1
|
Sorokin M, Garazha A, Suntsova M, Tkachev V, Poddubskaya E, Gaifullin N, Sushinskaya T, Lantsov D, Borisov V, Naskhletashvili D, Ilyin K, Seryakov A, Glusker A, Moisseev A, Buzdin A. Prospective trial of the Oncobox platform RNA sequencing bioinformatic analysis for personalized prescription of targeted drugs. Comput Biol Med 2025; 187:109716. [PMID: 39884056 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.109716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2024] [Revised: 01/13/2025] [Accepted: 01/16/2025] [Indexed: 02/01/2025]
Abstract
Interrogating gene expression in tumor can identify up- and downregulated molecular targets of cancer drugs. Here we report the results of prospective clinical investigation of using RNA sequencing analysis for personalized cancer therapy. Transcriptomic profiles were analyzed using Oncobox platform that identifies altered expression of drug target genes and molecular pathways and builds a personalized rating of targeted therapeutics. Totally, 239 adult solid cancer patients were enrolled: 135 received cancer drug therapy, others received palliative treatment or radiotherapy, or died before therapy started. Oncobox recommended drugs were prescribed in 59 % of the cases receiving therapy. Otherwise, patients received non-targeted therapy or targeted therapy predicted as inefficient by Oncobox (controls). Patients in the Oncobox group were significantly pre-treated compared to controls, but we observed a longer progression-free survival (PFS) trend in the Oncobox group. Furthermore, post-hoc analysis revealed that time between biopsy collection and tumor profiling significantly impacts Oncobox predictive capacity. Excluding patient cases with biopsy obtained more than 7 months before sequencing lead to a significant difference in PFS between Oncobox and control groups with hazard ratio of 0.45 (p-value = 0.023). These results suggest that transcriptomic profiling provides clinically relevant therapeutic match and can improve disease control rate in solid cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maksim Sorokin
- OmicsWay Corp., Walnut, CA, 91789, USA; Oncobox Ltd., Moscow, Russia; Laboratory of Clinical and Genomic Bioinformatics, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, 119146, Russia.
| | - Andrew Garazha
- OmicsWay Corp., Walnut, CA, 91789, USA; Oncobox Ltd., Moscow, Russia
| | - Maria Suntsova
- Laboratory of Clinical and Genomic Bioinformatics, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, 119146, Russia
| | | | - Elena Poddubskaya
- Vitamed Oncological Clinical Center, Moscow, 121309, Russia; World-Class Research Center "Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare", Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | | | | | - Dmitriy Lantsov
- Kaluga Regional Clinical Oncological Dispensary, 248007, Russia
| | | | | | - Kirill Ilyin
- Medical Holding SM-Clinic, 105120, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Alex Glusker
- Laboratory of Clinical and Genomic Bioinformatics, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, 119146, Russia
| | - Alexey Moisseev
- Laboratory of Clinical and Genomic Bioinformatics, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, 119146, Russia
| | - Anton Buzdin
- Oncobox Ltd., Moscow, Russia; World-Class Research Center "Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare", Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, 117997, Russia; PathoBiology Group, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Poddubskaya E, Suntsova M, Lyadova M, Luppov D, Guryanova A, Lyadov V, Garazha A, Sorokin M, Semenova A, Shatalov V, Biakhova M, Simonov A, Moisseev A, Buzdin A. Biomarkers of success of anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer derived from RNA- and whole-exome sequencing: results of a prospective observational study on a cohort of 85 patients. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1493877. [PMID: 39723204 PMCID: PMC11669362 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1493877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2024] [Accepted: 11/22/2024] [Indexed: 12/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment have shown high efficacy for about 15 cancer types. However, this therapy is only effective in 20-30% of cancer patients. Thus, the precise biomarkers of ICI response are an urgent need. Methods We conducted a prospective observational study of the prognostic potential ofseveral existing and putative biomarkers of response to immunotherapy in acohort of 85 patients with lung cancer (LC) receiving PD-1 or PD-L1 targeted ICIs. Tumor biosamples were obtained prior to ICI treatment and profiled by whole exome and RNA sequencing. The entire 403 putative biomarkers were screened, including tumor mutation burden (TMB) and number of cancer neoantigens, 131 specific HLA alleles, homozygous state of 11 HLA alleles and their superfamilies; four gene mutation biomarkers, expression of 45 immune checkpoint genes and closely related genes, and three previously published diagnostic gene signatures; for the first time, activation levels of 188 molecular pathways containing immune checkpoint genes and activation levels of 19 