1
|
Yoshizato H, Morimoto T, Nonaka T, Otani K, Kobayashi T, Nakashima T, Hirata H, Tsukamoto M, Mawatari M. Animal Model for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Literature Review. Spine Surg Relat Res 2024; 8:373-382. [PMID: 39131411 PMCID: PMC11310536 DOI: 10.22603/ssrr.2023-0262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) is a surgical procedure for treating lumbar spinal stenosis and deformities. It removes a spinal disc and insert a cage or bone graft to promote solid fusion. Extensive research on LIF has been supported by numerous animal studies, which are being developed to enhance fusion rates and reduce the complications associated with the procedure. In particular, the anterior approach is significant in LIF research and regenerative medicine studies concerning intervertebral discs, as it utilizes the disc and the entire vertebral body. Several animal models have been used for anterior LIF (ALIF), each with distinct characteristics. However, a comprehensive review of ALIF models in different animals is currently lacking. Medium-sized and large animals, such as dogs and sheep, have been employed as ALIF models because of their suitable spine size for surgery. Conversely, small animals, such as rats, are rarely employed as ALIF models because of anatomical challenges. However, recent advancements in surgical implants and techniques have gradually allowed rats in ALIF models. Ambitious studies utilizing small animal ALIF models will soon be conducted. This review aims to review the advantages and disadvantages of various animal models, commonly used approaches, and bone fusion rate, to provide valuable insights to researchers studying the spine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiromu Yoshizato
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan
| | - Tadatsugu Morimoto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan
| | - Toshihiro Nonaka
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan
| | - Koji Otani
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
| | | | - Takema Nakashima
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, JCHO Saga Central Hospital, Saga, Japan
| | - Hirohito Hirata
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan
| | - Masatsugu Tsukamoto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan
| | - Masaaki Mawatari
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Speed and quality of interbody fusion in porous bioceramic Al 2O 3 and polyetheretherketone cages for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a comparative study. J Orthop Surg Res 2023; 18:165. [PMID: 36869376 PMCID: PMC9983253 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03625-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this prospective randomized monocentric study is to compare the speed and quality of interbody fusion of implanted porous Al2O3 (aluminium oxide) cages with PEEK (polyetheretherketone) cages in ACDF (anterior cervical discectomy and fusion). MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 111 patients were enrolled in the study, which was carried out between 2015 and 2021. The 18-month follow-up (FU) was completed in 68 patients with an Al2O3 cage and 35 patients with a PEEK cage in one-level ACDF. Initially, the first evidence (initialization) of fusion was evaluated on computed tomography. Subsequently, interbody fusion was evaluated according to the fusion quality scale, fusion rate and incidence of subsidence. RESULTS Signs of incipient fusion at 3 months were detected in 22% of cases with the Al2O3 cage and 37.1% with the PEEK cage. At 12-month FU, the fusion rate was 88.2% for Al2O3 and 97.1% for PEEK cages, and at the final FU at 18 months, 92.6% and 100%, respectively. The incidence of subsidence was observed to be 11.8% and 22.9% of cases with Al2O3 and PEEK cages, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Porous Al2O3 cages demonstrated a lower speed and quality of fusion in comparison with PEEK cages. However, the fusion rate of Al2O3 cages was within the range of published results for various cages. The incidence of subsidence of Al2O3 cages was lower compared to published results. We consider the porous Al2O3 cage as safe for a stand-alone disc replacement in ACDF.
