Shorter Anogenital Distance in Women with Ovarian Endometriomas and Adenomyosis, but Not Uterine Leiomyomas

Hypermethylation of Klotho and Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ Concomitant with Overexpression of DNA Methyltransferase 1 in Adenomyosis

Cellular senescence is known to be involved in tissue repair, but its role in adenomyosis remains unclear. This study was tasked to evaluate the expression of Klotho, a well-known aging-suppressing protein, as well as PPARγ and DNMT1 in adenomyotic lesions (AD) in comparison with that of control endometrium (CT). We performed immunohistochemistry analysis of markers of cellular senescence p16 and p21, along with Klotho, PPARγ and DNMT1 in CT and AD samples, followed by the quantification of gene expression of Klotho, PPARγ and DNMT1 in epithelial organoids derived from AD and CT samples and methylation-specific PCR to evaluate promoter methylation status. The effect of forced expression and knockdown of DNMT1 on Klotho and PPARγ expression in ectopic endometrial epithelial cells was evaluated. We found that both p16 and p21 immunoreactivity in AD was significantly higher while that of Klotho and PPARγ was significantly lower than CT samples, which was concomitant with elevated immunoexpression of DNMT1. The results were confirmed by transcriptional analysis using epithelial organoids derived from AD and CT samples. In addition, the promoter regions of both Klotho and PPARγ genes were hypermethylated in AD as compared with CT, and treatment with HDAC and DNMT inhibitors reactivated the expression of both Klotho and PPARγ. Forced expression of DNMT1 resulted in downregulation of both Klotho and PPARγ but its knockdown increased their expression. Thus, overexpression of DNMT1 seems to facilitate the promoter hypermethylation of both Klotho and PPARγ in AD, resulting in their reduced expression that is suggestive of the role of senescence in adenomyosis.

Anogenital distance on MRI does not correlate to surgical diagnosis of endometriosis in patients without prior abdominal surgery

Anogenital distance (AGD) is regarded as a potential biomarker for endometriosis, and a measurement on MRI images has been found to be promising. This study aimed to evaluate the measurement of AGD on MRI to predict the surgical diagnosis of endometriosis. We included 127 patients who received an MRI for endometriosis between October 2018 and February 2023. AGD was measured on MRI by two readers (MRI-AGD-AC: clitoris to anus; MRI-AGD-AF: posterior fourchette to anus). The feasibility and interobserver reliability of AGD measurements were evaluated. Differences in AGD between patient groups were analyzed. The intraclass correlation coefficient estimates indicated a good to excellent reliability of MRI-AGD-AC (0.92; 95% CI: 0.83-0.95) and a poor to good reliability of MRI-AGD-AF (0.68; 95% CI: 0.27-0.83). No statistically significant differences in the mean MRI-AGD-AC and MRI-AGD-AF in patients with and without surgical diagnosis of DIE (p = 0.413; p = 0.110), peritoneal endometriosis with and without DIE (p = 0.641; p = 0.323), and ovarian endometriosis (p = 0.155; p = 0.150) were found. The AUC ranged from 0.475 (95% CI: 0.365-0.584) to 0.586 (95% CI: 0.454-0.718). Thus, AGD does not constitute a valuable biomarker for patients with clinically suspected endometriosis.

Lack of association between the length of anogenital distance and vaginal pH in women with endometriosis

AIM

We investigated the association between the length of anogenital distance (AGD) and intra-vaginal pH, an indicator of vaginal eubiosis or dysbiosis, in women with endometriosis.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was performed including patients with (n = 67) and without (n = 40) endometriosis undergoing surgery between July 2021 and June 2022. AGD was measured from the posterior fourchette to the center of the anus using digital caliper and vaginal pH was measured by inserting pH paper strip mostly into the posterior fornix.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the median AGD among control women (n = 40) (21.5 mm), women with revised-American Society of Reproductive Medicine stage I-II endometriosis (n = 27) (22.0 mm) and stage III-IV endometriosis (n = 40) (20.0 mm). In contrast, a significant difference of vaginal pH was observed among groups (p = 0.012) and between groups: control versus stage I-II, p = 0.004; stage I-II, versus stage III-IV, p = 0.037. After adjusting different confounding variables, the univariate analysis showed that women with endometriosis are less likely to have an alkaline vaginal pH (≥4.5) (OR [95% CI] = 0.40 [0.17, 0.93], p = 0.034). Multivariate analysis revealed that AGD or any of the other variables did not serve as an independent risk factor to predict the presence of endometriosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study with Japanese women suggests a lack of association between length of AGD, either shorter or longer, and the status of vaginal pH or the presence of endometriosis in pelvis.

Are Adenomyosis and Endometriosis Phenotypes of the Same Disease Process?

In recent literature reviews, we concluded that the possibility that endometrial molecular aberrations are the sole or a necessary determinant of endometriosis and the Tissue Injury and Repair (TIAR) theory are yet to be convincingly proven. Here, we critically examine the theory that adenomyosis and endometriosis represent different phenotypes of a single disease. A common etiopathology for adenomyosis and endometriosis has been suggested because both conditions entail the presence of endometrial tissue at locations other than the lining of the uterus. There are wide differences in reported disease incidence and prevalence and, consequently, in estimates of the coexistence of both conditions. There are some similarities but also differences in their clinical features and predisposing factors. Each condition has a range of subtypes. These differences alone pose the question of whether subtypes of endometriosis and adenomyosis have different etiopathologies, and, in turn, this raises the question of whether they all share a common etiology. It is debatable whether the recognized differences between the eutopic endometrium in adenomyosis and endometriosis compared to those in unaffected women are the cause or the effect of the disease. The finding of common mutations, particularly of KRAS, lend support to the notion of shared predisposing factors, but this alone is insufficient evidence of causation.