pathways algorithmically generated using a human interactome model centered around immune checkpoint genes. Treatment outcomes and/or progression-free survival (PFS) times were available for 61 of 85 patients with LC, including 24 patients with adenocarcinoma and 27 patients with squamous cell LC, whose samples were further analyzed. For the rest 24 patients, both treatment outcomes and PFS data could not be collected. Of these, 54 patients were treated with PD1-specific and 7 patients with PD-L1-specific ICIs. We evaluated the potential of biomarkers based on PFS and RECIST treatment response data. Results In our sample, 45 biomarkers were statistically significantly associated with PFS and 44 with response to treatment, of which eight were shared. Five of these (CD3G and NCAM1 gene expression levels, and levels of activation of Adrenergic signaling in cardiomyocytes, Growth hormone signaling, and Endothelin molecular pathways) were used in our signature that showed an AUC of 0.73 and HR of 0.27 (p=0.00034) on the experimental dataset. This signature was also reliable (AUC 0.76, 0.87) for the independent publicly available LC datasets GSE207422, GSE126044 annotated with ICI response data and demonstrated same survival trends on independent dataset GSE135222 annotated with PFS data. In both experimental and one independent datasets annotated with samples' histotypes, the signature worked better for lung adenocarcinoma than for squamous cell LC. Conclusion The high reliability of our signature to predict response and PFS after ICI treatment was demonstrated using experimental and 3 independent datasets. Additionally, annotated molecular profiles obtained in this study were made publicly accessible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Poddubskaya
- Institute of Personalized Oncology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- Vitamed Clinic, Moscow, Russia
| | - Maria Suntsova
- Institute of Personalized Oncology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- Laboratory of Translational Genomic Bioinformatic, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia
| | - Marina Lyadova
- Oncology Center No. 1, Moscow City Hospital Named after S. S. Yudin, Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russia
| | - Daniil Luppov
- Institute of Personalized Oncology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- Laboratory of Translational Genomic Bioinformatic, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia
- Department of Molecular Genetic Research, Endocrinology Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anastasia Guryanova
- Laboratory of Translational Genomic Bioinformatic, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia
| | - Vladimir Lyadov
- Oncology Center No. 1, Moscow City Hospital Named after S. S. Yudin, Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russia
- Branch Campus of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Further Professional Education «Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Novokuznetsk, Russia, Novokuznetsk, Russia
| | | | - Maksim Sorokin
- Department of Molecular Genetic Research, Endocrinology Research Center, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Research, Oncobox Ltd., Moscow, Russia
- Laboratory for Genomic Analysis of Cell Signaling Systems, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anna Semenova
- Oncology Center No. 1, Moscow City Hospital Named after S. S. Yudin, Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russia
| | - Vitaly Shatalov
- Oncology Center No. 1, Moscow City Hospital Named after S. S. Yudin, Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russia
| | - Maria Biakhova
- Oncology Center No. 1, Moscow City Hospital Named after S. S. Yudin, Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russia
| | - Alexander Simonov
- Laboratory of Translational Genomic Bioinformatic, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia
| | - Aleksey Moisseev
- Institute of Personalized Oncology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Molecular Genetic Research, Endocrinology Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anton Buzdin
- Institute of Personalized Oncology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- Laboratory of Translational Genomic Bioinformatic, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia
- Laboratory for Genomic Analysis of Cell Signaling Systems, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, Russia
