BRCAness as a Biomarker of Susceptibility to PARP Inhibitors in Glioblastoma Multiforme

Real-world efficacy and safety of combined first-line treatment with PARP inhibitors and novel hormonal therapy in mCRPC patients with HRR gene mutations

Objective

This study evaluated the real-world efficacy and safety of combining PARP inhibitors with novel hormonal therapy (NHT) as a first-line treatment in Chinese patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) harboring homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene mutations.

Methods

We enrolled 41 mCRPC patients who received at least 1 month of combined treatment with PARP inhibitors and NHT. Patients were divided into two groups: Cohort A (mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, or ATM genes) and Cohort B (mutations in other HRR genes). The primary endpoint was imaging-based progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), PSA50 response, and adverse events (AEs). To ensure accurate research results and control confounding factors, we will employ multivariate Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate key variables affecting mCRPC patient survival outcomes.

Results

This study enrolled 41 patients, 22 in Cohort A and 19 in Cohort B. The median PFS for all patients was 21.8 months, and the median OS had yet to be reached. The overall ORR was 48.8%, and the DCR was 61.0%. Specifically, the median PFS for Cohort A was 21.8 months compared to 14.5 months for Cohort B. The median OS had yet to be reached for either cohort. Regarding efficacy, 81.8% of patients in Cohort A and 73.7% in Cohort B achieved a PSA50 response. Imaging assessments showed ORRs of 54.6% for Cohort A and 42.1% for Cohort B, with DCRs of 72.7% and 47.4%, respectively. 85.4% of patients experienced grade 1 or 2 adverse events, and 51.2% encountered grade 3 or 4. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis focusing on PFS, the Gleason score was identified as a significant predictor (HR = 5.8, 95% CI: 1.65-20.2, p = 0.006).

Conclusion

Combined first-line treatment with PARP inhibitors and NHT is effective and well-tolerated in mCRPC patients with HRR gene mutations, particularly those with BRCA1, BRCA2, or ATM mutations. These findings underscore the potential of this therapeutic combination in managing mCRPC in the Chinese population, suggesting a favorable outcome for those with specific genetic backgrounds.

PARP inhibitors in gliomas: Mechanisms of action, current trends and future perspectives

Gliomas are the most common primary malignant brain tumours in adults. Despite decades of research into novel therapeutic approaches, the prognosis remains poor. PARP1-2 are critical for DNA repair, cell survival and genomic stability and PARP inhibition (PARPi) may be a promising therapeutic approach for gliomas. Inhibition of PARP activity leads to homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), which, in combination with DNA damage, results in cell death. This review summarises the current knowledge and future perspectives of PARPi in glioma. The available literature was reviewed using PubMed, recent major international oncology congresses were consulted, and ongoing clinical trials were searched using ClinicalTrials.gov. In translational research, PARPi have demonstrated a strong scientific rationale for their use in the treatment of glioma. They have been evaluated both alone and in combination with radiotherapy, temozolomide, anti-angiogenic agents, immunotherapy and other new drugs in newly diagnosed or recurrent glioma. Most studies were open-label, non-randomised, dose-escalation phase I-II trials. Early results show promising anti-tumour activity, and key challenges include identifying predictive biomarkers, elucidating synergistic effects in combination therapies, addressing the development of resistance, and managing hematological toxicity. In conclusion, early phase studies have shown promising anti-tumour activity of PARPi that should be confirmed in larger prospective and randomised trials. In addition, the development of novel PARPi with improved blood brain barrier (BBB) penetration and PARP inhibitor activity with new synergistic treatment combinations seems promising and needs to be further explored.