Collapse
|
3
|
Tuwalska A, Sionkowska A, Bryła A, Tylko G, Osyczka AM, Laus M, Vojtová L. A Biological Study of Composites Based on the Blends of Nanohydroxyapatite, Silk Fibroin and Chitosan. MATERIALS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 15:ma15155444. [PMID: 35955380 PMCID: PMC9369940 DOI: 10.3390/ma15155444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
In this work, the biological properties of three-dimensional scaffolds based on a blend of nanohydroxyapatite (nHA), silk fibroin (SF), and chitosan (CTS), were prepared using a lyophilization technique with various weight ratios: 10:45:45, 15:15:70, 15:70:15, 20:40:40, 40:30:30, and 70:15:15 nHA:SF:CTS, respectively. The basic 3D scaffolds were obtained from 5% (w/w) chitosan and 5% silk fibroin solutions and then nHA was added. The morphology and physicochemical properties of scaffolds were studied and compared. A biological test was performed to study the growth and osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs). It was found that the addition of chitosan increases the resistance properties and extends the degradation time of materials. In vitro studies with human mesenchymal stem cells found a high degree of biotolerance for the materials produced, especially for the 20:40:40 and 15:70:15 (nHa:SF:CTS) ratios. The presence of silk fibroin and the elongated shape of the pores positively influenced the differentiation of cells into osteogenic cells. By taking advantage of the differentiation/proliferation cues offered by individual components, the composites based on the nanohydroxyapatite, silk fibroin, and chitosan scaffold may be suitable for bone tissue engineering, and possibly offer an alternative to the widespread use of collagen materials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Tuwalska
- Department of Biomaterials and Cosmetic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, 87-100 Toruń, Poland
| | - Alina Sionkowska
- Department of Biomaterials and Cosmetic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, 87-100 Toruń, Poland
| | - Amadeusz Bryła
- Institute of Environmental Science, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University, 30-387 Kraków, Poland
| | - Grzegorz Tylko
- Department of Biology and Cell Imaging, Faculty of Biology, Institute of Zoology and Biomedical Research, Jagiellonian University, 30-387 Kraków, Poland
| | - Anna Maria Osyczka
- Department of Biology and Cell Imaging, Faculty of Biology, Institute of Zoology and Biomedical Research, Jagiellonian University, 30-387 Kraków, Poland
| | - Michele Laus
- Department of Science and Technological Innovation, University of Eastern Piedmont “A. Avogadro”, 15121 Alessandria, Italy
| | - Lucy Vojtová
- CEITEC—Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Laznovsky J, Brinek A, Zikmund T, Boudova M, Vojtova L, Dorazilova J, Trunec M, Stastny P, Krticka M, Planka L, Ira D, Faldyna M, Kaiser J. Automatic 3D analysis of the ex-vivo porcine lumbar interbody fusion based on X-ray micro computed tomography data. Comput Biol Med 2022; 145:105438. [PMID: 35364309 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Revised: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Spinal fusion is a surgical procedure used to join two or more vertebrae to prevent movement between them. This surgical procedure is considered in patients suffering from a wide range of degenerative spinal diseases or vertebral fractures. The success rate of spinal fusion is frequently evaluated subjectively using X-ray computed tomography. The pig was chosen as an animal model for spinal fusion, since its spinal structure is similar to the human spine. Our paper presents an automatic approach for pig's spinal fusion evaluation in 3D. The proposed approach is based on the determination of the vertebral fused area, which reflects the fusion quality. The approach was applied and tested on microCT (μCT) data of fused porcine vertebrae ex-vivo. In our study, three types of implants were used to perform spinal fusion: the iliac crest bone graft used as the gold standard, and two types of novel scaffold implants based on the polymer/ceramic porous foam involving either growth factors or polyphosphates. The evaluation worked automatically for all three types of used implants, and the fusion quality was determined quantitatively. The calculation is based on the detection of the fused area and area of facies intervertebralis, so the percentual representation of the vertebral joint can be determined. Since this approach is versatile and is described in detail as a guide for image processing the data of vertebrae fusion, this methodology has the potential to establish a standard approach for evaluating the fusion quality in ex-vivo samples that can be tested on clinical data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jakub Laznovsky
- CEITEC-Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Adam Brinek
- CEITEC-Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Tomas Zikmund
- CEITEC-Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
| | - Marketa Boudova
- CEITEC-Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Lucy Vojtova
- CEITEC-Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jana Dorazilova
- CEITEC-Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Trunec
- CEITEC-Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Premysl Stastny
- CEITEC-Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Milan Krticka
- Trauma Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University and the University Hospital Brno, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Ladislav Planka
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, Orthopedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University and the University Hospital Brno, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Daniel Ira
- Trauma Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University and the University Hospital Brno, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Faldyna
- Veterinary Research Institute, 621 00, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jozef Kaiser
- CEITEC-Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|