- PathoBiology Group, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang S, Chen X, Zhang X, Wen K, Chen X, Gu J, Li J, Wang Z. Pro-apoptotic gene BAX is a pan-cancer predictive biomarker for prognosis and immunotherapy efficacy. Aging (Albany NY) 2024; 16:11289-11317. [PMID: 39074253 PMCID: PMC11315380 DOI: 10.18632/aging.206003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Apoptosis Regulator BCL2 Associated X (BAX) is a pro-apoptotic gene. Apoptosis is one of the important components of immune response and immune regulation. However, there is no systematic pan-cancer analysis of BAX. METHODS Original data of this study were downloaded from TCGA databases and GTEX databases. We conducted the gene expression analysis and survival analysis of BAX in 33 types of cancer via Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) database. Real-time PCR and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were further performed to examine the BAX expression in cancer cells and tissues. Moreover, the relationship between BAX and immune infiltration and gene alteration was studied by the Tumor Immune Estimation Resource (TIMER) and cBioPortal tools. Protein-protein interaction analysis was performed in the STRING database. Finally, Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) were utilized to evaluate the enrichment analysis. RESULTS BAX was highly expressed in most cancers and was associated with poor prognosis in nine cancer types. In addition, BAX showed significant clinical relevance, and the mRNA expression of BAX was also strongly associated with drug sensitivity of many drugs. Furthermore, BAX may participate in proliferation and metastasis of many cancers and was associated with methylation. Importantly, BAX expression was positively correlated with most immune infiltrating cells. CONCLUSION Our findings suggested that BAX can function as an oncogene and may be used as a potential predictive biomarker for prognosis and immunotherapy efficacy of human cancer, which could provide a new approach for cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siying Wang
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210011, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | - Xuyu Chen
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210011, Jiangsu, P.R. China
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225012, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | - Xiaofei Zhang
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210011, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | - Kang Wen
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210011, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | - Xin Chen
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210011, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | - Jingyao Gu
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210011, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | - Juan Li
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210011, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | - Zhaoxia Wang
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210011, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Catalano M, Iannone LF, Nesi G, Nobili S, Mini E, Roviello G. Immunotherapy-related biomarkers: Confirmations and uncertainties. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2023; 192:104135. [PMID: 37717881 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Immunotherapy profoundly changed oncology treatment, becoming one of the main therapeutical strategies. Remarkable improvement has been achieved in survival outcomes, but the percentage of patients who benefit from immunotherapy is still limited. Only one-third of patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) achieve long-term response. Several patients are not responsive to treatment or relapse after an initial response. To date, programmed death-ligand 1, microsatellite instability, and tumor mutational burden are the three biomarkers validated to predict the ICIs response, but a single variable seems still insufficient in the patient's selection. Considering the substantial and increasing use of these drugs, the identification of new predictive biomarkers of ICI response is of paramount importance. We summarize the state of the art and the clinical use of immune biomarkers in oncology, highlighting the strength and weaknesses of currently approved biomarkers, describing the emerging tissues and circulating biomarkers, and outlining future perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Catalano
- 1 Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy
| | - Luigi Francesco Iannone
- 1 Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy
| | - Gabriella Nesi
- Section of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy
| | - Stefania Nobili
- Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health (NEUROFARBA), University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy
| | - Enrico Mini
- 1 Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy
| | - Giandomenico Roviello
- 1 Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sorokin M, Zolotovskaia M, Nikitin D, Suntsova M, Poddubskaya E, Glusker A, Garazha A, Moisseev A, Li X, Sekacheva M, Naskhletashvili D, Seryakov A, Wang Y, Buzdin A. Personalized targeted therapy prescription in colorectal cancer using algorithmic analysis of RNA sequencing data. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:1113. [PMID: 36316649 PMCID: PMC9623986 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10177-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Overall survival of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients remains poor, and gene expression analysis could potentially complement detection of clinically relevant mutations to personalize CRC treatments. METHODS We performed RNA sequencing of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cancer tissue samples of 23 CRC patients and interpreted the data obtained using bioinformatic method Oncobox for expression-based rating of targeted therapeutics. Oncobox ranks cancer drugs according to the efficiency score calculated using target genes expression and molecular pathway activation data. The patients had primary and metastatic CRC with metastases in liver, peritoneum, brain, adrenal gland, lymph nodes and ovary. Two patients had mutations in NRAS, seven others had mutated KRAS gene. Patients were treated by aflibercept, bevacizumab, bortezomib, cabozantinib, cetuximab, crizotinib, denosumab, panitumumab and regorafenib as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy, and information on the success of totally 39 lines of therapy was collected. RESULTS Oncobox drug efficiency score was effective biomarker that could predict treatment outcomes in the experimental cohort (AUC 0.77 for all lines of therapy and 0.91 for the first line after tumor sampling). Separately for bevacizumab, it was effective in the experimental cohort (AUC 0.87) and in 3 independent literature CRC datasets, n = 107 (AUC 0.84-0.94). It also predicted progression-free survival in univariate (Hazard ratio 0.14) and multivariate (Hazard ratio 0.066) analyses. Difference in AUC scores evidences importance of using recent biosamples for the prediction quality. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that RNA sequencing analysis of tumor FFPE materials may be helpful for personalizing prescriptions of targeted therapeutics in CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxim Sorokin
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
- Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 141701 Moscow Region, Russia
- OmicsWay Corp, 91789 Walnut, CA USA
| | | | - Daniil Nikitin
- OmicsWay Corp, 91789 Walnut, CA USA
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, 117997 Moscow, Russia
| | - Maria Suntsova
- World-Class Research Center “Digital biodesign and personalized healthcare”, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
| | - Elena Poddubskaya
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
- Clinical Center Vitamed, 121309 Moscow, Russia
| | - Alexander Glusker
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Alexey Moisseev
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
| | - Xinmin Li
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, 90095 Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Marina Sekacheva
- World-Class Research Center “Digital biodesign and personalized healthcare”, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
| | | | | | - Ye Wang
- Core Laboratory, The Affiliated Qingdao Central Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Anton Buzdin
- Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 141701 Moscow Region, Russia
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, 117997 Moscow, Russia
- World-Class Research Center “Digital biodesign and personalized healthcare”, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Konovalov N, Timonin S, Asyutin D, Raevskiy M, Sorokin M, Buzdin A, Kaprovoy S. Transcriptomic Portraits and Molecular Pathway Activation Features of Adult Spinal Intramedullary Astrocytomas. Front Oncol 2022; 12:837570. [PMID: 35387112 PMCID: PMC8978956 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.837570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
In this study, we report 31 spinal intramedullary astrocytoma (SIA) RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) profiles for 25 adult patients with documented clinical annotations. To our knowledge, this is the first clinically annotated RNA-seq dataset of spinal astrocytomas derived from the intradural intramedullary compartment. We compared these tumor profiles with the previous healthy central nervous system (CNS) RNA-seq data for spinal cord and brain and identified SIA-specific gene sets and molecular pathways. Our findings suggest a trend for SIA-upregulated pathways governing interactions with the immune cells and downregulated pathways for the neuronal functioning in the context of normal CNS activity. In two patient tumor biosamples, we identified diagnostic KIAA1549-BRAF fusion oncogenes, and we also found 16 new SIA-associated fusion transcripts. In addition, we bioinformatically simulated activities of targeted cancer drugs in SIA samples and predicted that several tyrosine kinase inhibitory drugs and thalidomide analogs could be potentially effective as second-line treatment agents to aid in the prevention of SIA recurrence and progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Mikhail Raevskiy
- Omicsway Corp., Walnut, CA, United States
- Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow, Russia
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, Russia
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Maxim Sorokin
- Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow, Russia
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, Russia
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anton Buzdin
- Omicsway Corp., Walnut, CA, United States
- Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow, Russia
