1
|
Baldwin RW, Beaver JT, Messinger M, Muday J, Windsor M, Larsen GD, Silman MR, Anderson TM. Camera Trap Methods and Drone Thermal Surveillance Provide Reliable, Comparable Density Estimates of Large, Free-Ranging Ungulates. Animals (Basel) 2023; 13:1884. [PMID: 37889800 PMCID: PMC10252056 DOI: 10.3390/ani13111884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Revised: 05/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Camera traps and drone surveys both leverage advancing technologies to study dynamic wildlife populations with little disturbance. Both techniques entail strengths and weaknesses, and common camera trap methods can be confounded by unrealistic assumptions and prerequisite conditions. We compared three methods to estimate the population density of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virgnianus) in a section of Pilot Mountain State Park, NC, USA: (1) camera trapping using mark-resight ratios or (2) N-mixture modeling and (3) aerial thermal videography from a drone platform. All three methods yielded similar density estimates, suggesting that they converged on an accurate estimate. We also included environmental covariates in the N-mixture modeling to explore spatial habitat use, and we fit models for each season to understand temporal changes in population density. Deer occurred in greater densities on warmer, south-facing slopes in the autumn and winter and on cooler north-facing slopes and in areas with flatter terrain in the summer. Seasonal density estimates over two years suggested an annual cycle of higher densities in autumn and winter than in summer, indicating that the region may function as a refuge during the hunting season.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert W. Baldwin
- Department of Biology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA; (R.W.B.); (M.M.); (J.M.); (G.D.L.); (M.R.S.); (T.M.A.)
| | - Jared T. Beaver
- Department of Biology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA; (R.W.B.); (M.M.); (J.M.); (G.D.L.); (M.R.S.); (T.M.A.)
- Wake Forest University Center for Energy, Environment, and Sustainability, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA
- Department of Animal and Range Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA
| | - Max Messinger
- Department of Biology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA; (R.W.B.); (M.M.); (J.M.); (G.D.L.); (M.R.S.); (T.M.A.)
- Wake Forest University Center for Energy, Environment, and Sustainability, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA
| | - Jeffrey Muday
- Department of Biology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA; (R.W.B.); (M.M.); (J.M.); (G.D.L.); (M.R.S.); (T.M.A.)
| | - Matt Windsor
- Pilot Mountain State Park, North Carolina State Parks, 1792 Pilot Knob Park Rd, Pinnacle, NC 27043, USA;
| | - Gregory D. Larsen
- Department of Biology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA; (R.W.B.); (M.M.); (J.M.); (G.D.L.); (M.R.S.); (T.M.A.)
- Wake Forest University Center for Energy, Environment, and Sustainability, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA
| | - Miles R. Silman
- Department of Biology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA; (R.W.B.); (M.M.); (J.M.); (G.D.L.); (M.R.S.); (T.M.A.)
- Wake Forest University Center for Energy, Environment, and Sustainability, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA
| | - T. Michael Anderson
- Department of Biology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA; (R.W.B.); (M.M.); (J.M.); (G.D.L.); (M.R.S.); (T.M.A.)
