Current Practices and Opportunities for Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy in Hospitals: A National Cross-Sectional Survey

Long-Term Self-Administered Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy in the Treatment of Tuberculosis

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the safety profiles and clinical outcomes in a continuous cohort of tuberculosis (TB) patients from a clinical referral centre in Germany receiving self-administered outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (sOPAT).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of patients receiving sOPAT after discharge from the Research Center Borstel in Germany between January 2015 and December 2020. Data were extracted from medical records.

RESULTS

In the observation period, 150 patients received parenteral antibiotics at the Research Center Borstel. Of these, 89 received sOPAT via a port catheter and were further analysed. The majority were male (n = 59, 66.3%), with a median age of 33.6 years (interquartile range-IQR 26.2-42.8). Most patients had multidrug-resistant (MDR)-TB (n = 56, 62.9%) or pre-extensively drug resistant (pre-XDR)-TB (n = 21; 23.6%). Fifty-eight (65.2%) patients received one and 24 patients (27.0%) received two parenteral drugs, most commonly capreomycin (n = 53, 59.6%) and meropenem (n = 44, 49.4%). The median duration of sOPAT was 7.4 months (IQR 5.2-17.2). In total, 71,128 intravenous drug administrations were recorded. One patient died of TB while another patient was lost to follow-up. Sixty-two (69.7%) patients completed the sOPAT regimen, the most common reason for premature discontinuation was adverse drug events (n = 12, 13.5%). There were eight (9.0%) port-related complications requiring port explantation (bloodstream infections: n = 6, local infection: n = 1, port thrombosis: n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

In selected patients requiring long-term intravenous anti-TB therapy, sOPAT is a feasible treatment option with a low risk of complications when adequate infrastructure and training are in place.

Organisational quality and hospital pharmacists' roles of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) in Belgian hospitals: a national survey

OBJECTIVES

Implementation of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT), also known as intravenous (IV) antimicrobial treatment at home, has increased in recent years. Ensuring OPAT quality is crucial to achieve positive patient outcomes. However, data on the Belgian quality of OPAT organisation is lacking. We aimed to monitor the organisational quality of OPAT in Belgian hospitals and identify roles of hospital pharmacists involved in OPAT.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study applying a web-based survey on OPAT quality was conducted from 2 to 29 April 2024. The survey assessed the presence of six core and five non-core structure indicators, and OPAT-related tasks of hospital pharmacists.

RESULTS

Almost two-thirds (64%; 65/101) of Belgian hospitals answered the survey, with 77% of these hospitals providing OPAT, with an increase since 2023. All 11 structure indicators were present in 6% of hospitals, while 18% had all six core structure indicators.Three of the six core structure indicators were formally present in the majority of the hospitals: a policy on patient selection criteria (76%), a structured OPAT programme (70%), and a dedicated team (64%). In contrast, a system for fast communication between the patient and OPAT team members (50%), a mechanism for urgent clinical discussions (42%), and monitoring of quality indicators (28%) were not formally present in the majority of the hospitals. The primary tasks for hospital pharmacists included overseeing OPAT prescriptions and supplying antimicrobials and related materials.

CONCLUSION

While the adoption of OPAT is increasing among Belgian hospitals, significant opportunities remain for improving the quality of the OPAT organisation and expanding the OPAT-related tasks of Belgian hospital pharmacists.

Current practices and challenges of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: a narrative review

Extended hospitalization for infection management increases inpatient care costs and the risk of healthcare-associated adverse events, including infections. The growing global demand for healthcare, the diminishing availability of hospital beds and an increasing patient preference for care within their own home have been the primary drivers of the expansion of hospital-in-the-home programmes. Such programmes include the use of IV antimicrobials in outpatient settings, known as outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). However, OPAT practices vary globally. This review article aims to describe the current OPAT practices and challenges worldwide. OPAT practice begins with patient evaluation and selection using eligibility criteria, which requires collaboration between the interdisciplinary OPAT team, patients and caregivers. Depending on care requirements, eligible patients may be enrolled to various models of care, receiving medication by healthcare professionals at outpatient infusion centres, hospital clinics, home visits or through self-administration. OPAT can be used for the management of many infections where an effective oral treatment option is lacking. Various classes of parenteral antimicrobials, including β-lactams, aminoglycosides, glycopeptides, fluoroquinolones and antifungals such as echinocandins, are used globally in OPAT practice. Despite its benefits, OPAT has numerous challenges, including complications from medication administration devices, antimicrobial side effects, monitoring requirements, antimicrobial instability, patient non-adherence, patient OPAT rejection, and challenges related to OPAT team structure and administration, all of which impact its outcome. A negative outcome could include unplanned hospital readmission. Future research should focus on mitigating these challenges to enable optimization of the OPAT service and thereby maximize the documented benefits for the healthcare system, patients and healthcare providers.

Barriers and facilitators for the implementation and expansion of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: a systematic review

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) has been expanding in recent years and serves as a viable solution in reducing the shortage of hospital beds. However, the wider implementation of OPAT faces numerous challenges. This review aimed to assess implementation barriers and facilitators of OPAT services. Studies describing barriers and facilitators of the OPAT service were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science Proceedings, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts and PsycINFO. All types of study designs published in the English language were included. Studies that did not mention any barrier or facilitator, did not differentiate OPAT and inpatient, focused on specific antimicrobials or diseases, and made no distinction between parenteral and other treatments were excluded. Qualitative analysis was performed using the 'best-fit' framework approach and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The review was PROSPERO registered (CRD42023441083). A total of 8761 studies were screened for eligibility and 147 studies were included. Problems in patient selection, lack of awareness, poor communication and co-ordination, lack of support, lack of structured service and inappropriate prescriptions were identified. OPAT provides safe, effective and efficient treatment while maintaining patients' privacy and comfort, resulting in less daily life disruption, and reducing the risk of infection. Satisfaction and preference for OPAT were very high. Initiatives in strengthening OPAT such as antimicrobial stewardship and telemedicine are beneficial. Challenges to and facilitators of OPAT were identified among patients, health professionals, OPAT service providers and healthcare administrators. Understanding them is crucial to designing targeted initiatives for successful OPAT service implementation.

Best practices, implementation and challenges of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: results of a worldwide survey among healthcare providers

Background

Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) is considered a patient-friendly and cost-effective practice. Patients in the OPAT service can be at risk for developing adverse events. Due to extensive variations in practice, guidelines have been developed to minimize the risks.

Objectives

In this first worldwide survey on OPAT, we explored the current OPAT services around the world, adherence to recommendations and identified best practices and challenges from different perspectives.

Methods

An e-survey was conducted and consisted of questions about demographics, characteristics of the OPAT service, role of pharmacy, future developments, and respondents' views on improvements as well as best practices.

Results

A total of 126 responses from 28 countries were included. Seventy-eight percent (78%) of the respondents stated that their facility provides antimicrobial therapy in the outpatient setting, whereas 22% did not. Forty-two percent (42%) of the hospitals with OPAT services had a specialized OPAT service, while 14% lacked specialized services and 22% had a partially specialized team in place. In facilities with a specialized OPAT service, the number of mandatory infectious disease (ID) consultations before discharge and clinical monitoring by an ID specialist or OPAT team member, the frequency of monitoring, and the availability of an OPAT registry were higher. A multidisciplinary team's presence was commonly noted as best practices. On the other hand, respondents experienced difficulties with reimbursement and lack of standardization in the screening, follow-up and monitoring of patients.

Conclusion

This survey provides a better understanding of the implementation and practices of OPAT services globally and describes best practices and the challenges from different professionals.