Role of BRCA1 in glioblastoma etiology

BRCA1 (Breast Cancer 1) is a tumor suppressor gene with a role in DNA repair by Homologous Recombination (HR), and maintenance of genomic stability that is frequently investigated in breast, prostate, and ovarian cancers. BRCA1 mutations or dysregulation in glioblastoma can lead to impaired DNA repair mechanisms, resulting in tumor progression and resistance to standard therapies. Several studies have shown that BRCA1 expression is altered, albeit rarely, in glioblastoma, leading to poor prognosis and increased tumor aggressiveness. In addition, the communication of BRCA1 with other molecular pathways such as p53 and PTEN further complicates its role in glioblastoma pathogenesis. Targeting BRCA1-related pathways in these cases has shown the potential to improve the efficacy of standard treatments, including radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The development of (Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase) PARP inhibitors that exploit the lack of HR also offers a therapeutic approach to glioblastoma patients with BRCA1 mutations. Despite these advances, the heterogeneity of glioblastoma and its complex tumor microenvironment make the translation of such approaches into clinical practice still challenging, and there is an "unmet need". This review discusses the current mechanisms of etiology and potential treatment of BRCA1-related glioblastoma.

Flavopiridol Suppresses Cell Proliferation and Migration and Induces Apoptotic Cell Death by Inhibiting Oncogenic FOXM1 Signaling in IDH Wild-Type and IDH-Mutant GBM Cells

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) remains one of the most challenging solid cancers to treat due to its highly aggressive and drug-resistant nature. Flavopiridol is synthetic flavone that was recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Flavopiridol exhibits antiproliferative activity in several solid cancer cells and currently evaluated in clinical trials in several solid and hematological cancers. In this study, we investigated the molecular mechanisms underlying antiproliferative effects of flavopiridol in GBM cell lines with wild-type and mutant encoding isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1). We found that flavopiridol inhibits proliferation, colony formation, and migration and induces apoptosis in IDH1 wild-type and IDH-mutant cells through inhibition of FOXM1 oncogenic signaling. Furthermore, flavopiridol treatment also inhibits of NF-KB, mediators unfolded protein response (UPR), including, GRP78, PERK and IRE1α, and DNA repair enzyme PARP, which have been shown to be potential therapeutic targets by downregulating FOXM1 in GBM cells. Our findings suggest for the first time that flavopiridol suppresses proliferation, survival, and migration and induces apoptosis in IDH1 wild-type and IDH1-mutant GBM cells by targeting FOXM1 oncogenic signaling which also regulates NF-KB, PARP, and UPR response in GBM cells. Flavopiridol may be a potential novel therapeutic strategy in the treatment of patients IDH1 wild-type and IDH1-mutant GBM.

Advances in Development of Selective Antitumor Inhibitors That Target PARP-1

Cancer is a major threat to the lives and health of people around the world, and the development of effective antitumor drugs that exhibit fewer toxic effects is an important aspect of cancer treatment. PARP inhibitors are antitumor drugs that target pathways involved in DNA-damage repair. The currently approved PARP inhibitors include olaparib, niraparib, rucaparib, talazoparib, fuzuloparib, and pamiparib. Hematological toxicities associated with the simultaneous inhibition of PARP-1 and PARP-2 have limited the clinical applications of these drugs. The present review introduces the necessity for research on the development of selective PARP-1 inhibitors from the perspective of structural and functional mechanisms of PARP-1 inhibition. A review of recently reported selective PARP-1 inhibitors provides the foundation for exploring novel strategies for designing selective PARP-1 inhibitors from the perspective of structure-activity relationships combined with computer simulations.

Novel, clinically relevant genomic patterns identified by comprehensive genomic profiling in ATRX-deficient IDH-wildtype adult high-grade gliomas

Glioblastomas are the most common IDH-wildtype adult high-grade gliomas, frequently harboring mutations in the TERT gene promoter (pTERT) and utilizing the subsequent telomerase overexpression for telomere length maintenance. However, some rare cases show loss of ATRX and use alternative mechanisms of telomere lengthening. In this study, we performed the first complex genomic analysis specifically concentrating on the latter subgroup. Comprehensive genomic profiling of 12 ATRX-deficient and 13 ATRX-intact IDH-wildtype adult high-grade gliomas revealed that ATRX and pTERT mutations are mutually exclusive. DNMT3A alterations were confined to ATRX-deficient, while PTEN mutations to ATRX-intact cases. RAS-MAPK pathway alterations, including NF1 mutations, were more characteristic in the ATRX-deficient group. Variants of genes related to homologous recombination repair showed different patterns of affected genes. Two ATRX-deficient tumors with high tumor mutational burden and mismatch repair deficiency were found. One of these contained a novel fusion involving the NTRK2 and LRRFIP2 genes, while the other showed loss of MSH2 and MSH6 without genetic alterations in the encoding genes suggesting an epigenetic background. Genetic characteristics of ATRX-deficient IDH-wildtype adult high-grade gliomas suggest that these tumors are particularly intriguing targets of potential future therapeutic interventions including immunotherapies combined with MAPK pathway inhibition and DNA repair inhibitors.

