Gökırmaklı Ç, Guzel-Seydim ZB. Water Kefir Grains vs. Milk Kefir Grains: Physical, Microbial and Chemical Comparison.
J Appl Microbiol 2022;
132:4349-4358. [PMID:
35301787 DOI:
10.1111/jam.15532]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIMS
Even though kefir has been known for centuries, there is confusion between the two types of kefir grains, e.g., milk kefir grain and water kefir grain. This study aimed to unravel the differences and similarities between water kefir grain and milk kefir grain.
METHODS AND RESULTS
Microbiological analyses, identification of grains microbiota and enumeration of microbiological content of the grains as well as Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) imaging, dry matter, protein, ash, and mineral content, and color analyses were carried out for the two types of grains. As a result, significant differences were found in microbiological content, chemical properties, and colors (p<0.05). Additionally, SEM images revealed the different intrinsic structures for the microbiota and the structure of the two types of grains.
CONCLUSIONS
MK grain has more nutritional content compared to WK grain. Despite not as widely known and used as MK grain, WK grain is a good source for minerals and health-friendly microorganisms like lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and yeasts. WK grain is possibly suitable for vegans and allergic individuals to fulfill nutritional requirements. Moreover, in this study, the variety of WK grain microbial consortia was wider than that of MK grains, and this significantly affected the resultant WK products.
SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY
This is the first study that comprehensively compares two different kefir grains in microbial, chemical, and physical properties.
Collapse