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, Russia
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- Oncobox Ltd., Moscow, Russia
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sorokin M, Gorelyshev A, Efimov V, Zotova E, Zolotovskaia M, Rabushko E, Kuzmin D, Seryakov A, Kamashev D, Li X, Poddubskaya E, Suntsova M, Buzdin A. RNA Sequencing Data for FFPE Tumor Blocks Can Be Used for Robust Estimation of Tumor Mutation Burden in Individual Biosamples. Front Oncol 2021; 11:732644. [PMID: 34650919 PMCID: PMC8506044 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.732644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Tumor mutation burden (TMB) is a well-known efficacy predictor for checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapies. Currently, TMB assessment relies on DNA sequencing data. Gene expression profiling by RNA sequencing (RNAseq) is another type of analysis that can inform clinical decision-making and including TMB estimation may strongly benefit this approach, especially for the formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples. Here, we for the first time compared TMB levels deduced from whole exome sequencing (WES) and RNAseq profiles of the same FFPE biosamples in single-sample mode. We took TCGA project data with mean sequencing depth 23 million gene-mapped reads (MGMRs) and found 0.46 (Pearson)–0.59 (Spearman) correlation with standard mutation calling pipelines. This was converted into low (<10) and high (>10) TMB per megabase classifier with area under the curve (AUC) 0.757, and application of machine learning increased AUC till 0.854. We then compared 73 experimental pairs of WES and RNAseq profiles with lower (mean 11 MGMRs) and higher (mean 68 MGMRs) RNA sequencing depths. For higher depth, we observed ~1 AUC for the high/low TMB classifier and 0.85 (Pearson)–0.95 (Spearman) correlation with standard mutation calling pipelines. For the lower depth, the AUC was below the high-quality threshold of 0.7. Thus, we conclude that using RNA sequencing of tumor materials from FFPE blocks with enough coverage can afford for high-quality discrimination of tumors with high and low TMB levels in a single-sample mode.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxim Sorokin
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Subgroup, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium.,The Laboratory of Clinical and Genomic Bioinformatics, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.,Laboratory for Translational Genomic Bioinformatics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia.,OmicsWay Corp., Walnut, CA, United States
| | - Alexander Gorelyshev
- Laboratory for Translational Genomic Bioinformatics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia.,OmicsWay Corp., Walnut, CA, United States
| | - Victor Efimov
- Laboratory for Translational Genomic Bioinformatics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia
| | - Evgenia Zotova
- The Laboratory of Clinical and Genomic Bioinformatics, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Marianna Zolotovskaia
- Laboratory for Translational Genomic Bioinformatics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia
| | - Elizaveta Rabushko
- The Laboratory of Clinical and Genomic Bioinformatics, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Denis Kuzmin
- Laboratory for Translational Genomic Bioinformatics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia
| | | | - Dmitry Kamashev
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Xinmin Li
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Technology Center for Genomics & Bioinformatics, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Elena Poddubskaya
- World-Class Research Center "Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare", Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Maria Suntsova
- World-Class Research Center "Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare", Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anton Buzdin
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Subgroup, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium.,Laboratory for Translational Genomic Bioinformatics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia.,OmicsWay Corp., Walnut, CA, United States.,Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.,World-Class Research Center "Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare", Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Seryakov A, Magomedova Z, Suntsova M, Prokofieva A, Rabushko E, Glusker A, Makovskaia L, Zolotovskaia M, Buzdin A, Sorokin M. RNA Sequencing for Personalized Treatment of Metastatic Leiomyosarcoma: Case Report. Front Oncol 2021; 11:666001. [PMID: 34527573 PMCID: PMC8435728 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.666001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Uterine leiomyosarcoma (UL) is a rare malignant tumor that develops from the uterine smooth muscle tissue. Due to the low frequency and lack of sufficient data from clinical trials there is currently no effective treatment that is routinely accepted for UL. Here we report a case of a 65-years-old female patient with metastatic UL, who progressed on ifosfamide and doxorubicin therapy and developed severe hypertensive crisis after administration of second line pazopanib, which lead to treatment termination. Rapid progression of the tumor stressed the need for the alternative treatment options. We performed RNA sequencing and whole exome sequencing profiling of the patient's biopsy and applied Oncobox bioinformatic algorithm to prioritize targeted therapeutics. No clinically relevant mutations associated with drug efficiencies were found, but the Oncobox transcriptome analysis predicted regorafenib as the most effective targeted treatment option. Regorafenib administration resulted in a complete metabolic response which lasted for 10 months. In addition, RNA sequencing analysis revealed a novel cancer fusion transcript of YWHAE gene with fusion partner JAZF1. Several chimeric transcripts for YWHAE and JAZF1 genes were previously found in uterine neoplasms and some of them were associated with tumor prognosis. However, their combination was detected in this study for the first time. Taken together, these findings evidence that RNA sequencing may complement analysis of clinically relevant mutations and enhance management of oncological patients by suggesting putative treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zaynab Magomedova
- The Laboratory of Clinical and Genomic Bioinformatics, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Maria Suntsova
- World-Class Research Center “Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare”, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anastasia Prokofieva
- The Laboratory of Clinical and Genomic Bioinformatics, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Elizaveta Rabushko
- The Laboratory of Clinical and Genomic Bioinformatics, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Alexander Glusker
- The Laboratory of Clinical and Genomic Bioinformatics, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Lyudmila Makovskaia
- Faculty of Fundamental Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Marianna Zolotovskaia
- Laboratory of Translational Genomic Bioinformatics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia
| | - Anton Buzdin
- World-Class Research Center “Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare”, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- Laboratory of Translational Genomic Bioinformatics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
- OmicsWay Corp, Walnut, CA, United States
| | - Maxim Sorokin
- The Laboratory of Clinical and Genomic Bioinformatics, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- Laboratory of Translational Genomic Bioinformatics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia
- OmicsWay Corp, Walnut, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang Y, Tong Z, Zhang W, Zhang W, Buzdin A, Mu X, Yan Q, Zhao X, Chang HH, Duhon M, Zhou X, Zhao G, Chen H, Li X. FDA-Approved and Emerging Next Generation Predictive Biomarkers for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Patients. Front Oncol 2021; 11:683419. [PMID: 34164344 PMCID: PMC8216110 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.683419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
A patient's response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is a complex quantitative trait, and determined by multiple intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Three currently FDA-approved predictive biomarkers (progra1mmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1); microsatellite instability (MSI); tumor mutational burden (TMB)) are routinely used for patient selection for ICI response in clinical practice. Although clinical utility of these biomarkers has been demonstrated in ample clinical trials, many variables involved in using these biomarkers have poised serious challenges in daily practice. Furthermore, the predicted responders by these three biomarkers only have a small percentage of overlap, suggesting that each biomarker captures different contributing factors to ICI response. Optimized use of currently FDA-approved biomarkers and development of a new generation of predictive biomarkers are urgently needed. In this review, we will first discuss three widely used FDA-approved predictive biomarkers and their optimal use. Secondly, we will review four novel gene signature biomarkers: T-cell inflamed gene expression profile (GEP), T-cell dysfunction and exclusion gene signature (TIDE), melanocytic plasticity signature (MPS) and B-cell focused gene signature. The GEP and TIDE have shown better predictive performance than PD-L1, and PD-L1 or TMB, respectively. The MPS is superior to PD-L1, TMB, and TIDE. The B-cell focused gene signature represents a previously unexplored predictive biomarker to ICI response. Thirdly, we will highlight two combined predictive biomarkers: TMB+GEP and MPS+TIDE. These integrated biomarkers showed improved predictive outcomes compared to a single predictor. Finally, we will present a potential nucleic acid biomarker signature, allowing DNA and RNA biomarkers to be analyzed in one assay. This comprehensive signature could represent a future direction of developing robust predictive biomarkers, particularly for the cold tumors, for ICI response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ye Wang