Preclinical Efficacy of LP-184, a Tumor Site Activated Synthetic Lethal Therapeutic, in Glioblastoma

PURPOSE

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common brain malignancy with median survival <2 years. Standard-of-care temozolomide has marginal efficacy in approximately 70% of patients due to MGMT expression. LP-184 is an acylfulvene-derived prodrug activated by the oxidoreductase PTGR1 that alkylates at N3-adenine, not reported to be repaired by MGMT. This article examines LP-184 efficacy against preclinical GBM models and identifies molecular predictors of LP-184 efficacy in clinical GBM.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

LP-184 effects on GBM cell viability and DNA damage were determined using cell lines, primary PDX-derived cells and patient-derived neurospheres. GBM cell sensitivities to LP-184 relative to temozolomide and MGMT expression were examined. Pharmacokinetics and CNS bioavailability were evaluated in mice with GBM xenografts. LP-184 effects on GBM xenograft growth and animal survival were determined. Machine learning, bioinformatic tools, and clinical databases identified molecular predictors of GBM cells and tumors to LP-184 responsiveness.

RESULTS

LP-184 inhibited viability of multiple GBM cell isolates including temozolomide-resistant and MGMT-expressing cells at IC50 = approximately 22-310 nmol/L. Pharmacokinetics showed favorable AUCbrain/plasma and AUCtumor/plasma ratios of 0.11 (brain Cmax = 839 nmol/L) and 0.2 (tumor Cmax = 2,530 nmol/L), respectively. LP-184 induced regression of GBM xenografts and prolonged survival of mice bearing orthotopic xenografts. Bioinformatic analyses identified PTGR1 elevation in clinical GBM subtypes and associated LP-184 sensitivity with EGFR signaling, low nucleotide excision repair (NER), and low ERCC3 expression. Spironolactone, which induces ERCC3 degradation, decreased LP-184 IC50 3 to 6 fold and enhanced GBM xenograft antitumor responses.

CONCLUSIONS

These results establish LP-184 as a promising chemotherapeutic for GBM with enhanced efficacy in intrinsic or spironolactone-induced TC-NER-deficient tumors.

Discovery, Synthesis, and Evaluation of Novel Dual Inhibitors of a Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor and Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase for BRCA Wild-Type Breast Cancer Therapy

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of breast cancer (BC) with breast cancer susceptibility (BRCA) gene mutation. Leveraging new synthetic lethal interactions may be an effective way to broaden the indication of PARP inhibitors for BC patients with wild-type BRCA. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-mediated suppression of angiogenesis has been reported to improve the sensitivity of wild-type BRCA cells to PARP inhibitors through synthetic lethality. Herein, we reported the conjugation of a PARP inhibitor with a VEGFR inhibitor pharmacophore to construct dual VEGFR and PARP inhibitors. The most potent compound 14b is identified to exert promising activities against VEGFR and PARP in the nanomolar range and possesses significant in vitro and in vivo antitumor and antimetastasis features. It also presented a favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics in rats with an oral bioavailability of 60.1%. Collectively, 14b may be a promising therapeutic agent of BRCA wild-type BC.

Harnessing the cooperation between DNA-PK and cGAS in cancer therapies: The cooperation between DNA-PK and cGAS shapes tumour immunogenicity

The cyclic GMP-AMP synthase-stimulator of interferon genes (cGAS-STING) pathway is central for the initiation of anti-tumoural immune responses. Enormous effort has been made to optimise the design and administration of STING agonists to stimulate tumour immunogenicity. However, in certain contexts the cGAS-STING axis fuels tumourigenesis. Here, we review recent findings on the regulation of cGAS expression and activity. We particularly focus our attention on the DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) complex, that recently emerged as an activator of inflammatory responses in tumour cells. We propose that stratification analyses on cGAS and DNA-PK expression/activation status should be carried out to predict treatment efficacy. We herein also provide insights into non-canonical functions borne by cGAS and cGAMP, highlighting how they may influence tumourigenesis. All these parameters should be taken into consideration concertedly to choose strategies aiming to effectively boost tumour immunogenicity.

BRCAness in biliary tract cancer: a new prognostic and predictive biomarker?

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare malignancy with a very poor prognosis. Considering that most cases of CCA are diagnosed at a locally advanced stage and the standard of care for advanced CCA remains suboptimal, new prognostic and predictive biomarkers must be developed to improve the management and survival of patients diagnosed with CCA regardless of disease stage. According to recent studies, 20% of biliary tract cancers exhibit the BRCAness phenotype, meaning that these tumors do not have germline mutations in BRCA but share phenotypic traits with tumors that possess hereditary BRCA mutations. Therefore, screening for these mutations in CCA patients is beneficial to predict tumor sensitivity and response to DNA-damaging chemotherapy such as platinum agents.

Concomitant Inhibition of IRE1α/XBP1 Axis of UPR and PARP: A Promising Therapeutic Approach against c-Myc and Gammaherpesvirus-Driven B-Cell Lymphomas

It is emerging that targeting the adaptive functions of Unfolded Protein Response (UPR) may represent a promising anti-cancer therapeutic approach. This is particularly relevant for B-cell lymphomas, characterized by a high level of constitutive stress due to high c-Myc expression. In this study, we found that IRE1α/XBP1 axis inhibition exerted a stronger cytotoxic effect compared to the inhibition of the other two UPR sensors, namely PERK and ATF6, in Burkitt lymphoma (BL) cells, in correlation with c-Myc downregulation. Interestingly, such an effect was more evident in Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-negative BL cells or those cells expressing type I latency compared to type III latency BL cells. The other interesting finding of this study was that the inhibition of IRE1α/XBP1 downregulated BRCA-1 and RAD51 and potentiated the cytotoxicity of PARP inhibitor AZD2661 against BL cells and also against Primary Effusion Lymphoma (PEL), another aggressive B-cell lymphoma driven by c-Myc and associated with gammaherpesvirus infection. These results suggest that combining the inhibition of UPR sensors, particularly IRE1α/XBP1 axis, and molecules involved in DDR, such as PARP, could offer a new therapeutic opportunity for treating aggressive B-cell lymphomas such as BL and PEL.

Perspective on the Use of DNA Repair Inhibitors as a Tool for Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy of Glioblastoma

Simple Summary

The current routine treatment for glioblastoma (GB), the most lethal high-grade brain tumor in adults, aims to induce DNA damage in the tumor. However, the tumor cells might be able to repair that damage, which leads to therapy resistance. Fortunately, DNA repair defects are common in GB cells, and their survival is often based on a sole backup repair pathway. Hence, targeted drugs inhibiting essential proteins of the DNA damage response have gained momentum and are being introduced in the clinic. This review gives a perspective on the use of radiopharmaceuticals targeting DDR kinases for imaging in order to determine the DNA repair phenotype of GB, as well as for effective radionuclide therapy. Finally, four new promising radiopharmaceuticals are suggested with the potential to lead to a more personalized GB therapy.

Abstract

Despite numerous innovative treatment strategies, the treatment of glioblastoma (GB) remains challenging. With the current state-of-the-art therapy, most GB patients succumb after about a year. In the evolution of personalized medicine, targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) is gaining momentum, for example, to stratify patients based on specific biomarkers. One of these biomarkers is deficiencies in DNA damage repair (DDR), which give rise to genomic instability and cancer initiation. However, these deficiencies also provide targets to specifically kill cancer cells following the synthetic lethality principle. This led to the increased interest in targeted drugs that inhibit essential DDR kinases (DDRi), of which multiple are undergoing clinical validation. In this review, the current status of DDRi for the treatment of GB is given for selected targets: ATM/ATR, CHK1/2, DNA-PK, and PARP. Furthermore, this review provides a perspective on the use of radiopharmaceuticals targeting these DDR kinases to (1) evaluate the DNA repair phenotype of GB before treatment decisions are made and (2) induce DNA damage via TRT. Finally, by applying in-house selection criteria and analyzing the structural characteristics of the DDRi, four drugs with the potential to become new therapeutic GB radiopharmaceuticals are suggested.

PARP-1 Expression and BRCA1 Mutations in Breast Cancer Patients' CTCs

Simple Summary

Recent estimates have shown that approx. 70% of individuals with BRCA1 mutations will develop breast cancer by the age of 70. To make matters worse, breast cancer patients with BRCA1 mutations are more likely to have the more aggressive triple-negative breast cancer. PARPs, belong to a family of nuclear enzymes, which are involved in many cellular processes, including DNA repair. PARP inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of BRCA-mutated breast cancer. The aim of the study was the determination of PARP-1 expression in the context of the presence of BRCA1 mutations in circulating tumor cells of breast cancer patients. PARP-1 (nuclear) expression and BRCA1 mutations were mainly detected in triple negative breast cancer patients, and the latter were correlated with decreased survival. Our data suggest that PARP-1, in conjunction with BRCA1, could potentially be used as (a) biomarker(s) for patients’ stratification.

Abstract

BRCA1 and PARP are involved in DNA damage repair pathways. BRCA1 mutations have been linked to higher likelihood of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). The aim of the study was to determine PARP-1 expression and BRCA1 mutations in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) of BC patients. Fifty patients were enrolled: 23 luminal and 27 TNBC. PARP expression in CTCs was identified by immunofluorescence. Genotyping was performed by PCR-Sanger sequencing in the same samples. PARP-1 expression was higher in luminal (61%) and early BC (54%), compared to TNBC (41%) and metastatic (33%) patients. In addition, PARP-1 distribution was mostly cytoplasmic in luminal patients (p = 0.024), whereas it was mostly nuclear in TNBC patients. In cytokeratin (CK)-positive patients, those with the CK⁺PARP⁺ phenotype had longer overall survival (OS, log-rank p = 0.046). Overall, nine mutations were detected; M1 and M2 were completely new and M4, M7 and M8 were characterized as pathogenic. M7 and M8 were predominantly found in metastatic TNBC patients (p = 0.014 and p = 0.002). Thus, PARP-1 expression and increased mutagenic burden in TNBC patients’ CTCs, could be used as an indicator to stratify patients regarding therapeutic approaches.

DNA Damage Repair in Brain Tumor Immunotherapy

With the gradual understanding of tumor development, many tumor therapies have been invented and applied in clinical work, and immunotherapy has been widely concerned as an emerging hot topic in the last decade. It is worth noting that immunotherapy is nowadays applied under too harsh conditions, and many tumors are defined as “cold tumors” that are not sensitive to immunotherapy, and brain tumors are typical of them. However, there is much evidence that suggests a link between DNA damage repair mechanisms and immunotherapy. This may be a breakthrough for the application of immunotherapy in brain tumors. Therefore, in this review, first, we will describe the common pathways of DNA damage repair. Second, we will focus on immunotherapy and analyze the mechanisms of DNA damage repair involved in the immune process. Third, we will review biomarkers that have been or may be used to evaluate immunotherapy for brain tumors, such as TAMs, RPA, and other molecules that may provide a precursor assessment for the rational implementation of immunotherapy for brain tumors. Finally, we will discuss the rational combination of immunotherapy with other therapeutic approaches that have an impact on the DNA damage repair process in order to open new pathways for the application of immunotherapy in brain tumors, to maximize the effect of immunotherapy on DNA damage repair mechanisms, and to provide ideas and guidance for immunotherapy in brain tumors.