1
|
Slomovitz BM, Cibula D, Lv W, Ortaç F, Hietanen S, Backes F, Kikuchi A, Lorusso D, Dańska-Bidzińska A, Samouëlian V, Barretina-Ginesta MP, Vulsteke C, Lai CH, Pothuri B, Zhang Y, Magallanes-Maciel M, Amit A, Guarneri V, Zagouri F, Bell M, Welz J, Eminowicz G, Hruda M, Willmott LJ, Lichfield J, Wang W, Orlowski R, Aktan G, Gladieff L, Van Gorp T. Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Adjuvant Chemotherapy With or Without Radiotherapy for Newly Diagnosed, High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: Results in Mismatch Repair-Deficient Tumors. J Clin Oncol 2025; 43:251-259. [PMID: 39411812 PMCID: PMC11771356 DOI: 10.1200/jco-24-01887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2024] [Revised: 09/26/2024] [Accepted: 10/08/2024] [Indexed: 11/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) endometrial cancer (EC) is an inflamed phenotype with poor outcomes when meeting high-risk criteria and limited treatment options in the adjuvant setting. We report protocol-prespecified subgroup analysis of patients with dMMR tumors from the phase III ENGOT-en11/GOG-3053/KEYNOTE-B21 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04634877) in newly diagnosed, high-risk EC after surgery with curative intent. Patients were randomly assigned to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo (six cycles) plus carboplatin-paclitaxel (four to six cycles) once every 3 weeks, then pembrolizumab 400 mg or placebo once every 6 weeks (six cycles), respectively. MMR status was a stratification factor. Patients received radiotherapy at investigator discretion. Investigator-assessed disease-free survival (DFS) was a primary end point. No formal hypothesis testing was performed for subgroup analysis. In the intention-to-treat population, 141 patients in the pembrolizumab arm and 140 in the placebo arm had dMMR tumors. At this interim analysis, hazard ratio for DFS favored pembrolizumab (0.31 [95% CI, 0.14 to 0.69]); median DFS was not reached in either group. Two-year DFS rates were 92.4% (95% CI, 84.4 to 96.4) and 80.2% (95% CI, 70.8 to 86.9), respectively. No new safety signals occurred. Longer-term follow-up of outcomes will be evaluated at final analysis. Preplanned subgroup analysis on the basis of the study's stratification factors suggests that pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy improves DFS and is clinically relevant for patients with dMMR tumors in the curative-intent setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian M. Slomovitz
- Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL
- GOG Foundation, Philadelphia, PA
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group (CEEGOG), Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Weiguo Lv
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Fırat Ortaç
- Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
- Turkish Society of Gynecologic Oncology (TRSGO), Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sakari Hietanen
- Turku University Hospital, FICAN West Cancer Centre, Turku, Finland
- Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology (NSGO), Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Floor Backes
- GOG Foundation, Philadelphia, PA
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH
| | - Akira Kikuchi
- Department of Gynecology, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan
| | - Domenica Lorusso
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome and Humanitas University, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
- Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer and Gynecologic Malignancies (MITO), Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Dańska-Bidzińska
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, 2nd Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
- Polish Group of Gynaecological Oncology (PGOG), Warsaw, Poland
| | - Vanessa Samouëlian
- Gynecologic Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CHUM), Centre de Recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Maria-Pilar Barretina-Ginesta
- Catalan Institute of Oncology and Girona Biomedical Research Institute, Medical School University of Girona, Girona, Spain
- Spanish Ovarian Cancer Research Group (GEICO), Madrid, Spain
| | - Christof Vulsteke
- Integrated Cancer Center Ghent, Department of Medical Oncology, AZ Maria Middelares Ghent and Center of Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium
- Belgium and Luxembourg Gynaecological Oncology Group (BGOG), Leuven, Belgium
| | - Chyong-Huey Lai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Gynecologic Cancer Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, Taiwan
- Taiwanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (TGOG), Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Bhavana Pothuri
- GOG Foundation, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Medicine, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - Yu Zhang
- Department of Gynecology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, PR China
| | | | - Amnon Amit
- Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
- Israeli Society of Gynecology Oncology (ISGO), Israel
| | - Valentina Guarneri
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology (DISCOG), University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
- Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology (MaNGO), Milan, Italy
| | - Flora Zagouri
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Medical School of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “Alexandra” General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece
- Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG), Athens, Greece
| | - Maria Bell
- GOG Foundation, Philadelphia, PA
- Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD
| | - Julia Welz
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
- German Gynecological Oncology Group (AGO), Essen, Germany
| | - Gemma Eminowicz
- University College London Hospitals and University College London, London, United Kingdom
- National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI), London, United Kingdom
| | - Martin Hruda
- Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group (CEEGOG), Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Lyndsay J. Willmott
- GOG Foundation, Philadelphia, PA
- The University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ
- Creighton University School of Medicine at Dignity Health St Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ
- Maricopa Integrated Health System, Phoenix, AZ
- Arizona Center for Cancer Care (Virginia Piper Cancer Care Network), Phoenix, AZ
| | | | | | | | | | - Laurence Gladieff
- Medical Oncology, Oncopole CLAUDIUS REGAUD, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
- National Investigators Group for the Study of Ovarian and Breast Cancers (GINECO), Paris, France
| | - Toon Van Gorp
- Belgium and Luxembourg Gynaecological Oncology Group (BGOG), Leuven, Belgium
- Division of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Van Gorp T, Cibula D, Lv W, Backes F, Ortaç F, Hasegawa K, Lindemann K, Savarese A, Laenen A, Kim YM, Bodnar L, Barretina-Ginesta MP, Gilbert L, Pothuri B, Chen X, Flores MB, Levy T, Colombo N, Papadimitriou C, Buchanan T, Hanker LC, Eminowicz G, Rob L, Black D, Lichfield J, Lin G, Orlowski R, Keefe S, Lortholary A, Slomovitz B. ENGOT-en11/GOG-3053/KEYNOTE-B21: a randomised, double-blind, phase III study of pembrolizumab or placebo plus adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk endometrial cancer. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:968-980. [PMID: 39284383 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.08.2242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2024] [Revised: 08/16/2024] [Accepted: 08/19/2024] [Indexed: 10/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy provides clinically meaningful benefit as first-line therapy for advanced (locoregional extension and residual disease after surgery)/metastatic/recurrent mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) and mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) endometrial cancer, with greater magnitude of benefit in the dMMR phenotype. We evaluated the addition of pembrolizumab to adjuvant chemotherapy (with/without radiation therapy) among patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk endometrial cancer without any residual macroscopic disease following curative-intent surgery. METHODS We included patients with histologically confirmed high-risk [International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I/II of non-endometrioid histology or endometrioid histology with p53/TP53 abnormality, or stage III/IVA of any histology] endometrial cancer following surgery with curative intent and no evidence of disease postoperatively, with no prior radiotherapy or systemic therapy. Patients were randomised to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks (Q3W) for six cycles added to carboplatin-paclitaxel followed by pembrolizumab 400 mg or placebo every 6 weeks (Q6W) for six cycles per treatment assignment. Radiotherapy was at the investigator's discretion. The primary endpoints were investigator-assessed disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS A total of 1095 patients were randomised (pembrolizumab, n = 545; placebo, n = 550). At this interim analysis (data cut-off, 4 March 2024), 119 (22%) DFS events occurred in the pembrolizumab group and 121 (22%) occurred in the placebo group [hazard ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79-1.32; P = 0.570]. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 2-year DFS rates were 75% and 76% in the pembrolizumab and placebo groups, respectively. The hazard ratio for DFS was 0.31 (95% CI 0.14-0.69) in the dMMR population (n = 281) and 1.20 (95% CI 0.91-1.57) in the pMMR population (n = 814). Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 386 of 543 (71%) and 348 of 549 (63%) patients in the pembrolizumab and placebo groups, respectively. No treatment-related grade 5 AEs occurred. CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy did not improve DFS in patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk, all-comer endometrial cancer. Preplanned subgroup analyses for stratification factors suggest that pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy improved DFS in patients with dMMR tumours. Safety was manageable. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04634877; EudraCT, 2020-003424-17. RESEARCH SUPPORT Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Van Gorp
- Division of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium; Belgian and Luxembourg Gynaecological Oncology Group (BGOG), Leuven, Belgium.
| | - D Cibula
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group (CEEGOG), Prague, Czech Republic
| | - W Lv
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - F Backes
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, USA; GOG Foundation, Philadelphia, USA
| | - F Ortaç
- Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey; Turkish Society of Gynecologic Oncology (TRSGO), Istanbul, Turkey
| | - K Hasegawa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama Prefecture, Japan
| | - K Lindemann
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology - Clinical Trial Unit (NSGO-CTU), Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - A Savarese
- IRCCS - Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer and Gynecologic Malignancies (MITO), Rome, Italy
| | - A Laenen
- Belgian and Luxembourg Gynaecological Oncology Group (BGOG), Leuven, Belgium; Leuven Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Y M Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - L Bodnar
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Radiotherapy, Mazovia Regional Hospital, Siedlce Oncology Center, Siedlce, Poland; Polish Group of Gynaecological Oncology (PGOG), Warsaw, Poland
| | - M-P Barretina-Ginesta
- Catalan Institute of Oncology and Girona Biomedical Research Institute, Medical School University of Girona, Girona, Spain; Spanish Ovarian Cancer Research Group (GEICO), Madrid, Spain
| | - L Gilbert
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada; Women's Health Research Unit, Research Institute McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada; Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - B Pothuri
- GOG Foundation, Philadelphia, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Medicine, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA
| | - X Chen
- Department of Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Gynecologic Oncology Group (SGOG), Shanghai, China
| | - M B Flores
- Instituto Oncológico Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile
| | - T Levy
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Israeli Society of Gynecology Oncology (ISGO), Wolfson Medical Center, Affiliated with the Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Holon, Israel
| | - N Colombo
- Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology (MaNGO), Milan, Italy
| | - C Papadimitriou
- Aretaieio University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG), Athens, Greece
| | - T Buchanan
- GOG Foundation, Philadelphia, USA; Jefferson Health, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Willow Grove, USA
| | - L C Hanker
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lubeck, Germany; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany; German Gynecological Oncology Group (AGO), Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - G Eminowicz
- University College London Hospitals and University College London, London, UK; National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI), London, UK
| | - L Rob
- Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group (CEEGOG), Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - D Black
- GOG Foundation, Philadelphia, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LSU Health Shreveport, Shreveport, USA; Willis-Knighton Physician Network, Shreveport, USA
| | | | - G Lin
- Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, USA
| | | | - S Keefe
- Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, USA
| | - A Lortholary
- Centre Catherine de Sienne, Hôpital Privé du Confluent, Nantes, France; National Investigators Group for the Study of Ovarian and Breast Cancers (GINECO), Paris, France
| | - B Slomovitz
- GOG Foundation, Philadelphia, USA; Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, USA
| |
Collapse
|