The Impact of Renal Function on Hepatic Encephalopathy Following TIPS Placement for Refractory Ascites

Ascites in patients with end-stage renal disease: Challenges and solutions from diagnosis to management

Metabolic diseases have exponentially increased in recent years, which has led to an increased prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and concomitant kidney diseases. Ascites are a common presentation of cirrhosis, and renal impairment in cirrhosis is well described. However, patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) may also present with ascites even in the absence of cirrhosis. The literature on the management of patients with ESRD with ascites with or without concomitant cirrhosis is limited. Massive ascites in this population are often refractory to medical therapy and are associated with dismal prognosis. Pathophysiologically, increased hepatic vein hydrostatic pressure, fluid retention, increased peritoneal membrane permeability, and impaired peritoneal lymphatic drainage are proposed mechanisms for ascites in ESRD without cirrhosis. Identifying underlying cirrhosis and portal hypertension (PH) has therapeutic implications in such patients. However, diagnostic tools such as serum ascites albumin gradient and noninvasive tests to identify cirrhosis have limited utility in ESRD. Hemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis are effective but can be associated with hemodynamic compromise and peritonitis, especially in those with PH. TIPS for ascites has a limited role in the presence of ESRD due to the increased risk of HE. Kidney transplant is the treatment of choice in ESRD with ascites without PH. Simultaneous liver-kidney transplant remains the definitive treatment in the presence of PH, but is less commonly feasible, and kidney transplant alone in the presence of PH can be associated with the risk of decompensations. This review discusses the approach and management of ascites in chronic kidney disease and ESRD specifically.

Chinese Guidelines on the Management of Hepatic Encephalopathy in Cirrhosis (2024)

With progress in basic and clinical research on hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis worldwide, the Chinese Society of Hepatology of the Chinese Medical Association has invited experts in relevant fields to revise the 2018 "Chinese Guidelines on the Management of Hepatic Encephalopathy in Cirrhosis." The updated guidelines provide recommendations for the clinical diagnosis, treatment, and both primary and secondary prevention of hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis.

Cerebral Aspects of Portal Hypertension: Hepatic Encephalopathy

Portal hypertension has cerebral consequences via its causes and complications, namely hepatic encephalopathy (HE), a common and devastating brain disturbance caused by liver insufficiency and portosystemic shunting. The pathogenesis involves hyperammonemia and systemic inflammation. Symptoms are disturbed personality and reduced attention. HE is minimal or grades I to IV (coma). Bouts of HE are episodic and often recurrent. Initial treatment is of events that precipitated the episode and exclusion of nonhepatic causes. Specific anti-HE treatment is lactulose. By recurrence, rifaximin is add-on. Anti-HE treatment is efficacious also for prophylaxis, but emergence of HE marks advanced liver disease and a dismal prognosis.

Advanced chronic renal disease is an independent risk factor for inpatient mortality following transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure

BACKGROUND

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a procedure used to alleviate portal hypertension in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. However, the risks and outcomes associated with TIPS in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) remain uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the perioperative outcomes of TIPS procedures in patients with advanced CKD using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, a comprehensive all-payer inpatient database in the US.

METHODS

The study identified patients who underwent TIPS procedures in the NIS database from Q4 2015 to 2020. Patients with advanced CKD were identified using specific ICD-10-CM codes, and they were compared to patients without CKD. Preoperative variables, including demographics, indications for TIPS, comorbidities, APR-DRG subclass, primary payer status, and hospital characteristics, were noted. Perioperative outcomes were examined by multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 248 patients with advanced CKD and 5511 patients without CKD undergoing TIPS procedures were identified in the NIS database. Compared to non-CKD, patients with advanced CKD had higher mortality (13.70% vs. 8.60%, aOR = 1.56, P  = 0.03), acute kidney injury (51.21% vs. 29.34, aOR = 1.46, P  < 0.01), transfer out (25.00% vs. 12.84%, aOR = 1.88, P  < 0.01), and length of stay over 7 days (64.11% vs. 38.97%, aOR = 2.34, P  < 0.01). However, there was no difference in hepatic encephalopathy (31.85% vs. 27.19%, aOR = 1.12, P  = 0.42).

CONCLUSION

Advanced CKD patients undergoing TIPS are at higher risk of mortality and AKI compared to patients without CKD; HE was mildly elevated but NS. Long-term prognosis of patients with advanced CKD who had TIPS is needed in future studies.

Post-Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) Hepatic Encephalopathy-A Review of the Past Decade's Literature Focusing on Incidence, Risk Factors, and Prophylaxis

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an established treatment for portal hypertension and its' complications in liver cirrhosis, yet the development of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) remains a significant concern. This review covers the reported incidence, risk factors, and management strategies for post-TIPS HE over the past decade. Incidence varies widely (7-61%), with factors like age, liver function, hyponatremia, and spontaneous portosystemic shunts influencing risk. Procedural aspects, including TIPS timing, indication, and stent characteristics, also contribute. Pharmacological prophylaxis with lactulose and rifaximin shows promise, but current evidence is inconclusive. Procedural preventive measures, such as shunt embolization and monitoring portal pressure gradients, are explored. Treatment involves pharmacological options like lactulose and rifaximin, and procedural interventions like stent diameter reduction. Ongoing studies on novel predictive markers and emerging treatments, such as faecal microbiota transplant, reflect the evolving landscape in post-TIPS HE management. This concise review provides clinicians with insights into the multifaceted nature of post-TIPS HE, aiding in improved risk assessment, prophylaxis, and management for patients undergoing TIPS procedures.