- Wake Forest University Center for Energy, Environment, and Sustainability, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Johnson JT, Chandler RB, Conner LM, Cherry MJ, Killmaster CH, Johannsen KL, Miller KV. Assessing the implications of sexual segregation when surveying white‐tailed deer
Odocoileus virginianus. Wildlife Biology 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/wlb3.01077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- James T. Johnson
- D.B. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, The Univ. of Georgia Athens GA USA
| | - Richard B. Chandler
- D.B. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, The Univ. of Georgia Athens GA USA
| | | | - Michael J. Cherry
- Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Inst., Texas A&M Univ. Kingsville TX USA
| | | | | | - Karl V. Miller
- D.B. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, The Univ. of Georgia Athens GA USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Margenau LLS, Cherry MJ, Miller KV, Garrison EP, Chandler RB. Monitoring partially marked populations using camera and telemetry data. Ecol Appl 2022; 32:e2553. [PMID: 35112750 DOI: 10.1002/eap.2553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Long-term monitoring is an important component of effective wildlife conservation. However, many methods for estimating density are too costly or difficult to implement over large spatial and temporal extents. Recently developed spatial mark-resight (SMR) models are increasingly being applied as a cost-effective method to estimate density when data include detections of both marked and unmarked individuals. We developed a generalized SMR model that can accommodate long-term camera data and auxiliary telemetry data for improved spatiotemporal inference in monitoring efforts. The model can be applied in two stages, with detection parameters estimated in the first stage using telemetry data and camera detections of instrumented individuals. Density is estimated in the second stage using camera data, with all individuals treated as unmarked. Serial correlation in detection and density parameters is accounted for using time-series models. The two-stage approach reduces computational demands and facilitates the application to large data sets from long-term monitoring initiatives. We applied the model to 3 years (2015-2017) of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) data collected in three study areas of the Big Cypress Basin, Florida, USA. In total, 59 females marked with ear tags and fitted with GPS-telemetry collars were detected along with unmarked females on 180 remote cameras. Most of the temporal variation in density was driven by seasonal fluctuations, but one study area exhibited a slight population decline during the monitoring period. Modern technologies such as camera traps provide novel possibilities for long-term monitoring, but the resulting massive data sets, which are subject to unique sources of observation error, have posed analytical challenges. The two-stage spatial mark-resight framework provides a solution with lower computational demands than joint SMR models, allowing for easier implementation in practice. In addition, after detection parameters have been estimated, the model may be used to estimate density even if no synchronous auxiliary information on marked individuals is available, which is often the case in long-term monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia L S Margenau
- Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA
| | - Michael J Cherry
- Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, Texas, USA
| | - Karl V Miller
- Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA
| | - Elina P Garrison
- Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Richard B Chandler
- Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Roden-Reynolds P, Kent CM, Li AY, Mullinax JM. White-Tailed Deer Spatial Distribution in Relation to '4-Poster' Tick Control Devices in Suburbia. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19:ijerph19084889. [PMID: 35457754 PMCID: PMC9030164 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19084889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2022] [Revised: 04/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Deer are keystone hosts for adult ticks and have enabled the spread of tick distributions. The ‘4-Poster’ deer bait station was developed by the United States Department of Agriculture to control ticks feeding on free-ranging deer. Although effective in certain scenarios, ‘4-Poster’ deer treatment stations require the use of bait to attract deer to one location, which may cause increased deer disease transmission rates and habitat damage. To better understand and manage the impact of baited ‘4-Poster’ stations on deer movements, we captured and GPS-monitored 35 deer as part of an integrated pest management project. Fifteen ‘4-Poster’ stations were deployed among three suburban county parks to control ticks. To quantify the effects of ‘4-Poster’ stations, we calculated deer movement metrics before and after feeders were filled with whole kernel corn, and we gathered information on visitation rates to feeders. Overall, 83.3% of collared deer visited a feeder and revisited approximately every 5 days. After feeders were refilled, collared deer were ~5% closer to feeders and conspecifics than before filling. Males used a higher percentage of available feeders and visited them more throughout the deployment periods. Although these nuanced alterations in behavior may not be strong enough to increase local deer abundance, in light of infectious diseases affecting deer populations and effective ‘4-Poster’ densities, the core range shifts and clustering after refilling bait may be a cause for concern. As such, trade-offs between conflicting management goals should be carefully considered when deploying ‘4-Poster’ stations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Roden-Reynolds
- Department of Environmental Science and Technology, 1422 Animals Sciences Bldg., University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
| | - Cody M Kent
- Department of Environmental Science and Technology, 1422 Animals Sciences Bldg., University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
| | - Andrew Y Li
- Invasive Insect Biocontrol and Behavior Laboratory, USDA-ARS, 10300 Baltimore Ave., Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
| | - Jennifer M Mullinax
- Department of Environmental Science and Technology, 1422 Animals Sciences Bldg., University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
| |
Collapse
|