Goldmann Tonometry and Corneal Biomechanics

Optimal Timing for Intraocular Pressure Measurement Following Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis

Post-operative increases in intraocular pressure (IOP) are a frequent complication following phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Assessment of IOP is an essential element in post-operative checks. Despite this, guidance regarding the optimal timing remains vague. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine the current status of evidence that may help guide best practice regarding the optimal time following phacoemulsification cataract surgery to measure IOP. A comprehensive literature search was performed on MEDLINE and EMBASE. In two stages, independent reviewers screened articles that reported IOP measurements following uncomplicated cataract surgery. Risk of Bias Assessment was conducted following data extraction. The meta-analysis incorporated 57 randomized clinical studies involving a total of 6318 participants and 7089 eyes. Post-operative hour one had a significant decrease in IOP from baseline, while hour two had a non-significant increase. Post-operative hours four, six, and eight were the only timepoints to have a significant increase in IOP. Finally, post-operative day one had no significant change in IOP, while day two had a non-significant decrease. These results suggest that the optimal time to measure IOP is within the first 4-8 h following phacoemulsification cataract extraction. Taking measurements too soon or too late could result in missed IOP spikes.

The Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measured by Transpalpebral Method Using Diaton and Rebound Tonometry by iCare in the Eyes Before and After Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy (TPRK) in Saudi Arabia

INTRODUCTION

Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement is vital to select and monitor a patient undergoing ocular surgery. The validity of tonometry by independent researchers is useful. In this paper, we compare intraocular pressure (IOP) by rebound tonometry using iCare (Tiolat Oy, Helsinki, Finland) with transpalpebral IOP (tpIOP) method by using Diaton (Bicom Inc., NY, USA) before and after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TPRK) in Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

This cross-sectional validity study was held at a private ophthalmology hospital in central Saudi Arabia from January 2021 to February 2022. The tonometry was performed before, at week 1 (W1), and month 1 (M1) after TPRK. The tpIOP and IOP by iCare were compared using matched-pair analysis. The agreement in IOP by two methods was reviewed using the Bland-Altman plot. Central corneal thickness (CCT), spherical equivalent (SE) before surgery, and gender were correlated to the difference in IOP by two tonometers. The main outcome was the difference in IOP measured by Diaton and iCare.

RESULTS

We studied 202 eyes of 101 patients. The median difference in IOP by Diaton and iCare was -1.0 mmHg before, at W1, and M1 follow-ups. Before surgery, tpIOP by Diaton was 15.0±2.8 mmHg and by iCare was 16.0±3.7 mmHg (P<0.001). At W1, tpIOP was 15.9±2.5 mmHg and 16.9±3.4 mmHg by iCare (P<0.001). At M1, tpIOP was 15.7±4.1 mmHg and 16.5±5.4 mmHg by iCare (P<0.001). IOP by two methods was within ±2 mmHg in 73.3%, 69.8%, and 75.2% of the eyes before, at W1, and M1 of TPRK. Pre-CCT (P<0.001) was the significant predictor of the difference in IOP by two methods at W1 and M1 (P=0.001). iCare gave the overestimation of IOP compared to Diaton in 18.3%, 22.8%, and 17.8% of the eyes before, W1, and M1 follow-ups.

CONCLUSIONS

IOP by iCare and Diaton was similar. Central corneal thickness was the predictor of IOP differences by tonometers.

Tissue Mechanics and Tissue Engineering

Tissue engineering (TE) combines scaffolds, cells, and chemical and physical cues to replace biological tissues [...]

Intraocular Pressure Measurement in Childhood Glaucoma under Standardized General Anaesthesia: The Prospective EyeBIS Study

Objective: We aimed to compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using iCare® PRO rebound tonometry (iCare) and Perkins applanation tonometry (Perkins) in childhood glaucoma subjects and healthy children and the influence of anaesthesia depth, age and corneal thickness. Material: Prospective clinical, case-control study of children who underwent an ophthalmologic examination under general anaesthesia according to our protocol. Children were 45.45 ± 29.76 months old (mean ± SD (standard deviation)). Of all children, 54.05% were female. IOP was taken three times (T1−T3), according to duration and the depth of anaesthesia. The order of measurement alternated, starting with iCare. Agreement between the device measurements was evaluated using Bland−Altman analysis. Results: 53 glaucoma subjects and 22 healthy controls. Glaucoma subjects: IOP measured with iCare was at T1: 27.2 (18.1−33.8), T2: 21.6 (14.8−30.6), T3: 20.4 mmHg (14.5−27.0) and Perkins 17.5 (12.0−23.0), 15.5 (10.5−20.5), 15.0 mmHg (10.5−21.0) (median ± IQR (interquartile range)). Healthy controls: IOP with iCare: T1: 13.3 (11.1−17.0), T2: 10.6 (8.1−12.4), T3: 9.6 mmHg (7.7−11.7) and Perkins 10.3 (8.0−12.0), 7.0 (5.5−10.5), 7.0 mmHg (5.5−8.5) (median ± IQR). The median IOP was statistically significantly higher with iCare than with Perkins (p < 0.001) in both groups. The mean difference (iCare and Perkins) was 6.0 ± 6.1 mmHg for T1−T3, 7.3 at T1, 6.0 at T2, 4.9 mmHg at T3. Conclusion: The IOP was the highest in glaucoma subjects and healthy children at T1 (under sedation), independently of the measurement method. iCare always leads to higher IOP compared to Perkins in glaucoma and healthy subjects, regardless of the duration of anesthesia.

Comparison of Three Tonometers in Measuring Intraocular Pressure in Eyes That Underwent Myopic Laser in situ Keratomileusis and Photorefractive Keratectomy

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion