Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Neuropathic Pain Associated or Not with a Nociplastic Condition

Psychological factors are associated with pain extent in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Widespread pain may be related to psychosocial aspects in several musculoskeletal conditions, but the literature on carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relationship between pain extent and psychological factors (catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, anxiety symptoms, and depression) in people with CTS.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted. The independent variables were: pain intensity, disability (QuickDASH), duration of symptoms, anxiety and depressive symptoms, catastrophizing, and kinesiophobia. The main outcome was: pain extent (% of total area and categories "pain within the median nerve-innervated territory" versus "extra-median nerve pain"). Correlation analysis was performed using Spearman's correlation coefficient. A linear regression model and binary logistic regression (both with forward selection) were performed to determine the main predictors of pain extent.

RESULTS

Forty-eight participants were included. A moderate positive correlation was found between catastrophizing (r = 0.455; p = 0.024) and disability (r = 0.448; p = 0.024) with total pain extent area. Regression models indicated that catastrophizing explained 22% of the variance in the pain extent (β = 0.003; 95% CI: 0.002-0.005), while kinesiophobia was the variable that best explained the distribution of pain in the extra-median territory (R2 Nagelkerke = 0.182). Null or weak correlations were found for the rest of the associations.

CONCLUSION

Catastrophizing and kinesiophobia were the main indicators of pain extent in people with CTS. Clinicians are advised to use specific questionnaires to check for the presence of catastrophizing or kinesiophobia in people with CTS and wider pain extension.

Effects of wrist orthoses in reducing pain in individuals with carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To examine the effectiveness of wrist orthoses in reducing pain in individuals with carpal tunnel syndrome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The searches were carried out in the CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Regional Portal of the Virtual Health Library, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases on 18 February 2021, and updated on 16 February 2023. Four independent evaluators performed the steps for inclusion of studies following the recommendations of the PRISMA and methods of the Cochrane Handbook for systematic review.

RESULTS

Three randomized clinical trials, two quasi-randomized clinical trials and one cohort study met the inclusion criteria. The visual analogue scale and numeric analog scale were used as a tool to assess pain outcome. The treatment period ranged from 2 weeks to 3 months. The period of use varied between nighttime only, and nighttime plus daytime. Most orthoses promoted a statistically significant reduction in intensity pain at night, at rest or during activities. Only one study carried out follow-up after the end of treatment and showed that pain reduction was maintained up to 6 months after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that the isolated use of orthoses were effective in reducing pain in individuals with carpal tunnel syndrome.

Occupational Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: a scoping review of causes, mechanisms, diagnosis, and intervention strategies

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) has traditionally been viewed as a specialized medical condition. However, its escalating prevalence among professionals across a multitude of industries has sparked substantial interest in recent years. This review aims to delve into CTS as an occupational disease, focusing on its epidemiological patterns, risk factors, symptoms, and management options, particularly emphasizing its relevance in professional environments. The complex interaction of anatomical, biomechanical, and pathophysiological factors that contribute to the development of CTS in different work settings underlines the critical role of ergonomic measures, prompt clinical identification, and tailored treatment plans in reducing its effects. Nevertheless, the challenges presented by existing research, including diverse methodologies and definitions, highlight the need for more unified protocols to thoroughly understand and tackle this issue. There's a pressing demand for more in-depth research into the epidemiology of CTS, its injury mechanisms, and the potential role of targeted medicine. Moreover, recognizing CTS's wider ramifications beyond personal health is essential. The economic burden associated with CTS-related healthcare costs, productivity losses, and compensation claims can significantly impact both businesses and the broader society. Therefore, initiatives aimed at preventing CTS through workplace interventions, education, and early intervention programs not only benefit the affected individuals but also contribute to the overall well-being of the workforce and economic productivity. By fostering a collaborative approach among healthcare professionals, employers, policymakers, and other stakeholders, we can strive towards creating safer and healthier work environments while effectively managing the challenges posed by CTS in occupational settings.