1
|
Gao R, Feng SY, Zheng J, Zhai LJ, Liu R. Telehealth and Telemedicine in the Management of Adult Patients after Liver Transplantation: A Scoping Review. Telemed J E Health 2025; 31:375-385. [PMID: 39630539 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2024.0359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Telemedicine can support home-based self-care for liver transplant recipients after discharge from the hospital. This study aimed to (1) provide an overview of the forms of home care for liver transplant patients; (2) identify the content elements of telemedicine in the home care of liver transplant patients; and (3) summarize the effect and outcome indexes of using telemedicine in liver transplantation patients. Methods: A search was performed in the electronic databases of PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Google Scholar, CNKI, Wan Fang data and Wei Pu database through March 1, 2024. Subject heading and keywords were used to reflect the concepts of telemedicine, hepatic transplantation. Studies of tele-home care after transplantation in liver transplant recipients over 18 years of age and the form, content elements, and outcome assessments of telemedicine were included. Results: A total of 16 articles met the inclusion criteria, and from this, the application form of telemedicine in liver transplantation patients, intervention elements and evaluation outcome indexes were identified. The forms of application include internet platform, applications, network communication software, and portable devices; and the elements of intervention include telemonitoring, remote health guidance, telerecordings, teleconsultation, and telerehabilitation; and the outcome indicators include physiological indicators, psychological status, Quality of life, self-management ability, compliance, satisfactory degree, complication rate, readmission rate, and feasibility. Conclusion: Telemedicine is active and feasible in the home-based self-care of patients after liver transplantation, but its application is immature and there are still some problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rong Gao
- School of Nursing, Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi, China
| | - Sheng-Ya Feng
- School of Nursing, Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi, China
| | - Jie Zheng
- School of Nursing, Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi, China
| | - Lin-Jun Zhai
- School of Nursing, Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi, China
| | - Rong Liu
- School of Nursing, Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rozenberg D, Logan S, Sohrabipour S, Bourgeois N, Cote A, Deliva R, De Souza A, de Vries R, Donald M, Ferreira M, Hart D, Ibrahim Masthan M, Jaundis-Ferreira T, Juillard S, Khoury M, Lallani A, Mager D, Mucsi I, Orchanian-Cheff A, Reed JL, Tandon P, Tennankore K, Yong E, Wickerson L, Mathur S. Establishment of emerging practices and research priorities for telerehabilitation in solid organ transplantation: meeting report and narrative literature review. FRONTIERS IN REHABILITATION SCIENCES 2025; 6:1535138. [PMID: 40226125 PMCID: PMC11985446 DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2025.1535138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/17/2025] [Indexed: 04/15/2025]
Abstract
Solid organ transplantation (SOT) is a life-saving procedure for those with end-stage organ dysfunction. The main goals of SOT are to improve quality of life and daily function, which are supported by pre- and post-transplant rehabilitation. In-person rehabilitation programs have traditionally been the standard-of-care for delivering rehabilitation for SOT patients. Many programs have adopted a virtual delivery model [telerehabilitation (TR)], an approach that has become increasingly used given restrictions to in-person delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Presently, TR programs are being used both clinically and in research with variable practices. A 2-day virtual meeting held in February 2023 brought together over 30 Canadian adult and pediatric researchers, clinicians, and patient and family partners across SOT. The meeting objectives were: (1) To facilitate knowledge exchange and dialogue in TR between patient partners, healthcare professionals, researchers, and key stakeholders, and (2) Identify gaps in clinical practice and research in TR. The discussion focused on delivery methods of TR, digital tools, facilitators and barriers of TR, and the effects of TR on physical and mental health in both adult and pediatric populations. This meeting report incorporates a narrative literature review of SOT and rehabilitation articles in the last 20 years. Future directions in TR are highlighted leading to the development of key research priorities targeted towards improved delivery of TR in SOT patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dmitry Rozenberg
- Toronto Lung Transplant Program, Ajmera Transplant Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Respirology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sherrie Logan
- Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program (CDTRP), Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Sahar Sohrabipour
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nicholas Bourgeois
- Lung Transplant Program, Centre Hospitalier de L’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Anita Cote
- School of Human Kinetics, Trinity Western University, Langley, BC, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, British Columbia Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Robin Deliva
- Department of Rehabilitation Services, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Astrid De Souza
- Department of Pediatrics, British Columbia Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Rienk de Vries
- Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program (CDTRP), Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Maoliosa Donald
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Manoela Ferreira
- Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program (CDTRP), Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Donna Hart
- Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program (CDTRP), Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | | | - Sandrine Juillard
- Department of Microbiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Microbiology, CHUM Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Michael Khoury
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Afsana Lallani
- Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program (CDTRP), Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Diana Mager
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Sciences, Dept of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Istvan Mucsi
- Ajmera Transplant Centre, and Division of Nephrology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Nephrology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ani Orchanian-Cheff
- Library and Information Services, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jennifer L. Reed
- University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Human Kinetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Puneeta Tandon
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (Liver Unit), University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Karthik Tennankore
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Elaine Yong
- Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program (CDTRP), Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Lisa Wickerson
- Toronto Lung Transplant Program, Ajmera Transplant Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto and Ajmera Transplant Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sunita Mathur
- School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ko D, Singh N, Saczynski J. Factors Influencing Telehealth Satisfaction Among Liver and Kidney Transplant Recipients. Clin Nurs Res 2025; 34:79-85. [PMID: 39800871 PMCID: PMC11789423 DOI: 10.1177/10547738241309703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2025]
Abstract
Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients now have widespread access to telehealth, but the factors influencing their satisfaction still need to be understood. This cross-sectional study explored potential contributors to telehealth satisfaction among SOT recipients, including liver, kidney, and simultaneous liver-kidney recipients. A total of 136 adult SOT recipients completed an online survey. The survey assessed telehealth satisfaction, previous telehealth experiences, including confidence levels and the need for assistance from others, electronic health literacy (eHealth literacy), perceived physical and mental health status, and cognitive function, along with demographic and clinical characteristics. The multivariate regression backward selection method was used to identify potential factors contributing to telehealth satisfaction. Participants had a mean age of 60.1 years (standard deviation [SD] = 10.5) and were, on average, 92 months post-transplant (SD = 99.9). The mean telehealth satisfaction score was 5.3 out of 7 (SD = 1.2), indicating positive satisfaction with telehealth. However, lower telehealth satisfaction was associated with poor confidence in communicating with providers via telehealth, lower eHealth literacy, better perceived cognitive function, and a prolonged time since SOT (adjusted R2 = 0.49). SOT recipients who perceive vulnerability in online technology, report better perceived cognitive function, and are farther out from their SOT may exhibit lower satisfaction with telehealth. When considering telehealth for transplant care, clinicians should prioritize addressing the specific concerns and challenges of SOT recipients who may perceive telehealth unfavorably.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dami Ko
- Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Neha Singh
- Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hakak F, Patel RN, Gearry RB. Review article: Telecare in gastroenterology-Within the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2024; 59:1170-1182. [PMID: 38557953 DOI: 10.1111/apt.17956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Telehealth is a growing model of care, greatly accelerated with the demands of the COVID-19 pandemic. Telecare is a synchronous audio-visual or audio-only format of health delivery. AIMS To evaluate the existing literature on telecare within adult gastroenterology subspecialties to determine if outcomes are comparable to traditional in-person consultations and to highlight the Pokapū Network, a local initiative in the Lakes Region of New Zealand, amongst these international findings. METHODS We completed an OVID MEDLINE search using the terms gastroenterology, endoscopy, digestive system, inflammatory bowel disease, functional, hepatology, liver, telemedicine, telehealth, videoconferencing, remote consultation, video clinic and telephone clinic. RESULTS Patients showed positive attitudes towards telecare and, in several reports, would elect to have telecare consults in the future. Telecare reduces travel time and out-of-pocket costs for patients and the need for patients to take time off work. Generally, patients engaging with telecare show equivalent health outcomes to patients engaging with traditional models of care. Patients from ethnic minority groups or lower socio-economic backgrounds, or who are older, are less likely to complete a 'successful' telecare consult. CONCLUSION Telecare is a useful model of care to allow gastroenterology centres to function within the context of COVID-19 isolation and beyond. It has significant benefits for patients who face geographical and financial barriers to accessing healthcare. Telecare models such as the Pokapū Network hold promise in reducing inequities for gastroenterology patients. Such models must be introduced with consideration of digital disparities that exist amongst patients to avoid worsening the digital divide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rajan N Patel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Richard B Gearry
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|