Criteria and Non-Criteria Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: How Strong Are They Correlated?

Association of anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies with adverse in vitro fertilization outcomes

Anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT) are classified as non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), and are strongly associated with thrombosis and pregnancy complications linked to antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). This study aimed to investigate whether aPS/PT positivity is associated with adverse outcomes in vitro fertilization (IVF). The study included infertile women who tested positive aPS/PT and underwent IVF cycles, as well as infertile controls with pure tubal etiology. We compared the impact of aPS/PT on baseline and clinical characteristics, immune-related indicators, IVF laboratory metrics, and pregnancy outcomes. Women with aPS/PT exhibited lower numbers of retrieved oocytes, embryos, and both perfect and available embryos, as well as reduced rates of blastocyst formation. Furthermore, an imbalanced Th17/Treg ratio and significantly elevated serum IL-17A levels were observed in women with aPS/PT compared to controls. In conclusion, the presence of aPS/PT is associated with adverse IVF and pregnancy outcomes. Early screening for aPS/PT and appropriate consultation for couples undergoing IVF-ET should be considered. Additionally, specific immune and inflammatory mechanisms related to aPS/PT warrant further investigation.

Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Review of Current Evidence and Future Management Practices

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by blood clots and pregnancy complications due to antiphospholipid antibodies. Catastrophic APS (CAPS), a severe variant, leads to multiorgan failure and is often fatal. Pathogenesis involves antiphospholipid antibodies, particularly anti-beta-2-glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI), which trigger endothelial cell (EC) activation, cytokine release, and a prothrombotic state. Infections, surgeries, and other triggers can precipitate CAPS, leading to widespread microthromboses and systemic inflammatory responses. CAPS predominantly affects younger patients and those with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), with a high mortality rate, though recent treatment advances have improved survival. Diagnosing CAPS involves identifying clinical manifestations, including rapid organ involvement and small vessel occlusions, confirmed by histopathology and high antiphospholipid antibody levels. The CAPS registry data indicate that commonly affected organs include kidneys, lungs, central nervous system, and the heart, with a high prevalence of lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL). Current management strategies focus on therapeutic anticoagulation, immunosuppressive therapies like corticosteroids, and adjunct treatments such as plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Early use of glucocorticoids and combination therapy has significantly improved outcomes. In life-threatening cases, especially with microangiopathy, experts recommend performing plasma exchange (PE). Patients with associated autoimmune conditions or refractory cases may receive cyclophosphamide (CY) and rituximab while considering PE for treatment. Maintenance of anticoagulation with an appropriate international normalized ratio (INR) is crucial to prevent recurrence. This article reviews the pathogenesis and epidemiology of CAPS. It also examines the current management strategies, and discusses the challenges and controversies associated with these strategies. It hereafter offers recommendations for future management and outlines directions for further research.

Antiphospholipid Antibody Testing: An Audit on Testing Practices in a Public Tertiary Care Center

BACKGROUND

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) are antibodies directed against cell membrane components and can be associated with clinical features or be asymptomatic. Testing and interpreting these antibodies is associated with many challenges and pitfalls in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

To review all antiphospholipid antibody testing and describe the testing practices, indications for testing and interpretation of results to infer local challenges with aPL testing and subsequently address ways to overcome those challenges.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of all aPL testing done in a tertiary center between 2014 and 2018. Characteristics of study patients collected through chart review were described using the mean and standard deviation for continuous variables and proportion for categorical variables. Group differences were compared between patients with any aPL-positive result and those with no positive result using chi-square or Fisher's exact test as appropriate for categorical variables and a simple regression model for numerical variables.

RESULTS

Among 414 patients undergoing aPL testing, mainly adult females, 62 (14.9%) patients had at least one positive antibody, of those, 26 (42%) had repeat testing done. Testing was mostly done for obstetric indication (107, 25.8%), with 36 patients having one or two early pregnancy losses <10 weeks as their testing indication. A total of 27 (6.5%) patients were labeled with APS/possible APS based on chart review, but on review of the testing of those patients according to classification criteria, only nine patients satisfied the criteria for APS.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the clinical challenges associated with aPL testing, including the controversies around indication for testing, the low rates of repeat testing to confirm persistence, and the common misinterpretation of results. Having an aPL testing profile, explicit reference ranges, results commentary, and close interaction between ordering physicians and laboratory staff might be starting points to overcome these challenges.

Criteria and Non-Criteria Antiphospholipid Antibodies and Cancer in Patients with Involuntary Weight Loss

Cancer patients have higher prevalences of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs), occasionally associated with thrombotic events. A cross-sectional study regarding the presence of criteria (IgG/IgM anti-cardiolipin-aCL, anti-β2 glycoprotein I-aβ2GPI) and non-criteria (IgG/IgM anti-phosphatidylserine-aPS, anti-phosphatidylethanolamine-aPE, anti-prothrombin-aPT) aPLs in 146 patients with involuntary weight loss was performed. None of the patients had thrombotic events during the study. Out of the 36 cancer patients, 33 had non-hematologic malignancies. In the cancer subgroup, 60% of the patients had at least one positive aPL, with significantly more patients being positive for aβ2GPI IgG compared with the non-cancer subgroup-p = 0.03, OR = 2.23 (1.02-4.88). When evaluating the titres, aCL IgG/IgM, aβ2GPI IgG, aPE IgG, and aPS IgG had significantly higher values in cancer patients, the best cancer predictor being aβ2GPI IgG-AUC 0.642 (0.542-0.742). Gastrointestinal cancer patients were studied separately, and aCL IgM positivity was significantly higher-p = 0.008, OR = 6.69 (1.35-33.02). Both the titres of aCL IgM (p = 0.006) and aPS IgM (p = 0.03) were higher in the gastrointestinal cancer subgroup, with aCL IgM being the best predictor for gastrointestinal cancer development-AUC 0.808 (0.685-0.932). Despite criteria and non-criteria aPLs being frequent in cancer, their connection with thrombosis in these patients is probably dependent on other important risk factors and needs further research.