- Clinical Laboratory, Qingdao Central Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Zhuang Tong
- Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Wenhua Zhang
- Clinical Laboratory, Qingdao Central Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Weizhen Zhang
- Department of Biology, University of California – Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, United States
| | - Anton Buzdin
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Biological and Medical Physics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow, Russia
- World-Class Research Center “Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare”, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Xiaofeng Mu
- Clinical Laboratory, Qingdao Central Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
- Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Qing Yan
- Clinical Laboratory, Qingdao Central Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Xiaowen Zhao
- Clinical Laboratory, Qingdao Central Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Hui-Hua Chang
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Technology Center for Genomics & Bioinformatics, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Mark Duhon
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Technology Center for Genomics & Bioinformatics, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Xin Zhou
- Department of Medicine, Qiqihaer First Hospital, Qiqihar, China
| | - Gexin Zhao
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Technology Center for Genomics & Bioinformatics, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Hong Chen
- Department of Medicine, Qiqihaer First Hospital, Qiqihar, China
| | - Xinmin Li
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Technology Center for Genomics & Bioinformatics, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sorokin M, Borisov N, Kuzmin D, Gudkov A, Zolotovskaia M, Garazha A, Buzdin A. Algorithmic Annotation of Functional Roles for Components of 3,044 Human Molecular Pathways. Front Genet 2021; 12:617059. [PMID: 33633781 PMCID: PMC7900570 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.617059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Current methods of high-throughput molecular and genomic analyses enabled to reconstruct thousands of human molecular pathways. Knowledge of molecular pathways structure and architecture taken along with the gene expression data can help interrogating the pathway activation levels (PALs) using different bioinformatic algorithms. In turn, the pathway activation profiles can characterize molecular processes, which are differentially regulated and give numeric characteristics of the extent of their activation or inhibition. However, different pathway nodes may have different functions toward overall pathway regulation, and calculation of PAL requires knowledge of molecular function of every node in the pathway in terms of its activator or inhibitory role. Thus, high-throughput annotation of functional roles of pathway nodes is required for the comprehensive analysis of the pathway activation profiles. We proposed an algorithm that identifies functional roles of the pathway components and applied it to annotate 3,044 human molecular pathways extracted from the Biocarta, Reactome, KEGG, Qiagen Pathway Central, NCI, and HumanCYC databases and including 9,022 gene products. The resulting knowledgebase can be applied for the direct calculation of the PALs and establishing large scale profiles of the signaling, metabolic, and DNA repair pathway regulation using high throughput gene expression data. We also provide a bioinformatic tool for PAL data calculations using the current pathway knowledgebase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxim Sorokin
- Omicsway Corp., Walnut, CA, United States.,Laboratory of Clinical Genomic Bioinformatics, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.,Laboratory for Translational Bioinformatics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Nicolas Borisov
- Omicsway Corp., Walnut, CA, United States.,Laboratory for Translational Bioinformatics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Denis Kuzmin
- Laboratory for Translational Bioinformatics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Alexander Gudkov
- Laboratory of Clinical Genomic Bioinformatics, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Marianna Zolotovskaia
- Laboratory for Translational Bioinformatics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Anton Buzdin
- Omicsway Corp., Walnut, CA, United States.,Laboratory for Translational Bioinformatics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow, Russia.,Laboratory of Systems Biology, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.,World-Class Research Center "Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare", Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Buzdin A, Skvortsova II, Li X, Wang Y. Editorial: Next Generation Sequencing Based Diagnostic Approaches in Clinical Oncology. Front Oncol 2021; 10:635555. [PMID: 33585258 PMCID: PMC7876435 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.635555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Anton Buzdin
