoints such as Trans Epithelial Electrical Resistance, Cilia Beat Frequency and Active Area. To contextualise responses, we have compared e-cigarette aerosol to cigarette smoke (1R6F research cigarette) and calculated the percentage reduction using a point of departure approach. We show that aerosolised flavoured e-liquids, (appropriately stewarded) do not increase the overall measured aerosol toxicity when compared to cigarette smoke. In fact, we demonstrate that the measured in vitro cellular toxicity of flavoured e-cigarette products remains >95% reduced when compared to cigarette smoke toxicity, using point of departure (IC₈₀) approach. These data indicate that the overall product toxicity is not increased in a flavour dependent manner and that flavoured e-cigarette products can potentially play a role in tobacco harm reduction.

Assessment of inhalation toxicity of cigarette smoke and aerosols from flavor mixtures: 5-week study in A/J mice

Most flavors used in e-liquids are generally recognized as safe for oral consumption, but their potential effects when inhaled are not well characterized. In vivo inhalation studies of flavor ingredients in e-liquids are scarce. A structure-based grouping approach was used to select 38 flavor group representatives (FGR) on the basis of known and in silico-predicted toxicological data. These FGRs were combined to create prototype e-liquid formulations and tested against cigarette smoke (CS) in a 5-week inhalation study. Female A/J mice were whole-body exposed for 6 h/day, 5 days/week, for 5 weeks to air, mainstream CS, or aerosols from (1) test formulations containing propylene glycol (PG), vegetable glycerol (VG), nicotine (N; 2% w/w), and flavor (F) mixtures at low (4.6% w/w), medium (9.3% w/w), or high (18.6% w/w) concentration or (2) base formulation (PG/VG/N). Male A/J mice were exposed to air, PG/VG/N, or PG/VG/N/F-high under the same exposure regimen. There were no significant mortality or in-life clinical findings in the treatment groups, with only transient weight loss during the early exposure adaptation period. While exposure to flavor aerosols did not cause notable lung inflammation, it caused only minimal adaptive changes in the larynx and nasal epithelia. In contrast, exposure to CS resulted in lung inflammation and moderate-to-severe changes in the epithelia of the nose, larynx, and trachea. In summary, the study evaluates an approach for assessing the inhalation toxicity potential of flavor mixtures, thereby informing the selection of flavor exposure concentrations (up to 18.6%) for a future chronic inhalation study.