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.,World-Class Research Center "Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare", Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.,Translational Genome Bioinformatics Laboratory, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (National Research University), Moscow, Russia.,Research Department, OmicsWay Corp., Walnut, CA, United States
| | - Ira Ida Skvortsova
- Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.,Group for Experimental and Translational Radiooncology, Tyrolean Cancer Research Institute, Innsbruck, Austria.,PathoBiology Group, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Xinmin Li
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Technology Center for Genomics & Bioinformatics, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Ye Wang
- Clinical Laboratory, Qingdao Central Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sorokin M, Ignatev K, Poddubskaya E, Vladimirova U, Gaifullin N, Lantsov D, Garazha A, Allina D, Suntsova M, Barbara V, Buzdin A. RNA Sequencing in Comparison to Immunohistochemistry for Measuring Cancer Biomarkers in Breast Cancer and Lung Cancer Specimens. Biomedicines 2020; 8:E114. [PMID: 32397474 PMCID: PMC7277916 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines8050114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2020] [Revised: 05/02/2020] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
RNA sequencing is considered the gold standard for high-throughput profiling of gene expression at the transcriptional level. Its increasing importance in cancer research and molecular diagnostics is reflected in the growing number of its mentions in scientific literature and clinical trial reports. However, the use of different reagents and protocols for RNA sequencing often produces incompatible results. Recently, we published the Oncobox Atlas of RNA sequencing profiles for normal human tissues obtained from healthy donors killed in road accidents. This is a database of molecular profiles obtained using uniform protocol and reagents settings that can be broadly used in biomedicine for data normalization in pathology, including cancer. Here, we publish new original 39 breast cancer (BC) and 19 lung cancer (LC) RNA sequencing profiles obtained for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples, fully compatible with the Oncobox Atlas. We performed the first correlation study of RNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry-measured expression profiles for the clinically actionable biomarker genes in FFPE cancer tissue samples. We demonstrated high (Spearman's rho 0.65-0.798) and statistically significant (p < 0.00004) correlations between the RNA sequencing (Oncobox protocol) and immunohistochemical measurements for HER2/ERBB2, ER/ESR1 and PGR genes in BC, and for PDL1 gene in LC; AUC: 0.963 for HER2, 0.921 for ESR1, 0.912 for PGR, and 0.922 for PDL1. To our knowledge, this is the first validation that total RNA sequencing of archived FFPE materials provides a reliable estimation of marker protein levels. These results show that in the future, RNA sequencing can complement immunohistochemistry for reliable measurements of the expression biomarkers in FFPE cancer samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxim Sorokin
- Institute of Personalized Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119048 Moscow, Russia; (M.S.); (E.P.); (D.A.); (M.S.)
- Omicsway Corp., Walnut, CA 91789, USA;
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, 117997 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Kirill Ignatev
- Karelia Republic Oncological Hospital, 185000 Petrozavodsk, Russia;
| | - Elena Poddubskaya
- Institute of Personalized Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119048 Moscow, Russia; (M.S.); (E.P.); (D.A.); (M.S.)
- Vitamed Oncological Clinical Center, 121309 Moscow, Russia
| | - Uliana Vladimirova
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, 117997 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Nurshat Gaifullin
- Faculty of Fundamental Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Dmitriy Lantsov
- Kaluga Regional Oncological Hospital, 248007 Kaluga, Russia;
| | | | - Daria Allina
- Institute of Personalized Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119048 Moscow, Russia; (M.S.); (E.P.); (D.A.); (M.S.)
| | - Maria Suntsova
- Institute of Personalized Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119048 Moscow, Russia; (M.S.); (E.P.); (D.A.); (M.S.)
| | - Victoria Barbara
- Oncological Dispensary of the Republic of Karelia, 185002 Petrozavodsk, Russia;
| | - Anton Buzdin
- Institute of Personalized Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119048 Moscow, Russia; (M.S.); (E.P.); (D.A.); (M.S.)
- Omicsway Corp., Walnut, CA 91789, USA;
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, 117997 Moscow, Russia;
- Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 141701 Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|